Hi,
I'm a little stumped on the TZ param for running a date range query. I've
indexed a single doc with a dateTime field value as 2013-07-08T00:00:00Z.
My query is basically this:
?q=date_dt:[* TO 2013-07-07T23:00:00Z]TZ=America/New_York
From what I'm seeing here:
Hi,
I'd like to bundle up a jar file, with a complete solr home and index.
This jar file is a dependency for another application, which uses an
instance of embedded solr, multi-core. Is there any way to have the
application's embedded solr, read the configs/index data from jar
dependency?
I
Hi,
I'm researching options for handling a better geospatial solution. I'm
currently using Solr 3.5 for a read-only database, and the
point/radius searches work great. But I'd like to start doing point in
polygon searches as well. I've skimmed through some of the geospatial
jira issues, and read
Hi,
I have an autocomplete fieldType that works really well, but because
the KeywordTokenizerFactory (if I understand correctly) is emitting a
single token, the stopword filter will not detect any stopwords.
Anyone know of a way to strip out stopwords when using
KeywordTokenizerFactory? I did try
exist. With something like that you could have a standard
tokenization chain, and put it all back together at the end.
Erik
On Jun 8, 2011, at 10:59 , Matt Mitchell wrote:
Hi,
I have an autocomplete fieldType that works really well, but because
the KeywordTokenizerFactory (if I
I have a recent build of solr (4.0.0.2011.02.25.13.06.24). I am seeing this
error when making a request (with fq's), right at the point where the
eviction count goes from 0 up:
severe: java.lang.classcastexception: [ljava.lang.object; cannot be cast to
)
at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:182)
at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:766)
at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:450) at
org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.h
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Matt
I'm considering running an embedded instance of Solr in Tomcat (Amazon's
beanstalk). Has anyone done this before? I'd be very interested in how I can
instantiate Embedded solr in Tomcat. Do I need a resource loader to
instantiate? If so, how?
Thanks,
Matt
Just wanted to see if others are handling this in some special way, but I
think this is pretty simple.
We have a database of api keys that map to allowed db records. I'm
planning on indexing the db records into solr, along with their api keys in
an indexed, non-stored, multi-valued field. Then,
From: Matt Mitchell goodie...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Sat, January 22, 2011 11:48:22 AM
Subject: api key filtering
Just wanted to see if others are handling this in some special way, but I
think this is pretty simple.
We have a database of api keys that map to allowed
to be sure).
Best
Erick
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Matt Mitchell goodie...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey thanks I'll definitely have a read. The only problem with this
though,
is that our api is a thin layer of app-code, with solr only (no db), we
index data from our sql db into solr
@tommychheng
On 10/18/10 7:28 PM, Matt Mitchell wrote:
I'd like to get solr snapshot-4.0 pushed into my local maven repo. Is
this possible to do? If so, could someone give me a tip or two on
getting started?
Thanks,
Matt
I'd like to get solr snapshot-4.0 pushed into my local maven repo. Is
this possible to do? If so, could someone give me a tip or two on
getting started?
Thanks,
Matt
I have a solr index full of documents that contain lots of duplicates.
The duplicates are not exact duplicates though. Each may vary slightly
in content.
After indexing, I have a bit of code that loops through the entire
index just to get what I'm calling target documents. For each target
Great, thanks Hoss. I'll try dismax out today and see what happens with this.
Matt
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: Is it possible to have certain query terms not effect score, if that
: same query term is present in a field? For example, I
No this isn't the MLT, just the standard query parser for now. I did
try the heuristic approach and I might stick with that actually. I ran
the process on known duplicates and created a collection of all
scores. I was then able to see how well the query worked. The scores
seemed focused to one
-up one.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Matt Mitchell goodie...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Fri, October 8, 2010 11:22:36 AM
Subject
From: Matt Mitchell [goodie...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 9:24 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: dynamic stop words?
Thanks for the feedback. I thought about stop words but since I have a
lot of documents spanning lots of different
if there is a way
to trick a StrField into doing that.
From: Matt Mitchell [goodie...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 10:53 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: case-insensitive phrase query for string fields
What's the recommended approach
Is it possible to have certain query terms not effect score, if that
same query term is present in a field? For example, I have an index of
hotels. Each hotel has a name and city. If the name of a hotel has the
name of the city in it's name field, I want to completely ignore
that and not have it
What's the recommended approach for handling case-insensitive phrase
queries? I've got this setup, but no luck:
fieldType name=ci_string class=solr.StrField
analyzer
filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/
tokenizer class=solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory/
/analyzer
Hey thanks Stanislaw! I'm going to try this against the current trunk
tonight and see what happens.
Matt
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Stanislaw Osinski
stanislaw.osin...@carrotsearch.com wrote:
The patch should also work with trunk, but I haven't verified it yet.
I've just added a
Hi,
I'm attempting to get the carrot based clustering component (in trunk) to
work. I see that the clustering contrib has been disabled for the time
being. Does anyone know if this will be re-enabled soon, or even better,
know how I could get it working as it is?
Thanks,
Matt
We have a similar setup and I'd be curious to see how folks are doing this
as well.
Our setup: A few servers and an F5 load balancer. Each Solr instance points
to a shared index. We use a separate server for indexing. When the index is
complete, we do some juggling using the Core Admin SWAP
- Original Message
From: Matt Mitchell goodie...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Fri, January 22, 2010 9:44:03 AM
Subject: Re: solr with tomcat in cluster mode
We have a similar setup and I'd be curious to see how folks are doing
this
as well.
Our setup
Can you post a few examples of your source data? What kinds of relationships
are you having to deal with?
If you want to retain a link to the source then that's pretty simple
(field for the file, url etc.). If your relationships will be between the
Solr documents themselves, then I think you'd
I have an index with more than 6 million docs. All is well, until I turn on
faceting and specify a facet.field. There is only about unique 20 values for
this particular facet throughout the entire index. I was able to make things
a little better by using facet.method=enum. That seems to work,
These are single valued fields. Strings and integers. Is there more specific
info I could post to help diagnose what might be happening?
Thanks!
Matt
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Matt Mitchell goodie
16, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Matt Mitchell goodie...@gmail.com
wrote:
These are single valued fields. Strings and integers. Is there more
specific
info I could post to help diagnose what might be happening?
Faceting
I remember having a difficult time getting jquery to work as I thought it
would. Something to do with the wt. I ended up creating a little client lib.
Maybe this will be useful in finding your problem?
example:
http://github.com/mwmitchell/get_rest/blob/master/solr_example.html
lib:
OK thanks Shalin.
Matt
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Matt Mitchell goodie...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there any reason the XMLWriter is declared as final? I'd like to
extend
it for a special case
Interesting. Well just to clarify my intentions a bit, I'll quickly explain
what I was trying to do.
I'm using the MLT component but because some of my stored fields are really
big, I don't need (or want) all of the fields for my MLT docs in the
response. I want my MLT docs to have only 2 fields,
Is there any reason the XMLWriter is declared as final? I'd like to extend
it for a special case but can't. The other writers (ruby, php, json) are not
final.
Thanks,
Matt
Hey Paul,
In rsolr, you could use the #request method to set a request handler path:
solr.request('/core1/select', :q='*:*')
Alternatively, (rsolr and solr-ruby) you could probably handle this by
creating a new instance of a connection object per-core, and then have some
kind of factory to
Yep same thing in rsolr and just use the :shards param. It'll return
whatever solr returns.
Matt
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Paul Rosen p...@performantsoftware.comwrote:
Hi Erik,
Yes, I've been doing that in my tests, but I also have the case of wanting
to do a search over all the cores
Thanks Yonik. Yeah the additional facet fields being added by the client do
make it a little more complicated.
Matt
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote:
The spellcheck issue needs to be resolved.
It doesn't seem like a good idea to access
Hi,
I'm experimenting with Solr components. I'd like to be able to use a
nice-high-level querying interface like the DirectSolrConnection or
EmbeddedSolrServer provides. Would it be considered absolutely insane to use
one of those *within a component* (using the same core instance)?
Matt
Saeli,
Solr expects a certain XML structure when adding documents. You'll need to
come up with a mapping, that translates the original structure to one that
solr understands. You can then search solr and get those solr documents
back. If you want to keep the original XML, you can store it in a
I know you can transform Solr document fields, but is it possible to have
Solr transform XML that might be embedded (as a string) in a field?
Matt
This is great! Thanks for this.
Matt
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Ian Holsman li...@holsman.net wrote:
not directly related to SOLR I know.. but I think most people would find it
interesting.
http://searchuserinterfaces.com/book/
from the preface:
Search is an integral part of
Yeah the lucid imagination articles are great!
Jonathan, you can also use the dismax query parser and apply boosts using
the qf (query fields) param:
q=my query hereqf=title^0.5 author^0.1
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxRequestHandler#head-af452050ee272a1c88e2ff89dc0012049e69e180
Matt
On
I'd like to have a MLT query return similar docs, but the fl for those mlt
docs should be different from the main fl. For example, the main fl is *,
score -- but I only want the title and id in my MLT results. Is this
possible?
Matt
] ^
[javac] 1 error
Matt
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Matt Mitchell goodie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Thomas,
In a 5-24-09 nightly build, I applied the patch:
cd apache-solr-nightly
patch -p0 ~/Projects/apache-solr-patches/SOLR-236_collapsing.patch
patching file src/common/org
near-dupe detection component and plug it
in.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Matt Mitchell goodie...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 3:30:42 PM
Subject: Re: grouping response
From: Matt Mitchell goodie...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 6:52:48 PM
Subject: grouping response docs together
Is there a built-in mechanism for grouping similar documents together in
the
response? I'd like to make it look like there is only one
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com wrote:
Matt,
I believe indexing those fields that you will use for highlighting with
term vectors enabled will make things faster (and your index a bit bigger).
Otis --
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Matt
:
Hello Matt,
the patch should work with trunk and after a small fix with 1.3 too (see
my comment in SOLR-236). I just made a successful build to be sure.
Do you see any error messages?
Thomas
Matt Mitchell schrieb:
Thanks guys. I looked at the dedup stuff, but the documents I'm adding
Hi,
I'm experimenting with highlighting and am noticing a big drop in
performance with my setup. I have documents that use quite a few dynamic
fields (20-30). The fields are multiValued stored/indexed text fields, each
with a few paragraphs worth of text. My hl.fl param is set to *_t
What kinds
Is there a built-in mechanism for grouping similar documents together in the
response? I'd like to make it look like there is only one document with
multiple hits.
Matt
of the html/xml problem
(highlighting inside of the tag), I'd be interested in seeing your and
others approach to this, even if it's a regular expression.
Matt
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Christian Vogler
christian.vog...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Matt,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Matt
Wow, this looks great. Thanks for this Koji!
Matt
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote:
Thanh Doan wrote:
Assuming a solr search returns 10 listing items as below
1) 4 digital cameras
2) 4 LCD televisions
3) 2 clothing items
If we navigate to
Hi,
I'm attempting to serialize a simple ruby object into a solr.StrField - but
it seems that what I'm getting back is munged up a bit, in that I can't
de-serialize it. Is there a field type for doing this type of thing?
Thanks,
Matt
Hi,
I've been looking around but can't seem to find any clear instruction on how
to do this... I'm storing html content and would like to enable highlighting
on the html content. The problem is that the search can sometimes match html
element names or attributes, and when the highlighter adds the
Hi,
I'm storing some raw xml in solr (stored and non-tokenized). I'd like to
highlight hits in the response, obviously this is problematic as the
highlighting elements are also xml. So if I match an attribute value or tag
name, the xml response is messed up. Is there a way to highlight only text,
Yeah great idea, thanks. Does anyone know if there is code out there that
will do this sort of thing?
Matt
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Ensdorf Ken ensd...@zoominfo.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm storing some raw xml in solr (stored and non-tokenized). I'd like
to
highlight hits in the
Thanks Erik! Looking forward to it.
Matt
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:00 AM, ahammad ahmed.ham...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Erik,
I'm interested in attending the Webinar. I just have some questions to
verify whether or not I am fit to attend...
1) How will it be carried out? What software or
Do you have qf set? Just last week I had a problem where no results were
coming back, and it turned out that my qf param was empty.
Matt
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Ben Lavender blaven...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm using the March 18th 1.4 nightly, and I can't get a dismax query
to
Hi,
Have you looked at this page: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat
It almost sounds like you're deploying twice? Putting the solr.war in
webapps would be one way, and the other would be a context config file +
using the web manager. If you're using the config/context, then don't put
the
The syntax for the q param when using dismax is different from standard.
Check this out:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxRequestHandler#head-df8184dddf870336839490ba276ea6ac566d0bdf
q.alt under dismax is parsed using the standard query parser though:
-7833
On Mar 2, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Matt Mitchell wrote:
Hi. I'm sorry if this is the second time this message comes through!
A few questions here...
#1
Does anyone know how to set the user/group and/or permissions on the index
that solr creates? It's always the tomcat user. Is it possible
goes bad in one, it doesn't affect the others.
Thanks for your time!
Matthew Runo
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
mr...@zappos.com - 702-943-7833
On Mar 3, 2009, at 8:39 AM, Matt Mitchell wrote:
Hi Matthew,
The problem is that we have multiple instances of solr running under one
tomcat. So
Hi. I'm sorry if this is the second time this message comes through!
A few questions here...
#1
Does anyone know how to set the user/group and/or permissions on the index
that solr creates? It's always the tomcat user. Is it possible to change
this in my context file? Help!
#2
I'm deploying
Love it! Congratulations Michiel.
Matt
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
(replies to solr-user please)
On behalf of the Solr Committers, I'm happy to announce that we the Solr
Logo Contest is officially concluded. (Woot!)
And the Winner Is...
Hi,
A while ago, we had a field called word which was used as a spelling
field. We switched this to spell. When querying our solr instance with
just q=*:*, we get back the expected results. When querying our solr
instance with q=*:*wt=json, we get this (below). When setting the qt to
dismax, the
- Original Message
From: Matt Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:08:43 PM
Subject: strange difference between json and xml responses
Hi,
A while ago, we had a field called word which was used as a spelling
field. We
tolerant when encountering a field that
is not known.
We should perhaps change the json/text based writers to handle this
case gracefully also.
-Yonik
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Matt Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, the dismax thing was a bad example. So, forget about the qt
Is it possible to send a request to admin/luke using the EmbeddedSolrServer?
I've been using solr-ruby with 1.3 for quite a while now. It's powering our
experimental, open-source OPAC, Blacklight:
blacklight.rubyforge.org
I've got a custom query builder and response wrapper, but it's using
solr-ruby underneath.
Matt
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL
I'm implementing connection adapters in ruby/jruby and wondering how all of
the different solr connection classes relate.
Is the only difference between EmbeddedSolrServer and DirectSolrConnection,
that EmbeddedSolrServer provides some higher level methods for adding,
deleting etc.? Or is there
Hi,
i'm using CoreContainer in jRuby. I'd like my data directory to be the
standard solr-home/data. But since CoreContainer == multi-core, I need to
supply a core name. Is it possible to use CoreContainer without a core? is
it possible to set the dataDir? Also, it seems that no matter what I set
Did you send in a spellcheck.build=true ?
Matt
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:31 AM, sunnyfr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
How come I've nothing in my spellchercker directories :
I've updated it but I'm started from an empty data directory and :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/data/solr/video/data# ls
Hi,
I was using a field called word but have changed it to spell. Do I need
to delete this field from the index and if so, how? I'm concerned because
when I do a query like:
?q.alt=*:*qt=dismax
I get an error saying the word field was not found.
Matt
OK I figured it out. It's because my fl had * in it. So, I'm guessing a
re-index will remove the word field for good?
+ Erik for the tip :)
Matt
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Matt Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was using a field called word but have changed it to spell. Do I
I'm starting to implement the new SpellCheckComponent. The solr 1.3 dist
example is using a file based dictionary, but I'd like to figure out the
best way to populate the dictionary from our index. Should the spellcheck
field be multivalued?
Thanks,
Matt
=true stored=true
multiValued=true/
HTH,
Grant
On Oct 9, 2008, at 9:38 AM, Matt Mitchell wrote:
I'm starting to implement the new SpellCheckComponent. The solr 1.3 dist
example is using a file based dictionary, but I'd like to figure out the
best way to populate the dictionary from our index
I'm using the Spellchecker handler but am a little confused. The docs say to
run the cmd=rebuild when building the first time. Do I need to supply a q
param with that cmd=rebuild? The examples show a url with the q param set
while rebuilding, but the main section on the cmd param doesn't say much
What does the Jetty log output say in the console after you start it? It
should mention the port # on one of the last lines. If it does, try using
curl or wget to do a local request:
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/
wget http://localhost:8983/solr/
Matt
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Shawn
Hi,
I recently started playing with the dismax handler and custom request
handlers. When using the solr.StandardRequestHandler class, I get the
response that I want; lots of facet values. When I switch to the dismax
class, I get none. I've posted my request handler definitions here. Am I
missing
, at 9:43 PM, Matt Mitchell wrote:
I'm looking for the exact same thing.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Ismail Siddiqui [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
I have a situation where i have to filter result on a non empty
field .
wild card wont work as it will have to match
I'm looking for the exact same thing.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Ismail Siddiqui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a situation where i have to filter result on a non empty field .
wild card wont work as it will have to match with a letter.
How can I form query to return result
Hi, I just posted this to the ruby/google group. It probably belongs
here! Also, anyone know exactly what the @ symbol in the curl command
is doing?
Thanks,
Matt
I've got a script that uses curl, and would like (for educational
purposes mind you) to use ruby instead. This is the curl
already be
url-encoded. Multiple files can also be specified. Posting data
from a file
named 'foobar' would thus be done with --data @foobar.
On 9/11/07, Matt Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I just posted this to the ruby/google group. It probably belongs
here! Also
)
solr.commit
solr.query(title)
Visit us over on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail list for
more on working with Solr from Ruby.
Erik
On Sep 11, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Matt Mitchell wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thanks for that. I've got something that's working now:
data = File.read('my_solr_docs.xml
Hi,
I recently upgraded to Solr 1.2. I've set it up through Tomcat using
context fragment files. I deploy using the tomcat web manager. In the
context fragment I set the environment variable solr/home. This use
to work as expected. The solr/home value pointed to the directory
where data,
input.
Matt
On Sep 6, 2007, at 3:25 PM, Tom Hill wrote:
It works for me. (fragments with solr 1.2 on tomcat 5.5.20)
Could you post your fragment file?
Tom
On 9/6/07, Matt Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I recently upgraded to Solr 1.2. I've set it up through Tomcat using
context
Hi,
I'm currently working on an application which is living in a
clustered server environment. There is a hardware based balancer, and
each node in the cluster has a separate install of Solr. The
application code and files are on a NFS mount, along with the solr/
home. The first node has
Hi,
Is there a way to have Solr completely remove the current index?
deleteAll/ ?
We're still in development and so our schema is wavering. Anytime we
make a change and want to re-index we first have to:
stop tomcat (or the solr webapp)
manually remove the data/index
restart tomcat (or
Hi,
I've got an app using Cocoon and Solr, both running through Tomcat.
The post.sh file has been modified to grab local files, send it to
Cocoon (via http), the Solr-fied xml from Cocoon is then sent to the
update url in Tomcat/Solr. Not sure any of that is relevant though!
I'm running
Hi,
I've had this application running before and not sure what has
changed to cause this error. When trying to do a clean update
(removed index dir and restarted solr) with just a commit/, Solr is
returning a status 1 with this error at the top:
java.io.EOFException: input contained no
waiting to be committed.
Matt
On May 31, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Matt Mitchell wrote:
Hi,
I've had this application running before and not sure what has
changed to cause this error. When trying to do a clean update
(removed index dir and restarted solr) with just a commit/, Solr
is returning
90 matches
Mail list logo
