regards,
Xavier Schepler
Hi,
I added “slf4j-log4j12-1.5.5.jar” and “log4j-1.2.15.jar” to
$CATALINA_HOME/webapps/solr/WEB-INF/lib ,
then deleted the library “slf4j-jdk14-1.5.5.jar” from
$CATALINA_HOME/webapps/solr/WEB-INF/lib,
then created a directory $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/solr/WEB-INF/classes.
and created
with
-Dlog4j.configuration=$CATALINA_HOME/webapps/solr/WEB-INF/classes/log4j.properties
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 10. feb. 2011, at 09.41, Xavier Schepler wrote:
Hi,
I added “slf4j-log4j12-1.5.5.jar” and “log4j-1.2.15.jar” to
$CATALINA_HOME/webapps
I added it to /etc/default/tomcat6.
What happened is that the same error message appeared twice in
/var/log/tomcat6/catalina.out.
Like the same file was loaded twice.
--
Tous les courriers électroniques émis depuis la
Yes thanks. This works fine :
log4j.rootLogger=INFO, SOLR
log4j.appender.SOLR=org.apache.log4j.DailyRollingFileAppender
log4j.appender.SOLR.file=/home/quetelet_bdq/logs/bdq.log
log4j.appender.SOLR.datePattern='.'-MM-dd
log4j.appender.SOLR.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
the hints in your last message, I suspect
nested queries _might_ be helpful to you.
On 1/19/2011 3:46 AM, Xavier SCHEPLER wrote:
Ok I was already at this point.
My facetting system use exactly what is described in this page. I read it
from the Solr 1.4 book. Otherwise I would'nt ask
Since it seems to be no voodoo available I did it on the client side.
I send a first request to get the facets and a second to get the documents and
their highlighting.
It works well but requires more processing.
From: Xavier SCHEPLER xavier.schep
You're right the second query didn't result in an error but neither gave the
expected result.
I'm gone to have a look at the link you gave me.
Thanks !
From: Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io
Sent: Tue Jan 18 21:31:52 CET 2011
To:
Ok I was already at this point.
My facetting system use exactly what is described in this page. I read it from
the Solr 1.4 book. Otherwise I would'nt ask.
The problem is that the filter queries doesn't affect the relevance score of
the results so I want the terms in the main query.
Hey,
here are my needs :
- a query that has tagged and untagged contents
- facets that ignore the tagged contents
I tryed :
q=({!tag=toExclude} ignored) taken into account
q={tag=toExclude v='ignored'} take into account
Both resulted in a error.
Is this possible or do I have to try another
Hi,
with the Lucene query syntax, is :
a AND (a OR b)
equivalent to :
a
(absorption)
?
by your
query ... it's the same. In terms of the score of the results no,
since, if you are using the first query, the documents that will match both
the a and the b terms, will match higher then the ones matching just the
a term.
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Xavier Schepler
to do it, but you can automatically
restart it once a day.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Xavier Schepler
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr wrote:
Hi,
We are in a beta testing phase, with several users a day.
After several days of waiting, the solr server didn't respond to requests
Hi,
We are in a beta testing phase, with several users a day.
After several days of waiting, the solr server didn't respond to
requests that require a lot of processing time.
I'm using Solr inside Tomcat.
This is the request that had no response from the server :
Hi,
We are in a beta testing phase, with several users a day.
After several days of running well, the solr server stopped responding
to requests that require a lot of processing time, like this one :
Hi,
does the more like this search uses terms positions information in the
score formula ?
On 04/10/2010 16:40, Robert Muir wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Xavier Schepler
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr wrote:
Hi,
does the more like this search uses terms positions information in the
score formula ?
no, it would be nice if it did use them though (based upon
the results.
How can I have both queries working ? I'm thinking about different
configurations but I didn't found any solution at the moment.
Thx for reading,
Xavier Schepler
On 08/09/2010 12:21, Grijesh.singh wrote:
see the analysis.jsp with debug verbose and see what happens at index time
and search time during analysis with your data
Also u can use debugQuery=on for seeing what actually parsed query is.
-
Grijesh
I've found a first solution by myself,
Hi,
When I take the two letters from the middle of a word and put the first
in place of the second and the second in place of the first, ex : jospin
= jopsin, I don't get any suggestion from the spellchecker component.
I tryed the default algorithm and the Jaro Winkler Distance, with a
On 03/09/2010 15:31, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Sep 3, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Xavier Schepler wrote:
On 03/09/2010 14:47, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Sep 3, 2010, at 6:02 AM, Xavier Schepler wrote:
no, jopsin isn't in the index.
I tryed this with other words and I had the same
Hi,
can the highlighting component highlight terms only if the distance
between them matches the query ?
I use those parameters :
hl=onhl.fl=qFR,iFR,mFR,vlFRhl.usePhraseHighlighter=falsehl.highlightMultiTerm=truehl.simple.pre=bhl.simple.post=%2Fbhl.mergeContiguous=false
On 01/09/2010 12:38, Markus Jelsma wrote:
I think you need to enable usePhraseHighlighter in order to use the
highlightMultiTerm parameter.
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 12:12:11 Xavier Schepler wrote:
Hi,
can the highlighting component highlight terms only if the distance
between them
On 01/09/2010 13:54, Xavier Schepler wrote:
On 01/09/2010 12:38, Markus Jelsma wrote:
I think you need to enable usePhraseHighlighter in order to use the
highlightMultiTerm parameter.
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 12:12:11 Xavier Schepler wrote:
Hi,
can the highlighting component
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: how could I have the highlighting component return only the terms that were
: matched, without any surrounding text ?
I'm not a Highlighter expert, but this is somethign that certainly
*sounds* like it should be easy.
I took a shot at it and this is hte best i could
Hi,
several documents from my index contain the phrase : PS et.
However, PS is expanded to parti socialiste and a phrase search for
PS et fails.
A phrase search for parti socialiste et succeeds.
Can I have both queries working ?
Here's the field type :
fieldtype name=SyFR
Hi,
how could I have the highlighting component return only the terms that
were matched, without any surrounding text ?
Hi,
Here's a field type using synonyms :
fieldtype name=SFR class=solr.TextField
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/
filter class=solr.StandardFilterFactory/
filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory
synonyms=french-synonyms.txt ignoreCase=true expand=true/
Hey,
let's say I have :
- a field named A with specific contents
- a field named B with specific contents
- a field named C witch contents only from A and B added with copyField.
Are those queries equivalents in terms of performance :
- A: (the lazy fox) AND B: (the lazy fox)
- C: (the
Le 17/05/2010 16:57, Xavier Schepler a écrit :
Hey,
let's say I have :
- a field named A with specific contents
- a field named B with specific contents
- a field named C witch contents only from A and B added with copyField.
Are those queries equivalents in terms of performance
Le 17/05/2010 17:49, Marco Martinez a écrit :
No, the equivalent for this will be:
- A: (the lazy fox) *OR* B: (the lazy fox)
- C: (the lazy fox)
Imagine the situation that you dont have in B 'the lazy fox', with the AND
you get 0 results although you have 'the lazy fox' in A and C
Marco
Hi,
I'm working with Solr 1.4.
My schema has about 50 fields.
I'm using full text search in short strings (~ 30-100 terms) and
facetted search.
My index will have 100 000 documents.
The number of requests per second will be low. Let's say between 0 and
1000 because of auto-complete.
Is a
Le 23/04/2010 17:08, Otis Gospodnetic a écrit :
Xavier,
0-1000 QPS is a pretty wide range. Plus, it depends on how good your
auto-complete is, which depends on types of queries it issues, among other
things.
100K short docs is small, so that will all fit in RAM nicely, assuming those
other
Hey,
Is there a way to make the more like this feature build its queries
from a minimum number of interesting terms ?
It looks like this component fires query with only 1 term in them.
I got a lot of results that aren't similar at all with the parsed
document fields.
My parameters :
Hello,
this field would not be searched, but it would be used to display results.
A query could be :
q=tablehl=truehl.fl=htmlfieldhl.fragsize=0
It would be tokenized with the HTMLStripStandardTokenizerFactory, then
analyzed the same way as the searcheable fields.
Could this result in
Vijayant Kumar wrote:
Hi Group,
I need some feedback on solr security.
For Making by solr admin password protected,
I had used the Path Based Authentication form
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrSecurity.
In this way my admin area,search,delete,add to index is protected.But Now
when I make
Vijayant Kumar wrote:
Hi Xavier,
Thanks for your feedback
the firewall rule for the trusted IP is not fessiable for us because the
application is open for public so we can not work through IP banning.
Vijayant Kumar wrote:
Hi Group,
I need some feedback on solr security.
For Making
Xavier Schepler wrote:
Vijayant Kumar wrote:
Hi Xavier,
Thanks for your feedback
the firewall rule for the trusted IP is not fessiable for us because the
application is open for public so we can not work through IP banning.
Vijayant Kumar wrote:
Hi Group,
I need some feedback on solr
Shalin Shekhar Mangar a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Xavier Schepler
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr wrote:
Hey,
I'm thinking about using dynamic fields.
I need one or more user specific field in my schema, for example,
concept_user_*, and I will have maybe more than 200 users
Shalin Shekhar Mangar a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Xavier Schepler
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr wrote:
Shalin Shekhar Mangar a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Xavier Schepler
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr wrote:
Hey,
I'm thinking about using
Hey,
I'm thinking about using dynamic fields.
I need one or more user specific field in my schema,
for example, concept_user_*, and I will have maybe more than 200 users
using this feature.
One user will send and retrieve values from its field. It will then be
used to filter result.
How
Hi,
I'm trying to highlight short text values. The field they came from has
a type shared with other fields. I have highlighting working on other
fields but not on this one.
Why ?
AM, Xavier Schepler
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to highlight short text values. The field they came from has a
type shared with other fields. I have highlighting working on other fields
but not on this one.
Why ?
Thanks for your response.
Here are some
43 matches
Mail list logo
