Hi Mark,
I don't think there's anything for 1.4.1. There are SOLR-236 and SOLR-1682 (in
trunk). Neither one works for distributed search. SOLR-2066 has a patch for
field collapsing / results grouping in distributed search, but it doesn't seem
to work well.
Otis
Sematext ::
Jurgen,
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk solr_svn
According to the book I am reading I should be able to run the tests
succesfully, so I did a
/var/solr_svn# ant test
Between the above 2 commands you need to:
/var/solr_svn# cd solr
Otis
Sematext ::
Ryan,
It's not possible out of the box, no. If your docs with abc* keywords have all
fields stored, you could get them from the index, modify them in memory to
remove abc*, and send them back to Solr for indexing. It's still reindexing,
but only of those particular documents and without
Tri,
What you are you trying to accomplish?
Otis
---
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Tri Nguyen tringuye...@yahoo.com
To: solr user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Fri,
Ron,
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Olson, Ron rol...@lbpc.com
To:
Hi mrw,
It sounds like you (e)dismax is what you should look into. You didn't mention
it/them, so I'm assuming you're not aware of them.
See: http://search-lucene.com/?q=dismax+OR+edismaxfc_project=Solr
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem
Isha,
Could be a case sensitivity thing. Try crime if that's what's that field
(you
can look manually when you run *:* or with Luke.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From:
Hi Stijn,
Thank you for sharing this.
Would it at all be possible for you to update the parts of SolrCloud page that
are incorrect and that you figured out or add anything new that's not on that
page yet?
Thanks!
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene
Hi,
In short, the bigger the overlap of query and document, the higher the
document's relevance to the query. This is an oversimplification, of course,
but that's the general idea (and it doesn't match what you listed below).
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
I have a field in my database, id, which is the unique key. The id
is generated as an MD5 hash of some of the other data in the record,
and unfortunately the way I converted it to hex meant that sometimes I
get a negative value. I'm having a real hard time figuring out the
right combination of
What is the field type of if field? Is it string?
What happens when you do :
q={!raw f=id}-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d
query.setQuery({!raw f=id}-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d);
--- On Sun, 2/20/11, Paul Tomblin ptomb...@xcski.com wrote:
From: Paul Tomblin ptomb...@xcski.com
Yes, it's string:
fieldType name=string class=solr.StrField
sortMissingLast=true omitNorms=true/
field name=id type=string stored=true indexed=true/
Is there a better field definition I should be using?
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com
Hello,
Is there any free Synonyms.txt available on internet ? Wasn't able to
find any. Specially interested by the french version.
++
Marc
--
*Programmers.ch*
Développement WEB
Solutions libres et Opensources
Tel: ++41 76 44 888 72
Site: http://www.programmers.ch
--- On Sun, 2/20/11, Paul Tomblin ptomb...@xcski.com wrote:
From: Paul Tomblin ptomb...@xcski.com
Subject: Re: How to get a field that starts with a minus?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Sunday, February 20, 2011, 5:53 PM
Yes, it's string:
fieldType name=string
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Paul Tomblin ptomb...@xcski.com wrote:
I have a field in my database, id, which is the unique key. The id
is generated as an MD5 hash of some of the other data in the record,
and unfortunately the way I converted it to hex meant that sometimes I
get a
Hi Marc,
I don't want to sound to prissy and also assume to much about your
application but a generic synonym file could do more harm than good. Lots of
applications have specific vocabularies and a specific synonym list is what
is needed. Remember synonyms increase recall but reduce precision.
He could also just escape it or am i
missing something?
Yes, he can also just escape minus sign using back slash.
As I said in my original post, I'd already tried various methods of escaping:
:call that using key = id and value =
:-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d and I get an exception. If I
:change value to \-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d\, I get no
:results. If I change value to
Thanks Lee !
Your are right, I'm new to solr, and I didn't think about that point.
But in my case, target is newspaper articles, so it's more generic
contents that specialized contents and I suppose that a generic synonym
dictionnary should fit my needs. Thanks for the link !
Marc
Hi,
Can I edit the SolrCloud page?
I never thought about it - but since it's a wiki -- everyone can edit,
right?
For the moment I'll not write stuff onto it - but if you need some help, I
can share you some of my ( little, but some ) experience.
2011/2/20 Otis Gospodnetic-2 [via Lucene]
Not crazy -- but be aware of a few *key* caviates.
1. Do good testing on a stable snapshot.
2. Don't get surprised if you have to rebuild the index from scratch
to upgrade in the future. The official releases will upgrade smoothly
-- but within dev builds, anything may happen.
On Sat, Feb 19,
Thanks for the adivce.
Where can I find stable snapshots, I only know of checking out from head?
On 2/20/11 11:56 AM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
Not crazy -- but be aware of a few *key* caviates.
1. Do good testing on a stable snapshot.
2. Don't get surprised if you have to rebuild the index from
It does not substitute values correctly in many cases. It seems to
work at a top level, but not in sub-levels.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com wrote:
I used it on 4,0 and it did not help us. We were bound on SQL io
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On Feb 18, 2011,
Johnny:
Are you still looking for help?
Wease
-
NOT always nice. When are we getting better releases?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-performance-very-slow-even-after-autowarming-tp2010384p2542789.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
Hii,
I want to confirm that if a change the type of a field from
sting to text in schema.xml then whether i have rebuild the index or
will it works fine with previous index.
Rebuild - the tokenizers/analyzers for string type would be different for
string and text type.
-Original Message-
From: Isha Garg isha.g...@orkash.com
To: solr-user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Mon, Feb 21, 2011 10:51 am
Subject: change in field_type
Hii,
I
26 matches
Mail list logo
