Re: prefix facet performance

the code later, > > Regards > > > > - > --- > Alessandro Benedetti > Search Consultant, R Software Engineer, Director > Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/prefix-facet-performance-tp4330684p4331553.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: prefix facet performance

- --- Alessandro Benedetti Search Consultant, R Software Engineer, Director Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/prefix-facet-performance-tp4330684p4331553.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: prefix facet performance

I see. Once I specify a prefix the number of terms is MUCH smaller. Thank you again for all your help. Maria On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Maria Muslea > wrote: > > The field is: > > > > > >

Re: prefix facet performance

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Maria Muslea wrote: > The field is: > > > > and using unique() I found that it has 700K+ unique values. > > The query before (that takes ~10s): > > wt=json=true=*:*=0=true=concept=A/ > > the query after (that is almost instant): > >

Re: prefix facet performance

/The+Stats+Component > [2] http://yonik.com/solr-count-distinct/ > > > > - > --- > Alessandro Benedetti > Search Consultant, R Software Engineer, Director > Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io > -- > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3. > na

Re: prefix facet performance

Benedetti Search Consultant, R Software Engineer, Director Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/prefix-facet-performance-tp4330684p4331309.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: prefix facet performance

algorithm you are using and the schema config for your > field, > > Cheers > > > > - > --- > Alessandro Benedetti > Search Consultant, R Software Engineer, Director > Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io > -- > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n

Re: prefix facet performance

. Let's start from the algorithm you are using and the schema config for your field, Cheers - --- Alessandro Benedetti Search Consultant, R Software Engineer, Director Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/prefix-facet

Re: prefix facet performance

Hmmm, not sure. Probably in the range of 100K-500K. Before writing the email I was just looking at: http://yonik.com/facet-performance/ Wow, using facet.method=enum makes a big difference. I will read on it to understand what it does. Thank you so much. Maria On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:21 PM,

Re: prefix facet performance

How many unique values in the index? You could try facet.method=enum -Yonik On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 8:16 PM, Maria Muslea wrote: > Hi, > > I have ~40K documents in SOLR (not many) and a multivalued facet field that > contains at least 2K values per document. > > The

prefix facet performance

Hi, I have ~40K documents in SOLR (not many) and a multivalued facet field that contains at least 2K values per document. The values of the facet field look like: A/B, A/C, A/D, C/E, M/F, etc, and I use facet.prefix. q=*:*=0=true=concept=A/ with "concept" defined as: This generates the