Re: Solr - rudimentary problems

2007-09-17 Thread Chris Hostetter
: The corresponding entry for this field in schema.xml is : : field name=id type=text indexed=true : stored=true multiValued=false required=true/ i'm guessing text is from the example schema.xml ... this is not a good type to use for a uniqueId field ... that alone might

Re: Solr - rudimentary problems

2007-09-17 Thread Venkatraman S
C'est Parfait! .. yes - that was the problem. thanks a lot. I am compiling a complete list of FAQs - will update it in the wiki soon. -vEnKAt On 9/18/07, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : The corresponding entry for this field in schema.xml is : : field name=id

RE: Solr - rudimentary problems

2007-09-16 Thread Stu Hood
With regards to #3, it is recommended that for faceting, you use a separate copy of the field with stemming/tokenizing disabled. See : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrFacetingOverview#head-fc68926c8421055de872acc694a6a966fab705d6 Thanks, Stu -Original Message- From: Venkatraman S

Re: Solr - rudimentary problems

2007-09-16 Thread Ryan McKinley
Venkatraman S wrote: We are using Lucene and are migrating to Solr 1.2 (we are using Embedded Solr). During this process we are stumbling on certain problems : 1) IF the same document is added again, then it it getting added in the index again(duplicated); inspite of the fact that the IDs are

Re: Solr - rudimentary problems

2007-09-16 Thread Venkatraman S
Kindly Note again : we are using Embedded Solr. On 9/17/07, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Venkatraman S wrote: We are using Lucene and are migrating to Solr 1.2 (we are using Embedded Solr). During this process we are stumbling on certain problems : 1) IF the same document is