David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 9:03 PM Wolf, Chris (ELS-CON)
wrote:
> I am having several issues due to the slf4j implementation dependency
> “log4j-slf4j-impl” being declare
(sorry for bad formatting Outlook-for-Mac doesn't support Internet quoting)
Thanks Mark, I did that until I finally was able to exclude it altogether.
-Chris
On 1/17/20, 10:20 AM, "Mark H. Wood" wrote:
For the version problem, I would try adding something like:
--- original message ---
It looks to me as though solr-core is not the only artifact with that
dependency. The first thing I would do is examine the output of 'mvn
dependency:tree' to see what has dragged log4j-slf4j-impl in even when
it is excluded from solr-core.
--- end of original message
I am having several issues due to the slf4j implementation dependency
“log4j-slf4j-impl” being declared as a dependency of solr-core:7.5.0. The
first issue observed when starting the app is this:
SLF4J: Class path contains multiple SLF4J bindings.
SLF4J: Found binding in
deleting documents using Delete by ID
Thanks Bharat. This is a bug. I've opened LUCENE-5289.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5289
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Akkinepalli, Bharat (ELS-CON)
b.akkinepa...@elsevier.com wrote:
Hi Shalin,
I am not sure why the log specifies
Hi Otis,
Did you get a chance to look into the logs. Please let me know if you need
more information. Thank you.
Regards,
Bharat Akkinepalli
-Original Message-
From: Akkinepalli, Bharat (ELS-CON) [mailto:b.akkinepa...@elsevier.com]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 2:16 PM
To: solr-user
are trying to delete never existed in the first
place and hence there was nothing to commit. Hence replication was not
triggered. Am I missing something?
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Akkinepalli, Bharat (ELS-CON)
b.akkinepa...@elsevier.com wrote:
Hi Otis,
Did you get a chance to look
Monitoring --
http://sematext.com/spm
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Akkinepalli, Bharat (ELS-CON)
b.akkinepa...@elsevier.com wrote:
Hi,
We have recently migrated from Solr 3.6 to Solr 4.4. We are using the
Master/Slave configuration in Solr 4.4 (not Solr Cloud). We have noticed
Hi,
We have recently migrated from Solr 3.6 to Solr 4.4. We are using the
Master/Slave configuration in Solr 4.4 (not Solr Cloud). We have noticed the
following behavior/defect.
Configuration:
===
1. The Hard Commit and Soft Commit are disabled in the configuration (we
control
Hi
My solr deployment is giving correct results for normal search terms like
john.
But when i search with john55 or 55 it will return all the search terms,
including those which neither contains john nor 55.
Below is the fieldtype defined for this field.
fieldType name=mytype
I have added
filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory catenateAll=1 /
to both index and query but still getting same behaviour.
Is there any other that i am missing?
con wrote:
Yes. I meant all the indexed documents.
With debugQuery=on, i got the following result
Hi all
I am getting incorrect results when i search with numbers only or string
containing numbers.
when such a search is done, all the results in the index is returned,
irrespective of the search key.
For eg, the phone number field is mapped to TextField. it can contains
values like , 653-23345
i downloaded and installed a fresh jboss (jboss-4.2.1.GA) and updated run.bat
and jboss-service.xml
then deployed solr war in the deploy folder.
but still it is showing the same message on jboss
startup.:confused::confused:
con wrote:
Thanks Hossman
As per my understandings
Thanks Hossman
As per my understandings and investigations, if we disable STDERR from the
jboss configs, we will not be able to see any STDERR coming from any of the
APIs - which can be real error messages.
So if we know the exact reason why this message from solr is showing up, we
can block
Hi Giovanni,
i am facing same issue. Can you share some info on how you solved this
puzzle..
hossman wrote:
: Even setting everything to INFO through
: http://localhost:8080/solr/admin/logging didn't help.
:
: But considering you do not see any bad issue here, at this time I will
Hi
I am deploying solr in jboss and is indexing data from db.
Everything works fine and i am getting correct response.
But the log message that is getting print in the server console, in my case
jboss, is showing status as error.
Why is this showing as ERROR, even though things are working
not getting the actual rank based sorted
results
also, rank:5 , is giving 0 results(all results with rank 5 is expected).
Can somebody please suggest a workaround for this issue.
Thanks in advance
con
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Issue-in-using-numeric-values
in
the spring configs.
Is there anyway to achieve this. Or atleast can i externalise these
parameters from the data-config.xml, so that i can encrypt the password.
Thanks
con
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Externalize-database-parameters-from-data-config.xml
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-avoid-case-sensitive-search--tp22716698p22716698.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hoss
Assume my current working directory is C:/MyApplication/searchApp
and in the solr.xml i am specifying C:/lib as shared lib,
then the console output contains the following line:
INFO: loading shared library: C:\MyApplication\searchApp\C:\lib
Thanks
con
hossman wrote:
Adding
is the default value
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:53 PM, con convo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
Because of my particular development environment, I want to set up solr
in
such a way that
1) The shared lib have to be relocated to another path : This location
must
be read from an environment
1.3
Thanks
con
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Mar 11, 2009, at 5:14 AM, con wrote:
But still it is not working
I changed the data directory accordingly,
dataDir${SOLR_DATA}/dataDir
But this is not working and is giving the following error:
SEVERE: Error
exception but not updating the index also. I have put the same
query that is used in full import to do the delta import.
Thanks
con
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
1. There is no closing quote in transformer=TemplateTransformer
2. Attribute names are case-sensitive so it should be deltaQuery instead
/dataimport?command=delta-import. Whereas
the dataimport.properties is getting updated with the time at which
delta-import is run.
Where as http://localhost:8080/solr/users/dataimport?command=full-import is
properly inserting data.
Can anybody suggest what is wrong with this configuration.
Thanks
con
Thanks for the reply Otis
Even if we dont get both George and Georgeon, Can we have only the firstname
as searchable.
That is, If I search George, I should get firstname, lastname, and country
of the first row, and no values from the third row should be returned
Regards
Con
Otis Gospodnetic
Thanks Shalin
That really helped :handshake:
I have created a plugin class and now things are working fine
Thanks Again
Regards
Con
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:53 AM, con convo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I am using solr to index data from my database
the exact results.
How can I change the field attributes to get this result? Or is there
someother configs for this?
Expecting reply
Thanks in advance
con
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Searchable-and-Non-Searchable-Fields-tp21450664p21450664.html
Sent from the Solr
..:-( )?
Expecting your reply
Thanks in advance
Con
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Custom-Transformer-to-handle-Timestamp-tp21421742p21421742.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in advance
con
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
sorry I meant wrong dest field name
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:41 PM, con [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Nobble
I have cross checked. This is my copy field of schema.xml
copyField source=CREATED_DATE dest=date /
I am still getting that error
database, with the format like: 22-10-08
03:57:11.63700 PM.
I want to index and search these dates. even after making the above updates
I am still not able to index or search these values.
Expecting your reply
Thanks in advance
con
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
could you explain me what
format to solr and
index and search data based on that.
i have already setup solr and is working fine for other datatypes.
So is it possible to set this new date format in some config files.
Expecting suggestions/advices
Thanks in advance
con
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com
Hi Noble,
I am using DIH.
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
How are you indexing the data ? by posting xml? or using DIH?
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:53 PM, con [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys
I have timestamp fields in my database in the format,
ddmmyyhhmmss.Z AM
eg: 26-05-08
:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: undefined field date.
Is there any thing else to be configured or I missed something.
Thanks in advance
con
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
Take a look at the DateFormatTransformer. You can find documentation on
the
DataImportHandler wiki.
http
solr.solr.home: C:\Search\solr
10:18:33,553 ERROR [STDERR] 19 Nov, 2008 10:18:33 AM
org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrUpdateServlet init
INFO: SolrUpdateServlet.init() done
Thanks
con
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
Do you have a stacktrace?
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:24 AM, con [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Nobble
I have cross checked. This is my copy field of schema.xml
copyField source=CREATED_DATE dest=date /
I am still getting that error.
thanks
con
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
yoour copyField has the wrong source field name . Field name is not
date it is 'CREATED_DATE
Hi Guys
any idea why this error is coming??
Waiting for your advice.
Thanks
con
con wrote:
Thanks Norberto and Hossma.
That really helped me.
Fist of all i deleted the contents in the example/solr directory and
created a solx.xml that points to the multicore.
That itself worked
-config or do i need to add some more
parameters to some configuration files or is there some other much better
approach or whether a full-import each time can serve better??.
I respect any suggestion or hints to solve this issue. Waiting for your
responce,
Thanking in advance
con.
--
View this message
in the classpath. Can anyone provide
some tips on why this error message is displaying.
Thanks again
con
Norberto Meijome-6 wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 23:45:40 -0800 (PST)
con [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But for the first question, I am still not clear.
I think to use the multicore feature we
specify the index directly so that we can point the
indexed documents to a custom folder instead of jboss/bin?
I really appreciate any suggestion, at least which file to edit, or some
other tips to solve this problem.
Thanking in advance
con
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How
start.jar
Once the server is started I think it will take the parameters from
multicore/solr.xml.
But I am confused on how and where to pass this argument to JBOSS.
Looking forward for a positive reply
Thanking in advance
coN
Norberto Meijome-6 wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 09:55:38 -0800 (PST
in this subject.
Also where can I specify the index directory?
Any suggestion/advice is really appreciable.
Thanks
con
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Error-in-Integrating-JBoss-4.2-and-Solr-1.3.0%3A-tp20202032p20202032.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
=file:/C:/jboss/jboss-4.2.1.GA/server/default/deploy/solr.war }
deployer: null
status: null
state: INIT_WAITING_DEPLOYER
watch: file:/C:/jboss/jboss-4.2.1.GA/server/default/depl
oy/solr.war
altDD: null
lastDeployed: 1224766525227
lastModified: 1224766525226
mbeans:
Thanks
con
lastModified: 1224766525226
mbeans:
Is there anything wrong in the steps i followed or i missed some steps?
Also where can I specify the index directory?
Any suggestion/advice is really appreciable.
Thanks
con
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Integrating-Solr-with-JBOSS-to-run
you have 2 queries in 2 different entities?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:17 PM, con [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two queries in my data-config.xml which takes values from multiple
tables, like:
select * from EMPLOYEE, CUSTOMER where EMPLOYEE.prod_id=
CUSTOMER.prod_id.
When i do a full
is as expected.
But when i invoke a *:* it is displaying only 9 records.
Similarly, For another entity that indexes around 500 records, a *:* gives
only 4 responces.
Why this inconsistency ? how can I fix it before deploying it in actual
production.
Thanks
con
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote
this issue is now solved.
Thanks again Nobble.
Thanks
con
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
This is to debug your problem.
remove the unniqueKey and run import.
just see if all the docs are shown .
If yes , then you have duplicate ids which cause some documents to be
removed
the values.
Do I need any extra configurations?
Thanks
con
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-search-not-displaying-all-the-indexed-values.-tp20010401p20010401.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
. whereas indexing is fine.
Thanks
con
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
do you have 2 queries in 2 different entities?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:17 PM, con [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two queries in my data-config.xml which takes values from multiple
tables, like:
select * from EMPLOYEE
is successfully done. Then
why my search doesn't yield all the values in the second case?
Thanks and regards
con
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
now just do a normal full-import do not enable debug . I guess it
should be just fine
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 1:20 PM, con [EMAIL PROTECTED
Thanks Nobble
I tried in the debug mode with rows=100 and it is accepting all the result
sets.
So i suppose there is nothing wrong in the query.
But I am not able to update the index since this is available only in the
debug mode.
Can you please give some suggestions based on this.
thanks
con
I wrote a jdbc program to implement the same query. But it is returning all
the responses, 25 nos.
But the solr is still indexing only 10 rows.
Is there any optimization settings by default in the solrconfig.xml that
restricts the responses to 10 ?
thanks
con.
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
Hi Jon
I have my unique key set to false.
uniqueKey required=falseEMP_ID/uniqueKey.
I tried with enabling the unique key. Still the same problem exists.
Thanks
con
jonbaer wrote:
What is your uniqueKey set to? Could it be you have duplicates in
your uniqueKey setup (thus producing
=onwt=json
I tried in the debug mode:
(http://localhost:8983/solr/dataimport?command=full-importdebug=onverbose=on)
, But it is not all mentioning anything after the 10th document.
Thanks and regards
con
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
The DIH status says 10 rows which means only 10
)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter$1.run(DataImporter.java:377)
8 Oct, 2008 12:54:48 PM org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.JdbcDataSource$1
call
Is there something I missed or done anything wrong.
thanks in advance.
con
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Problem-in-using-Unique-key-tp19873980p19873980
is marked with required=false, it will be a
required field
--
That's why I put the required=false attribute.
Thanks
con
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
uniqueKey required=falseuserID/uniqueKey
I do not think there is a required attribute on uniquekey
By default uniquekey is required
Is there some other arguments that can be entered to this entity, so that we
can invoke it by its rowtype?
thanks
con
con wrote:
Hi Burnell
As we know in the real enterprise application the queries will be always
complex than what I have posted here. That time I fear, this approach may
if there is a way by which we can handle both just like
user, that will be a more stable approach.
Thanks for your suggestion
con
Neville Burnell wrote:
Hi Con,
I'm not sure if you need the 'both' entity.
For example, perhaps the following query will work for you to retrieve
both
on the end user's choice. How can I achieve it.
Thanks for your reply
con
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
The entity and the select query has no relationship
The entity comes into picture when you do a dataimport
eg:
http://localhost:8983/solr/dataimport?command=full-importenity=user
...
So, as expected, when I go to search it is giving- undefined field rowtype-
error.!!!
Do I need to update any other files or fields?
I am happy that it worked for you...:jumping::jumping:
Looking forward for your reply
Thanks
con
Neville Burnell wrote:
Hi,
But while performing a search
a lot:handshake:
Expecting reply
con
Neville Burnell wrote:
BTW, You will also need to configure your schema.xml to index [and store?]
the rowtype attribute:
field name=rowtype type=string indexed=true stored=true
required=true /
Or alternatively change rowtype to be say
and not on entities. Better not to
confuse
them.
Ok. I am actually saying from the data-config.xml perspective.:-)
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 3:24 PM, con [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And finally its almost fine.. :jumping: :jumping: :jumping:
Thanks Burnell.
My tables
..
thanks and regards.
con
Norberto Meijome-6 wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 02:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
con [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What you meant is correct only. Please excuse for that I am new to solr.
:-(
Con, have a read here :
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-solr1/
it helped
.userID
/entity
/document
/dataConfig
I cannot invoke the entity, 'user', just like the above url. i went through
the possible arguments but didnt found a way to invoke an entity. Is there a
way for this purpose.
ragards
con
con wrote:
Thanks
to search all the users,
only the entity, 'user' must be executed. And if he wants to search all
managers, the entity, 'manager' must be executed.
How can i accomplish this through url?
Thanks
con
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 6:13 PM, con [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I
://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=user:bobversion=2.2start=0rows=10indent=onwt=json
But it didn't worked. Is the above URL correct or is there some other
option.
Thanks for your reply..
con
Norberto Meijome-6 wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
con [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be more
with this query:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=physicsversion=2.2start=0rows=10indent=onwt=json
Thanks
con
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-select-one-entity-at-a-time--tp19668759p19668759.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Guys
I am trying to take values by connecting two tables. My data-config.xml
looks like:
dataConfig
dataSource * /
document
entity name=emp query=select * from EMPLOYEE
field name=features column=EMPID /
the query browser, that also running fine.
But when i go and search it through the admin UI, no responce is displayed.
Is there something i missed in the configuration file or something else:
Expecting your reply/suggestion
thanks
con
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Error
Hi guys
How can I define a custom schema based on my table.
Thanks
con
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Defining-custom-schema-tp19645491p19645491.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
name and column type dynamically to the
schema.xml so that the output will show something like, CUSTOMER_NAME
markrmiller/CUSTOMER_NAME
If this is not possible, is there any way for aliasing, so that I will get
the above output.
Thanks
con
markrmiller wrote:
con wrote:
Hi guys
How can I
Ya I know, for a startup i am using that default schema.
But can I develop a schema from the table automatically.
Or do I need to manually create a schema.
Thanks
con
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Defining-custom-schema-tp19645491p19663339.html
Sent from the Solr
71 matches
Mail list logo
