Le 17/05/2010 17:49, Marco Martinez a écrit :
No, the equivalent for this will be:
- A: (the lazy fox) *OR* B: (the lazy fox)
- C: (the lazy fox)
Imagine the situation that you dont have in B 'the lazy fox', with the AND
you get 0 results although you have 'the lazy fox' in A and C
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
2010/5/17 Xavier Schepler<xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr>
Hey,
let's say I have :
- a field named A with specific contents
- a field named B with specific contents
- a field named C witch contents only from A and B added with copyField.
Are those queries equivalents in terms of performance :
- A: (the lazy fox) AND B: (the lazy fox)
- C: (the lazy fox)
??
Thanks,
Xavier
yes you're right I figured it after posting.
