There were some changes in solrconfig.xml between solr3.1 and solr3.5.
Always read CHANGES.txt when switching to a new version.
Also helpful is comparing both versions of solrconfig.xml from the examples.
Are you sure you need a MaxPermSize of 5g?
Use jvisualvm to see what you really need.
This
oh, that's right.
thanks a lot,
Elisabeth
2012/4/11 Jeevanandam Madanagopal je...@myjeeva.com
Elisabeth -
As you described, below mapping might suit for your need.
mairie = hotel de ville, mairie
mairie gets expanded to hotel de ville and mairie at index time. So
mairie and hotel de
What operating system?
Are you using spellchecker with buildOnCommit?
Anything special in your Update Chain?
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
On 12. apr. 2012, at 06:45, Rohit wrote:
We recently migrated from
Hi Rohit,
What would be the average size of your documents and also can you please share
your idea of having 2 cores in the master. I just wanted to know the reasoning
behind the design.
Thanks in advance
Tirthankar
On Apr 12, 2012, at 3:19 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
What operating system?
Hi Rohit,
Can you please check the solrconfig.xml in 3.5 and compare it with 3.1 if there
are any warming queries specified while opening the searchers after a commit.
Thanks,
Tirthankar
On Apr 12, 2012, at 3:30 AM, Tirthankar Chatterjee wrote:
Hi Rohit,
What would be the average size of
Hi Tirthankar,
The average size of documents would be a few Kb's this is mostly tweets
which are being saved. The two cores are storing different kind of data and
nothing else.
Regards,
Rohit
Mobile: +91-9901768202
About Me: http://about.me/rohitg
-Original Message-
From: Tirthankar
Operating system in linux ubuntu.
No not using spellchecker
Only language detection in my update chain.
Regards,
Rohit
Mobile: +91-9901768202
About Me: http://about.me/rohitg
-Original Message-
From: Jan Høydahl [mailto:jan@cominvent.com]
Sent: 12 April 2012 12:50
To:
thanks Rohit.. for the information.
On Apr 12, 2012, at 4:08 AM, Rohit wrote:
Hi Tirthankar,
The average size of documents would be a few Kb's this is mostly tweets
which are being saved. The two cores are storing different kind of data and
nothing else.
Regards,
Rohit
Mobile:
Hi,
I'm using Apache Solr 3.5.0 and Jetty 8.1.2 with Windows 7. (Versions in
the Book used... Solr 3.1, Jetty 6.1.26)
I've tried to get Solr running with Jetty.
- I copied the jetty.xml and the webdefault.xml from the example Solr.
- I copied the solr.war to webapps
- I copied the solr directory
Hi,
Thanks for your answer.
Let's say I have to fields : 'keywords' and 'short_title'.
For these fields I'd like to make a faceted search : if 'Computer' is
stored in at least one of these fields for a document I'd like to get
it added in my results.
doc1 = keywords : 'Computer' / short_title :
Given an input of Windjacke (probably wind jacket in English), I'd
like the code that prepares the data for the index (tokenizer etc) to
understand that this is a Jacke (jacket) so that a query for Jacke
would include the Windjacke document in its result set.
It appears to me that such an
Your largest index has 66 segments (690 files) ... biggish but not
insane. With 64K maps you should be able to have ~47 searchers open
on each core.
Enabling compound file format (not the opposite!) will mean fewer maps
... ie should improve this situation.
I don't understand why Solr defaults
Hello,
We're using a sorted index in order to implement early termination
efficiently over an index of hundreds of millions of documents. As of now,
we're using the default codecs coming with Lucene 4, but we believe that
due to the fact that the docids are sorted, we should be able to do much
Given an input of Windjacke (probably wind jacket in English),
I'd like the code that prepares the data for the index (tokenizer
etc) to understand that this is a Jacke (jacket) so that a
query for Jacke would include the Windjacke document in its
result set.
It appears to me that such an
Michael,
I'm on this list and the lucene list since several years and have not found
this yet.
It's been one neglected topics to my taste.
There is a CompoundAnalyzer but it requires the compounds to be dictionary
based, as you indicate.
I am convinced there's a way to build the
You might have a look at:
http://www.basistech.com/lucene/
Am 12.04.2012 11:52, schrieb Michael Ludwig:
Given an input of Windjacke (probably wind jacket in English), I'd
like the code that prepares the data for the index (tokenizer etc) to
understand that this is a Jacke (jacket) so that a
Hi Mikhail Khludnev,
Thank you for the reply.
I think the index is getting corrupted because StreamingUpdateSolrServer is
keeping reference
to some index files that are being deleted by EmbeddedSolrServer during
commit/optimize process.
As a result when I Index(Full) using EmbeddedSolrServer and
If you want that query jacke matches a document containing the word
windjacke or kinderjacke, you could use a custom update processor.
This processor could search the indexed text for words matching the
pattern .*jacke and inject the word jacke into an additional field
which you can search
Bernd,
can you please say a little more?
I think this list is ok to contain some description for commercial solutions
that satisfy a request formulated on list.
Is there any product at BASIS Tech that provides a compound-analyzer with a big
dictionary of decomposed compounds in German? If yes,
Hi,
I have a field in my index called itemDesc which i am applying
EnglishMinimalStemFilterFactory to. So if i index a value to this field
containing Edges, the EnglishMinimalStemFilterFactory applies stemming
and Edges becomes Edge. Now when i search for Edges, documents with
Edge score better
Hi all,
I'm a solr newbie, so sorry if I do anything wrong ;)
I want to use SOLR not only for fast text search, but mainly to create a
very fast search engine for a high-traffic system (MySQL would not do the
job if the db grows too big).
I need to store *two big structures* in SOLR: projects
WordDelimiterFilterFactory will _almost_ do what you want
by setting things like catenateWords=0 and catenateNumbers=1,
_except_ that the punctuation will be removed. So
12.34 - 1234
ab,cd - ab cd
is that close enough?
Otherwise, writing a simple Filter is probably the way to go.
Best
Erick
On
Hi,
We are currently using solr (version 1.4.0.2010.01.13.08.09.44). we have a
strange situation in dismax request handler. when we search for a keyword
and append qt=dismax, we are not getting the any results. The solr request
is as follows:
facet.query=keywords:computer short_title:computer
seems like what you're asking for.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Marc SCHNEIDER
marc.schneide...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your answer.
Let's say I have to fields : 'keywords' and 'short_title'.
For these fields I'd like to make a
Paul,
nearly two years ago I requested an evaluation license and tested BASIS Tech
Rosette for Lucene Solr. Was working excellent but the price much much to
high.
Yes, they also have compound analysis for several languages including German.
Just configure your pipeline in solr and setup the
You could use SolrCloud (for the automatic scaling) and just mount a
fuse[1] HDFS directory and configure solr to use that directory for its
data.
[1] https://ccp.cloudera.com/display/CDHDOC/Mountable+HDFS
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 16:04 +0300, Ali S Kureishy wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to setup a
hello everyone,
can people give me their thoughts on this.
currently, my schema has individual fields to search on.
are there advantages or disadvantages to taking several of the individual
search fields and combining them in to a single search field?
would this affect search times, term
Von: Valeriy Felberg
If you want that query jacke matches a document containing the word
windjacke or kinderjacke, you could use a custom update processor.
This processor could search the indexed text for words matching the
pattern .*jacke and inject the word jacke into an additional field
Hi,
We've done a lot of tests with the HyphenationCompoundWordTokenFilter using a
from TeX generated FOP XML file for the Dutch language and have seen decent
results. A bonus was that now some tokens can be stemmed properly because not
all compounds are listed in the dictionary for the
I ask the question in
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/A-little-onfusion-with-maxPosAsterisk-tt3889226.html
However, when I do some implementation, I get a further questions.
1. Suppose I don't use ReversedWildcardFilterFactory in the index time, it
seems that Solr doesn't allow the leading
Thanks Darren.
Actually, I would like the system to be homogenous - i.e., use Hadoop based
tools that already provide all the necessary scaling for the lucene index
(in terms of throughput, latency of writes/reads etc). Since SolrCloud adds
its own layer of sharding/replication that is outside
Von: Markus Jelsma
We've done a lot of tests with the HyphenationCompoundWordTokenFilter
using a from TeX generated FOP XML file for the Dutch language and
have seen decent results. A bonus was that now some tokens can be
stemmed properly because not all compounds are listed in the
Solrcloud or any other tech specific replication isnt going to 'just work' with
hadoop replication. But with some significant custom coding anything should be
possible. Interesting idea.
brbrbr--- Original Message ---
On 4/12/2012 09:21 AM Ali S Kureishy wrote:brThanks Darren.
br
Erick,
Thank you for your response!
The problem with this approach is that searching for 12:34 will also match
12.34 which is not what I want.
From: Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Jian Xu joseph...@yahoo.com
Sent:
Thanks guys for all the help. We moved to an upgraded O.S. version and the
java script worked.
- Randolf
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-3-3-DIH-and-Java-1-6-tp3841355p3905583.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Can anyone help me out with this? Is this too complicated / unclear? I
could share more detail if needed.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Hopefully this question is not too complex to handle, but I'm currently
stuck with it.
We have a system
Please review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
You haven't said whether, for instance, you're using trunk which
is the only version that supports the termfreq function.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Abhishek tiwari
abhishek.tiwari@gmail.com wrote:
We import an XML file directly to SOLR using a the script called post.sh in
the exampledocs. This is the script:
FILES=$*
URL=http://localhost:8983/solr/update
for f in $FILES; do
echo Posting file $f to $URL
curl $URL --data-binary @$f -H 'Content-type:text/xml; charset=utf-8'
echo
done
German noun decompounding is a little more complicated than it might seem.
There can be transformations or inflections, like the s in Weinachtsbaum
(Weinachten/Baum).
Internal nouns should be recapitalized, like Baum above.
Some compounds probably should not be decompounded, like Fahrrad
Hi,
I need to configure the solr so that the opened searcher will see a new
document immidiately after it was adding to the index.
And I don't want to perform commit each time a new document is added.
I tried to configure maxDocs=1 under autoSoftCommit in solrconfig.xml but
it didn't help.
Von: Walter Underwood
German noun decompounding is a little more complicated than it might
seem.
There can be transformations or inflections, like the s in
Weinachtsbaum (Weinachten/Baum).
I remember from my linguistics studies that the terminus technicus for
these is Fugenmorphem
On Apr 12, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Lyuba Romanchuk wrote:
Hi,
I need to configure the solr so that the opened searcher will see a new
document immidiately after it was adding to the index.
And I don't want to perform commit each time a new document is added.
I tried to configure
Please see the documentation:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud#Required_Config
schema.xml
You must have a _version_ field defined:
field name=_version_ type=long indexed=true stored=true/
On Apr 11, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
I didn't have a _version_ field, since
Le 12 avr. 2012 à 17:46, Michael Ludwig a écrit :
Some compounds probably should not be decompounded, like Fahrrad
(farhren/Rad). With a dictionary-based stemmer, you might decide to
avoid decompounding for words in the dictionary.
Good point.
More or less, Fahrrad is generally abbreviated
On 4/12/2012 2:21 AM, Bastian Hepp wrote:
When I try to start I get this error message:
C:\\jetty-solrjava -jar start.jar
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
On Apr 12, 2012, at 6:07 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Your largest index has 66 segments (690 files) ... biggish but not
insane. With 64K maps you should be able to have ~47 searchers open
on each core.
Enabling compound file format (not the opposite!) will mean fewer maps
... ie should
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Please see the documentation:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud#Required_Config
Did I fail to find this in google or did I just goad you into a writing job?
I'm inclined to write a JIRA asking for _version_ to be
On Apr 12, 2012, at 8:46 AM, Michael Ludwig wrote:
I remember from my linguistics studies that the terminus technicus for
these is Fugenmorphem (interstitial or joint morpheme).
That is some excellent linguistic jargon. I'll file that with hapax legomenon.
If you don't highlight, you can get
On Thursday 12 April 2012 18:00:14 Paul Libbrecht wrote:
Le 12 avr. 2012 à 17:46, Michael Ludwig a écrit :
Some compounds probably should not be decompounded, like Fahrrad
(farhren/Rad). With a dictionary-based stemmer, you might decide to
avoid decompounding for words in the dictionary.
On Apr 12, 2012, at 9:00 AM, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
More or less, Fahrrad is generally abbreviated as Rad.
(even though Rad can mean wheel and bike)
A synonym could handle this, since farhren would not be a good match. It is
judgement call, but this seems more like an equivalence Fahrrad = Rad
Do you mean you are pre-sorting the documents (by what criteria?)
yourself, before adding them to the index?
In which case... you should already be seeing some benefits (smaller
index size) than had you randomly added them (ie the vInts should
take fewer bytes), I think. (Probably the savings
i am using 3.4 solr version... please assist...
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
Please review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
You haven't said whether, for instance, you're using trunk which
is the only version that supports the
On 4/12/2012 4:52 AM, pcrao wrote:
I think the index is getting corrupted because StreamingUpdateSolrServer is
keeping reference
to some index files that are being deleted by EmbeddedSolrServer during
commit/optimize process.
As a result when I Index(Full) using EmbeddedSolrServer and then do
Hi Mark,
Thank you for reply.
I tried to normalize data like in relational databases:
- there are some types of documents where \
- documents with the same type have the same fields
- documents with not equal types may have different fields
- but all documents have type
The termfreq function is only valid for trunk.
You're using 3.4. Since 'termfreq' is not recognized, Solr
gets confused.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Abhishek tiwari
abhishek.tiwari@gmail.com wrote:
i am using 3.4 solr version... please assist...
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at
On 4/12/2012 7:27 AM, geeky2 wrote:
currently, my schema has individual fields to search on.
are there advantages or disadvantages to taking several of the individual
search fields and combining them in to a single search field?
would this affect search times, term tokenization or possibly
Thanks Shawn,
I think I'll stay with the build in. I had problems with Solr Cell, but I
could fix it.
Greetings,
Bastian
Am 12. April 2012 18:02 schrieb Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org:
Bastian,
The jetty.xml included with Solr is littered with org.mortbay class
references, which are
google must not have found it - i put that in a month or so ago I believe -
at least weeks. As you can see, there is still a bit to fill in, but it
covers the high level. I'd like to add example snippets for the rest soon.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Benson Margulies
: Please see the documentation:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud#Required_Config
:
: schema.xml
:
: You must have a _version_ field defined:
:
: field name=_version_ type=long indexed=true stored=true/
Seems like this is the kind of thing that should make Solr fail hard and
fast on
Dmitry,
The last NPE in HighlightingComponent is just a sad coding issue.
few rows later we can see that developer expected to have some docs not
found
// remove nulls in case not all docs were able to be retrieved
rb.rsp.add(highlighting, SolrPluginUtils.removeNulls(new
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
We have a system with nTiers, that is:
Solr front base --- Solr front -- shards
Although the architecture had this in mind (multi-tier), all of the
pieces are not yet in place to allow it.
The errors you see are a direct
Thanks for pointing these out, but I still have one concern, why is the
Virtual Memory running in 300g+?
Regards,
Rohit
Mobile: +91-9901768202
About Me: http://about.me/rohitg
-Original Message-
From: Bernd Fehling [mailto:bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de]
Sent: 12 April 2012 11:58
To:
Thanks for pointing these out, but I still have one concern, why is the
Virtual Memory running in 300g+?
Regards,
Rohit
-Original Message-
From: Tirthankar Chatterjee [mailto:tchatter...@commvault.com]
Sent: 12 April 2012 13:43
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 3.5
In that case documents 1 and 2 will not be in the results. We need them also be
shown in the results but be ranked after those docs with exact match.
I think omitting term frequency in calculating ranking in phrase queries will
solve this issue, but I do not see that such a parameter in configs.
Mikhail,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Yes I have tried checking for NULL and
the entire chain of queries between tiers seems to work. But I suspect,
that some docs will be missing. In principle, unless there is an
OutOfMemory or a shard down, the doc ids should be retrieving valid
documents.
Hi,
I am using the edismax query handler with solr 3.5. From the Solr admin
interface when i do a wildcard search with the string: edge*, all documents
are returned with exactly the same score. When i do the same search from my
application using SolrJ to the same solr instance, only a few
Thanks Yonik,
This is what I expected. How big the change would be, if I'd start just
with Query and Highlight components? Did the change to QueryComponent I
made make any sense to you? It would of course mean a custom solution,
which I'm willing to contribute as a patch (in case anyone
I think someone already made a JIRA issue like that. I think Yonik might
have had an opinion about it that I cannot remember right now.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
: Please see the documentation:
Correction, this difference betweeen Solr admin scores and SolrJ scores
happens with leading wildcard queries e.g. *edge
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Kissue Kissue kissue...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using the edismax query handler with solr 3.5. From the Solr admin
interface when i do
You end up with one multivalued field, which means that you can only
have one analyzer chain.
actually two of the three fields being considered for combination in to a
single field ARE multivalued fields.
would this be an issue?
With separate fields, each field can be
analyzed
Well now I am really lost...
1. yes I want to suggest whole sentences too, I want the tokenizer to be
taken into account, and apparently it is working for me in 3.5.0?? I get
suggestions that are like foo bar abc. Maybe what you mention is only for
file based dictionaries? I am using the field
hello all,
i just want to check to make sure i have this right.
i was reading on this page: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax,
thanks to shawn for educating me.
*i want the user to be able to fire a requestHandler but search across
multiple fields (itemNo, productType and brand)
Hello Developers,
I just want to ask don't you think that response streaming can be useful
for things like OLAP, e.g. is you have sharded index presorted and
pre-joined by BJQ way you can calculate counts in many cube cells in
parallel?
Essential distributed test for response streaming just
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: Please see the documentation:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud#Required_Config :
: schema.xml
:
: You must have a _version_ field defined:
:
: field name=_version_ type=long indexed=true stored=true/
12 April 2012, Apache Solr™ 3.6.0 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 3.6.0.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast open source enterprise search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting,
: Off the top of my head:
: _version_ is needed for solr cloud where a leader forwards updates to
: replicas, unless you're handing update distribution yourself or
: providing pre-built shards.
: _version_ is needed for realtime-get and optimistic locking
:
: We should document for sure... but
I think this page needs updating... it says it's not out yet.
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr3.6
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir [mailto:rm...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 1:33 PM
To: d...@lucene.apache.org; solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Lucene mailing list;
Hi,
Just edit it! its a wiki page anyone can edit! There are probably
other out of date ones too
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Robert Petersen rober...@buy.com wrote:
I think this page needs updating... it says it's not out yet.
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr3.6
-Original
I'm probably confused, but it seems to me that the case I hit does not
meet any of Yonik's criteria.
I have no replicas. I'm running SolrCloud in the simple mode where
each doc ends up in exactly one place.
I think that it's just a bug that the code refuses to do the local
deletion when there's
Hello Michael,
Yes, we are pre-sorting the documents before adding them to the index. We
have a score associated to every document (not an IR score but a
document-related score that reflects its importance). Therefore, the
document with the biggest score will have the lowest docid (we add it
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
google must not have found it - i put that in a month or so ago I believe -
at least weeks. As you can see, there is still a bit to fill in, but it
covers the high level. I'd like to add example snippets for the rest
On 4/12/2012 1:37 PM, geeky2 wrote:
can you elaborate on this and how EDisMax would preclude the need for
copyfield?
i am using extended dismax now in my response handlers.
here is an example of one of my requestHandlers
requestHandler name=partItemNoSearch class=solr.SearchHandler
No, I don't think there's an OOB way to make this happen. It's
a recurring theme, make exact matches score higher than
stemmed matches.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Kissue Kissue kissue...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a field in my index called itemDesc which i am applying
It is easy. Create two fields, text_exact and text_stem. Don't use the stemmer
in the first chain, do use the stemmer in the second. Give the text_exact a
bigger weight than text_stem.
wunder
On Apr 12, 2012, at 4:34 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
No, I don't think there's an OOB way to make this
You have to take off your DB hat when using Solr G...
There is no problem at all having documents in the
same index that are of different types. There is no
penalty for field definitions that aren't used. That is, you
can easily have two different types of documents in the
same index.
It's all
On 4/12/2012 12:42 PM, Rohit wrote:
Thanks for pointing these out, but I still have one concern, why is the
Virtual Memory running in 300g+?
Solr 3.5 uses MMapDirectoryFactory by default to read the index. This
does an mmap on the files that make up your index, so their entire
contents are
Then I suspect your solrconfig is different or you're using a *slightly*
different URL. When you specify defType=dismax, you're NOT going
to the dismax requestHandler. You're specifying a dismax style
parser, and Solr expects that you're going to provide all the parameters
on the URL. To whit:
There is special handling build into Solr (but not Lucene I don't think)
that deals with the reversed case, that's probably the source of your
differences.
Leading wildcards are extremely painful if you don't do some trick
like Solr does with the reversed stuff. In order to run, you have to
spin
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:52 PM, jmlucjav jmluc...@gmail.com wrote:
Well now I am really lost...
1. yes I want to suggest whole sentences too, I want the tokenizer to be
taken into account, and apparently it is working for me in 3.5.0?? I get
suggestions that are like foo bar abc. Maybe what
What does treated as null mean? Deleted from the doc?
The problem here is that null-ness is kind of tricky. What
behaviors do you want out of Solr in the NULL case?
You can drop this out of the document by writing a custom
updateHandler. It's actually quite simple to do.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Apr
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas
c...@experienceon.com wrote:
Hello Michael,
Yes, we are pre-sorting the documents before adding them to the index. We
have a score associated to every document (not an IR score but a
document-related score that reflects its importance).
Looks good on a quick glance. There are a couple of things...
1 there's no need for the qt param _if_ you specify the name
as /partItemNoSearch, just use
blahblah/solr/partItemNoSearch
There's a JIRA about when/if you need at. Either will do, it's
up to you which you prefer.
2 I'd consider
GAH! I had my head in make this happen in one field when I wrote my
response, without being explicit. Of course Walter's solution is pretty
much the standard way to deal with this.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org wrote:
It is easy. Create two
Thanks for the response. I have given a size of 8gb for the instance and
has only around few thousands of documents (with 15 fields each having
small amount of data)..apparently the problem is the process (solr jetty
instance) is consuming lots of threads...one time it consumed around 50k
threads
: Are any of you using Solr Http caching? I am interested to see how people
: use this functionality. I have an index that basically changes once a day
: at midnight. Is it okay to enable Solr Http caching for such an index and
: set the max age to 1 day? Any potential issues?
:
: I am using
hi,neosky, how to do? i need this way too. thanks
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:35 PM, neosky neosk...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks！I will try again
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Does-the-lucene-can-read-the-index-file-from-solr-tp3902927p3905364.html
Sent from
Hello Ali,
I'm trying to setup a large scale *Crawl + Index + Search *infrastructure
using Nutch and Solr/Lucene. The targeted scale is *5 Billion web pages*,
crawled + indexed every *4 weeks, *with a search latency of less than 0.5
seconds.
That's fine. Whether it's doable with any tech
: I use solr 3.5 with edismax. I have the following issue with phrase
: search. For example if I have three documents with content like
:
: 1.apache apache
: 2. solr solr
: 3.apache solr
:
: then search for apache solr displays documents in the order 1,.2,3
: instead of 3, 2, 1 because term
The machine has a total ram of around 46GB. My Biggest concern is Solr index
time gradually increasing and then the commit stops because of timeouts, out
commit rate is very high, but I am not able to find the root cause of the issue.
Regards,
Rohit
Mobile: +91-9901768202
About Me:
On 4/12/2012 8:42 PM, Rohit wrote:
The machine has a total ram of around 46GB. My Biggest concern is Solr index
time gradually increasing and then the commit stops because of timeouts, out
commit rate is very high, but I am not able to find the root cause of the issue.
For good performance,
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
