or par,
unless you index them as single documents?
Should I still read up on the payload discussion?
Dave
- Original Message
From: Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 5:00:43 PM
Subject: Re: Redundant indexing * 4 only
PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 5:21:45 AM
Subject: Re: Redundant indexing * 4 only solution (for par/sen and case
sensitivity)
Solr query syntax is documented here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/
SolrQuerySyntax
What Yonik is referring to is creating your
- Original Message
From: Erick Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 2:11:14 PM
Subject: Re: Redundant indexing * 4 only solution (for par/sen and case
sensitivity)
DISCLAIMER: This is from a Lucene-centric viewpoint. That said, this
may
On Nov 12, 2007 2:20 PM, David Neubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik - thanks, I am considering this approach, verses explicit redundant
indexing -- and am also considering Lucene -
There's not a well defined solution in either IMO.
- problem is, I am one week into both technologies (though
: - problem is, I am one week into both technologies (though have years in
the search space) -- wish I could
: go to Hong Kong -- any discounts available anywhere :)
:
: Unfortunately the OS Summit has been canceled.
Or rescheduled to 2008 ... depending on wether you are a half-empty /
know where on-line documentation on the +case: syntax is
located? I can't seem to find it.
Dave
- Original Message
From: Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 4:56:40 PM
Subject: Re: Redundant indexing * 4 only solution
over complicating this?
Dave
- Original Message
From: Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 2:18:00 PM
Subject: Re: Redundant indexing * 4 only solution (for par/sen and case
sensitivity)
So now I have:
(1) 4X in content
On Nov 10, 2007 4:24 PM, David Neubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if I am hitting multiple fields (in the same search request) that invoke
different Analyzers -- am I at a dead end, and have to result to consequetive
multiple queries instead
Solr handles that for you automatically.
The
David Neubert wrote:
Ryan,
Thanks for your response. I infer from your response that you can have a
different analyzer for each field
yes! each field can have its own indexing strategy.
I believe that the Analyzer approach you suggested requires the use
of the same Analzyer at query
Subject: Re: Redundant indexing * 4 only solution (for par/sen and case
sensitivity)
David Neubert wrote:
Ryan,
Thanks for your response. I infer from your response that you can
have a different analyzer for each field
yes! each field can have its own indexing strategy.
I believe
indexing * 4 only solution (for par/sen and case
sensitivity)
On Nov 10, 2007 4:24 PM, David Neubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if I am hitting multiple fields (in the same search request) that
invoke different Analyzers -- am I at a dead end, and have to result to
consequetive multiple queries
11 matches
Mail list logo
