Hi,
try
http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=YOUR-QUERYfacet=truefacet.field=title
I don't think the bolean fields is mapped to on and off :)
-birger
-Original Message-
From: Ilya Sterin [mailto:ster...@gmail.com]
Sent: 24. mai 2010 23:11
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
Hi,
I am using the following solution:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Tagging_and_excluding_Filters
However when I implemented this on I found that I cannot combine different
filter types:
http://search.un-informed.org/search?q==t[23]=malariatm=anys=Search
The above request
I want to facet over a field group.
Since group is created by users, potentially there can be a huge number of
values for group.
- Would Solr be able to handle a use case like this? Or is Solr not really
appropriate for facet fields with a large number of values?
- I understand that I can set
It depends on what kind of load you are talking about and what your
expertise is.
NGINX does perform better than apache for most people, however less people
know about NGINX than apache. If you have more than 100K searchers a day
doing a few searches each, you will benefits from NGINX. If your
Hey,
I thought the Highlights would happen in the field of the documents
returned from SOLR J
But it gives new list of Highlighting at below, sorry for the confusion
I was wondering is there a way that the fields returned itself contains
bold characters
Eg : if searched for query
doc
Hi Birger,
Birger Lie wrote:
I don't think the bolean fields is mapped to on and off :)
You can use true and on interchangeably.
-Sascha
-birger
-Original Message-
From: Ilya Sterin [mailto:ster...@gmail.com]
Sent: 24. mai 2010 23:11
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
Hi Erick,
Erick Erickson wrote:
Are you sure you want to recompute the length when sorting?
It's the classic time/space tradeoff, but I'd suggest that when
your index is big enough to make taking up some more space
a problem, it's far too big to spend the cycles calculating each
term length for
Hi,
to accomplish that, use the highlighting parameters hl.simple.pre and
hl.simple.post.
By the way, there are a plenty of other parameters that affect
highlighting. Take a look at:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters
-Sascha
Doddamani, Prakash wrote:
Hey,
I thought the
Thanks Paul, I shall continue doing some more RD with your inputs.
Best Regards,
Kranti K K Parisa
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Paul Dhaliwal subp...@gmail.com wrote:
It depends on what kind of load you are talking about and what your
expertise is.
NGINX does perform better than
With the uninverted algorithm it will be very fast whatever is the number of
unique terms. But be careful with the memory because it uses quite a lot.
Using the oldest facet algorithm, if you have a lot of different terms it
will be slow.
--
View this message in context:
This looks like a case where the extended dismax parser is creating a
Lucene QueryParser parsed query rather than a disjunction maximum query.
A case of too much magic maybe? Looks like this one should be
parsed quite differently. Try dismax and see what you get, it'll be
quite
Since Solr 1.4 I think the uninverted method is on by default. Anyway, you
can choose wich to use with the method param:
facet.method=fc/enum (where fc is the uninverted one)
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
Is there any way to get all the fields (irrespective of whether
it contains a value or null) in solrDocument.
or
Is there any way to get all the fields in schema.xml of the url link (
http://localhost:8983/solr/core0/)??
Regards,
Raakhi
To reterive all documents, You need to use the query/filter *FieldName:*:**
Regards
Aditya
www.findbestopensource.com
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Rakhi Khatwani rkhatw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way to get all the fields (irrespective of whether
it contains a value
How many docs are in the batch you are pulling down? How many docs/second do
you expect on the index size? How big are the docs? What do you expect in
terms of queries per second? How fast do new documents need to be available on
the local server? How much analysis do you have to do?
To reterive all documents, You need to use the query/filter *FieldName:*:**
Regards
Aditya
www.findbestopensource.com
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Rakhi Khatwani rkhatw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way to get all the fields (irrespective of whether
it contains a value or
Resending it as there is a typo error.
To reterive all documents, You need to use the query/filter FieldName:*:* .
Regards
Aditya
www.findbestopensource.com
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 4:29 PM, findbestopensource
findbestopensou...@gmail.com wrote:
To reterive all documents, You need to use
Hi all,
I did some further investigation and (after turning of some filters in
yourkit) found that is was actually the machine sending the files to
solr that was slowing things down.
At first I couldn't find this as it turned out that yourkit hides
org.apache.* classes. When I removed this
Hi Aditya,
i can retrieve all documents. but cannot retrieve all the fields
in a document(if it does not hv any value).
For example i get a list of documents, some of the documents have some value
for title field, and others mite not contain a value for title field. in
anycase i need
If a field doesn't have a value, You will get NULL on retrieving it. How
could you expect a value for a field which is not provided?
You have two options, choose either one..
1. If the fieldvalue is returned NULL then display a proper error / user
defined message. Handle the error.
2. Add a
On 25.05.2010, at 08:55, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Now when I deselect one of the checkboxes I add an fq parameters:
Ah, I may have misunderstood, I somehow got it in my mind
you were talking about the length of each term (as in string length).
But if you're looking at the field length as the count of terms, that's
another question, sorry for the confusion...
I have to ask, though, why you want to sort this
Is the FacetComponent loaded at all?
requestHandler name=standard class=solr.SearchHandler default=true
arr name=components
strquery/str
strfacet/str
/arr
/requestHandler
On 2010-05-25, at 3:32 AM, Sascha Szott wrote:
Hi Birger,
Birger Lie wrote:
I don't think the bolean
I have a work!,
i musst indexing a lot of E-Mails, so i will create a Script to generate me
a xml of the Mails.
Now is the question, what happens when i creade a field body and in this
field comes a lot of or like this:
Confidentiality Caution: This message and all its included content and
Chris,
I am using SolrIndexSearcher to get a handle to the total number of records
in the index. I am doing it like this :
int num =
Integer.parseInt((String)solrSearcher.getStatistics().get(numDocs).toString());
Please let me know if there is a better way to do this.
Mark,
I can tell you what I
Hi,
please note, that the FacetComponent is one of the six search components
that are automatically associated with solr.SearchHandler (this holds
also for the QueryComponent).
Another note: By using name=components all default components will be
replaced by the components you explicitly
Well, you'll just have to create valid XML, either encoding some
characters or using CDATA sections.
Erik
On May 25, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Jörg Agatz wrote:
I have a work!,
i musst indexing a lot of E-Mails, so i will create a Script to
generate me
a xml of the Mails.
Now is the
ok, done..
But now i dosent find any word in the CDATA field.
i make :
field name=P_CONTENT_ITEMS_COMMENT![CDATA[
Hallo leute. mein name ist dein name und wir wollen eigentlich nur unsere
Ruhe haben.
bich du er sie es/b
Ha ha Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
]]/field
it is a string field Multivalued..
You have to provide more details than that. We need to know the field
definition for that named field, the corresponding field type
definition, and the exact request you're making to Solr that you think
should find this document.
And most importantly, did you commit/ :)
Erik
On
i create a new Index, but nothing Change.
field name=COMMENT type=string indexed=true stored=true
multiValued=true/
field name=COMMENT
![CDATA[
Hallo leute. mein name ist dein name und wir wollen eigentlich nur unsere
Ruhe haben.
bich du er sie es/b
Ha ha Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
]]/field
I
: Pretty much every one of my queries is going to be unique. However, the
: query is fairly complex and also contains both unique and non-unique
: data. In the query, some fields will be unique (e.g description), but
: other fields will be fairly common (e.g. category). If we could use
:
Any idea why this query returns 0 records:
sexual assault AND (-obama)
while this one returns 1400 ?
sexual assault AND -(obama)
Some debug info:
sexual assault AND (-obama), translates to: +text:sexual assault
+(-text:obama), returns 0 records
sexual assault AND -(obama), translates
The main issue is if you're using facets, which are currently
inefficient for the realtime use case because they're created on the
entire set of segment/readers. Field caches in Lucene are per segment
and so don't have this problem.
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Grant Ingersoll
: I'm running edismax (on both a 1.4 with patch and a branch_3x version) and
: I'm seeing something I don't expect.
...
: str name=rawquerystringdog cat -trilogy/str
: str name=querystringdog cat -trilogy/str
: str name=parsedqueryallfields:dog allfields:cat
: -allfields:trilogi/str
:
I would like to leverage on whatever SOLR provides to properly url-encode a
search string.
For example a user enters:
mr. bill oh no
The URL submitted by the admin page is:
Java provides one. You probably want to use utf-8 as the encoding scheme.
http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/net/URLEncoder.html
Note you also will want to strip or escape character that are meaningful
in the Solr/Lucene query syntax.
My documents are all quite small if not down right tiny, there is not much
analysis to do. I plan to mainly use Solr for indexing application
configuration data which there is a lot of and I have all pre-formated. Since
it is a music application there are many score templates, scale and rhythm
:Is there any way to get all the fields (irrespective of whether
: it contains a value or null) in solrDocument.
no. a document only has Field instances for the fields which it has
values for. it's also not a feature that would even be theoretically
posisbly to add, becuase of
Sascha thanks for the response, here is the output...
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
response
lst name=responseHeader
int name=status0/int
int name=QTime0/int
lst name=params
str name=wtxml/str
str name=qtitle:*/str
str name=fltitle/str
/lst
/lst
result
Ah, the issue was explicitly specifying components...
arr name=components
strquery/str
/arr
I don't remember changing this during default install, commenting this
out enabled faceted search component.
Thanks all for the help.
Ilya
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Sascha Szott sz...@zib.de
Thanks Sean, that was exactly what I need. One question though...
How to correctly retain the Solr specific characters.
I tried adding escape chars but URLEncoder doesn't seem to care about that:
Example:
String s1 = \mr. bill\ oh n?;
String s2 = \\\mr. bill\\\ oh n\\?;
String encoded1 =
Hoss,
I was able to successfully apply the path Solr-343 and even after applying
the patch, date facet minCount does not work. Appropriate part of response
are as given below:
[responseHeader] = object(SolrObject)#107 (3) {
[status] = int(0)
[QTime] = int(4)
[params] =
Chris,
Please ignore the repeated response header due to typo in the previous
message.
~Umesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Re-SOLR-343-date-facet-mincount-patch-tp789556p842863.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
This sounds like you have the same solrconfig for the slave and the
master? You should turn off autoCommit on the slave. Only the master
should autoCommit.
You should set up the ReplicationHandler. This moves index updates
from the indexer to the query server.
Is there a way to open a Solr index/core in read-only mode?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-read-only-core-tp843049p843049.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I'd guess there are two ways in doing this but i've never seen any
solrconfig.xml file having any directives that explicitly do not allow for
updates.
You'd either have a proxy in front that simply won't allow any other HTTP
method than GET and HEAD, or you could remove the update
The stats.jsp page walks the internal JMX beans. It prints out the
numbers of documents among other things. I would look at how that
works instead of writing your own thing for the internal APIs.
They may have changed from Solr 1.3 to 1.4 and will change further for
1.5 (4.0 is the new name?).
Change type=string to type=text. This causes the field to be
analyzed and then searching on words finds the document.
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Jörg Agatz joerg.ag...@googlemail.com wrote:
i create a new Index, but nothing Change.
field name=COMMENT type=string indexed=true
Hi all,
I have a suggestion for improving relevance functions in Solr by way of
providing access to a set of pre-defined constants in Solr queries.
Specifically, the number of documents indexed, the number of unique terms in
a field, the total number of terms in a field, etc. are some of the
: Subject: Debugging - DIH Delta Queries-
: References:
: 1659766275.5213.1274376509278.javamail.r...@vicenza.dmz.lexum.pri
: In-Reply-To:
: 1659766275.5213.1274376509278.javamail.r...@vicenza.dmz.lexum.pri
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
Thread Hijacking on Mailing
: I can't seem to get solr cell to index password protected pdf files.
: I can't figure out how to pass the password to tika and looking at
: ExtractingDocumentLoader,
: it doesn't seem to pass any pdf password related metadata to the tika parser.
I suspect you are correct, i don't think anyone
Don't forget to re-index after you make the change Lance suggested...
Erick
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
Change type=string to type=text. This causes the field to be
analyzed and then searching on words finds the document.
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at
: field name=indexed_timestamp type=date indexed=true stored=true
default=NOW multiValued=false/
: For some reason when doing delta indexing via DIH, this field is not being
updated.
:
: Are timestamp fields updated during DELTA updates?
timestamp fields aren't treated any differnetly then
: Is it possible to use solr caches such as query cache , filter cache
: and document cache from external caching system like memcached as it
: has several advantages such as centralized caching system and reducing the
: pause time of JVM 's garbage collection as we can assign less
: Actually, its not as much a Solr problem as a Lucene one, as it turns
: out, the WeightedSpanTermExtractor is in Lucene and not Solr.
:
: Why they decided to only highlight queries that are in Lucene I don't
: know, but what I did to solve this problem was simply to make my queries
:
: yes i am running 1.5, Any idea how we can run Solr 1.4 using Java 1.5
Solr 1.4 works just fine with Java 1.5 -- even when Using the
DataImportHandler.
there are some features of DIH like the ScriptTransformer that requires
java 1.6, but that's not your issue...
: Last I encountered that
I am just using the sor.war file that came with the Solr 1.4 download on
weblogic.
did not add any jar or remove any jar
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
: yes i am running 1.5, Any idea how we can run Solr 1.4 using Java 1.5
Solr 1.4 works
57 matches
Mail list logo