II. Is there a way to use the stats.calcdistinct functionality and only
return the countDistinct portion of the response and not the full list of
distinct values -- as provided in the distinctValues portion of the
response. In a field with high cardinality the response size becomes too
Perfect, thank you for the information -- will have a look through those
classes.
Thank you,
Levan
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/5-1-unique-facet-function-calcDistinct-tp4200110p4200535.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I've posted the issue here, please let me know if any additional information
needs to be provided.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7417
Happy to provide the feedback, using the sub-facets has been a lot of fun,
the nested facet query is especially useful.
--
View this message in
Hello,
We are looking at a couple of options for using solr to dynamically calulate
unique values per field. In testing out Solr 5.1, I've been using the
unique() facet function:
http://yonik.com/solr-facet-functions/
Overall, loving the JSON Facet API, especially the sub-faceting thus far.
Thanks for the feedback Levan!
Could you open a JIRA issue for unique() on numeric/date fields?
We don't yet have explicit numeric support for unique() and I think
some changes in Lucene 5 broke treating these fields as strings (i.e.
the ability to retrieve ords).
-Yonik
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at
