On May 7, 2009, at 10:25 PM, David Shettler wrote:
I found myself with a real need for some of the StatsComponent stuff
(mainly the sum feature), so I pulled down a nightly build and played
with it. StatsComponent proved perfect, but... the nightly build
output seems to be different, and thus i
I'm guessing that manipulating the client end, acts_as_solr, is an
easier approach then backporting server side functionality.
Especially as you will have to forward migrate at some point.
Out of curiosity, which version of acts_as_solr are you using? The
plugin has moved homes a couple o
Foreword: I'm not a java developer :)
OSVDB.org and datalossdb.org make use of solr pretty extensively via
acts_as_solr.
I found myself with a real need for some of the StatsComponent stuff
(mainly the sum feature), so I pulled down a nightly build and played
with it. StatsComponent proved perf