Did you completely reindex your data after emptying the stop words file?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Stavros Delisavas
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 10:05 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Local Solr and Webserver-Solr act differently (and treated
like
Message- From: Stavros Delisavas
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 10:05 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Local Solr and Webserver-Solr act differently (and
treated like or)
Okay, I emtpied the stopword file. I don't know where the wordlist came
from. I have never seen
but the second does not. Did you expect stop
words to be removed, or not?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Stavros Delsiavas
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:02 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Local Solr and Webserver-Solr act differently (and
treated like
Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Stavros Delsiavas
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:02 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Local Solr and Webserver-Solr act differently (and
treated like or)
Okay I understand,
here's the rawquerystring. It was at about line 3000
-Original Message- From: Stavros Delsiavas
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:02 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Local Solr and Webserver-Solr act differently (and
treated like or)
Okay I understand,
here's the rawquerystring. It was at about line 3000:
lst name=debug
, 2013 3:27 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Local Solr and Webserver-Solr act differently (and treated
like or)
Thank you,
I found the file with the stopwords and noticed that my local file is
empty (comments only) and the one on my webserver has a big list of
english stopwords
and on
my webserver. My local solr gives me the expected results: all entries
that have the words into AND the AND wild* in them.
But my webserver acts as if I was looking for into OR the OR
wild*, eventhough the query is the same (as shown above). That's why I
get useless (too many) results
/select/?q=title%3A%28into+AND+the+AND+wild*%29version=2.2start=0rows=1000indent=onfl=titleid
It is autogenerated by an php-script and 100% identical on local and on
my webserver. My local solr gives me the expected results: all entries
that have the words into AND the AND wild* in them.
But my
My local solr gives me:
http://pastebin.com/Q6d9dFmZ
and my webserver this:
http://pastebin.com/q87WEjVA
I copied only the first few hundret lines (of more than 8000) because
the webserver output was to big even for pastebin.
On 16.10.2013 12:27, Erik Hatcher wrote:
What does the debug
On 10/16/2013 4:46 AM, Stavros Delisavas wrote:
My local solr gives me:
http://pastebin.com/Q6d9dFmZ
and my webserver this:
http://pastebin.com/q87WEjVA
I copied only the first few hundret lines (of more than 8000) because
the webserver output was to big even for pastebin
+title:the +title:wild*/str
str name=parsedquery_toString+title:into +title:the
+title:wild*/str
Why is that? Any ideas?
Am 16.10.2013 21:03, schrieb Shawn Heisey:
On 10/16/2013 4:46 AM, Stavros Delisavas wrote:
My local solr gives me:
http://pastebin.com/Q6d9dFmZ
and my webserver
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Local Solr and Webserver-Solr act differently (and treated
like or)
Okay I understand,
here's the rawquerystring. It was at about line 3000:
lst name=debug
str name=rawquerystringtitle:(into AND the AND wild*)/str
str name=querystringtitle:(into AND the AND wild
Hi all,
My team is looking for developers with SOLR experience for a company in
Minneapolis, MN. If interested please reply to this posting and I can fill
you in on more details.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/job-Looking-for-local-SOLR-developers
at using that offers the most geospatial
support? I also need to think about the compatibility with nutch though..
that might be a stopping point for me.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Local-Solr-Spatial-Search-and-LatLonType-clarification-tp1609570p1614309.html
!!!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Local-Solr-Spatial-Search-and-LatLonType-clarification-tp1609570p1609570.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:09 PM, webdev1977 webdev1...@gmail.com wrote:
1. I noticed that it said that the type of LatLongType can not be
mulitvalued. Does that mean that I can not have multiple lat/lon values for
one document.
That means that if you want to have multiple points per document,
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:40 PM, webdev1977 webdev1...@gmail.com wrote:
Or.. do you mean each field must have a unique name, but both be of type
latLon(solr.LatLonType).
work x,y/work
homex,y/home
Yes.
If the statement directly above is true (I hope that it is not), how does
one
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
Dynamic field types. You can configure it such that anything ending
with _latlon is of type LatLonType.
Perhaps we should do this in the example schema.
Looks like we already have it:
dynamicField name=*_p
I faced the same problem when i used locallucene 1.5 and localsolr 1.5.
Now I am using localsolr 2.0 and locallucene 2.0 and I dont see that issue.
You need to upgrade the binaries.
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Spatial-Local-Solr-radius-tp487813p705744.html
Sent from
Mauricio,
I hooked up the spatial solr plugin to the Eclipse debugger and
narrowed the problem down to CartesianShapeFilter.getBoxShape(). The
algorithm used in the method can produce values of startX that are
greater than endX depending on the tier level returned by
datasets were also sparse and geographically distant.
-Sean
-- Forwarded Message
From: Michael solrco...@gmail.com
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:33:39 -0700
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spatial / Local Solr radius
Mauricio,
I hooked up
Mauricio,
I was wondering whether you had heard anything back from jteam
regarding this issue. I have also noticed it and was wondering why It
was happening.
One thing I noticed is that this problem only appears for sparse
datasets as compared to dense ones. For example, I have two datasets
I've
Hi Michael
I exchanged a few mails with jteam, ultimately I realized my longitudes'
signs were inverted so I was mapping to China instead of U.S. Still a bug,
but inverting those longitudes fixed the problem in my case since I'm not
running world-wide searches.
Before that I ran a test to
in context:
http://old.nabble.com/local-solr-geo_distance-tp27873810p27878068.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/local-solr-geo_distance-tp27873810p27878068.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
the field as
tdouble. my search looks like
/solr/select?qt=geolat=xx.xxlong=yy.yyq=*radius=10
Is there anyway i can get is as
double instead of str
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/local-solr-geo_distance-tp27873810p27878068.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
that is hardcoded in the Local Solr code, but
you could put in a request on that project. You might also note that the Solr
trunk is building on Local Solr right now and has incorporate most of the
functionality there. See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch for the
status.
Cheers
Hi I'm getting geo_distance as str eventhough I'm define the field as
tdouble. my search looks like
/solr/select?qt=geolat=xx.xxlong=yy.yyq=*radius=10
Is there anyway i can get is as
double instead of str
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/local-solr-geo_distance
Hello,
I have a question related to local solr. For certain locations (latitude,
longitude), the spatial search does not work. Here is the query I try to
make which gives me no results:
q=*qt=geosort=geo_distance asclat=33.718151long=73.
060547radius=450
However if I make the same query
Hi Emad,
I had the same issue (
http://old.nabble.com/Spatial---Local-Solr-radius-td26943608.html ), it
seems that this happens only on eastern areas of the world. Try inverting
the sign of all your longitudes, or translate all your longitudes to the
west.
Cheers,
Mauricio
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010
Hello Mauricio,
Do you know why such a problem occurs. Has it to do with certain latitudes,
longitudes. If so why is it happening. Is it a bug in local solr?
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Mauricio Scheffer
mauricioschef...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Emad,
I had the same issue (
http
such a problem occurs. Has it to do with certain latitudes,
longitudes. If so why is it happening. Is it a bug in local solr?
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Mauricio Scheffer
mauricioschef...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Emad,
I had the same issue (
http://old.nabble.com/Spatial---Local-Solr-radius
Hi everyone,
I'm getting inconsistent behavior from Spatial Solr when searching with
different radii. For the same lat/long I get:
radius=1 - 1 result
radius=10 - 0 result
radius=25 - 2 results
radius=100 - 2 results
radius=250 - 0 results
I don't understand why radius=10 and 250 return no
What do your queries look like?
On Dec 28, 2009, at 9:30 AM, Mauricio Scheffer wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm getting inconsistent behavior from Spatial Solr when searching with
different radii. For the same lat/long I get:
radius=1 - 1 result
radius=10 - 0 result
radius=25 - 2 results
q={!spatial lat=43.705 long=116.3635 radius=100}*:*
with no other parameters.
When changing the radius to 250 I get no results.
In my config I have startTier = 9 and endTier = 17 (default values)
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsi...@gmail.com wrote:
What do your queries
On Dec 28, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Mauricio Scheffer wrote:
q={!spatial lat=43.705 long=116.3635 radius=100}*:*
What's QParser is the spatial plugin? I don't know of any such QParser in
Solr. Is this a third party tool? If so, I'd suggest asking on that list.
with no other parameters.
When
It's jteam's plugin ( http://www.jteam.nl/news/spatialsolr ) which AFAIK is
just the latest patch for SOLR-773 packaged as a stand-alone plugin.
I'll try to contact jteam directly.
Thanks
Mauricio
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
On Dec 28, 2009, at
All the follwing .getTextContent() failed , which caused my local solr build
failed, althogh it is just sync-ed with the SVN build.
list.add(nodeList.item(i).getTextContent());
assertEquals(prefix-proptwo-suffix, nl.item(0).getTextContent());
Node node = solrConfig.getNode(propTest, true
Thanks,
That worked perfectly.
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
apparently the local solr expects everything as string. I guess we
must raise an issue with them.
meanwhile you can convert those double fields to String using
TemplateTransformer
field column=lat template
--
defaultSearchFieldlocation/defaultSearchField
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Local-Solr---Error-creating-document-with-DIH-tp21211133p21211133.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
apparently the local solr expects everything as string. I guess we
must raise an issue with them.
meanwhile you can convert those double fields to String using
TemplateTransformer
field column=lat template=${your_entity_name.lat}/
field column=lng template=${your_entity_name.lng}/
On Tue
Hi, I have been looking at local solr, and I was wondering about the state
of integration with Solr. Do you have any idea of when local solr might be
integrated in with Solr, or is this still an open question?
From looking at previous posts, it looked like part of the problem had to do
been looking at local solr, and I was wondering about the
state
of integration with Solr. Do you have any idea of when local solr
might be
integrated in with Solr, or is this still an open question?
From looking at previous posts, it looked like part of the problem
had to do
with GeoTools
, 2008, at 1:00 PM, Robert Najlis wrote:
Hi, I have been looking at local solr, and I was wondering about the state
of integration with Solr. Do you have any idea of when local solr might
be
integrated in with Solr, or is this still an open question?
From looking at previous posts, it looked
44 matches
Mail list logo
