Hi Thorsten...
SOrry for giving u much trouble but I need some answer regarding solr...plz
help...
Question1
I am using tomcat 5.5.23 so for JNDI setup of solr, adding solr.xml with
context fragment as below in the tomcat5.5/...catalina/localhost.
Is it the correct way of doing it? Or do
: We'd like to restrict older modified documents with a step function, rather
: bf="map(map(modified,0,0,today),0,12monthago,0.2)
: map(map(modified,0,0,today),12monthago,6monthago,0.3)
: map(map(modified,0,0,today),6monthsago,today,1)"
:
: is this inefficient?
For something like this, i would
Ok, Thanks..
On 2/15/08, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> : I have created a Index of some xml files (xml's was created from mysql
> : database) with solr. In xml's I have one text field. (more than 1000
> : characters). Its searches fine, but solr result page is too long. I have
My eclipse IDE still gives me suggestion that JNDI is not set properly...How
to set JNDI for solr?
I am using tomcat5.5.23 and added solr.xml with context fragments inside the
tomact5.5/../catalina/localhost. Is it the correct way of doing it? Or do i
need to add context fragment in the server.xm
: I have created a Index of some xml files (xml's was created from mysql
: database) with solr. In xml's I have one text field. (more than 1000
: characters). Its searches fine, but solr result page is too long. I have
: tried highlight (&hl=on&hl.fl=fname), its shows highlighting results at end
:
: > How do I generate URLs to retrieve a document against any given Solr
: > instance that I happen to be pointing at without knowing which field is the
: > document id?
:
: One cool technique, not instead of your change to Luke RH (a needed change
: IMO) but another way to go about it - we have
Bottomline: it's very hard to get everything right with having a uniqueKey
field that uses TextField. if your goal is to let your users do case
insnsitive or "single word" queries on your uniqueKey field, just just
copyFiled to clone it into something more search friendly.
-Hoss
Ryan,
Using the KeywordTokenizer does not help. And there are not any spaces in
the unique keys. the keys are alpha numeric. E.g.: AA-23-E1
Regards,
Rishabh
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I noticed this happened because the field type was "strin
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Mahesh Udupa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even I tried with *text* Field type. But no use.
> As splitOnCaseChange="1", do we have splitOnLetterToNumberChange or
> something like that?
Sorting requires a single token in the field (you want to sort on the
whole
Thanks Erick for your quick response.
Even I tried with *text* Field type. But no use.
As splitOnCaseChange="1", do we have splitOnLetterToNumberChange or
something like that?
Thanks in advance
kmu
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Erick Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I admit I know l
On 14-Feb-08, at 6:51 AM, tedonk03 wrote:
Hi,
I also have the same problem. My case is similar like this, but the
user can
select their preferences. I´ll use climbingrose´s example but add it a
little bit.
Doc1: [Title=Java; Location=Parramatta, NSW; latitude=x1;
longitude=x2]
Doc2: [Tit
It should be easy to configure SOLR Schema, & use SOLRJ client; does not
matter jetty/tomcat etc.; stick with simple SOLRJ java client: access
database, generate SOLR document, update SOLR, execute query, parse
(SOLRJ->SolrDocument), generate content, etc... Much easier, scalable, and
more effectiv
Hi All,
I am facing a problem when search for multiphrases in a word.
My index data is :
srinivasan,sweetheart,thomasmaster,thomasMaster.(totally 4 words)
Scenario : 1
Search data : vasan
If i search for "vasan", its return nothing. But the result should be
"srinivasan".
Like
I noticed this happened because the field type was "string". I then changed
it to a custom text type and had specified only the whitespace tokenizer and
lowercase filter. It worked. The users were able to search on the
are there spaces in your unique key? Try using the KeywordTokenizer --
th
I admit I know little about SOLR, but wouldn't an AlphaOnlySorter ignore
the digits?
Erick
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Mahesh Udupa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have following entry in my title list:
>
> Content1
> Content2
> Content3
> Content4
> Content5
>
> If I try to Sort
On 14/02/2008, at 00:58, Mike Klaas wrote:
On 13-Feb-08, at 6:11 PM, Leonardo Santagada wrote:
On 13/02/2008, at 23:03, Mike Klaas wrote:
Try using standardrequesthandler with the dismax query parser.
How can I say to standardrequesthandler to apply each query string
to a diferent field,
Hi,
Initially, in my schema, I had my uniqueField's field type as "string" and
everything was working fine. But, then the users of my application wanted to
search on the unique field and entered values which were in a different case
than what was indexed. They never got proper results, at times, n
Hi,
I also have the same problem. My case is similar like this, but the user can
select their preferences. I´ll use climbingrose´s example but add it a
little bit.
Doc1: [Title=Java; Location=Parramatta, NSW; latitude=x1; longitude=x2]
Doc2: [Title=Java; Location=North Ryde, NSW; latitude=x3; l
Hi,
I'm having problems using SolrQuery.add(String, String).
My Sample code is:
SolrQuery anotherQuery = new SolrQuery();
anotherQuery.add("city", cmd.getCity());
I get the following error:
null java.lang.NullPointerException at
org.apache.solr.common.util.StrUtils.splitSmar
Hello,
I have following entry in my title list:
Content1
Content2
Content3
Content4
Content5
If I try to Sort it in ascending or descending order, I am getting same
order.
I am using following alphaOnlySort field and text.
Please let me know if I miss anything here.
Thanks in advance for looki
20 matches
Mail list logo
