ng
> > concern all by itself. If we're going to make the change anyway, it might
> > be best to get it over with and pick the most appropriate terminology we
> > can agree upon, rather than trying to minimize the amount of change. It's
> > going to be backward breaking an
we might as well do it all now
> rather than risk having to go through two separate breaking changes at
> different points in time.
> >
> > - Demian
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Noble Paul
> > Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 1:51 AM
king changes at different points in
> time.
>
> - Demian
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Noble Paul
> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 1:51 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Getting rid of Master/Slave nomenclature in Solr
>
> Looking
points in time.
- Demian
-Original Message-
From: Noble Paul
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 1:51 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Getting rid of Master/Slave nomenclature in Solr
Looking at the code I see a 692 occurrences of the word "slave".
Mostly v
