Can anyone help me?
Rishabh
rishabh9 wrote:
Hi,
I am evaluating Solr 1.2 for my project and wanted to know if it can
return near duplicate documents (near dups) and how do i go about it? I am
not sure, but is MoreLikeThisHandler the implementation for near dups?
Rishabh
--
On Nov 18, 2007 1:50 AM, Dave C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe you can help me with this related problem I am having.
My query is: q=description:(test)!(type:10)!(type:14).
However, my results are not as expected (55 results instead of the expected
23)
The response header shows:
On Nov 18, 2007 10:50 AM, Eswar K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a scenario, where we want to find out documents which are similar in
content. To elaborate a little more on what we mean here, lets take an
example.
The example of this email chain in which we are interacting on, can be best
We have a scenario, where we want to find out documents which are similar in
content. To elaborate a little more on what we mean here, lets take an
example.
The example of this email chain in which we are interacting on, can be best
used for illustrating the concept of near dupes (We are not
Is there any idea implementing that feature in the up coming releases?
Regards,
Eswar
On Nov 18, 2007 9:35 PM, Stuart Sierra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 18, 2007 10:50 AM, Eswar K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a scenario, where we want to find out documents which are
similar in
Hi,
I understand that Solr can be used on different Linux flavors. Is there any
preferred flavor (Like Red Hat, Ubuntu, etc)?
Also what is the kind of configuration of hardware (Processors, RAM, etc) be
best suited for the install?
We expect to load it with millions of documents (varying from 2 -
Eswar K wrote:
We have a scenario, where we want to find out documents which are similar in
content. To elaborate a little more on what we mean here, lets take an
example.
The example of this email chain in which we are interacting on, can be best
used for illustrating the concept of near dupes
Hi All,
I am new to Lucene / SOLR and developing a POC as part of research. Check below
my requirement and problem statement. Need help on how I can index the data
such data I have a very good search functionality in my POC.
--
q=description:(test)!(type:10)!(type:14)
You can't use an '' symbol in your query (without escaping it). The boolean
operator for 'and' in Lucene is 'AND': and it is case sensitive. Your query
should probably look like:
q=description:test AND -type:10 AND -type:14
See the Lucene query
Thanks for your comments, Yonik!
All for it... depending on what one means by payload functionality of course.
We should probably hold off on adding a new lucene version to Solr
until the Payload API has stabilized (it will most likely be changing
very soon).
It sounds like Lucene 2.3 is
Hello-
Solrj has been out there for a while, but is not yet baked into an
official release. If there is anything major to change just so it feels
better, now is the time. Here are a few things I'm thinking about:
1. The setFields() behavior
Currently:
query.setFields( name,id );
I apologize for cross-posting but I believe both Solr and Lucene users
and developers should be concerned with this. I am not aware of a
better way to reach both communities.
In this email I'm looking for comments on:
* Do TokenFilters belong in the Solr code base at all?
* How to
On Nov 18, 2007 9:58 PM, Dave C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to the Lucene query syntax:
The symbol can be used in place of the word AND. So, I shouldn't have
to use 'AND'.
Yes, but before the query parser can even get the query string, the
servlet container parses query args and
okay thanks for the details
- David
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:14:23 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Query multiple fields
On Nov 18, 2007 9:58 PM, Dave C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to the Lucene query syntax:
The symbol can be
On 18-Nov-07, at 8:17 AM, Eswar K wrote:
Is there any idea implementing that feature in the up coming releases?
Not currently. Feel free to contribute something if you find a good
solution g.
-Mike
On Nov 18, 2007 9:35 PM, Stuart Sierra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 18, 2007 10:50
Kishore,
Solr has a SynonymFilterFactory which might be off use to you (
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#head-2c461ac74b4ddd82e453dc68fcfc92da77358d46)
Regards,
Eswar
On Nov 18, 2007 10:39 PM, Kishore AVK. Veleti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi All,
I am new to
The easiest solution I know is:
deletequeryid:1 OR id:2 OR .../query/delete
If you know that all of these ids can be found by issuing a query, you
can do delete by query:
deletequeryYOUR_DELETE_QUERY_HERE/query/delete
Cheers
On Nov 19, 2007 4:18 PM, Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Hello,
Does SOLR supports searching for a keyword which has a
combination of more than 1 language within the same search page?
-Original Message-
From: Guglielmo Celata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 7:39 PM
To:
Hello,
Also can we have something like this ? i.e having multiple
defaultSearchField entries in the schema.xml while searching for a keyword
which has a combination of more than 1 language:
defaultSearchFieldtext/defaultSearchField
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:53:17 +1100
climbingrose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The easiest solution I know is:
deletequeryid:1 OR id:2 OR .../query/delete
If you know that all of these ids can be found by issuing a query, you
can do delete by query:
deletequeryYOUR_DELETE_QUERY_HERE/query/delete
20 matches
Mail list logo
