From: Chris Hostetter-3 [via Lucene]
[mailto:ml-node+825052-1711725506-201...@n3.nabble.com]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 9:04 PM
To: Ge, Yao (Y.)
Subject: Re: Date faceting and memory leaks
: Cache settings:
:
that's a monster filterCache ...i can easly imagine it causing an OOM if
Chris,
Just completed the re-run and your date rounding tip saved my day. I now
realized the "NOW" as a timestamp is a very bad idea for query caching as it
is never the same in value. NOW/DAY would at least makes a set facet queries
caches re-usable for a period of time. It turns on you can help
: Cache settings:
:
that's a monster filterCache ...i can easly imagine it causing an OOM if
your heap is only 5G.
: The date rounding suggest is a very good one, I will need to rerun the test
: and report back on the cache setting. I remember my filterCache hit ratio is
: around 0.7. I did u
Chris,
Thanks for the detailed response. No I am not using Date Facet but Facet
Query as for facet display. Here is the full configuration of my "dismax"
query handler:
dismax
explicit
0.01
title text^0.5 domain^0.1 nature^0.1 author
title
: Subject: Date faceting and memory leaks
First off, just to be clear, you don't seem to be useing the "date
faceting" feature, you are using the "Facet Query" feature, your queries
just so happen to be on a date field.
Second: to help people help you, you need to provide all the details.
you
No I still have the OOM issue with repeated facet query request on the date
field. I forgot to mention that I am running 64-bit IBM 1.5 JVM. I also
tried the Sun 1.6 JVM with and without your GC arguments. The GC pattern is
different but the heap size does not drop as the test going on. I tested
w
2010 2:44 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Date faceting and memory leaks
>
> What garbage collection settings are you running at the command line
> when starting Solr?
> On May 17, 2010, at 2:41 PM, Yao wrote:
>
>>
>> I have been running load testing using JM
44 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Date faceting and memory leaks
What garbage collection settings are you running at the command line
when starting Solr?
On May 17, 2010, at 2:41 PM, Yao wrote:
>
> I have been running load testing using JMeter on a Solr 1.4 index with
~4
>
What garbage collection settings are you running at the command line when
starting Solr?
On May 17, 2010, at 2:41 PM, Yao wrote:
>
> I have been running load testing using JMeter on a Solr 1.4 index with ~4
> million docs. I notice a steady JVM heap size increase as I iterator 100
> query terms