Re: Weird issue with q.op=AND

2014-02-12 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 2/12/2014 3:32 PM, Shamik Bandopadhyay wrote: Hi, I'm facing a weird problem while using q.op=AND condition. Looks like it gets into some conflict if I use multiple appends condition in conjunction. It works as long as I've one filtering condition in appends. lst name=appends str

Re: Weird issue with q.op=AND

2014-02-12 Thread shamik
Thanks a lot Shawn. Changing the appends filtering based on your suggestion worked. The part which confused me bigtime is the syntax I've been using so far without an issue (barring the q.op part). lst name=appends str name=fqSource:TestHelp | Source:downloads | -AccessMode:internal |

Re: Weird issue with q.op=AND

2014-02-12 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 2/12/2014 4:58 PM, shamik wrote: Thanks a lot Shawn. Changing the appends filtering based on your suggestion worked. The part which confused me bigtime is the syntax I've been using so far without an issue (barring the q.op part). lst name=appends str name=fqSource:TestHelp |

Re: Weird issue with q.op=AND

2014-02-12 Thread shamik
Thanks, I'll take a look at the debug data. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Weird-issue-with-q-op-AND-tp4117013p4117047.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Weird issue with q.op=AND

2014-02-12 Thread Jack Krupansky
Did you mean to use || for the OR operator? A single | is not treated as an operator - it will be treated as a term and sent through normal term analysis. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Shamik Bandopadhyay Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 5:32 PM To: