On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:58:36 -0700
Amit Nithian wrote:
> i recommend JMeter. We use that to do load testing on a search
> server.
[...]
JMeter is certainly good, but we have also found Apache bench
to also be of much use. Maybe it is just us, and what we are
familiar with, but Apache bench seeme
reful though.. as silly as this may sound.. do NOT just issue random
queries because that won't exercise your caches... We had a load test that
killed our servers because our caches kept getting blown out. Of course the
traffic being generated was purely random was not representative of
We're currently building a Solr index with ober 1.2 million documents. I
want to do a good stress test of it. Does anyone know if ther's a
appropriate stress test tool for Solr? Or any good suggestion?
Best Regards,
Scott
From: Tomas
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Mon, August 2, 2010 8:33:46 AM
Subject: Stress Test Solr
Hi All, we've been building an open source tool for load tests on Solr
Installations. Thetool is called SolrMeter. It's on google code
at http://code.google.com/p/solrmeter
Very interersting. Could you add some information and link to the relevant wiki
page [1] ?
[1]: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/BenchmarkingSolr
-Original message-
From: Tomas
Sent: Mon 02-08-2010 17:34
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org;
Subject: Stress Test Solr
Hi All, we've
gure the number of updates/inserts in a time period.
* Configure commits frequency during adds
* Monitor error counts when adding and commiting documents.
* Perform and monitor index optimization
* Monitor query times online and visually
* Add filter querie
and iostat. Recently
> http://www.newrelic.com/solr.html has been released
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-test-solr-s-performance-tp881928p885025.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
I normally use jmeter, jconsole and iostat. Recently
http://www.newrelic.com/solr.html has been released
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-test-solr-s-performance-tp881928p885025.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
are there any built-in tools for performance test? thanks
Hi,
Users pls ignore this mail. I am just sending a test mail to check whether
my user id is okay.
The mails I am sending to this group is bouncing from yesterday.Pls excuse
me for any inconvenience.
Thanks and Rgds,
Mark
I like to use JMeter with a large queries file. This way you can measure
response times with lots of requests at the same time. Having JConsole
opened at the same time you can check the memory status
James liu-2 wrote:
>
> before stressing test, Should i close SolrCache?
>
> whic
before stressing test, Should i close SolrCache?
which tool u use?
How to do stress test correctly?
Any pointers?
--
regards
j.L ( I live in Shanghai, China)
test
elhojda
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello. I'm trying to do some speed tests on the SOLR server (Average
>> Response
>> Time, etc). I tried all kinds of tool and software but I didn't manage
>> because at one point some errors appeared. The "*:*" qu
uot; query works just
> fine,
> but when I try to test another query the tool complains that the link(URL)
> can't be accessed, isn't valid, stuff like that.
>
> Eg. of tested links:
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*%3A* -works just fine (query="*:*")
&g
Hello. I'm trying to do some speed tests on the SOLR server (Average Response
Time, etc). I tried all kinds of tool and software but I didn't manage
because at one point some errors appeared. The "*:*" query works just fine,
but when I try to test another query the tool com
ml format?
>
> --
> --
> - Mark
>
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Reuben Firmin
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm setting up an embedded solr server from a unit test (the non-bolded
> > lines are just moving t
likely your
trying to use a regular solrconfig.xml format?
--
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Reuben Firmin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm setting up an embedded solr server from a unit test (the non-bolded
> lines are just moving test r
Hi,
I'm setting up an embedded solr server from a unit test (the non-bolded
lines are just moving test resources to a tmp directory which is acting as
solor.home.)
final File dir = FileUtils.createTmpSubdir();
*System.setProperty("solr.solr.home", dir.
Sorry about that - wrong list. Auto complete foiled me again.
- Mark
I'm on the latest Ubuntu and since last week the clustering tests have
been failing for me. Not sure why.
[junit] Running org.apache.solr.handler.clustering.ClusteringComponentTest
[junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0 sec
[junit]
Thanks, you are correct.
_
From: Andrey Klochkov [mailto:akloch...@griddynamics.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 8:00 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; cra...@ceiindia.com
Subject: Re: Search in all the fields q=(*:test)
I suppose that when you use "*" as field
2009 at 5:46 PM, Radha C. wrote:
> Hello List,
>
>
>
> I need to search a value in all the fields. I am using q=(*:test) . But it
> retrives zero results.
>
> Can anyone tell me the above syntax is correct or not?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
--
Andrew Klochkov
Hello List,
I need to search a value in all the fields. I am using q=(*:test) . But it
retrives zero results.
Can anyone tell me the above syntax is correct or not?
Thanks in advance.
Yes, look at AbstractSolrTestCase which is the base class of almost all Solr
tests.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/AbstractSolrTestCase.java
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Eric Pugh
wrote:
> Look into the test code that Solr uses, there i
Look into the test code that Solr uses, there is a lot of good stuff
on how to do testing. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/src/test/
.
Eric
On Apr 27, 2009, at 6:25 AM, tarjei wrote:
Hi, I'm looking for ways to test that my indexing methods work
correctly with my
Hi, I'm looking for ways to test that my indexing methods work correctly
with my Solr schema.
Therefore I'm wondering if someone has created a test setup where they
start a Solr instance and then add some documents to the instance - as a
Junit/testng test - preferably with a wor
Sorry, I am having trouble sending a message to this Distribution list. This
is a test.
So in the "building block" story you talked about, that sounds like an
integration (functional? user acceptance?) test.. And I would treat
Solr the same way you treat your database that you are storing model
objects in.
If in your tests you bring up a fresh version of the db
Joe,
Have a look at Solr's own unit test, I believe they have pieces of what you
need - the ability to start a Solr instance, index docs, run a query, and test
if the results contain what you expect to see in them. You can get to Solr's
unit test by checking out Solr from
Thanks for the tips, I like the suggestion of testing the document and query
generation without having solr involved. That seems like a more bite-sized
unit; I think I'll do that.
However, here's the test case that I'm considering where I'd like to have a
live solr
So my first thought is that "unit test + solr integration" is an
oxymoron. In the sense that unit test implies the smallest functional
unit, and solr integration implies multiple units working together.
It sounds like you have two different tasks. the code that generate
queie
Hello,
On our project, we have quite a bit of code used to generate Solr queries, and
I need to create some unit tests to ensure that these continue to work. In
addition, I need to generate some unit tests that will test indexing and
retrieval of certain documents, based on our current schema
ed"). I've added a portion of the sample docs
>> > [a-n]*.xml to the local host solr server, and added the other portion,
>> > [m-z]*.xml sample docs to host fred.
>> >
>> > Assuming that I have setup things correctly, I would expect to receive a
>>
rectly, I would expect to receive a
> see
> > non zero length SolrDocumentList for any distributed search that matches
> > syntax in the example docs.
> >
> > Specifically when I test the contents of each server separately ( using
> the
> > include
> > hosts (localhost and "fred"). I've added a portion of the sample docs
> > [a-n]*.xml to the local host solr server, and added the other portion,
> > [m-z]*.xml sample docs to host fred.
> >
> > Assuming that I have setup things correctly, I would ex
I have setup things correctly, I would expect to receive a see
> non zero length SolrDocumentList for any distributed search that matches
> syntax in the example docs.
>
> Specifically when I test the contents of each server separately ( using the
> included TestCase ) the tests p
see
non zero length SolrDocumentList for any distributed search that matches
syntax in the example docs.
Specifically when I test the contents of each server separately ( using the
included TestCase ) the tests pass. This confirms that each server has
different documents. However when I do the distributed
What error are you getting exactly?
Do you only get the error running from eclipse, or do you also get it
running from ant?
The TestHarness class is used in almost all the tests, so 'yes', it is
ues with solr 1.2.
ryan
Lance Norskog wrote:
Hi-
Is anybody using the unit test
Hi-
Is anybody using the unit test assistant class TestHarness in Solr 1.2? I'm
trying to use it in Eclipse and found a few problems with classloading.
These might be a quirk of using it with Eclipse. I also found a bug in the
commit() function where '(Object)' should be '(O
17 sep 2007 kl. 12.06 skrev David Welton:
I'm in the process of evaluating solr and sphinx, and have come to
realize that actually having a large data set to run them against
would be handy. However, I'm pretty new to both systems, so thought
that perhaps asking around my produce something us
If you want to see what performance will be like on the next release,
you could try upgrading Solr's internal version of lucene to trunk
(current dev version)... there have been some fantastic improvements
in indexing speed.
For query speed/throughput, Solr 1.2 or trunk should do fine.
-Yonik
On
Hi Yonik.
Do you have any performance statistics about those changes?
Is it possible to upgrade to this new Lucene version using the Solr 1.2
stable version?
Regards,
Daniel
On 17/9/07 17:37, "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want to see what performance will be like on the ne
You might be interested in the Lucene Java contrib/Benchmark task,
which provides an indexing implementation of a download of Wikipedia
(available at http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/wikipedia/)
It is pretty trivial to convert the indexing code to send add
commands to Solr.
HTH,
Grant
Hi,
I'm in the process of evaluating solr and sphinx, and have come to
realize that actually having a large data set to run them against
would be handy. However, I'm pretty new to both systems, so thought
that perhaps asking around my produce something useful.
What *I* mean by largish is somethi
i fix it by myself.
my analyzer base on two dll and one jar file.
jar file maybe complied by old java version.
i use java1.6 to recompile it.
Thk everybody who noticed my question and thk Chris...You are good people.
Tomcat start error。
Does solr support java 1.6?
Test under winxp, tomcat 6.0, java 1.6
My test jsp code :
<%@ page import="org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardAnalyzer" %>
<%
StandardAnalyzer a = new StandardAnalyzer();
TokenStream t = a.tokenStream("f&
: Subject: Anyone know How to test CustomerAnalyzer with jsp?
:
: I don't know how to test,,Maybe someone can tell me.
how about something like...
<%
Analyzer a = new CustomerAnalyzer();
TokenStream t = a.tokenStream("f", new StringReader("test"));
%>
<%= t.next().toString() %>
-Hoss
I don't know how to test,,Maybe someone can tell me.
Thks Chris Advice.
--
regards
jl
I have created a bug to track this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-63
I will attach a patch to the bug shortly.
Bill
On 11/1/06, Yu-Hui Jin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yap, Bill.
The backslash-escaping one works for my zsh as well. And I'm sure you
checked it's working for othe
Yap, Bill.
The backslash-escaping one works for my zsh as well. And I'm sure you
checked it's working for other major shells.
So I would say backslash seems to be a good solution since you don't have to
worry about double-single quotes.
Thanks!
regards,
-Hui
On 11/1/06, Bill Au <[EMAIL P
I did some testing and blackslash-escaping also works:
find /home/yjin/apps/solr-nightly/example/solr/data/ -name snapshot.\*
-print
Hui, can you verify that?
I am already using single quote in the snappuller script to specify the find
command
to as an argument to ssh. I could change that to d
On 10/31/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bill: what do you think about explicitly putting in the single quotes as
Hui suggested? that should still work under bash and sh right?
That should work in bash, at least. Backslash-escaping is also an option.
The semantics of file glo
: I also found this:
: http://www.zsh.org/mla/users/2005/msg00295.html
:
: Obviously that won't work for bash or ksh.
interesting ... i allways assumed it worked because the shell wasn't
evaluating the * when executed by ssh, i had no idea the the shell tries
to expand it and leaves it alone if t
It is definitely zsh related. I got the same error when I run the find
command under zsh, but not with bash or ksh.
I also found this:
http://www.zsh.org/mla/users/2005/msg00295.html
Obviously that won't work for bash or ksh.
Bill
On 10/31/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: F
I found that if I add single quotes to the pattern as below, it worked on
the command line of my zsh env, so I'll try add the quotes in the snappuller
script and test it again.
find /home/yjin/apps/solr-nightly/example/solr/data/ -name 'snapshot.*'
-print
/home/yjin/apps/solr-
: For #2, I think I just need to setup the passwordless SSH with empty
: passphase. right?
correct.
: I tried to run the find command
: find /home/yjin/apps/solr-nightly/example/solr/data/ -name snapshot.* -print
:
: directly on my box and it gave the same result:
: zsh: no matches found: snapsho
It looks like find running under zsh is the problem. In this case it does
like the wildcard (*).
I don't really know zsh so I will have to spend some time to investigate.
Bill
On 10/30/06, Yu-Hui Jin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Hoss,
Thanks for the reply!
For #2, I think I just need to s
Hi, Hoss,
Thanks for the reply!
For #2, I think I just need to setup the passwordless SSH with empty
passphase. right?
For #1:
I'm using the following Enterprise version:
Linux version 2.4.21-37a6 (gcc version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux
3.2.3-47))
I tried to run the find command
find /hom
: Here's a problem I got. It says there's no match for snapshot.* found on the
: master box. This is wrong, there's one such file exists.
:
: - I then ran snappuller specifically on the snap file that's on the master:
: ./bin/snappuller -n snapshot.20061023172655
:
: This time it worked. and ru
Hi, solr folks,
I followed the tutorial and everything worked well.
I then read the collection and distribtution twiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CollectionDistribution and tried to test
replication using the scripts.
What I did are the following:
- downloaded solr-nightly binary to two
s). but
> in order to do this I need a lucene db to test against.
>
> does any one know of a publicly available production size database
> which I can use? otherwise I will generate something off dmoz or
> randomly.
Nothing I know of...
A large realistic example for benchmarking would be nice though.
-Yonik
Hi.
I'd like to do a benchmark on how SolR performs on the new Sun T2000
hardware (compared to a x86-64) machine (why? I'm trying to get the
HW for free ) check out http://sunfirefan.com for more details). but
in order to do this I need a lucene db to test against.
does any one
201 - 263 of 263 matches
Mail list logo
