> Thanks for the answers, more questions below.
>
> On 2/16/2011 3:37 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> > 200.000 stored fields? I asume that number includes your number of
> > documents? Sounds crazy =)
>
> Nope, I wasn't clear. I have less than a dozen stored field, but the
> value of a stored field
Thanks for the answers, more questions below.
On 2/16/2011 3:37 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
200.000 stored fields? I asume that number includes your number of documents?
Sounds crazy =)
Nope, I wasn't clear. I have less than a dozen stored field, but the
value of a stored field can sometimes b
> In my own Solr 1.4, I am pretty sure that running an index optimize does
> give me significant better performance. Perhaps because I use some
> largeish (not huge, maybe as large as 200k) stored fields.
200.000 stored fields? I asume that number includes your number of documents?
Sounds crazy =
In my own Solr 1.4, I am pretty sure that running an index optimize does
give me significant better performance. Perhaps because I use some
largeish (not huge, maybe as large as 200k) stored fields.
So I'm interested in always keeping my index optimized.
Am I right that if I set mergeFactor to
