On 10/10/2007, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Without seeing the actual queries that are slow, it's difficult to
determine
what the problem is. Have you tried using EXPLAIN (
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/explain.html) to check if your
query
is using the table indexes
I'm developing a java application using solr, this application is
working with English search
Yes, I have tried querying solr directly for Arabic and it's working
Any suggestions ??
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Thanks that was the problem! I mistakingly thought the lib-folder containing
the jetty.jar etc. was the folder to put the plugins into. After adding a
lib-folder to solr-home everything is resolved.
Geert-Jan
hossman wrote:
: SEVERE: java.lang.ClassCastException:
:
Hi Solr-Users,
i try to follow the instructions [1] from the solr-wiki
to build my custom solr server.
First i have created the directory-structure.
mySolr
--solr
--conf
--schema.xml
--solrconfig.xml
--solr.xml -- Where i can find this file?
--build.xml -- copy paste from the wiki
Hi *,
I use solr as embedded solution.
I have set unlockOnStartup to true in my solrconfig.xml
But it seems, that this option is ignored by embedded solr.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance,
Alexey
Hi guys !
Is it possible to configure Solr to manage different indexes depending on the
added documents ?
For example:
* document 1, with uniq ID ui1 will be indexed in the indexA
* document 2, with uniq ID ui2 will be indexed in the indexB
* document 3, with uniq ID ui1 will be indexed in the
i would be interested to know in both the cases :
Case 1 :
* document 1, with uniq ID ui1 will be indexed in the indexA
* document 2, with uniq ID ui2 will be indexed in the indexB
* document 3, with uniq ID ui3 will be indexed in the indexA
Case 2 :
* document 1, with uniq ID ui1 will be
Hello,
with our application we have the issue, that we get different
results for singular and plural searches (german language).
E.g. for hose we get 1.000 documents back, but for hosen
we get 10.000 docs. The same applies to t-shirt or t-shirts,
of e.g. hut and hüte - lots of cases :)
This is
in short: use stemming
Try the SnowballPorterFilterFactory with German2 as language attribute
first and use synonyms for combined words i.e. Herrenhose = Herren,
Hose.
By using stemming you will maybe have some interesting results, but it
is much better living with them than having no or
Hi Piete,
Good idea. Thanks. One other change that should probably be made is to
change the package statement from org.oclc.solr.analysis to
org.apache.solr.analysis. Thanks again.
Cheers!
harry
-Original Message-
From: Pieter Berkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October
Can you give more detail about what you have done? What character
encoding do you have your browser set to? In Firefox, do View -
Character Encoding to see what it is set to when you are on the input
page? Internet Explorer and other browsers have other options. Are
you sending the
In firefox, character encoding is set to UTF-8
Yes, I'm sending the query directly to solr using apache httpclient and
I set the http request header content type to : Content-Type=text/html;
charset=UTF-8
Any suggestions
Thanks in advance
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll
Hmmm, by the looks of your query, it doesn't seem like it is a Solr
query, but I admit I don't have all the parameters memorized. What
request handler, etc. are you using? Have you tried debugging?
And you say you have tried a query with the Solr Admin query page,
right? And that works?
Hi,
- Original Message
From: David Whalen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On that note -- I've read that Jetty isn't the best servlet
container to use in these situations, is that your experience?
OG: In which situations? Jetty is great, actually! (the pretty high traffic
site in my sig runs
Hi
for some tests I need to know how many documents are stored in the
index - is there a fast easy way to retrieve this number (instead
of searching for *:* and counting the results)?
I already took a look at the stats.jsp code - but there the number of
documents is retrieved via an api
i'm not very familiar with that wiki, but note the line in the example ant
script...
!-- SOLR_HOME must be set as an environment variable --
...
: --solr.xml -- Where i can find this file?
according to the wiki page...
First we will setup a basic directory structure (assuming we only
: there a fast easy way to retrieve this number (instead of searching for
: *:* and counting the results)?
NOTE: you don't have to count the results to know the total number of
docs matching any query ... just use the numFound attribute of the
results/ block.
: I already took a look at the
: I think search for *:* is the optimal code to do it. I don't think you can
: do anything faster.
FYI: getting the data from the xml returned by stats.jsp is definitely
faster in the case where you really want all docs.
if you want the total number from some other query however, don't count
It looks now like I can't use facets the way I was hoping
to because the memory requirements are impractical.
So, as an alternative I was thinking I could get counts
by doing rows=0 and using filter queries.
Is there a reason to think that this might perform better?
Or, am I simply moving the
: Does anyone know how to correct this? Is it not possible to have multiple
: different top-level tags in the same update xml file? It seems to me like it
: should work, but perhaps there's something inherently bad about this from
: the XMLStreamReader's point of view.
it's inherently bad from
We simply process a queue of updates from a database table. Some of the
updates are deletes, some are adds. Sometimes you can have many deletes in a
row, sometimes many adds in a row, and sometimes a mixture of deletes and
adds. We're trying to batch our updates and were hoping to avoid having to
Hi Felipe -
The issue you're encountering is a problem with the data format being passed
to the solr server. If you follow the stack trace that you posted, you'll
notice that the solr field is looking for a value that's a float, but the
passed value is 1,234.
I'm guessing this is caused by one
Normally this is the type of thing I'd just scour through the online
docs or the source code for, but I'm under the gun a bit.
Anyway, I need to update some docs in my index because my client program
wasn't accurately putting these docs in (values for one of the fields
was missing). I'm
On 10-Oct-07, at 12:19 PM, David Whalen wrote:
It looks now like I can't use facets the way I was hoping
to because the memory requirements are impractical.
I can't remember if this has been mentioned, but upping the
HashDocSet size is one way to reduce memory consumption. Whether
this
On 10-Oct-07, at 1:11 PM, Charlie Jackson wrote:
Anyway, I need to update some docs in my index because my client
program
wasn't accurately putting these docs in (values for one of the fields
was missing). I'm hoping I won't have to write additional code to go
through and delete each existing
On 10-Oct-07, at 12:49 PM, BrendanD wrote:
We simply process a queue of updates from a database table. Some of
the
updates are deletes, some are adds. Sometimes you can have many
deletes in a
row, sometimes many adds in a row, and sometimes a mixture of
deletes and
adds. We're trying to
Thanks for the response, Mike. A quick test using the example app
confirms your statement.
As for Solrj, you're probably right, but I'm not going to take any
chances for the time being. The server.add method has an optional
Boolean flag named overwrite that defaults to true. Without knowing
for
Accoriding to Yonik I can't use minDf because I'm faceting
on a string field. I'm thinking of changing it to a tokenized
type so that I can utilize this setting, but then I'll have to
rebuild my entire index.
Unless there's some way around that?
-Original Message-
From: Mike
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 12:00, Martin Grotzke wrote:
Basically I see two options: stemming and the usage of synonyms. Are
there others?
A large list of German words and their forms is available from a Windows
software called Morphy
I've re-written the code to generate separate files. One for adds and one for
deletes. And this is working well for us now. Thanks.
Mike Klaas wrote:
This would be very complicated from a standpoint of returning errors
to the client.
Keep in mind the deletes can never be batched,
Hello,
We're using solr 1.2 and a nightly build of the solrj client code. We very
occasionally see things like this:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: Error executing query
at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.QueryRequest.process(
QueryRequest.java:86)
at
On 10-Oct-07, at 2:40 PM, David Whalen wrote:
Accoriding to Yonik I can't use minDf because I'm faceting
on a string field. I'm thinking of changing it to a tokenized
type so that I can utilize this setting, but then I'll have to
rebuild my entire index.
Unless there's some way around that?
the default solrj implementation should do what you need.
As for Solrj, you're probably right, but I'm not going to take any
chances for the time being. The server.add method has an optional
Boolean flag named overwrite that defaults to true. Without knowing
for sure what it does, I'm not
I'll see what I can do about that.
Truthfully, the most important facet we need is the one on
media_type, which has only 4 unique values. The second
most important one to us is location, which has about 30
unique values.
So, it would seem like we actually need a counter-intuitive
solution.
On 10-Oct-07, at 3:46 PM, David Whalen wrote:
I'll see what I can do about that.
Truthfully, the most important facet we need is the one on
media_type, which has only 4 unique values. The second
most important one to us is location, which has about 30
unique values.
So, it would seem like we
: Around Sept. 20 I started getting Japanese spam to this account. This is
: a special account I only use for the Solr and Lucene user mailing
: lists. Did anybody else get these, starting around 9/20?
Note that many mailing list archives leave the sender emails in plain text
(which results in
Hi,
The examples that I've found in the solrconfig.xml file and on this site are
fairly basic for pre-warming specific queries. I have some rather complex
looking queries that I'm not quite sure how to specify in my solrconfig.xml
file in the newSearcher section.
Here's an example of 3 queries
: looking queries that I'm not quite sure how to specify in my solrconfig.xml
: file in the newSearcher section.
:
Awesome! Thanks!
hossman wrote:
: looking queries that I'm not quite sure how to specify in my
solrconfig.xml
: file in the newSearcher section.
:
On 10/10/07, Mike Klaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you tried setting multivalued=true without reindexing? I'm not
sure, but I think it will work.
Yes, that will work fine.
One thing that will change is the response format for stored fields
arr name=foostrval1/str/arr
instead of
str
40 matches
Mail list logo
