Hi Team,
I was implementing block join faceting query in my project and was stuck in
integrating the existing functional queries in the block join faceting
query.
*The current query using 'select' handler is as follows* :-
https://localhost:8983/solr/master_Product_default/*select*?*yq*
Cross-posted / addressed (both me), here.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65620642/solr-query-with-space-only-q-20-stalls/65638561#65638561
--
Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Cross-posted / addressed (both me), here.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65620642/solr-query-with-space-only-q-20-stalls/65638561#65638561
--
Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
I have a frontend that uses Ajax to query Solr.
It's working well, but if I enter a single space (nothing else) in the
input/search box (the URL in the browser will show
... index.html#q=%20
In that circumstance I get a 400 error (as there are no parameters in the
request), which is fine,
I have a frontend that uses Ajax to query Solr.
It's working well, but if I enter a single space (nothing else) in the
input/search box (the URL in the browser will show
... index.html#q=%20
In that circumstance I get a 400 error (as there are no parameters in the
request), which is fine,
data value if it
>> exists, otherwise an empty string? I'm integrating this with a 3rd party
>> app which I can't change. When the field is null it isn't showing up in the
>> output.
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Erick Erickson
>&
d is null it isn't showing up in the
> output.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Erick Erickson
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 12:49 PM
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: solr query returns items with spaces removed
> >
> >
r@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: solr query returns items with spaces removed
>
> The “def” function goes after the _indexed_ value, so that’s what you’re
> getting back. Try just specifying “fl=INSTRUCTIONS”, and if the value is
> stored that should return the original fiel
, July 29, 2020 12:49 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: solr query returns items with spaces removed
The “def” function goes after the _indexed_ value, so that’s what you’re
getting back. Try just specifying “fl=INSTRUCTIONS”, and if the value is stored
that should return
The “def” function goes after the _indexed_ value, so that’s what you’re
getting back. Try just specifying “fl=INSTRUCTIONS”, and if the value is stored
that should return the original field value before any analysis is done.
Why are you using the def function? If the field is absent from the
I am sure I'm doing something silly. Basically it looks like my data is being
altered upon search.
This is my fieldType:
I have a string field called "INSTRUCTIONS" using this field type that looks
like this:
ABC_D=
Hi,
I want to search Solr for server names in a set of Microsoft Word documents,
PDF, and image files like jpg,gif.
Server names are given by the regular expression(regex)
INFP[a-zA-z0-9]{3,9}
TRKP[a-zA-z0-9]{3,9}
PLCP[a-zA-z0-9]{3,9}
SQRP[a-zA-z0-9]{3,9}
Problem
===
I want to get the
Hi Swetha,
Given URL is encoded. So, you can decode it before analyzing. Plus
character is used for whitespaces when you encode a URL and minus sign
represents a negative query in Solr.
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 9:16 PM swetha vemula
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an URL and
Hi,
I have an URL and I want to break this down and run it in the admin console
but I am not what is ++ and - represents in the query.
Hi
Thanks Erick and Walter for your response.
Solr Version Used : 6.5.0
I tried to elaborate the issue:
Case 1 : Search String : Industrial Electric Oven
Results=945
Case 2 : Search String : Dell laptop bags
Results=992
In above both cases, mm play its role.(match
First, remove the “mm” parameter from the request handler definition. That can
be added back in and tweaked later, or just left out.
Second, you don’t need any query syntax to search for two words. This query
should work fine:
books bags
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
Please let s know what version of Solr you use, otherwise it’s very hard to know
whether you’re running into https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8812
or similar.
But two things to try:
1> specify q.op
lr
2> specify mm=0%
Best,
Erick
> On Jul 2, 2020, at 1:22 AM, Tushar Arora wrote:
>
>
Hi,
I have a scenario with following entry in the request handler(handler1) of
solrconfig.xml.(defType=edismax is used)
description category title^4 demand^0.3
2-1 4-30%
When I searched 'bags' as a search string, solr returned 15000 results.
Query Used :
Is this odd use-case where one needs to convert Lucene query to Solr query?
Isn't this normal use-case when somebody is trying to port their Lucene
code to Solr?
I mean, is it like a XY problem where I should not even run into this
problem in the first place?
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 9:40 AM
abble.com/Lucene-Query-to-Solr-query-td493751.html
>
>
> As suggested in that thread, I do not want to use toString method for
> Lucene query to pass it to the q param in SolrQuery.
>
> I am looking for a function that accepts org.apache.lucene.search.Query and
> returns org.apac
I think this question here in this thread is similar to my question.
https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-Query-to-Solr-query-td493751.html
As suggested in that thread, I do not want to use toString method for
Lucene query to pass it to the q param in SolrQuery.
I am looking
607211 (topics:146)^0.008187325
> -asset_id:doc:en:index.html
>
> But, it does not work if I use it as a solr query with lucene as defType.
>
> For it to work, I need to convert it like following:
> q=+((topics:132)^0.02607211 (topics:146)^0.008187325
> +(-(asset_id:doc\:en\:index.html
Hi,
I have following query which works fine as a lucene query:
+(topics:132)^0.02607211 (topics:146)^0.008187325
-asset_id:doc:en:index.html
But, it does not work if I use it as a solr query with lucene as defType.
For it to work, I need to convert it like following:
q=+((topics:132)^0.02607211
Well, in a way, QTime can depend on the total number of terms existing in
the core.
It would have been better if you had posted sample query and analysis
chain.
On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 11:45, Anshuman Singh
wrote:
> Suppose I have two phone numbers P1 and P2 and the number of records with
> P1
Suppose I have two phone numbers P1 and P2 and the number of records with
P1 are X and with P2 are 2X (2 times X) respectively. If I query for R rows
for P1 and P2, the QTime in case of P2 is more. I am not specifying any
sort parameter and the number of rows I'm asking for is same in both the
ltAccess:(true) AND -blockedUsers:(1) AND -blockedRoles:(
> 6440215 6368478) OR (isLatestRevPrivate:(true) AND
> allowedUsersForPvtRev:(1) AND -folderadmin_list:(1))) AND
> (doc_ref:((*KON\-N2*) )) AND (title:((*cdrl*) ))
>
> Is it possible? How does Solr execute th
))) AND (doc_ref:((*KON\-N2*) )) AND
(title:((*cdrl*) ))
Is it possible? How does Solr execute this query? field sequence is matter for
performance?
I want to know the step by step Solr query execution same like database query
because I will arrange field for better performance.
Regards,
Vishal
Sent from
/bf9db95f218f49bac8e7971eb953a9fd9d13a2f0#diff-269ae02e56283ced3ce781cce21b3147R563
sincerely
hongtai
送信元: "Staley, Phil R - DCF"
Reply-To: "d...@lucene.apache.org"
日付: 2020年3月2日 月曜日 22:38
宛先: solr_user lucene_apache ,
"d...@lucene.apache.org"
件名: Re: strange behavior of solr query parser
Hello, Community:
I have a question about interpreting a parsed query from Debug Query.
I used Solr 8.4.1 and LuceneQueryParser.
I was learning the behavior of ManagedSynonymFilter because I was curious
about how "ManagedSynonymGraphFilter" fails to generate a graph.
So, I try to interpret the
lucene_apache
Cc: d...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: strange behavior of solr query parser
Hi,
Our team found a strange behavior of solr query parser.
In some specific cases, some conditional clauses on unindexed field will be
ignored.
for query like, q=A:1 OR B:1 OR A:2 OR B:2
if field B
Hi,
Our team found a strange behavior of solr query parser.
In some specific cases, some conditional clauses on unindexed field will be
ignored.
for query like, q=A:1 OR B:1 OR A:2 OR B:2
if field B is not indexed(but docValues="true"), "B:1" will be lost.
but if you wri
Hi all,
I am working in Chinese App. I am suffering a question of whether a PhraseQuery
involved StartOffset and EndOffset of a term on SOLR.
For instance:
Text: ??
Indexing: ??|??||||??||??
position: 1 | 2| 3 | 4|
4 | 5 | 5 | 5
querying:
cs:29)^2 (topics:38)^3 +(-id:41135)
>>
>> It works fine when I am using it as a lucene query in
>> SolrIndexSearcher.getDocList function.
>>
>> However, now I want to use it as a Solr query and query against a
>> collection. I tried to use the as-is representation from Lucene query
>> object's toString method but it does not work. How should I proceed?
>>
>
tring represenation of Lucene's
> Query object):
>
> +(topics:29)^2 (topics:38)^3 +(-id:41135)
>
> It works fine when I am using it as a lucene query in
> SolrIndexSearcher.getDocList function.
>
> However, now I want to use it as a Solr query and query against a
> collection
Hi,
I have a Lucene query as following (toString represenation of Lucene's
Query object):
+(topics:29)^2 (topics:38)^3 +(-id:41135)
It works fine when I am using it as a lucene query in
SolrIndexSearcher.getDocList function.
However, now I want to use it as a Solr query and query against
Hi All,
Do we have any library which can convert Odata filter to Solr Query
EX : $filter=Address eq 'Redmond' to ?q=Address:Redmond
Any suggestions will help.
Thanks
Sambasiva
Multiple replicas of the same shard will execute their autocommits at
different wall clock times.
Thus there may be a _temporary_ time when newly-indexed document is
found by a query that
happens to get served by replica1 but not by replica2. If you have a
timestamp in the doc, and
a soft commit
Hi all,
There is something "strange' happening in our Solr cluster. If I execute a
query from the server, via solarium client, I get one result. If I execute
the same or similar query from admin Panel, I get another result. If I go
to Admin Panel - Collections - Select Collection and click
Hello.
_text_=kids is not a query syntax Solr supports. Last time I've looked
into, mixing doc blocks and childfree docs is not supported. Anyway,
debugQuery=true usually helps to understand puzzling results.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:19 AM craftlogan wrote:
> So in Solr I have a data
So in Solr I have a data structure that is made of of Restaurant Documents
that have Deals attached as _childDocuments to a Restaurant. However with my
current query
{!parent which='content_type:restaurant'}_text_=kids
=*,[child parentFilter=content_type:restaurant
childFilter="content_type:deal
If you’re literally including the quotes, i.e. q=“one two”, then you’re doing
phrase searches which are more complex and will take longer. q=field:one AND
field:two is a straight boolean query. Also, what query parser are you using?
If it’s edismax, then you’re searching across multiple fields.
Hi,
when I run "q=one" the Qtime is around 200ms however when I run 2 or 3 words
the run time exponentially increases eg: "q=two words" or "q=apple orange
berry" resulting in 3s to 10s.
I have indexed around 10 milion document with each document containing around
100 words. I am using that
Hello Experts,
I have a following query
product:TV or os:Android or size:(55 60 65) or brand:samsung or issmart:yes
or ram:[4 TO *] or rate:[10 TO *] or bezel : no or sound:dolby
In Total there are 9 conditions.
Now I need the document with best match should return top. Best match I mean
and get the
> results from solr and display them on PCAT.
>
> But as per new requirement , we need to invoke third party service to fetch
> the personalized products and send them to Solr get the results. that is
> the reason i was tying to send those products in solr query.
>
products and send them to Solr get the results. that is
the reason i was tying to send those products in solr query.
@Eric : we are using Solr 7.2.1 version. I will check on solr cache.
Thanks,
Venkat.
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:53 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> What version of Solr? Recent versi
What version of Solr? Recent versions automatically use terms query parser
for large, simple or clauses. Do look into using it anyway. And I'd set
cache=false because I doubt you'll ever get a cache hit...
On Thu, May 30, 2019, 16:21 Venkateswarlu Bommineni
wrote:
> Hello Team,
>
> I have got a
Venkat,
There is another way to do this. If you have a category of "thing" you are
attempting to filter over, then you create a query and tag the documents
with this category. So, create a 'categories' field and append 'thing' to
the field updating the field if need be. (Be wary of over
On 5/30/2019 4:13 PM, Venkateswarlu Bommineni wrote:
Thank you guys for quick response.
I was able to query solr by sending 1500 products using solrJ with http
post method.
But I had to change maxBooleanClauses to 4096 from default 1024.
But I wanted to check with you guys that, will there be
Thank you guys for quick response.
I was able to query solr by sending 1500 products using solrJ with http
post method.
But I had to change maxBooleanClauses to 4096 from default 1024.
But I wanted to check with you guys that, will there be any performance
issues by changing maxBooleanClauses
On 5/30/2019 2:20 PM, Venkateswarlu Bommineni wrote:
I have got a requirement to send many strings (~1500) in the filter query
param to the solr.
Can you please provide any suggestions/precautions we need to take care in
this particular scenario.
You'll probably want to send that as a POST,
You can use POST instead of GET.
But you may also want to see if you can refactor those 1500 strings somehow.
If you don't use it already, maybe Terms query parser could be useful:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_7/other-parsers.html#terms-query-parser
Also, if at least some of those
Hello Team,
I have got a requirement to send many strings (~1500) in the filter query
param to the solr.
Can you please provide any suggestions/precautions we need to take care in
this particular scenario.
Thanks,
Venkat.
On 5/13/2019 2:51 AM, vishal patel wrote:
Executing an identical query again will likely satisfy the query from Solr's
caches. Solr won't need to talk to the actual index, and it will be REALLY
fast. Even a massively complex query, if it is cached, will be fast.
All caches are disabled in
Oh, and you can freely set docValues=true _and_ have indexed=true on the same
field, Solr will use the right structure for the operations it needs. HOWEVER:
if you change that definition you _must_ re-index the entire collection.
> On May 13, 2019, at 1:22 AM, Bernd Fehling
> wrote:
>
> Your
That indicates you’re hitting the queryResultCache, which is also supported by
your statement about how fast queries are returned after they’re run once. Look
at admin UI>>select core>>stats/plugins>>cache>>queryResultCache and you’ll
probably see a very hit ratio, approaching 1.
You also have
cet?
If I do not do a separate field then any performance issue when the same field
will search in a query?
Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
From: Bernd Fehling
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2019 11:52 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr qu
hema file because of our indexing and
searching ratio is high in our live environment.
Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
From: Shawn Heisey
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 9:32 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr query takes a too mu
Your "sort" parameter has "sort=id+desc,id+desc".
1. It doesn't make sense to have a sort on "id" in descending order twice.
2. Be aware that the id field has the highest cadinality.
3. To speedup sorting have a separate field with docValues=true for sorting.
E.g.
Regards
Bernd
Am
On 5/10/2019 7:32 AM, vishal patel wrote:
We have 2 shards and 2 replicas in Live environment. we have multiple
collections.
Some times some query takes much time(QTime=52552). There are so many
documents indexing and searching within milliseconds.
There could be any number of causes of
first inclination is your index is cold.
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 9:32 AM vishal patel
wrote:
> We have 2 shards and 2 replicas in Live environment. we have multiple
> collections.
> Some times some query takes much time(QTime=52552). There are so many
> documents indexing and searching within
We have 2 shards and 2 replicas in Live environment. we have multiple
collections.
Some times some query takes much time(QTime=52552). There are so many
documents indexing and searching within milliseconds.
When we executed the same query again using admin panel, it does not take a
much time
Thanks Saurabh And Prince, Works perfectly.
On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 at 17:21, Prince Manohar
wrote:
> Basically, you need to boost some documents low.
>
> For this, you can either use solr’s Boost Query ( bq ) or Boost Function
> (bf)
> parameter.
>
> For example in your case:-
>
> If you want the
Basically, you need to boost some documents low.
For this, you can either use solr’s Boost Query ( bq ) or Boost Function (bf)
parameter.
For example in your case:-
If you want the documents with countries A and B to show last in the
result, you can use:-
bq=( country:A OR country:B )^-1
Note
fq=country :c1 OR c2 OR c3=if(termfreq (country,c2),0,1) desc
Correcting query.
On Sun 14 Apr, 2019, 3:36 PM Saurabh Sharma,
wrote:
> I would suggest to sort on the basis of condition. First find all the
> records and then sort on the basis of condition where you will be putting
> spcific
I would suggest to sort on the basis of condition. First find all the
records and then sort on the basis of condition where you will be putting
spcific countries below other.
fq=country :c1 OR c2 OR c3=if(termfreq (country,c2),1,0) desc
Here we are putting c2 below c1 and c3.
You can also try
I have a field *country*. I need to do a search in which I need to show the
search result of a country or some countries, last in the search result for
eg. country code *BD*. What query should I use to get the above result.
fq=country:???=*%3A*
On 3/22/2019 7:52 AM, Rajdeep Sahoo wrote:
My solr query sometime taking more than 60 sec to return the response .
Is there any way I can check why it is taking so much time .
Please let me know if there is any way to analyse this issue(high
response time ) .Thanks
With the information
Hi all,
My solr query sometime taking more than 60 sec to return the response .
Is there any way I can check why it is taking so much time .
Please let me know if there is any way to analyse this issue(high
response time ) .Thanks
Hi Shilpa,
I am assuming you know the functionality of synonym.
Synonym in Solr can be applied over the tokens getting indexed/queried for
the field. In order to apply synonym to a field you need to update the
configuration file schema.xml where you also define a file (synonym.txt is
default,
Hello,
can you ask me how we use synonyms with apache solr.
Thanks & Regards,
Shilpa solanki
wrote:
> Hello,
> We have a Solr query that runs much slower in Production Solr cluster
> compared with lower environments.(Yes they may not be apples to apples
> comparison but it's really slow in prod as HDFS gets pounded)
> What are the general ways to track/trouble shoot slowne
Hello,
We have a Solr query that runs much slower in Production Solr cluster
compared with lower environments.(Yes they may not be apples to apples
comparison but it's really slow in prod as HDFS gets pounded)
What are the general ways to track/trouble shoot slowness in the query. Is
there any
I find myself doing exactly the same, so such a tool would be wonderful.
I sometimes use the Solr Query Debugger
<https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/solr-query-debugger/gmpkeiamnmccifccnbfljffkcnacmmdl>
Chrome plugin but that does not help with decoding the q parameter, only to
lucene.apache.org
Ämne: Re: SV: Tool to format the solr query for easier reading?
Hi Jimi,
I recalled that the Chrome plugin would do this, obviously it's not a perfect
solution for you as you've prefer a Java formatter but it's a start - have you
tried this one?
Best
Charlie
>
> /J
On 08/01/2019 09:20, Hullegård, Jimi wrote:
Hi Charlie,
Care to elaborate on that a little? I can't seem to find any tool in that blog
entry that formats a given solr query. What tool did you have in mind?
Hi Jimi,
I recalled that the Chrome plugin would do this, obviously it's
On 08/01/2019 09:20, Hullegård, Jimi wrote:
Hi Charlie,
Care to elaborate on that a little? I can't seem to find any tool in that blog
entry that formats a given solr query. What tool did you have in mind?
This also does some basic URL splitting:
https://www.freeformatter.com/url-parser
Hi Charlie,
Care to elaborate on that a little? I can't seem to find any tool in that blog
entry that formats a given solr query. What tool did you have in mind?
/Jimi
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Charlie Hull
Skickat: den 8 januari 2019 15:55
Till: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Ämne
On 08/01/2019 04:33, Hullegård, Jimi wrote:
Hi,
Hi Jimi,
There are some suggestions in part 4 of my recent blog:
http://www.flax.co.uk/blog/2018/11/15/defining-relevance-engineering-part-4-tools/
Cheers
Charlie
I often find myself having to analyze an already existing solr query
Hi,
I often find myself having to analyze an already existing solr query. But when
the number of clauses and/or number of nested parentheses reach a certain level
I can no longer grasp what the query is about by just a quick glance. Sometimes
I can look at the code generating the query
, Nov 20, 2018, 00:35 Chris Ulicny Rajdeep,
>
> Not an external tool, but there is the option of using the "debug"
> parameter in the Solr query that can be used at least as a starting point
> for looking at the query timing.
>
>
> https://lucene.apache.
Rajdeep,
Not an external tool, but there is the option of using the "debug"
parameter in the Solr query that can be used at least as a starting point
for looking at the query timing.
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/common-query-parameters.html#CommonQueryParameters-Thedebu
Hi all,
Please suggest, how can I analyze the time taken by a solr query?
Is there any tool for analyzing the query response time.I f there is any
way to do this please suggest.
Alexandre's response is probably a better solution, assuming that the
field in question isn't complex, for instance:
http://localhost:8983/solr/techproducts/query?q={!term f=id}AND
Be aware that this requires that the value for the field (AND in this
case) be exactly as it appears in the index as
As Erick said, you need to be looking into Query Parsers. There are
many, depending on what search you are actually allowing your users to
do. You probably know lucene/default, dismax and edismax, but there
are many more: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_4/other-parsers.html
For example, you
This is a query _parsing_ issue, way before a tokenizer ever gets to
it. The problem of course is that AND is an operator in the query
language, so your problem is how to distinguish it from the value of a
field.
You can always quote the input for id, as in id:"AND" which you could
do for
One of the ID attribute which we are using to query is AND so our looks like
http://localhost:8983/solr//select?fq=id:AND=json
This throws below mentioned exception
error: { metadata: [ "error-class", "org.apache.solr.common.SolrException",
"root-error-class",
ove to Solr Query partially using pivot facet.
But how do I have the having clause implemented in my Solr Query. Without
having clause in place the number of records is too large and so the
pivoting on A is returning a very large result. In addition the number of
distinct value for A is also very h
Hi Guys,
I am new to the Solr world and I am using Solr 5.4.1. I have a question and
hope to find answer to the same.
Consider a SQL query as:
select A, sum(B), sum(C)
from Col1
where D = ‘Test’
group by A
having sum(B) > 20
order by A
limit 100
I am able to translate the above to Solr Qu
ove to Solr Query partially using pivot facet.
But how do I have the having clause implemented in my Solr Query. Without
having clause in place the number of records is too large and so the
pivoting on A is returning a very large result. In addition the number of
distinct value for A is also very h
Hey,
digging the web for a while now to find a solution due to a complex search
string.
what i've got:
xml file with a date/description fields which are not part of the index:
(start-date-time="2018-04-01T18:00:00.000+02:00" code-name="MD 28")
(start-date-time="2018-04-07T15:00:00.000+02:00"
t;>> Hi Emir,
>>>
>>> If using OR-ed conditions for different years then the query will be very
>>> long if I got 100 years and I think this is not practical.
>>> You have any other idea?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Albert
>>>
birthdate_year, birthdate_month,
> birthdate_day.
> Is this practical adding so much additional fields?
>
> Albert
> From: Stefan Matheis
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 3:05 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: solr query
>
> > You have any other idea?
>
&
: Stefan Matheis
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 3:05 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: solr query
> You have any other idea?
Yes, we go back to start and discuss again why you're not adding a separate
field for that. It's the simplest thing possible and avoids all those
workarou
M
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: solr query
>
> I think you have inadvertently "corrected" the intentional exclusive end on
> my range... [NOW/MONTH TO NOW/MONTH+1MONTH}
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Emir Arnautović <
> emir.arnauto...@sem
Hi Emir,
If using OR-ed conditions for different years then the query will be very long
if I got 100 years and I think this is not practical.
You have any other idea?
Regards,
Albert
From: Gus Heck
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 12:43 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: solr query
ng Support Training - http://sematext.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 14 Mar 2018, at 10:53, Albert Lee <albertlee8...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I don’t want to add separate fields since I have many da
- Alerting - Anomaly Detection
> >> Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 14 Mar 2018, at 10:53, Albert Lee <albertlee8...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I
sematext.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 14 Mar 2018, at 10:53, Albert Lee <albertlee8...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I don’t want to add separate fields since I have many dates to index.
>> How to index it as timestamp and do function query, any ex
> >
> > From: Emir Arnautović
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 5:38 PM
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: solr query
> >
> > Hi Albert,
> > The simplest solution is to index month/year as separate fields.
> Alternative is t
r Arnautović
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 5:38 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: solr query
>
> Hi Albert,
> The simplest solution is to index month/year as separate fields. Alternative
> is to index it as timestamp and do function query to do some m
1 - 100 of 780 matches
Mail list logo
