This patch covers the issues I wrote about in my previous mails How to
get SolrSharp to work and How to get SolrSharp to work, part 2
By the way should I post on this thread, or on CodePlex. When the topic
is SolrSharp? I don't mind adding a few more comments to the
discussion I already started
Is there any interest/activity for SOLR to provide a restricted view of an
index, making only certain fields available/public, depending on the identity
of the requesting client? Certain information in our index is confidential
and should only be accessible to certain individuals/groups,
:
: I did try with the latest nightly build and followed the steps outlined in
: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckerRequestHandler
: with regards to creating new catchall field 'spell' of type 'spell' and
: copied my text fields to 'spell' at index time.
: Still q=grapics returns 'graphics'
Thanks. But i'm looking at this
http://.../spellchecker?indent=ononlyMorePopular=trueaccuracy=.6suggestionCount=20q=facial+salophosphoprotein
on
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/handler/SpellCheckerRequestHandler.html
It seems to return results (well in the example)
with and
: Is it possible to log incoming requests? I'd love to have the incoming IP
: and request string.
:
: What is the exact set of class names for this?
Solr tries to remain as agnostic as possible about this sort of thing ...
by which i mean log configuration in general, but also things like
: so when i do a debug this is the parsedquery_tostring i see:
: (((text:divorc^0.8 | name:divorc^2.0)~0.01 (text:mediat^0.8 |
: name:mediat^2.0)~0.01)~2) (text:(divorc altern) (disput mediat)
: resolut~5^0.8 | name:(divorc altern) (disput mediat) resolut~5^2.0)~0.01
FYI: it's very hard to make
: Hi, is it possible to have append like updates, where if two records of
there is an open Jira issue to deal with the notion of updating docs in
place, but i think the people who were working on it the most have put it
somewhat on hold to focus more on the MultiCore and distributed search
: Great, thanks Peter. And yes, I think it would be good to concentrate the
: conversation over on codeplex. I know the Solr team has no problem with
: solrsharp conversations here on the solr mailing list, but the conversation
: is highly focused on the server. Putting the solrsharp
I've been struggling with how to get various bits of structured data
into solr documents. In various projects I have tried various ideas,
but none feel great.
Take a simple example where I want a document field to be the list of
linked data with name, ID, and path. I have tried things like:
Is it possible to log incoming requests? I'd love to have the incoming IP
and request string.
What is the exact set of class names for this?
Thanks,
Lance Norskog
Yes, I'm fairly new as well.
So do you mean adding words to the query effectively doing an or
between synonymous terms? That sounds simple way of doing it, if this
works, what makes indexing with synonyms useful?
Ravish
On Jan 25, 2008 2:42 PM, Jon Lehto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ravish,
Hi Ravish,
You may want to think about the synonym dictionary as being a tool on the side,
rather than each indexed document having a copy of the synonyms. At indexing
time, one might normalize synonyms to a single value, and at query time do the
same to get the match.
Alternately, use the
Hi all,
Is there any interest/activity for SOLR to provide a restricted view of an
index, making only certain fields available/public, depending on the identity
of the requesting client ? Certain information in our index is confidential
and should only be accessible to certain
Ups. Forgot to tell that the patch was uploaded on CodePlex
http://www.codeplex.com/solrsharp/SourceControl/PatchList.aspx
\peter
-Original Message-
From: Peter Thygesen
Sent: 25. januar 2008 13:17
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Getting SolrSharp to work, Part 2
This
: i'm using Solr in a e-commerce site, and i wanted to use protected words
: also to reduce recall for certain queries.
I'm not sure i understand what you mwan. Why would protected words (in
regards to the stemmer) reduce recall ? ... i guess it depends on the
words you are protecting right
: I have an 'integer' static field in my schema. Some the index for this field
: is corrupted. When I search on this field it works. When I use this field to
: sort against, I get this exception. Does this mean that there is a string in
: one of my entries? It is possible the field was not
I'm trying to add documents using the SolrPhpClient (if there's a
specific mailinglist for it, please let me know and I'll ask there
instead).
I've searched the net for missing content stream, but found
nothing that makes sense.
I have now (finally) found the solution!
If I change the
Great, thanks Peter. And yes, I think it would be good to concentrate the
conversation over on codeplex. I know the Solr team has no problem with
solrsharp conversations here on the solr mailing list, but the conversation
is highly focused on the server. Putting the solrsharp conversation on
As I understood from available documentation, synonyms need to be
defined before starting the indexing process. Is it possible to add
synonyms at run time such that all index fields of all documents get
updated? Does it work for newly added documents atleast?
Also, how to make each user of
I followed your instructions exactly. But still have trouble with multiword
queries
for eg: q=grapics returns 'graphics'
but q=grapics card returns nothing.
I even tried with the latest nightly build but didn't solve the problem. Any
solution available.
scott.tabar wrote:
Matthew,
Thanks
Karen Loughran wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any interest/activity for SOLR to provide a restricted view of an
index, making only certain fields available/public, depending on the identity
of the requesting client ? Certain information in our index is confidential
and should only be accessible to
To me, it's really a question of where the work should be done given your
problem space. Injecting synonyms at index time allows the queries to be
simpler/faster. Injecting the synonyms at query time gets complex but is
more flexible.
As always, it's a time/space tradeoff. If you're willing to
Solr filters already provide a restricted review of results, so the
code that calls Solr can choose the appropriate handler for each
class of users. Make sure that end users cannot directly access the
Solr server, or at least not the search URL (/solr/select).
Building authentication and
Thanks for the info Ryan Walter,
We're looking into invariants and handler logic as you suggest,
Karen
On Friday 25 January 2008 15:55:09 Ryan McKinley wrote:
Karen Loughran wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any interest/activity for SOLR to provide a restricted view of
an index, making only
I see, thanks a lot for this, makes things clear now.
So just to make sure I understand this bit, by injecting synonyms at
query time you mean basically adding terms implicitly to keywords
behind the scenes before passing it to solr? Or is there are more
conventional method or interface that is
Here is what it means by injecting at query time:
This is the text field definition i have in my schema
fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/
filter
: For a few reasons (mainly field based security restrictions) I need to know
: which fields in my result documents matched the query
: e.g. I would like to have something like
: doc
: arr name=matching fields
: strfield1/...
there's really nothing like that now ... you can use the
27 matches
Mail list logo
