Hi all,
I want to use the multiple schemas in the same solrCloud, is it allowed?
If it is allowed,how?
These schemas may have no relation.
Thank You.
Dai.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multiple-schemas-in-the-same-SolrCloud-tp4094279.html
Sent from
Hi:
I'm involved in a process o upgrade solr from 1.4 to 4.4 and I'm having a
problem using SynonymFilterFactory within the process chain
SynonymFilterFactory, StopFilterFactory .
I have configured synonyms.txt to expand the word AIO as: all-in-one. Well,
when using solr 1.4 I get the following
You can simply have multiple collections, each independent of each other on
the schema but could run on the same instance/jvm if you want.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:36 PM, xinwu xinwu0...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I want to use the multiple schemas in the same solrCloud, is it allowed?
If
Hi David,
A separate Solr document for each section is a good option if you also need
to handle phrases, case, special characters, etc. within the title field.
How do you map them to dynamic fields?
E.g.: Appendix for cities, APPENDIX 1: Cities
Regards,
Aloke
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:45 AM,
I remember I must put the
-Dbootstrap_confdir=/opt/Solr_home/collection1/conf
-Dcollection.configName=solrConfig in the catalina.sh .
Is it means that solrCloud must have one ,and only one, schema?
--
View this message in context:
I suggest you to look at here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj?action=fullsearchcontext=180value=cloudsolrservertitlesearch=Titles#Using_with_SolrCloud
2013/10/9 Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org
On 10/7/2013 3:08 PM, Mark wrote:
Some specific questions:
- When working with HttpSolrServer
Hi Saurabh,
Your link does not work (it is broken).
2013/10/9 Saurabh Saxena ssax...@gopivotal.com
Pastbin link http://pastebin.com/cnkXhz7A
I am doing a bulk request. I am uploading 100 files, each file having 100
docs.
-Saurabh
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Mark Miller
Could you send screenshot of admin Analysis page when trying to analyze
that words?
2013/10/9 Alvaro Cabrerizo topor...@gmail.com
Hi:
I'm involved in a process o upgrade solr from 1.4 to 4.4 and I'm having a
problem using SynonymFilterFactory within the process chain
SynonymFilterFactory,
You can have more information from here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Using+ZooKeeper+to+Manage+Configuration+Files
2013/10/9 xinwu xinwu0...@gmail.com
I remember I must put the
-Dbootstrap_confdir=/opt/Solr_home/collection1/conf
-Dcollection.configName=solrConfig in the
Sure,
Find attached the screenshots with almost all the analysis, (dont worry
about the lowercase and the porter stemmer)
Regards.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.comwrote:
Could you send screenshot of admin Analysis page when trying to analyze
that
I will try using solrj.Thanks.
but I tried to index .docx file I am getting some different error:
SEVERE: null:java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.VerifyError: (class:
org/apache/poi/extractor/ExtractorFactory, method: createExtractor signature:
I will try using solrJ.
Now I tried indexing .docx files and I get some different error,logs are:
SEVERE: null:java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.VerifyError: (class:
org/apache/poi/extractor/ExtractorFactory, method: createExtractor signature:
Does two has a synonym of in and one?
2013/10/9 Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com
Does two has a synonym of in and one?
2013/10/9 Alvaro Cabrerizo topor...@gmail.com
Sure,
Find attached the screenshots with almost all the analysis, (dont worry
about the lowercase and the porter
No, it has no synonyms.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.comwrote:
Does two has a synonym of in and one?
2013/10/9 Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com
Does two has a synonym of in and one?
2013/10/9 Alvaro Cabrerizo topor...@gmail.com
Sure,
Find
The synonyms.txt has defined the next associations defined.
AIO=All in one
aio=all-in-one
Regards.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Alvaro Cabrerizo topor...@gmail.comwrote:
No, it has no synonyms.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.comwrote:
Does two has
I'm experimenting with SolrCloud using Solr 4.5.0 and the Collection API
What i did was:
1. upload configuration to ZK
zkcli.sh -cmd upconfig -zkhost 127.0.0.1:8993 -d
solr/my_custom_collection/conf/ -n my_custom_collection
2. create a collection using the api:
OK. Then the JSON returned would contain a lot of documents that are
really sections. This would work fine for the use-case I mentioned but I
also use the index for full-text search of the whole document. Therefore,
I would need to parse the result JSON in a way that combines the solr docs
Using Solr 4.4.0 the same scenarion behaves as expected.
Can anyone else try this, to check if it this only happens with 4.5.0 and if
so, is this a desired behaviour or a bug?
--
View this message in context:
This may be a bug in 4.5
Another user has also reported this bug:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5307
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:51 PM, maephisto my_sky...@yahoo.com wrote:
Using Solr 4.4.0 the same scenarion behaves as expected.
Can anyone else try this, to check if it this only
Works fine at my end. I use Solr 4.5.0 on Windows 7.
I tried:
zkcli.bat -cmd upconfig -zkhost localhost:9000 -d
..\solr\collection2\conf -n my_custom_collection
java -Djetty.port=8001 -DzkHost=localhost:9000 -jar start.jar
and finally
Is there a way that in Solr Query i find documents that is composed of n
number of words. for example here is the list of words
- Love
- Ice
- Cream
- Sunny
- I
- To
- A
- On
- Elephant
- Balloon
And a percentage such as: 80%
Let’s assume you’re analyzing the text of the following sentence.
Yes, the problem described in the ticket is what I'm also confronting with.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Collection-API-wrong-configuration-in-4-5-0-tp4094319p4094335.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
David,
Yes. Document grouping (aka field collapsing) will help you here. It
should also allow you to create a better search experience on the front end
- it's often better to narrow down where in a large document a match is
than give users a large doc and say: we know the match is in here
Hi,
You can take your words, combine some % of them with AND. Then take another
set of them OR it with the previous set, and so on.
Otis
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Oct 9, 2013 6:54 AM, shahzad73 shahzad...@yahoo.com wrote:
Is there a way that in Solr Query i find
Jan:
This worked for me if I do NOT have a core.properties at all in my new
core. Personally I think the behavior in 4.4 was dangerous, what
happens if you mis-type the command for instance? You could do Bad
Things to the old core you were inadvertently re-creating.
The core.properties file
Tim:
I think you're mis-interpreting. By replying to a post with the subject:
{soft}Commit and cache flushing
but going in a different direction, it's easy for people to think I'm
not interested in that
thread, I'll ignore it, thereby missing the fact that you're asking a
somewhat different
Shawn:
Hmmm, I hadn't thought about that before. The shareSchema
stuff is keyed off the absolute directory (and timestamp) of
the schema.xml file associated with a core and is about
sharing the internal object that holds the parsed schema.
Do you know for sure if the fact that this is coming
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
This worked for me if I do NOT have a core.properties at all in my new
core. Personally I think the behavior in 4.4 was dangerous, what
happens if you mis-type the command for instance? You could do Bad
Things to
Hi Shahzad,
Have you tried with the Minimum Should Match feature:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax#mm_.28Minimum_.27Should.27_Match.29
Regards,
Aloke
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
You can take your words, combine some % of
Hello.
When in solr/home directory exists directory to which solr do not have
rights, then solr failed to start with exception:
2108 [main] INFO org.apache.solr.core.CoresLocator - Looking for core
definitions underneath /var/lib/solr
2109 [main] ERROR org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter
If you create a Wiki login, I'll be happy to add you to the
contributors list. It's always valuable to have fresh eyes
update docs while the ambiguities are still fresh!
Erick
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Jan Van Besien ja...@ngdata.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Erick Erickson
What do you think Solr should do in this case? If the
process doesn't have permission to the dir, it can't
write to it. You need to set the permissions, or the
authority of the process that Solr is running as
appropriately.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Said Chavkin
Thank you Upayavira.
I'm trying to figure out what will make Solr stem on multi in the word
multicad so that any attempt to search on multicad, Multi-CAD or
multiCAD will return results. The WordDelimiterFilterFactory helps with the
case of multi followed by a dash or a capital letter, but I'm
I'm not sure, may be solr should skip inaccessible directory.
Because it is standard rule to place service on separate filesystem.
On the other hand it is possible to place solr/home not on the top of
mounted fs.
Anyway it would be better if error message was more clearly.
2013/10/9 Erick
I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5324
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Yago Riveiro yago.rive...@gmail.com wrote:
If the replica has 20G must probably the recovery will take more than 120
seconds.
In my case I have ssd's and 120 it's not enough.
--
Yago Riveiro
Sent
If you have that word to index: multicad and if you want to get result
when you search that: multi you can use ngram filter. However you should
consider pros and cons of using Ngram Filter. If you use ngrams you may
find multicad from multi but your index size will be much more bigger.
I suggest
Hi,
In a content management system I have a document and an attachment. The
document contains the meta data and the attachment the actual data.
I would like to combine data of both in one Solr document.
I have thought of several options:
1. Using ExtractingRequestHandler I would extract the
Hey,
so the post filter logs the number of ids that it receives.
With the above filter having cost=200, the post filter should have received
the same number of ids as before ( when the filter was not present ).
But that does not seem to be the case...with the filter query on the index,
the number
Please help me formulate the query that will be easy or do i have to build a
custom filter for this ?
Shahzad
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Find-documents-that-are-composed-of-words-tp4094264p4094372.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
my client has a strange requirement, he will give a list of 500 words and
then set a percentage like 80% now he want to find those pages or
documents which consist of the only those 80% of 500 and only 20% unknown.
like we have this document
word1 word2
On 10/9/2013 6:24 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Hmmm, I hadn't thought about that before. The shareSchema
stuff is keyed off the absolute directory (and timestamp) of
the schema.xml file associated with a core and is about
sharing the internal object that holds the parsed schema.
Do you know for
Hi All,
I have an issue in handling filters for one of our requirements and
liked to get suggestion for the best approaches.
*Use Case:*
1. We have List of groups and the number of groups can increase upto 1
million. Currently we have almost 90 thousand groups in the solr search
system.
On 10/9/2013 1:17 AM, xinwu wrote:
I remember I must put the
-Dbootstrap_confdir=/opt/Solr_home/collection1/conf
-Dcollection.configName=solrConfig in the catalina.sh .
Is it means that solrCloud must have one ,and only one, schema?
Those bootstrap options are intended to be used ONCE, and
Thanks for the clarification.
In Solr Cloud just use 1 connection. In non-cloud environments you will need
one per core.
On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:58 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 10/7/2013 3:08 PM, Mark wrote:
Some specific questions:
- When working with HttpSolrServer should
Are you asking something like that:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TextProfileSignature
9 Ekim 2013 Çarşamba tarihinde shahzad73 shahzad...@yahoo.com adlı
kullanıcı şöyle yazdı:
Please help me formulate the query that will be easy or do i have to
build a
custom filter for this ?
Shahzad
--
On 10/8/13 6:51 PM, Peter Keegan wrote:
Is there a way to configure Solr 'defaults/appends/invariants' such that
the product of the 'start' and 'rows' parameters doesn't exceed a given
value? This would be to prevent deep pagination. Or would this require a
custom requestHandler?
Peter
Just
@Furkan Pastebin link is working for me. Can you try again ?
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Saurabh,
Your link does not work (it is broken).
2013/10/9 Saurabh Saxena ssax...@gopivotal.com
Pastbin link http://pastebin.com/cnkXhz7A
I am
Apologies all. I think the suggestion that I was replying to get noticed
is what erked me, otherwise I would have moved on. I'll follow this advice.
Cheers,
Tim
On 9 October 2013 05:20, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
Tim:
I think you're mis-interpreting. By replying to a
My index contains documents which could be a single word or a short sentence
which contains up to 4-5 words. I need to return documents, which starts
with only from the searched pattern.
in regex it would be [^my_query].
for example, for a docs:
black
beautiful black cat
cat
cat is black
black
On 10/9/2013 12:57 PM, adm1n wrote:
My index contains documents which could be a single word or a short sentence
which contains up to 4-5 words. I need to return documents, which starts
with only from the searched pattern.
in regex it would be [^my_query].
for example, for a docs:
black
Ah, I think you're misunderstanding the nature of post-filters.
Or I'm confused, which happens a lot!
The whole point of post filters is that they're assumed to be
expensive (think ACL calculation). So you want them to run
on the fewest documents possible. So only docs that make it
through the
Shawn Heisey-4:
thanks for the quick response.
Why this field have to be copyField? Couldn't it be a single field, for
example:
fieldType name=text_general_long class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory/
bq: ...in the sense that there's only one canonical copy.
Agreed, and as you say that copy is kept in ZooKeeper.
And I pretty much guarantee that the internal solrconfig object
is NOT shared. I doubt the schema object is shared, but it seems
like it could be with some work.
But the savings
On 10/9/2013 2:16 PM, adm1n wrote:
Why this field have to be copyField? Couldn't it be a single field, for
I always assume that people already are using the existing field and
type for other purposes. Offering advice without making that assumption
will usually result in people making a
The admin/analysis page is definitely your friend. On the
surface, [catenateWords=1] in WDFF should mash the
split up bits of multiCAD into multicad and you should be.
I suspect that StandardTokenizerFactory is somehow getting
into the mix here. Under any circumstance, the admin/analysis
page
search by starts with is something new I have to add, as well as the data I
have to index for this purpose, so it's ok to create a new field.
But once I added the following field type:
fieldType name=text_general_long class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
yes i get that. actually i should have explained in more detail.
- i have a query which gets certain documents.
- the post filter gets these matched documents and does some processing on
them and filters the results.
- but after this is done i need to apply another filter - which is why i
gave a
It depends whether multicad is a special case, or whether you want micr
to match the term microsoft.
If it is a special case, you can use synonyms, so that multi and
multicad are considered the same term.
If it isn't a special case, then ngrams could work - your document would
be indexed with:
Hi,
All of our synonyms are maintained in DB, we would like to fetch those
synonym dynamically for query expansion (Not indexing time). Are there any
code contribution?
I saw some discussion years ago but without conclusion.
Thanks a lot!
Hi Rohit,
The main problem is that if the query inside the filter does not have a
PostFilter implementation then your post filter is silently transformed
into a simple filter. The query field:value is based on the inverted
lists and does not have a postfilter support.
If your field is a numeric
Bharat,
Can you look at the logs on the Master when you issue the delete and
the subsequent commits and share that?
Otis
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support -- http://sematext.com/
Performance Monitoring -- http://sematext.com/spm
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Akkinepalli, Bharat (ELS-CON)
Hi,
Not as I know of. You'd probably want to subclass SynonymFilter* with your own
DB aware implementation, and of course contribute this back :)
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
9. okt. 2013 kl. 23:31 skrev ALEX PKB alex...@gmail.com:
Hi,
All of
hi all,
I have encountered some problems and post it on stackoverflow here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19285251/solr-field-with-default-value-resets-itself-if-it-is-stored-false
as you can see from the response, does it make sense to open a bug ticket
for this? because, although i can
You have to update the whole record including all fields...
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On Oct 9, 2013, at 7:50 PM, deniz denizdurmu...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
I have encountered some problems and post it on stackoverflow here:
Billnbell wrote
You have to update the whole record including all fields...
so what is the point of having atomic updates if i need to update
everything?
-
Zeki ama calismiyor... Calissa yapar...
--
View this message in context:
On 10/9/2013 8:39 PM, deniz wrote:
Billnbell wrote
You have to update the whole record including all fields...
so what is the point of having atomic updates if i need to update
everything?
If you have any regular fields that are not stored, atomic updates will
not work -- unstored field
66 matches
Mail list logo
