Re: -field1:value1 OR field2:value2

2016-09-26 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 9/26/2016 3:56 AM, Sandeep Khanzode wrote: > Hi Alex, It seems that this is not an issue with AND clause. For > example, if I do ... field1:value1 AND -field2:value2 ... the results > seem to be an intersection of both. Is this an issue with OR? Which is > which we replace it with an implicit

Re: -field1:value1 OR field2:value2

2016-09-26 Thread Sandeep Khanzode
Sure. Noted.  Thanks for the link ...  SRK On Monday, September 26, 2016 8:29 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: Please do not cross post to multiple lists, it's considered bad etiquette. Solr does not implement strict boolean logic, please read:

Re: -field1:value1 OR field2:value2

2016-09-26 Thread Erick Erickson
Please do not cross post to multiple lists, it's considered bad etiquette. Solr does not implement strict boolean logic, please read: https://lucidworks.com/blog/2011/12/28/why-not-and-or-and-not/ Best, Erick On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 2:58 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: >

Re: -field1:value1 OR field2:value2

2016-09-26 Thread Alexandre Rafalovitch
I don't remember specifically :-(. Search the archives http://search-lucene.com/ or follow-up on Solr Users list. Remember to mention the version of Solr, as there were some bugs/features/fixes with OR, I think. Regards, Alex. Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates:

Re: -field1:value1 OR field2:value2

2016-09-26 Thread Sandeep Khanzode
Hi Alex, It seems that this is not an issue with AND clause. For example, if I do ... field1:value1 AND -field2:value2  ... the results seem to be an intersection of both. Is this an issue with OR? Which is which we replace it with an implicit (*:* NOT)? SRK On Monday, September 26, 2016

Re: -field1:value1 OR field2:value2

2016-09-26 Thread Sandeep Khanzode
Yup. That works. So does (*:* NOT ...) Thanks, Alex.  SRK On Monday, September 26, 2016 3:03 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: Try field2:value2 OR (*:* -field1=value1) There is a magic in negative query syntax that breaks down when it gets more complex. It's been

Re: -field1:value1 OR field2:value2

2016-09-26 Thread Alexandre Rafalovitch
Try field2:value2 OR (*:* -field1=value1) There is a magic in negative query syntax that breaks down when it gets more complex. It's been discussed on the mailing list a bunch of times, though the discussions are hard to find by title. Regards, Alex. Newsletter and resources for Solr