Re: Field Collapsing on 1.4.1
Hi Mark, I don't think there's anything for 1.4.1. There are SOLR-236 and SOLR-1682 (in trunk). Neither one works for distributed search. SOLR-2066 has a patch for field collapsing / results grouping in distributed search, but it doesn't seem to work well. Otis Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ - Original Message From: Mark static.void@gmail.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Sat, February 19, 2011 9:49:19 AM Subject: Field Collapsing on 1.4.1 Is there a seamless field collapsing patch for 1.4.1? I see it has been merged into trunk but I tried downloading it to give it a whirl but it appears that many things have changed and our application would need some considerable work to get it up an running. Thanks
Re: Problems with ant test : No tests found
Jurgen, svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk solr_svn According to the book I am reading I should be able to run the tests succesfully, so I did a /var/solr_svn# ant test Between the above 2 commands you need to: /var/solr_svn# cd solr Otis Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ - Original Message From: Jurgen blur...@gmail.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Sat, February 19, 2011 9:26:34 AM Subject: Problems with ant test : No tests found Hi List! I was wondering, after downloading the subversion source with svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk solr_svn According to the book I am reading I should be able to run the tests succesfully, so I did a /var/solr_svn# ant test And it seems that junit-parallel gives _only_ errors, not because tests it self fail but tests aren't found. What did I do wrong? junit-parallel: [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.TestDemo [junit] Testcase: warning(junit.framework.TestSuite$1):FAILED [junit] No tests found in org.apache.lucene.TestDemo [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: No tests found in org.apache.lucene.TestDemo [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,475 sec [junit] TEST org.apache.lucene.TestDemo FAILED [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.TestSearchForDuplicates [junit] Testcase: warning(junit.framework.TestSuite$1):FAILED [junit] No tests found in org.apache.lucene.TestSearchForDuplicates [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: No tests found in org.apache.lucene.TestSearchForDuplicates [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,012 sec [junit] TEST org.apache.lucene.TestSearchForDuplicates FAILED [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.document.TestDocument [junit] Testcase: warning(junit.framework.TestSuite$1): FAILED [junit] No tests found in org.apache.lucene.document.TestDocument [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: No tests found in org.apache.lucene.document.TestDocument [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,008 sec [junit] TEST org.apache.lucene.document.TestDocument FAILED [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestByteSlices [junit] Testcase: warning(junit.framework.TestSuite$1): FAILED [junit] No tests found in org.apache.lucene.index.TestByteSlices [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: No tests found in org.apache.lucene.index.TestByteSlices [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,008 sec [junit] TEST org.apache.lucene.index.TestByteSlices FAILED [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy [junit] Testcase: warning(junit.framework.TestSuite$1): FAILED [junit] No tests found in org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: No tests found in org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,01 sec [junit] TEST org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy FAILED [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDoc [junit] Testcase: warning(junit.framework.TestSuite$1):FAILED [junit] No tests found in org.apache.lucene.index.TestDoc [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: No tests found in org.apache.lucene.index.TestDoc [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,007 sec [junit] TEST org.apache.lucene.index.TestDoc FAILED [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterDelete [junit] Testcase: warning(junit.framework.TestSuite$1): FAILED [junit] No tests found in org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterDelete [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: No tests found in org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterDelete [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,007 sec [junit] TEST org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterDelete FAILED [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestMultiFields [junit] Testcase: warning(junit.framework.TestSuite$1):FAILED [junit] No tests found in org.apache.lucene.index.TestMultiFields [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: No tests found in org.apache.lucene.index.TestMultiFields [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,008 sec [junit] TEST org.apache.lucene.index.TestMultiFields FAILED [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNoMergeScheduler [junit] Testcase: warning(junit.framework.TestSuite$1): FAILED [junit] No tests found in org.apache.lucene.index.TestNoMergeScheduler [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: No
Re: Remove part of keywords from existing index and merging new index
Ryan, It's not possible out of the box, no. If your docs with abc* keywords have all fields stored, you could get them from the index, modify them in memory to remove abc*, and send them back to Solr for indexing. It's still reindexing, but only of those particular documents and without having to go to the original document source. But it does require all fields to be stored, so you can get and modify their values in your custom app. Otis Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ - Original Message From: Ryan Chan ryanchan...@gmail.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Sat, February 19, 2011 12:06:52 AM Subject: Remove part of keywords from existing index and merging new index Hello, I am not sure if it is possible. 1. I have a document of 100MB, I want to remove keywords started with a specific pattern, e.g. abc*, so all keywords started with abc* in the index will be removed, and I don't need to reindex the document again. 2. I have another document of 100KB, I want to append the new document to an existing one, without the new to reindex the existing document again. I believe (2) is possible, but not sure about (1). Thanks.
Re: adding a TimerTask
Tri, What you are you trying to accomplish? Otis --- Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ - Original Message From: Tri Nguyen tringuye...@yahoo.com To: solr user solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Fri, February 18, 2011 9:02:44 PM Subject: adding a TimerTask Hi, How can I add a TimerTask to Solr? Tri
Re: XML Stripping from DIH
Ron, http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory Otis Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ - Original Message From: Olson, Ron rol...@lbpc.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Fri, February 18, 2011 4:05:15 PM Subject: XML Stripping from DIH Hi all- I have some XML in a database that I am trying to index and store; I am interested in the various pieces of text, but none of the tags. I've been trying to figure out a way to strip all the tags out, but haven't found anything within Solr to do so; the XML parser seems to want XPath to get the various element values, when all I want is to turn the whole thing into one blob of text, regardless of whether it makes any contextual sense. Is there something in Solr to do this, or is it something I'd have to write myself (which I'm willing to do if necessary)? Thanks for any info, Ron DISCLAIMER: This electronic message, including any attachments, files or documents, is intended only for the addressee and may contain CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY or LEGALLY PRIVILEGED information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this message or any of the information included in or with it is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete and destroy this message and its attachments, along with any copies thereof. This message does not create any contractual obligation on behalf of the sender or Law Bulletin Publishing Company. Thank you.
Re: Understanding multi-field queries with q and fq
Hi mrw, It sounds like you (e)dismax is what you should look into. You didn't mention it/them, so I'm assuming you're not aware of them. See: http://search-lucene.com/?q=dismax+OR+edismaxfc_project=Solr Otis Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ - Original Message From: mrw mikerobertsw...@gmail.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Fri, February 18, 2011 1:56:24 PM Subject: Understanding multi-field queries with q and fq After searching this list, Google, and looking through the Pugh book, I am a little confused about the right way to structure a query. The Packt book uses the example of the MusicBrainz DB full of song metadata. What if they also had the song lyrics in English and German as files on disk, and wanted to index them along with the metadata, so that each document would basically have song title, artist, publisher, date, ..., All_Metadata (copy field of all metadata fields), Text_English, and Text_German fields? There can only be one default field, correct? So if we want to search for all songs containing (zeppelin AND (dog OR merle)) do we repeat the entire query text for all three major fields in the 'q' clause (assuming we don't want to use the cache): q=(+All_Metadata:zeppelin AND (dog OR merle)+Text_English:zeppelin AND (dog OR merle)+Text_German:(zeppelin AND (dog OR merle)) or repeat the entire query text for all three major fields in the 'fq' clause (assuming we want to use the cache): q=*:*fq=(+All_Metadata:zeppelin AND (dog OR merle)+Text_English:zeppelin AND (dog OR merle)+Text_German:zeppelin AND (dog OR merle)) ? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Understanding-multi-field-queries-with-q-and-fq-tp2528866p2528866.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: string field_type query
Isha, Could be a case sensitivity thing. Try crime if that's what's that field (you can look manually when you run *:* or with Luke. Otis Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ - Original Message From: Isha Garg isha.g...@orkash.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Fri, February 18, 2011 7:31:38 AM Subject: string field_type query i had declare a field_name=category ,field_type=string now i am querying category:Crime but it did nt show any results .But when i query for *:* it shows values related to this category can anyone tell me the problem?
Re: SolrCloud new....
Hi Stijn, Thank you for sharing this. Would it at all be possible for you to update the parts of SolrCloud page that are incorrect and that you figured out or add anything new that's not on that page yet? Thanks! Otis Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ - Original Message From: Stijn Vanhoorelbeke stijn.vanhoorelb...@gmail.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Fri, February 18, 2011 6:42:10 AM Subject: Re: SolrCloud new Hi, I'm busy doing the exact same thing. I figured things out - all by myself - the wiki page is a nice 'fist view', but doesn't goes in dept... Lets go ahead: 1)Should i copy the libraries from cloud to trunk??? 2)should i keep the cloud module in every system??? A: Yes, you should. You should get yourself the latest dev trunk and compile it. The steps I followed: + grap latest trunk build solr + backup all solr config files + in dir tomcat6/webapps/ remove the dir 'solr' + copy the new solr.war ( which you build in first step ) to tomcat6/webapps + On your Solr_home/conf dir solrconfig.xml need to be replaced by a new one ( you take from example dir of your build) -- some other config files ( like schema.xml ) you may keep using the old ones. + Adapt the new files to represent the old configuration + restart tomcat and it will install new version of solr It seems the index isn't compatible - so you need to flush your whole index and re-index all data. And finally you have your solr system back with zookeeper integrated in /admin zone :) 3) I am not using any cores in the solr. It is a single solr in every system.can solrcloud support it?? A: Actually you are using one cor - so gives no problem. But be sure to check you have solr.xml file in your solr_home dir. This file just mentions all cores - in your case just one core; ( you can find examples of layout of this file easily on http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin ) 4) the example is given in jetty.Is it the same way to make it in tomcat??? A: Right now - it is the same way. You have to edit your /etc/init.d/tomcat6 startup script. In the start) section you can specify all the JAVA_OPTS ( the ones the solrcloud wiki mentions). Be sure to set following one: export JAVA_OPTS=$JAVA_OPTS -DhostPort=8080 ( if tomcat runs on port 8080 ) At first I didn't -- my zookeeper pointed to standard 8983 port, which gave errors. In the above I gave you a quick peak how to get the SolrCloud feature. In above the Zookeeper is embedded in one of your solr machines. If you don't want this you may place zookeeper on a different machine ( like I'm doing right now). If you need more help - you can contact me. Stijn Vanhoorelbeke, -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-new-tp1528872p2526080.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: fine tuning the solr search
Hi, In short, the bigger the overlap of query and document, the higher the document's relevance to the query. This is an oversimplification, of course, but that's the general idea (and it doesn't match what you listed below). Otis Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ - Original Message From: Churchill Nanje Mambe mambena...@afrovisiongroup.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Thu, February 17, 2011 6:50:08 AM Subject: fine tuning the solr search Hi I would love to know how to do this with solr say a user inputs Account manager files, I wish that solr puts priority on the documents it finds as follows 1) documents containing account manager files gets a greater score 2) then documents with account manager come next 3) then documents with account can come before the other words are used to get documents in the search right now I think it works different as it finds documents with accounts and puts them like in first position or documents with word manager in second position or so thanks -- Mambe Churchill Nanje 237 33011349, AfroVisioN Founder, President,CEO http://www.afrovisiongroup.com | http://mambenanje.blogspot.com skypeID: mambenanje www.twitter.com/mambenanje
How to get a field that starts with a minus?
I have a field in my database, id, which is the unique key. The id
is generated as an MD5 hash of some of the other data in the record,
and unfortunately the way I converted it to hex meant that sometimes I
get a negative value. I'm having a real hard time figuring out the
right combination of quotes and escapes so I can actually query these
things using SolrJ. On the Solr web interface, I can just do put in
id:-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d
which results in a url like:
http://localhost:8080/solrChunk/nutch/select/?q=id:%22-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d%22version=2.2start=0rows=10indent=on
but when I try that using SolrJ
SolrQuery query = new SolrQuery();
query.setQuery(key + : + value);
query.setRows(NUM_AT_A_TIME);
int start = 0;
while (true)
{
query.setStart(start);
QueryResponse resp = solrChunkServer.query(query);
SolrDocumentList docs = resp.getResults();
LOG.debug(got + docs.getNumFound() + documents
(or + docs.size() + if you prefer));
if (docs.size() == 0)
break;
for (SolrDocument doc : docs)
{
retCode.add(doc);
}
if (docs.size() NUM_AT_A_TIME)
break;
start += NUM_AT_A_TIME;
}
I call that using key = id and value =
-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d and I get an exception. If I
change value to \-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d\, I get no
results. If I change value to \-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d, I
get no results. If I change value to
\\-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d\, I get no results.
If I had hair, I'd be tearing it out right now.
--
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paultomblin
http://careers.stackoverflow.com/ptomblin
Re: How to get a field that starts with a minus?
What is the field type of if field? Is it string?
What happens when you do :
q={!raw f=id}-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d
query.setQuery({!raw f=id}-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d);
--- On Sun, 2/20/11, Paul Tomblin ptomb...@xcski.com wrote:
From: Paul Tomblin ptomb...@xcski.com
Subject: How to get a field that starts with a minus?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Sunday, February 20, 2011, 5:15 PM
I have a field in my database, id,
which is the unique key. The id
is generated as an MD5 hash of some of the other data in
the record,
and unfortunately the way I converted it to hex meant that
sometimes I
get a negative value. I'm having a real hard time
figuring out the
right combination of quotes and escapes so I can actually
query these
things using SolrJ. On the Solr web interface, I can
just do put in
id:-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d
which results in a url like:
http://localhost:8080/solrChunk/nutch/select/?q=id:%22-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d%22version=2.2start=0rows=10indent=on
but when I try that using SolrJ
SolrQuery query = new
SolrQuery();
query.setQuery(key + : +
value);
query.setRows(NUM_AT_A_TIME);
int start = 0;
while (true)
{
query.setStart(start);
QueryResponse resp = solrChunkServer.query(query);
SolrDocumentList docs = resp.getResults();
LOG.debug(got + docs.getNumFound() + documents
(or + docs.size() + if you prefer));
if
(docs.size() == 0)
break;
for
(SolrDocument doc : docs)
{
retCode.add(doc);
}
if
(docs.size() NUM_AT_A_TIME)
break;
start += NUM_AT_A_TIME;
}
I call that using key = id and value =
-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d and I get an
exception. If I
change value to \-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d\, I
get no
results. If I change value to
\-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d, I
get no results. If I change value to
\\-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d\, I get no
results.
If I had hair, I'd be tearing it out right now.
--
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paultomblin
http://careers.stackoverflow.com/ptomblin
Re: How to get a field that starts with a minus?
Yes, it's string:
fieldType name=string class=solr.StrField
sortMissingLast=true omitNorms=true/
field name=id type=string stored=true indexed=true/
Is there a better field definition I should be using?
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
What is the field type of if field? Is it string?
What happens when you do :
q={!raw f=id}-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d
query.setQuery({!raw f=id}-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d);
--- On Sun, 2/20/11, Paul Tomblin ptomb...@xcski.com wrote:
From: Paul Tomblin ptomb...@xcski.com
Subject: How to get a field that starts with a minus?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Sunday, February 20, 2011, 5:15 PM
I have a field in my database, id,
which is the unique key. The id
is generated as an MD5 hash of some of the other data in
the record,
and unfortunately the way I converted it to hex meant that
sometimes I
get a negative value. I'm having a real hard time
figuring out the
right combination of quotes and escapes so I can actually
query these
things using SolrJ. On the Solr web interface, I can
just do put in
id:-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d
which results in a url like:
http://localhost:8080/solrChunk/nutch/select/?q=id:%22-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d%22version=2.2start=0rows=10indent=on
but when I try that using SolrJ
SolrQuery query = new
SolrQuery();
query.setQuery(key + : +
value);
query.setRows(NUM_AT_A_TIME);
int start = 0;
while (true)
{
query.setStart(start);
QueryResponse resp = solrChunkServer.query(query);
SolrDocumentList docs = resp.getResults();
LOG.debug(got + docs.getNumFound() + documents
(or + docs.size() + if you prefer));
if
(docs.size() == 0)
break;
for
(SolrDocument doc : docs)
{
retCode.add(doc);
}
if
(docs.size() NUM_AT_A_TIME)
break;
start += NUM_AT_A_TIME;
}
I call that using key = id and value =
-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d and I get an
exception. If I
change value to \-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d\, I
get no
results. If I change value to
\-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d, I
get no results. If I change value to
\\-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d\, I get no
results.
If I had hair, I'd be tearing it out right now.
--
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paultomblin
http://careers.stackoverflow.com/ptomblin
--
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paultomblin
http://careers.stackoverflow.com/ptomblin
Synonyms.txt
Hello, Is there any free Synonyms.txt available on internet ? Wasn't able to find any. Specially interested by the french version. ++ Marc -- *Programmers.ch* Développement WEB Solutions libres et Opensources Tel: ++41 76 44 888 72 Site: http://www.programmers.ch
Re: How to get a field that starts with a minus?
--- On Sun, 2/20/11, Paul Tomblin ptomb...@xcski.com wrote:
From: Paul Tomblin ptomb...@xcski.com
Subject: Re: How to get a field that starts with a minus?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Sunday, February 20, 2011, 5:53 PM
Yes, it's string:
fieldType name=string
class=solr.StrField
sortMissingLast=true omitNorms=true/
field name=id
type=string stored=true indexed=true/
No, string is OK. In this case it is better to use raw or field query parser.
SolrQuery.setQuery({!raw f=id}-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d);
Re: How to get a field that starts with a minus?
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Paul Tomblin ptomb...@xcski.com wrote: I have a field in my database, id, which is the unique key. The id is generated as an MD5 hash of some of the other data in the record, and unfortunately the way I converted it to hex meant that sometimes I get a negative value. I'm having a real hard time figuring out the It turns out that the problem isn't the minus sign, the problem is that I keep expecting Solr to act like a relational database. In a relational database, if you do inserts, your queries will find those records even if you haven't committed them. It's only *other* database connections that won't find the records until you commit. But evidently in Solr, even the original connection/thread that inserted the records doesn't see them in a query until you commit them - I assume that's because a web connection is stateless. I added a commit before my query, and now I can find them. -- http://www.linkedin.com/in/paultomblin http://careers.stackoverflow.com/ptomblin
Re: Synonyms.txt
Hi Marc, I don't want to sound to prissy and also assume to much about your application but a generic synonym file could do more harm than good. Lots of applications have specific vocabularies and a specific synonym list is what is needed. Remember synonyms increase recall but reduce precision. The better matched your synonym list is to your users and their searches the better this ratio between recall and precision will be. Without knowing your app or motivation I'd say don't go for a generic list but maybe its right for your circumstances. see this thread here http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/French-synonyms-amp-Online-synonyms-td488829.html On 20 February 2011 15:58, Marc Kalberer i...@programmers.ch wrote: Hello, Is there any free Synonyms.txt available on internet ? Wasn't able to find any. Specially interested by the french version. ++ Marc -- *Programmers.ch* Développement WEB Solutions libres et Opensources Tel: ++41 76 44 888 72 Site: http://www.programmers.ch
Re: How to get a field that starts with a minus?
He could also just escape it or am i missing something? Yes, he can also just escape minus sign using back slash.
Re: How to get a field that starts with a minus?
As I said in my original post, I'd already tried various methods of escaping:
:call that using key = id and value =
:-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d and I get an exception. If I
:change value to \-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d\, I get no
:results. If I change value to \-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d, I
:get no results. If I change value to
:\\-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d\, I get no results.
But it turned out that the values I was querying for had been added
but not committed.
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
He could also just escape it or am i missing something?
--- On Sun, 2/20/11, Paul Tomblin ptomb...@xcski.com wrote:
From: Paul Tomblin ptomb...@xcski.com
Subject: Re: How to get a field that starts with a minus?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Sunday, February 20, 2011, 5:53 PM
Yes, it's string:
fieldType name=string
class=solr.StrField
sortMissingLast=true omitNorms=true/
field name=id
type=string stored=true indexed=true/
No, string is OK. In this case it is better to use raw or field query
parser.
SolrQuery.setQuery({!raw f=id}-3f66fdfb1ef5f8719f65a7403e93cc9d);
--
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paultomblin
http://careers.stackoverflow.com/ptomblin
Re: Synonyms.txt
Thanks Lee ! Your are right, I'm new to solr, and I didn't think about that point. But in my case, target is newspaper articles, so it's more generic contents that specialized contents and I suppose that a generic synonym dictionnary should fit my needs. Thanks for the link ! Marc Programmers.ch Solutions libres et Opensources Tel: ++41 76 44 888 72 Site: http://www.programmers.ch Le 20. 02. 11 17:27, lee carroll a écrit : Hi Marc, I don't want to sound to prissy and also assume to much about your application but a generic synonym file could do more harm than good. Lots of applications have specific vocabularies and a specific synonym list is what is needed. Remember synonyms increase recall but reduce precision. The better matched your synonym list is to your users and their searches the better this ratio between recall and precision will be. Without knowing your app or motivation I'd say don't go for a generic list but maybe its right for your circumstances. see this thread here http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/French-synonyms-amp-Online-synonyms-td488829.html On 20 February 2011 15:58, Marc Kalberer i...@programmers.ch wrote: Hello, Is there any free Synonyms.txt available on internet ? Wasn't able to find any. Specially interested by the french version. ++ Marc -- *Programmers.ch* Développement WEB Solutions libres et Opensources Tel: ++41 76 44 888 72 Site: http://www.programmers.ch
Re: SolrCloud new....
Hi, Can I edit the SolrCloud page? I never thought about it - but since it's a wiki -- everyone can edit, right? For the moment I'll not write stuff onto it - but if you need some help, I can share you some of my ( little, but some ) experience. 2011/2/20 Otis Gospodnetic-2 [via Lucene] ml-node+2538747-751169843-301...@n3.nabble.com Hi Stijn, Thank you for sharing this. Would it at all be possible for you to update the parts of SolrCloud page that are incorrect and that you figured out or add anything new that's not on that page yet? Thanks! Otis Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ - Original Message From: Stijn Vanhoorelbeke [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2538747i=0 To: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2538747i=1 Sent: Fri, February 18, 2011 6:42:10 AM Subject: Re: SolrCloud new Hi, I'm busy doing the exact same thing. I figured things out - all by myself - the wiki page is a nice 'fist view', but doesn't goes in dept... Lets go ahead: 1)Should i copy the libraries from cloud to trunk??? 2)should i keep the cloud module in every system??? A: Yes, you should. You should get yourself the latest dev trunk and compile it. The steps I followed: + grap latest trunk build solr + backup all solr config files + in dir tomcat6/webapps/ remove the dir 'solr' + copy the new solr.war ( which you build in first step ) to tomcat6/webapps + On your Solr_home/conf dir solrconfig.xml need to be replaced by a new one ( you take from example dir of your build) -- some other config files ( like schema.xml ) you may keep using the old ones. + Adapt the new files to represent the old configuration + restart tomcat and it will install new version of solr It seems the index isn't compatible - so you need to flush your whole index and re-index all data. And finally you have your solr system back with zookeeper integrated in /admin zone :) 3) I am not using any cores in the solr. It is a single solr in every system.can solrcloud support it?? A: Actually you are using one cor - so gives no problem. But be sure to check you have solr.xml file in your solr_home dir. This file just mentions all cores - in your case just one core; ( you can find examples of layout of this file easily on http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin ) 4) the example is given in jetty.Is it the same way to make it in tomcat??? A: Right now - it is the same way. You have to edit your /etc/init.d/tomcat6 startup script. In the start) section you can specify all the JAVA_OPTS ( the ones the solrcloud wiki mentions). Be sure to set following one: export JAVA_OPTS=$JAVA_OPTS -DhostPort=8080 ( if tomcat runs on port 8080 ) At first I didn't -- my zookeeper pointed to standard 8983 port, which gave errors. In the above I gave you a quick peak how to get the SolrCloud feature. In above the Zookeeper is embedded in one of your solr machines. If you don't want this you may place zookeeper on a different machine ( like I'm doing right now). If you need more help - you can contact me. Stijn Vanhoorelbeke, -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-new-tp1528872p2526080.htmlhttp://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-new-tp1528872p2526080.html?by-user=t Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-new-tp1528872p2538747.html To unsubscribe from SolrCloud new, click herehttp://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=1528872code=c3Rpam4udmFuaG9vcmVsYmVrZUBnbWFpbC5jb218MTUyODg3MnwxNjg2NDg1MjQ0. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-new-tp1528872p2540432.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Solr 4.0 trunk in production
Not crazy -- but be aware of a few *key* caviates. 1. Do good testing on a stable snapshot. 2. Don't get surprised if you have to rebuild the index from scratch to upgrade in the future. The official releases will upgrade smoothly -- but within dev builds, anything may happen. On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Mark static.void@gmail.com wrote: Would I be crazy even to consider putting this in production? Thanks
Re: Solr 4.0 trunk in production
Thanks for the adivce. Where can I find stable snapshots, I only know of checking out from head? On 2/20/11 11:56 AM, Ryan McKinley wrote: Not crazy -- but be aware of a few *key* caviates. 1. Do good testing on a stable snapshot. 2. Don't get surprised if you have to rebuild the index from scratch to upgrade in the future. The official releases will upgrade smoothly -- but within dev builds, anything may happen. On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Markstatic.void@gmail.com wrote: Would I be crazy even to consider putting this in production? Thanks
Re: DIH threads
It does not substitute values correctly in many cases. It seems to work at a top level, but not in sub-levels. On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com wrote: I used it on 4,0 and it did not help us. We were bound on SQL io Bill Bell Sent from mobile On Feb 18, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Mark static.void@gmail.com wrote: Has anyone applied the DIH threads patch on 1.4.1 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1352)? Does anyone know if this works and/or does it improve performance? Thanks -- Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com
Re: Query performance very slow even after autowarming
Johnny: Are you still looking for help? Wease - NOT always nice. When are we getting better releases? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-performance-very-slow-even-after-autowarming-tp2010384p2542789.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
change in field_type
Hii, I want to confirm that if a change the type of a field from sting to text in schema.xml then whether i have rebuild the index or will it works fine with previous index.
Re: change in field_type
Rebuild - the tokenizers/analyzers for string type would be different for string and text type. -Original Message- From: Isha Garg isha.g...@orkash.com To: solr-user solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Mon, Feb 21, 2011 10:51 am Subject: change in field_type Hii, I want to confirm that if a change the type of a field from sting to text in schema.xml then whether i have rebuild the index or will it works fine with previous index.
