On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Furkan Kuru wrote:
> facet.limit = default value 100
> facet.minCount is 1
>
> The document count that matches the query is 8-10K in average. I did not
> calculate the terms (maybe using using facet.limit=-1 and facet.minCount=1)
>
> My index entirely fits into memo
eturning the facet
> counts of all 1M of facet terms, or did you limit the number of facet terms
> returned to a small number?
>
> Also did your entire index fit within RAM?
>
>
> --- On Sat, 6/5/10, Furkan Kuru wrote:
>
> > From: Furkan Kuru
> > Subject: Re: F
all 1M of facet terms, or did you limit the number of facet terms returned to a
small number?
Also did your entire index fit within RAM?
--- On Sat, 6/5/10, Furkan Kuru wrote:
> From: Furkan Kuru
> Subject: Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger
> To: solr-user@lucene.a
The documents full-text fields are 140 chars length (tweets).
Actually I had looked at those parameters and thought no change was
neccessary because the terms per document would be few and the unique term
count was nearly 1 M. I don't know exactly but average term count per
document text can be 10
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Andy wrote:
> Yonik,
>
> Just curious why does using enum improve the facet performance.
>
> Furkan was faceting on a text field with each word being a facet value. I'd
> imagine that'd mean there's a large number of facet values. According to the
> documentation
FacetParameters#facet.method)
facet.method=fc is faster when a field has many unique terms. So how come enum,
not fc, is faster in this case?
Also why use filterCache less?
Thanks
Andy
--- On Fri, 6/4/10, Furkan Kuru wrote:
> From: Furkan Kuru
> Subject: Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as i
t;
> > As the number of total indexed documents gets larger (now 5 M)
> >
> > a faceted search on a text field limited by the creation time, which we
> use
> > to find the most used word in all these text fields, gets slow down.
> >
> >
> > query string: cr
t; Hello,
>
> I have been dealing with real-time data.
>
> As the number of total indexed documents gets larger (now 5 M)
>
> a faceted search on a text field limited by the creation time, which we use
> to find the most used word in all these text fields, gets slow down.
>
>
Hello,
I have been dealing with real-time data.
As the number of total indexed documents gets larger (now 5 M)
a faceted search on a text field limited by the creation time, which we use
to find the most used word in all these text fields, gets slow down.
query string: created_time:[NOW-1HOUR
Ah, the issue was explicitly specifying components...
query
I don't remember changing this during default install, commenting this
out enabled faceted search component.
Thanks all for the help.
Ilya
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Sascha Szott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please
ya Sterin wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to perform a faceted search without any luck. Result set
>> doesn't return any facet information...
>>
>> http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=title:*&facet=on&facet.field=title
>>
>> I'm getting th
t wrote:
Hi Birger,
Birger Lie wrote:
I don't think the bolean fields is mapped to "on" and "off" :)
You can use true and on interchangeably.
-Sascha
-birger
-Original Message-
From: Ilya Sterin [mailto:ster...@gmail.com]
Sent: 24. mai 2010 23:11
To: solr-u
e true and on interchangeably.
>
> -Sascha
>
>>
>>
>> -birger
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ilya Sterin [mailto:ster...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 24. mai 2010 23:11
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Faceted search not working
lucene.apache.org
Subject: Faceted search not working?
I'm trying to perform a faceted search without any luck. Result set doesn't
return any facet information...
http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=title:*&facet=on&facet.field=title
I'm getting the result set, but no fac
1
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Faceted search not working?
I'm trying to perform a faceted search without any luck. Result set doesn't
return any facet information...
http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=title:*&facet=on&facet.field=title
I'm getting the result se
it's probably because your query isn't matching anything. try q=title:
[* TO *], or maybe even simply *:* if you are trying to match all
documents.
Erik
On May 24, 2010, at 5:11 PM, Ilya Sterin wrote:
I'm trying to perform a faceted search without any luck. Res
Hi Ilya,
Ilya Sterin wrote:
I'm trying to perform a faceted search without any luck. Result set
doesn't return any facet information...
http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=title:*&facet=on&facet.field=title
I'm getting the result set, but no face information prese
I'm trying to perform a faceted search without any luck. Result set
doesn't return any facet information...
http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=title:*&facet=on&facet.field=title
I'm getting the result set, but no face information present? Is there
something else that
I apply a faceted search and get document ids from the facet_field I have
used.
Then I search for these documents given ids. id:(id1 id2 ...)
But the order is not predictable. (It applies OR)
I do not want to sort documents again.
Is there any way to get documents in the given id order
Not really SOLR doesn't have a way to implement this
kind of thing. You'd have to do some sort of post-processing
of the results I think.
HTH
Erick
2010/3/10 André Maldonado
> Hi all.
>
> I have 2 indexes with different structures, but a few equal fields. There
> is so
Hi all.
I have 2 indexes with different structures, but a few equal fields. There
is some way to do a faceted search (faceting the equal fields) in the 2
indexes at same time, with only one response (like a UNION in sql server)?
Thank's
"Então aproximaram-se os que estavam no barco,
and some distinct fields. I need
> to make a faceted search that returns the union of the same search in these
> 2 indexes.
>
> How can I make it?
>
> Thank's
>
> "Então aproximaram-se os que estavam no barco, e adoraram-no, dizendo: És
> verdadeiramente o Filho de Deus." (Mateus 14:33)
>
: I have 2 indexes with some similar fields and some distinct fields. I need
: to make a faceted search that returns the union of the same search in these
: 2 indexes.
:
: How can I make it?
Assuming you don't need facets or sorting on the fields that are distinct
between the two in
Hi all.
I have 2 indexes with some similar fields and some distinct fields. I need
to make a faceted search that returns the union of the same search in these
2 indexes.
How can I make it?
Thank's
"Então aproximaram-se os que estavam no barco, e adoraram-no, dizendo: És
verdadeiramen
27;m
> wondering if I should focus more on a tree view of my catalog data instead,
> as described in "Beyond Basic Faceted Search"
>
> Is it possible that either or both of the patches for SOLR-792 or SOLR-64
> provide something like this? Below is a link to the paper, fol
I'm currently using the latest SOLR-236 patch (12/24/2009) and
field-collapsing seems to be giving me the desired results, but I'm
wondering if I should focus more on a tree view of my catalog data instead,
as described in "Beyond Basic Faceted Search"
Is it possible that e
Thank you Yonik, that worked (I added :method => :enum to the :facets hash).
And it seems to work really fast, too.
Yonik Seeley wrote:
Hi Paul,
The new faceting method is faster in the general case, but doesn't
work well for faceting full text fields (which tends not to work well
regardless
Hi Paul,
The new faceting method is faster in the general case, but doesn't
work well for faceting full text fields (which tends not to work well
regardless of the method).
You can get the old behavior bt adding either of the parameters
"facet.method=enum" or "f.content.facet.method=enum"
We'll
(using solr 1.4 nightly; solr-ruby 0.0.7)
I am attempting to do an auto-complete with the following statement:
req = Solr::Request::Standard.new(
:start => 0, :rows => 0, :shards => [ 'resources', 'exhibits'],
:query => "*:*", :filter_queries => [ ],
:facets => {:fields => [ "content" ], :min
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> Faceting, as of now, can only be done of definitive field names.
To further clarify, the fields you can facet on can include those
defined by dynamic fields. You just must specify the exact field name
when you facet.
Did you reall
/document/787cc8cc9ea095e6/item_facet
Cheers
Avlesh
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:47 PM, danben wrote:
>
> Also, here is the field definition in the schema
>
> indexed="true" stored="true" multiValued="true"/>
>
>
> --
> View this mess
Also, here is the field definition in the schema
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Faceted-Search-on-Dynamic-Fields--tp25612887p25612936.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
eted queries are not permitted on dynamic facet
fields, and if so, is there any workaround?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Faceted-Search-on-Dynamic-Fields--tp25612887p25612887.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Nicolae Mihalache wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using faceted search (perhaps in a dumb way) to collect some statistics
> for my index. I have documents in various languages, one of the field is
> "language" and I simply want to see how
Hello,
I'm using faceted search (perhaps in a dumb way) to collect some statistics
for my index. I have documents in various languages, one of the field is
"language" and I simply want to see how many documents I have for each
language. I have noticed that the search builds a in
Thank you Chris.
I've find out how to implement my faceted search.
I don't index any metadata document but i create my in-memory faceting data
structure from database at my request handlers init method. Compute facet
count on any request and wrrite to response as NamedList of
:
: I'm trying to implement custom faceted search like CNET's
:
approach.<http://www.mail-archive.com/java-u...@lucene.apache.org/msg02646.html>
: .
: But i couldn't figure out how to structure and index category metadata
: document.
The short answer: "however you w
Hi.
I'm trying to implement custom faceted search like CNET's
approach.<http://www.mail-archive.com/java-u...@lucene.apache.org/msg02646.html>
.
But i couldn't figure out how to structure and index category metadata
document.
Thanks.
--
Osman İZBAT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Sol Lederman has written a Review
<http://federatedsearchblog.com/2009/05/14/review-faceted-search/> of
the almost finished manuscript of Daniel Tunkelang's "Faceted Search"
which is set to be published in June. As the te
koon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can someone of you tell me how to implement a faceted search?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Regards,
>
> Sajith Vimukthi Weerakoon.
>
>
>
>
Hi all,
Can someone of you tell me how to implement a faceted search?
Thanks,
Regards,
Sajith Vimukthi Weerakoon.
ge
> From: "Deo, Shantanu"
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:15:09 PM
> Subject: faceted search returning multiple values for same field
>
> Hi,
> I am using solr for indexing some product data, and wanted to use the
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Deo, Shantanu wrote:
>
> I have tried playing around with defining the fieldtype using the
> following analyzers:
> positionIncrementGap="100" >
>
>
>
>
> words="manufacturer.txt"/>
>
>
>
>
> Any ideas if its possible to get the same facets a
Hi,
I am using solr for indexing some product data, and wanted to use the
faceted search. My indexed field (mfg) sometimes contains two words
"sony erricson" for example. When I get the facets on the mfg, SOLR
return "sony" and "erricson" as separate hits. There are
: generating XML feed file and feeding to the Solr server. However, I was
: also looking into implementing having sub-categories within the
: categories if that make sense. For example, in the shopper.com we have
: the categories of by price, manufactures and so on and with in them,they
: are su
e
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 4:24 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Faceted Search!
: define the sub-categories. let's say from the above example, the
: category "price" has different sub-cate
Niraj: What environment are you using? SQL Server/.NET/Windows? or something
else?
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 4:24 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Faceted Search!
: define the sub-categories
: define the sub-categories. let's say from the above example, the
: category "price" has different sub-categories like "less than 100"
: ,"100-200"? I'm guessing, we explicit define this in XML feed file, but
: I could be very wrong. In any case, can you please give me the short
: example achi
Hi Chris,
thank you for the reply. I was reading other posting regarding faceted
search and seems like they are using the filtering capability of Lucene for
that. If that the case, can we have control over the "label" of categories?
For example: in shopper.com when we search
: Thanks Chris for replying my question. So I'm thinking about using a
: CMS and when somebody publishes a page in CMS, I would generated this
: well structure XML file and feed that xml to Solr to generate the index
: on those data. Then, I can simply do faceted search using the co
Thanks Chris for replying my question. So I'm thinking about using a CMS and
when somebody publishes a page in CMS, I would generated this well structure
XML file and feed that xml to Solr to generate the index on those data. Then, I
can simply do faceted search using the correct Lucene
one of you have
: implemented, can you please give me suggestion or code snippets so that
: I can implemented them to achieve the "faceted search". Any help would
: be appericated.
I'm not very familiar with the Nutch/Solr hybrid stuff some people have
done, but faceting requires that y
Hi all,
I'm couple of days old with Solr so I'm very new to this. However, I'm
trying to implemented Faceted search somewhat close to CNET shopper.com.
Instead of using some items (like "camera"), I want to search for documents.
I'm planning to use Nutch to c
: It sure could, but I was just trying to stretch my imagination as far
: as possible. filter.term also seems to me like only a marginal
: improvement over lucene syntax.
the only reason i suggested filter.term at all was because it eliminates
hte need to worry baout quoting/escaping when dealin
On 2/10/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: As for future expansion, some possibilities are: filter.op/filter.q.op
: (set operator of filter query parser, which is currently OR regardless
I'm not sure why/how thta would ever make sense... you'd be much better
off using seperate fil
: > > filter.query
: > > filter.term
: > > filter.
: I like self-documenting parameter names, but if there is concern about
: verbosity, how 'bout:
:
: fq
: fq.term
no it's cool ... filter.query and filter.term are definitely better.
: As for future expansion, some possibilities are: filter.op/f
On 2/9/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 9, 2007, at 9:16 PM, Mike Klaas wrote:
> Might I suggest:
>
> filter.query
> filter.term
> filter.
I like it. While Hoss has a point, though descriptive names do make
a lot of sense too. It has been a bit confusing to explain
facet.que
On Feb 9, 2007, at 9:16 PM, Mike Klaas wrote:
Might I suggest:
filter.query
filter.term
filter.
I like it. While Hoss has a point, though descriptive names do make
a lot of sense too. It has been a bit confusing to explain
facet.query and fq as two different things. However, is there a
: filter.query
: filter.term
: filter.
there's a whole lot of Unicode letters availble thta could fill in the f_
blank, how much more expansion do we really need? :)
I suppose filter.term is a wise choice, and adding filter.query as an
alias makes sense too ... i'm just a big fan of short param
Might I suggest:
filter.query
filter.term
filter.
-Mike
On 2/9/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ft and fq work for me!
Erik
On Feb 9, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On 2/9/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> : The simplest form would be a term quer
ft and fq work for me!
Erik
On Feb 9, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 2/9/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: The simplest form would be a term query with no escaping
whatsoever:
:
: Something like:
: fq=High School
I know yonik isn't a big fan of query param
On 2/9/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: The simplest form would be a term query with no escaping whatsoever:
:
: Something like:
: fq=High School
I know yonik isn't a big fan of query param proliferation, and there's
definitely going to be a need for some kind of markup in the fu
: The simplest form would be a term query with no escaping whatsoever:
:
: Something like:
: fq=High School
I know yonik isn't a big fan of query param proliferation, and there's
definitely going to be a need for some kind of markup in the future to
denote which query syntax to use for different
On Feb 9, 2007, at 4:45 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 2/9/07, Gunther, Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Try surrounding you mutli-word query in quotes: education_facet:"High
School". Also do you want to use the filter query param instead
fq=education_facet:"High School"
Hopefully having the cl
On 2/9/07, Gunther, Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Try surrounding you mutli-word query in quotes: education_facet:"High
School". Also do you want to use the filter query param instead
fq=education_facet:"High School"
Hopefully having the client escape simple term filters won't be
necessary
Awesome, thanks that works.
From: "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Faceted search glitch???
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:28:05 -0500
On 2/9/07, Peter McPeterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
O
09, 2007 4:22 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Faceted search glitch???
On Solr, I'm indexing a facet field which contains different values on
each
record (of course) but it doesn't seem to be working the way I had
expected.
For instance:
When looking for:
http://localhost:8
On 2/9/07, Peter McPeterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Solr, I'm indexing a facet field which contains different values on each
record (of course) but it doesn't seem to be working the way I had expected.
For instance:
When looking for:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=sales&facet=true&fa
On Solr, I'm indexing a facet field which contains different values on each
record (of course) but it doesn't seem to be working the way I had expected.
For instance:
When looking for:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=sales&facet=true&facet.field=education_facet
it returns the facet:
'educ
On Jan 16, 2007, at 10:05 PM, Peter McPeterson wrote:
Hi all, I'm trying this solr ruby DSL called Flare/solrb and I
don't really know how the faceted search works because I cant add
whatever fields I want to to the index. This is currently not working:
conn = Solr::Connection
Hi all, I'm trying this solr ruby DSL called Flare/solrb and I don't really
know how the faceted search works because I cant add whatever fields I want
to to the index. This is currently not working:
conn = Solr::Connection.new('http://localhost:8983/solr')
doc = {:id =>
On Dec 28, 2006, at 10:18 PM, Giri wrote:
Do you have any simple tutorial that explains how to enable the
faceted
search in solr? I wouold appreciate if you point me to some resource.
The wiki is the best source of information on Solr. For facets, look
here:
<h
Hi Yonik,
Thanks for the information and suggestion.
Do you have any simple tutorial that explains how to enable the faceted
search in solr? I wouold appreciate if you point me to some resource.
Thanks much
On 12/28/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/27/06, Giri &
r this contains more than one value per record (e.g., java,
programming, object oriented), is it possible to include this field on the
faceted search? or this metaKeyword needs to have only unique value per
record to use a faceted?
Yes, multivalued fields are supported with faceted search, but the
sp
., java,
programming, object oriented), is it possible to include this field on the
faceted search? or this metaKeyword needs to have only unique value per
record to use a faceted?
Any help in this regard is appreciated
Thanks!
Giri
101 - 175 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
