Re: Ingesting geo data into Solr very slow

2013-07-31 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 7/31/2013 11:20 AM, Simonian, Marta M (US SSA) wrote: Does anybody know if Solr performs better on Jetty vs Tomcat? Jetty has less complexity than tomcat. It is likely to use less memory. If you went with default settings for both, jetty is likely to perform better, but the difference wo

RE: Ingesting geo data into Solr very slow

2013-07-31 Thread Simonian, Marta M (US SSA)
Does anybody know if Solr performs better on Jetty vs Tomcat? -Original Message- From: David Smiley (@MITRE.org) [mailto:dsmi...@mitre.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 9:08 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Ingesting geo data into Solr very slow Hi Marta, Presumably you

RE: Ingesting geo data into Solr very slow

2013-07-31 Thread Simonian, Marta M (US SSA)
2013 9:08 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Ingesting geo data into Solr very slow Hi Marta, Presumably you are indexing polygons -- I suspect complex ones. There isn't too much that you can do about this right now other than index them in parallel. I see you are doing this in

Re: Ingesting geo data into Solr very slow

2013-07-30 Thread David Smiley (@MITRE.org)
to do some > conversion? > > Can you please let me know what are the best settings for Solr? Maybe some > changes in the solrconfig.xml or the schema.xml? > What are the preferred environment settings and resources? > > Thank you! > Marta - Author: http://www.pack

Ingesting geo data into Solr very slow

2013-07-30 Thread Simonian, Marta M (US SSA)
Hi, We are using Solr 4.4 to ingest geo data and it's really slow. When we don't index the geo it takes seconds to ingest 100, 000 records but as soon as we add it takes 2 hours. Also we found that when changing the distErrPct from 0.025 to 0.1, 1000 rows are ingested in 20 sec vs 2 min. But w

Ingesting geo data into Solr very slow

2013-07-30 Thread Simonian, Marta M (US SSA)
Hi, We are using Solr 4.4 to ingest geo data and it's really slow. When we don't index the geo it takes seconds to ingest 100, 000 records but as soon as we add it takes 2 hours. Also we found that when changing the distErrPct from 0.025 to 0.1, 1000 rows are ingested in 20 sec vs 2 min. But w