Re: Need help on LTR

Does your feature definitions and the feature names used in the model match? On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:17 AM Amjad Khan wrote: > Yes, I did. > > I can see the feature that I created by this > schema/feature-store/exampleFeatureStore and it return me the features I > created. But issue is when

Response time creep in Solr

Hi All, >From the past few months there has been a steady increase in the Solr response time in our application, yes there are enhancements and index size increase. How to approach this issue to find the root cause for this slow and constant increase? What parameters to check? Any pointers on

Re: Learning to Rank (LTR) with grouping

Hi Ilay, I am still on Solr 6.6.0 and did not patch the grouping fix. I implemented a temporary workaround solution to have 2 async request from the web application 1st with grouping 2nd without grouping and merged the results. This solution worked for my case as we were getting grouping results

Re: LTR not able to upload org.apache.solr.ltr.model.MultipleAdditiveTreesModel

Here is the stacktrace Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Failed to create new ManagedResource /schema/model-store of type org.apache.solr.ltr.store.rest.ManagedModelStore due to: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: org.apache.solr.ltr.model.ModelException: Model type does not

Re: LTR not able to upload org.apache.solr.ltr.model.MultipleAdditiveTreesModel

Hi Alessandro, I figured the issue, the model was using a feature which was not in the features file. The error was very generic so was hard to find this. Thank you, Roopa On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 7:16 AM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote: > Hi Roopa, > that model changed name

Re: LTR Model size

ader to allow anyone to diagnose the > problem. > > > Best, > Erick > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 12:15 PM, spoonerk <john.spoo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Please unsubscribe me. I have tried and tried but still get emails > > > > On Mar 9, 2018 10:19 AM,

Re: LTR Model size

Is there a way to patch the fix to use a external model to Solr 6.6 ? Thanks, Roopa On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:30 PM, tapan1707 wrote: > Could you elaborate a little bit more? Otherwise, I think that you might be > experiencing the same issue reported in >

Re: LTR Model size

Thank you, this is exactly what I am facing. There is a mention of increasing jute.maxbuffer in the Jira I will try that option. Thanks, Roopa On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:30 PM, tapan1707 wrote: > Could you elaborate a little bit more? Otherwise, I think that you might be

LTR Model size

what is the way to configure the model size for LTR? We have about 3MB model and Solr is not holding this model as a ManagedResource. How can this be configured? Thanks, Roopa

LTR not able to upload org.apache.solr.ltr.model.MultipleAdditiveTreesModel

Trying to upload a simple MultipleAdditiveTreesModel, however I am getting an error "msg":"org.apache.solr.ltr.model.ModelException: Model type does not exist org.apache.solr.ltr.model.MultipleAdditiveTreesModel" Root cause seems to be a syntax error in the model file? I did copy this from the

LTR not picking up modified features

Hi - There was an error in one of the feature definition in Solr LTR features.json file and I modified and uploaded it to Solr. I can see that the definition change is uploaded correctly using the feature store url such as http://servername/solr/techproducts/schema/feature-store/myFeatureStore

Re: Turn on/off query based on a url parameter

he proxy obviously depends on your application > environment. We use java and Spring. > > -Original Message- > From: Roopa Rao [mailto:roop...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, 23 February 2018 8:04 a.m. > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Turn on/off query based on

Turn on/off query based on a url parameter

Hi, I want to enable or disable a SolrFeature in LTR based on efi parameter. In simple the query should be executed only if a parameter is true. Any examples or suggestion on how to accomplish this? Functions queries examples are are using fields to give a value to. In my case I want to

Using dynamic synonyms file

Hi, Is it possible to specify the synonyms file as a variable, set a default synonym file and passing the file name from the request? If so, is there an example of this? Such as, Thanks, Roopa

Re: Using Synonyms as a feature with LTR

I see okay, thank you. On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote: > I see, > According to what I know it is not possible to run for the same field > different query time analysis. > > Not sure if anyone was working on that. > > Regards > > > > - >

Re: Using Synonyms as a feature with LTR

can get the synonyms from the analysis chain, however tokens are individual tokens and not phrases. So, I am stuck at how to construct a correct query based on the synonym tokens and positions. Thank you, Roopa On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Roopa Rao <roop...@gmail.com> wrote: > So, I

Re: Using Synonyms as a feature with LTR

So, I would end up with ~6 copy fields with ~8 synonym files so that would be about 48 field/synonym combination. Would that be a significant in terms of index size. I guess that depends on the thesaurus size, what would be the best way to measure this? Custom parser: This would take the file

Re: Using Synonyms as a feature with LTR

Thank you, Alessandro, I was trying these options before replying. Yes, I am looking to generate a score for a query with synonym expansion (not binary feature) I can go with the "title" field and have that include the synonyms in analysis. Only problem is that the number of fields and number

Using Synonyms as a feature with LTR

I am trying to use synonyms expansion as a feature in LTR Any input on a feature using synonym expansion providing a field and the synonym file would be helpful. Thanks, Roopa -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Re: Learning to Rank (LTR) with grouping

+ LTR > Merge 1) & 2) in web app. > Doing a performance test now. Since there are only 10 results for these > queries and the queries are executed in parallel, I don't foresee any > problems. > > Thanks! > Roopa > > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Roopa Rao <ro

Re: Learning to Rank (LTR) with grouping

with no grouping + LTR Merge 1) & 2) in web app. Doing a performance test now. Since there are only 10 results for these queries and the queries are executed in parallel, I don't foresee any problems. Thanks! Roopa On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Roopa Rao <roop...@gmail.com> wr

Re: Learning to Rank (LTR) with grouping

Hi, Any guidance on this would be helpful. Thank you, Roopa On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Roopa Rao <roop...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Diego, > > Thank you for looking into it further. > We recently ported over to 6.6 version solely to use LTR feature as it is > critical

Re: Learning to Rank (LTR) with grouping

com> wrote: > Hi Roopa, unfortunately I can't port the patch to the branch_6_6, but > soon I'll update to upstream. Sorry about that. > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Roopa Rao <roop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi - > > > > I merged the code from the bloombe

Re: Learning to Rank (LTR) with grouping

. Could you please provide your input if master-solr-8776 is compatible with branch_6_6? If this is not the case then how to proceed with using fix in master-solr-8776 with branch_6_6 can a new patch be created for this? Thank you, Roopa On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Roopa Rao <roop...@gmail.

Re: Learning to Rank (LTR) with grouping

k #1 FAILED at 1471. > > > Could you please give your input on how to apply this ticket as a patch for > branch_6_5 ? > > > Thank you, > > Roopa > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Roopa Rao <roop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Diego, > > >

Re: Learning to Rank (LTR) with grouping

/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SolrIndexSearcher.java Hunk #1 FAILED at 1471. Could you please give your input on how to apply this ticket as a patch for branch_6_5 ? Thank you, Roopa On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Roopa Rao <roop...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Diego, > &g

Re: Learning to Rank (LTR) with grouping

rouping doens't > support RankQuery. > I opened a jira item time ago > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8776) and I would be happy > to receive feedback on that. You can find the code here > https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/162. > > Cheers, > diego > &

Learning to Rank (LTR) with grouping

Hi, I am using grouping and LTR together and the results are not getting re-rank as it does without grouping. I am passing parameter. Does LTR work with grouping on? Solr version 6.5 Thank you, Roopa