, Yongtao Liu wrote:
> Mikhail,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> Random field is based on index time.
> We want to do sampling based on search result.
>
> Like if the random field has value 1 - 100.
> And the query touched documents may all in range 90 - 100.
> So random
Shamik,
Thanks a lot.
Collapsing query parser solve the issue.
Thanks,
Yongtao
-Original Message-
From: shamik [mailto:sham...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 3:09 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: how to remove duplicate from search result
Did you take a look
David,
Thanks for your reply.
Group cannot solve the issue.
We also need run facet and stats based on search result.
With group, facet and stats result still count duplicate.
Thanks,
Yongtao
-Original Message-
From: David Santamauro [mailto:david.santama...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, Sep
Mikhail,
Thanks for your reply.
Random field is based on index time.
We want to do sampling based on search result.
Like if the random field has value 1 - 100.
And the query touched documents may all in range 90 - 100.
So random field will not help.
Is it possible we can sampling based on searc
Hi,
I am try to remove user defined duplicate from search result.
like below documents match the query.
when query return, I try to remove doc3 from result since it has duplicate guid
with doc1.
Id (uniqueKey)
guid
doc1
G1
doc2
G2
doc3
G1
To do this, I generate exclude list based guid
Sorry, the table is missing.
Update below email with table.
-Original Message-
From: Yongtao Liu [mailto:y...@commvault.com]
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 10:47 AM
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: remove user defined duplicate from search result
Hi,
I am try to r
to:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 8:37 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: memory usage keep increase
I'm pretty sure not. The words "virtual memory address space" is important
here, that's not physical memory...
Best
Erick
On Mon, Nov 14,
Hi all,
I saw one issue is ram usage keep increase when we run query.
After look in the code, looks like Lucene use MMapDirectory to map index file
to ram.
According to
http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_1_0/api/core/org/apache/lucene/store/MMapDirectory.html
comments, it will use lot of memory.
, and there
are lot of query which cause wide index file access.
Then, the machine has no available memory.
The system change to very slow.
What i did is change lucene code to disable MMapDirectory.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Yongtao Liu wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> F
