Paolo Castagna wrote:
Hi,
we are using Solr v1.4.x with multi-cores and a master/slaves
configuration.
We also use HAProxy [1] to load balance search requests amongst slaves.
Finally, we use MapReduce to create new Solr indexes.
I'd like to share with you what I am doing when I need to:
1
Hi,
we are using Solr v1.4.x with multi-cores and a master/slaves configuration.
We also use HAProxy [1] to load balance search requests amongst slaves.
Finally, we use MapReduce to create new Solr indexes.
I'd like to share with you what I am doing when I need to:
1. add a new index
2.
?
Is there a better way?
Paolo
Paolo Castagna wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use EmbeddedSolrServer with just one core and I'd like to
load solrconfig.xml, schema.xml and other configuration files from a jar
via getResourceAsStream(...).
I've tried to use SolrResourceLoader, but all my attempts failed
Hi,
I am trying to use EmbeddedSolrServer with just one core and I'd like to
load solrconfig.xml, schema.xml and other configuration files from a jar
via getResourceAsStream(...).
I've tried to use SolrResourceLoader, but all my attempts failed with a
RuntimeException: Can't find resource [...].
Hi,
I am not completely sure on what's the recommended setting for fields
used for faceting regarding omitNorms and potitionIncrementGap.
Should I used omitNorms=true?
What about positionIncrementGap?
At the moment I have this in my schema.xml:
dynamicField name=*_facet type=keyword
Paolo Castagna wrote:
Hi,
I am not completely sure on what's the recommended setting for fields
used for faceting regarding omitNorms and potitionIncrementGap.
Should I used omitNorms=true?
What about positionIncrementGap?
At the moment I have this in my schema.xml:
dynamicField name=*_facet
Hi,
I am using Solr v1.4 and I am not sure which facet.method I should use.
What should I use if I do not know in advance if the number of values
for a given field will be high or low?
What are the pros/cons of using facet.method=enum vs. facet.method=fc?
When should I use enum vs. fc?
I have
to need to finely tune
your speed.
HTH
Erick
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Paolo Castagna
castagna.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using Solr v1.4 and I am not sure which facet.method I should use.
What should I use if I do not know in advance if the number of values
for a given field
Hi,
I am using Solr v1.4 and SolrJ on the client side.
I am not sure how SolrJ behaves regarding escaping special characters
[1] in a query string.
SolrJ does URL encoding of the query string it sends to Solr.
Do I need to escape special characters [1] when I construct a SolrQuery
object or
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: However, I'd like to hear a comment on the approach of doing the parsing
: using Lucene and then constructing a SolrQuery from a Lucene Query:
I believe you are asking about doing this in the client code? using the
Lucene QueryParser to parse a string using an
Hi,
thank you for your reply.
What you suggested is a good idea and I am probably going to follow it.
However, I'd like to hear a comment on the approach of doing the parsing
using Lucene and then constructing a SolrQuery from a Lucene Query:
QueryParser parser = new QueryParser(, analyzer);
Hi,
I have an existing Lucene application which I want to port to Solr.
A scenario I need to support requires me to use dynamic fields
with Solr, since users can add new fields at runtime.
At the same time, the existing Lucene application is using a
PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper in order to use
type, so you'll want to use
different dynamic field patterns for different types of fields.
Erik
On May 5, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Hi,
I have an existing Lucene application which I want to port to Solr.
A scenario I need to support requires me to use dynamic fields
Thanks for asking, I am interested as well in reading the response to
your questions.
Paolo
Andy wrote:
Just wanted to know if anyone has used LucidWorks Solr.
- How do you compare it to the standard Apache Solr?
- the non-blocking IO of LucidWorks Solr -- is that for networking IO or disk
Hi,
I do not have an answer to your questions.
But, I have the same issue/problem you have.
It would be good if Solr community would agree and share their approach
for benchmarking Solr. Indeed, it would be good to have a benchmark for
information retrieval systems. AFIK there isn't one. :-/
Paolo Castagna wrote:
I do not have an answer to your questions.
But, I have the same issue/problem you have.
Some related threads:
- http://markmail.org/message/pns4dtfvt54mu3vs
- http://markmail.org/message/7on6lvabsosvj7bc
- http://markmail.org/message/ftz7tkd7ekhnk4bc
- http
Shawn Heisey wrote:
Anyone got a recommendation about where to put it on the wiki?
There are already two related pages:
- http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors
- http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceData
Why not to create a new page?
-
Erick Erickson wrote:
It is possible but you have to take care to match Solr's schema with the
structure of documents in the Lucene index. The correct field names and
query-analyzers should be configured in schema.xml
Is it possible to use Solr v1.4 together with a legacy Lucene (v2.1.0
and/or
Hi,
(I know that this is probably not recommended and not a common
scenario, but...)
Is it possible to have an application using Lucene and a separate
(i.e. different JVM) instance of Solr both pointing at the same
index and read/write to the index from both applications?
I am trying
Hi Brian,
I had similar questions when I begun to try and evaluate Solr.
If you use Java and SolrJ you might find these useful:
- http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj#Streaming_documents_for_an_update
-
Hi,
I have an existing web application which is using Lucene (v2.1.0 and/or
v2.4.x) and which I'd like to gradually migrate to Solr.
I am already using multiple cores, master/slave replication and SolrJ
to re-implement current functionalities.
One use case I have is: backup/restore indexes.
I
21 matches
Mail list logo
