Re: Delte all docs in a SOLR index?

2007-11-10 Thread David Neubert
Thanks -- I didn't know that deleting the Index (offline) was safe and complete -- thanks. - Original Message From: Norskog, Lance [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Friday, November 9, 2007 6:42:21 PM Subject: RE: Delte all docs in a SOLR index? A safer way is to

Re: Delte all docs in a SOLR index?

2007-11-10 Thread David Neubert
I guess I better look into trunk -- not familiar with it yet. - Original Message From: Mike Klaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Friday, November 9, 2007 6:49:40 PM Subject: Re: Delte all docs in a SOLR index? On 9-Nov-07, at 3:42 PM, Norskog, Lance wrote: A

Re: where to hook in to SOLR to read field-label from functionquery

2007-11-10 Thread Britske
hossman wrote: : Say I have a custom functionquery MinFloatFunction which takes as its : arguments an array of valuesources. : : MinFloatFunction(ValueSource[] sources) : : In my case all these valuesources are the values of a collection of fields. a ValueSource isn't required

Redundant indexing * 4 only solution (for par/sen and case sensitivity)

2007-11-10 Thread David Neubert
Hi all, Using SOLR, I believe I have to index the same content 4 times (not desirable) into 2 indexes -- and I don't know how you can practically do multiple indexes in SOLR (if indeed there is no better solution than 4 indexing runs into two indexes? My need is case-sensitive and case

Re: Redundant indexing * 4 only solution (for par/sen and case sensitivity)

2007-11-10 Thread David Neubert
Ryan, Thanks for your response. I infer from your response that you can have a different analyzer for each field -- I guess I should have figured that out --but because I had not thought of that, I concluded that I needed multiple indices (sorry , I am still very new to Solr/Lucene). Does

Re: Redundant indexing * 4 only solution (for par/sen and case sensitivity)

2007-11-10 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Nov 10, 2007 4:24 PM, David Neubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So if I am hitting multiple fields (in the same search request) that invoke different Analyzers -- am I at a dead end, and have to result to consequetive multiple queries instead Solr handles that for you automatically. The

Re: Redundant indexing * 4 only solution (for par/sen and case sensitivity)

2007-11-10 Thread Ryan McKinley
David Neubert wrote: Ryan, Thanks for your response. I infer from your response that you can have a different analyzer for each field yes! each field can have its own indexing strategy. I believe that the Analyzer approach you suggested requires the use of the same Analzyer at query

Re: Redundant indexing * 4 only solution (for par/sen and case sensitivity)

2007-11-10 Thread David Neubert
Ryan (and others who need something to put them so sleep :) ) Wow -- the light-bulb finally went off -- the Analzyer admin page is very cool -- I just was not at all thinking the SOLR/Lucene way. I need to rethink my whole approach now that I understand (from reviewing the schema.xml closer

Re: Redundant indexing * 4 only solution (for par/sen and case sensitivity)

2007-11-10 Thread David Neubert
Yonik (or anyone else) Do you know where on-line documentation on the +case: syntax is located? I can't seem to find it. Dave - Original Message From: Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 4:56:40 PM Subject: Re: Redundant