Re: Empty facet counts

2012-04-02 Thread Youri Westerman
Alright well I discovered that php converts '.' in a variable name to '_' causing my request to contain a variable to a non-exsistent facet_field. 2012/3/30 William Bell billnb...@gmail.com Can you also include a /select?q=*:*wt=xml ? On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Erick Erickson

Empty facet counts

2012-03-29 Thread Youri Westerman
Hi, I'm currently learning how to use solr and everything seems pretty straight forward. For some reason when I use faceted queries it returns only empty sets in the facet_count section. The get params I'm using are: ?q=*:*rows=0facet=truefacet.field=urn The result: facet_counts: {

Re: Empty facet counts

2012-03-29 Thread Bill Bell
Send schema.xml and did you apply any patches? What version of Solr? Bill Bell Sent from mobile On Mar 29, 2012, at 5:26 AM, Youri Westerman yo...@pluxcustoms.nl wrote: Hi, I'm currently learning how to use solr and everything seems pretty straight forward. For some reason when I use

Re: Empty facet counts

2012-03-29 Thread Youri Westerman
The version is 3.5.0.2011.11.22.14.54.38. I did not apply any patches, but then again it is not my server. Do you have a clue on what is going wrong here? Regards, Youri 2012/3/29 Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com Send schema.xml and did you apply any patches? What version of Solr? Bill Bell

Re: Empty facet counts

2012-03-29 Thread Erick Erickson
Hmmm, looking at your schema, faceting on a uniqueKey really doesn't make all that much sense, there will always be exactly one of them. At least it's highly questionable. But that's not your problem and what's wrong isn't at all obvious. Can you try pasting the results of adding debugQuery=on?

Re: Empty facet counts

2012-03-29 Thread William Bell
Can you also include a /select?q=*:*wt=xml ? On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote: Hmmm, looking at your schema, faceting on a uniqueKey really doesn't make all that much sense, there will always be exactly one of them. At least it's highly