--
Michael Kimsal
http://webdevradio.com
it in code by calling *
QueryParser.setAllowLeadingWildcard( true );*?
Regards,
Eswar
--
Michael Kimsal
http://webdevradio.com
, November 29, 2007 11:51:37 PM
Subject: can I do *thing* substring searches at all?
With a fieldtype of string, can I do any sort of *thing* search? I
can do thing* but not *thing or *thing*. Workarounds?
--
Michael Kimsal
http://webdevradio.com
leading wildcard queries in Solr? Thank
you
--
Best regards,
Traut
--
Best regards,
Traut
--
Michael Kimsal
http://webdevradio.com
--
Michael Kimsal
http://webdevradio.com
::HTTP::Post.new(url.path)
post.body = data
post.content_type = 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=utf-8'
response = Net::HTTP.start(url.host, url.port) do |http|
http.request(post)
end
puts response.body
--
Michael Kimsal
http://webdevradio.com
in the index.
Thanks!
--
Michael Kimsal
http://webdevradio.com
, but I haven't tried it yet.
On 6/25/07, Kijiji Xu, Ping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about fsockopen, Or any other simple method?
Thanks
--
Regards
Xp from china
--
Michael Kimsal
http://webdevradio.com
#Range%20Searches
Any ideas?
Stu Hood
Webmail.us
You manage your business. We'll manage your email.(r)
--
Michael Kimsal
http://webdevradio.com
Is there any benefit to using a fixed schema as opposed to the 'wildcard'
approach demonstrated in the sample schema.xml file?
--
Michael Kimsal
http://webdevradio.com
I wasn't sure if I was perhaps missing some sort of optimization that may
occur under the hood during querying. I sort of thought that what you just
wrote may be the case.
Thanks!
On 6/23/07, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 23, 2007, at 1:38 PM, Michael Kimsal wrote
:
php not support multi thread,,,and how can u solve with multi index in
parallel？
now i use curl_multi
maybe more effect way i don't know,,,so if u know, tell me. thks.
--
regards
jl
--
Michael Kimsal
http://webdevradio.com
.
On 4/27/07, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/26/07, Michael Kimsal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're (and by 'we' I mean my esteemed colleague!) working on patching a
few
of these items to be in the solrconf.xml file and should likely have
some
patches submitted next week. It's being
a
query? Or do I have to reindex
all my data again with lowercase values?
--
Michael Kimsal
http://webdevradio.com
LowerCaseFilterFactory in the query analyzer
and the index analyzer.
I'm still digging in to this, but are there any other things to look for
anyone can point me to? (Thanks Erik!)
On 4/26/07, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 26, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Michael Kimsal wrote:
I've looked through
someone can point out a way around this, it seems I'll need to
manually reindex and lower-case everything on the way in, then reformat my
search queries to be lower-case as well.
On 4/26/07, Michael Kimsal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just writing a followup.
I'm using the default text field
are not case-sensitive.
Unless someone can point out a way around this, it seems I'll need to
manually reindex and lower-case everything on the way in, then reformat my
search queries to be lower-case as well.
On 4/26/07, Michael Kimsal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just writing a followup
(or
indeed, if there is one at all).
On 4/26/07, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 26, 2007, at 6:03 PM, Michael Kimsal wrote:
My colleague, after some digging, found in SolrQueryParser
(around line 62)
setLowercaseExpandedTerms(false);
The default for Lucene is true
or filename:+angel* or filename:+*angel)
doesn't seem to work either.
I've tried this a number of ways and I either get a parse error or
*everything* is returned - I only want
records where the type is 'changelog' and the filename has 'angel' in it.
How would this be expressed?
--
Michael Kimsal
http
wildcards ?
- do we need to make adjustments to the solr source code ?
- if we need to adjust the solr source, what do we need to change ?
thanks in advance !
Maarten
--
Michael Kimsal
http://webdevradio.com
wildcards ?
- do we need to make adjustments to the solr source code ?
- if we need to adjust the solr source, what do we need to change ?
thanks in advance !
Maarten
--
Michael Kimsal
http://webdevradio.com
Agreed, but in our tests (100M index) it wasn't a performance hit, and much
better (as in it actually worked) than MSSQL ;)
On 4/19/07, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:56 AM, Michael Kimsal wrote:
It's bugged us a little bit, because it's something that we need
(and
subsequently faceting, of course) kills over or dies? FuzzyQuery's
die on my 3.7M index and not-super-beefy hardware and system setup.
Erik
--
Michael Kimsal
http://webdevradio.com
up with two
other projects here first.
It's not that I don't *want* to contribute, but hardly have enough time to
get the basics
done some days.
On 4/19/07, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 19, 2007, at 11:04 AM, Michael Kimsal wrote:
Perhaps I'm simplifying it a bit. It would
--
Michael Kimsal
http://webdevradio.com
fairly
easily. I'm no tech expert and got it to run.
Hope that helps.
Tim
On 3/21/07, Michael Kimsal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any companies that offer hosted SOLR services?
If not, is there any interest in the community in a service like this?
--
Michael Kimsal
http
Hello all:
While I realize this goes against the grain of an indexing server, is there
any way to do wildcard searching like the following:
Term indexed is 123456789
Searching for *456* would find 123456789
Is there any mechanism to enable or allow for that scenario?
Thanks!
--
Michael
month. Will there be new SOLR package
bundles with the latest lucene?
On 3/21/07, Michael Kimsal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I changed the 'leading wildcard' setting in the query parser (well,
actually someone else here did, but it works).
*789 works
but
*456* still doesn't work.
Yeah, I
to be enabled in SOLR beyong
the leadingWildCard to have this work?
Thanks for everyone's patience.
On 3/21/07, Michael Kimsal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This looks like a lucene issue.
http://www.nabble.com/-jira--Created%3A-%28LUCENE-839%29-WildcardQuery-do-not-find-documents-if-leading
first, and having them be more useful for
'average' use cases would be helpful, with comments on how to do advanced
stuff left in.
Thanks!
--
Michael Kimsal
http://webdevradio.com
kl. 04.19 skrev Michael Kimsal:
Thanks Erik. That worked, then threw me for another loop, which I
sort of
have fixed I think.
I'm using the highligher functionality, but it doesn't seem to
highlight the
'matched' word if it's a partial match, although it does in fact
return that
record
-08-01T00:00:00Z TO 2005-08-01T23:59:59Z]
: Does anyone have any clues/pointers to help me debug this?
adding debugQuery=1 to any URL will help you see exactly what query is
being used, and show you an explanation of why each document matched.
:
: Thanks!
:
-Hoss
--
Michael Kimsal
http
I'm having a devil of a time getting date seaching to work properly. I've
created a 'date' field in my schema, and I put values like
2005-08-01T23:59:59Z in it.
However, when I run the following search
foobar date:[2005-08-01T00:00:00Z TO 2005-08-01T23:59:59Z]
I get values back that do not
at the data as
well, I'd rather that 1) they be able to use their existing tech and skills
and 2) I not have to reindex everything in lucene-only indexes.
I've read the FAQs and some of the mailing list and couldn't find this
question addressed.
Thanks.
--
Michael Kimsal
http://webdevradio.com
34 matches
Mail list logo
