Re: SOLR hangs - update timeout - please help

Lance, I know there are many variables that's why I'm asking where to start and what to check. Updates are sent every 5-7 seconds, each update contains between 1 and 50 docs. Commit is done every time (on each update). Currently queries aren't very frequent - about 1 query every 3-5 seconds, but

RE: Build solr with Maven

Well, it's got all to do with how we have decided the rest of our deployment environment. So the point is basicly that there should be no configurations to the tomcat because the webapp should know all it's settings and could basicly be deployed to whatever tomcat without configuration. Also there

Re: Solr Tomcat Install

Hi, You should disable velocity by adding -Dsolr.velocity.enabled=false to JAVA_OPTS --Jamel -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Tomcat-Install-tp3865290p3866947.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

disadvantage one field in a catchall field

Hi all, I'm using solr 3.4 with a catchall field and an edismaw request handler. I'd like to score higher answers matching with words not contained in one of the fields copied into my catchall field. So my catchallfield is called catchall. It contains, let's say, fields NAME, CATEGORY, TOWN, WAY

Re: disadvantage one field in a catchall field

On 29 March 2012 13:35, elisabeth benoit elisaelisael...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I'm using solr 3.4 with a catchall field and an edismaw request handler. I'd like to score higher answers matching with words not contained in one of the fields copied into my catchall field. So my

Re: SOLR hangs - update timeout - please help

5-7 seconds- there's the problem. If you want to have documents visible for search within that time, you want to use the trunk and near-real-time search. A hard commit does several hard writes to the disk (with the fsync() system call). It does not run smoothly at that rate. It is no surprise that

SolrCloud

Hello, I am working on solr.I have set up 2 solr instances on different systems i.e i did sharding.I am using tomcat and eclipse environment.When I fire a query in solrj for a data from index,i get response when both system's tomcat is working.But when I stop one of the system's server I dont get

Re: SOLR hangs - update timeout - please help

That's bad news. If 5-7 seconds is not safe then what is the safe interval for updates? Near real-time is not for me as it works only when querying by document Id - this doesn't solve anything in my case. I just want the index to be updated in real-time, 30-40 seconds delay is acceptable but not

Re: Responding to Requests with Chunks/Streaming

@All Why nobody desires such a pretty cool feature? Nicholas, I have a tiny progress: I'm able to stream in javabin codec format while searching, It implies sorting by _docid_ here is the diff https://github.com/m-khl/solr-patches/commit/2f9ff068c379b3008bb983d0df69dff714ddde95 The current

Re: Build solr with Maven

I see.. Try to use env-entry.../env-entry in web.xml. Regards, Ingar On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Aleksander Akerø solraleksan...@gmail.com wrote: Well, it's got all to do with how we have decided the rest of our deployment environment. So the point is basicly that there should be no

Fw: confirm subscribe to solr-user@lucene.apache.org

- Forwarded Message - From: Rahul Mandaliya rahul_i...@yahoo.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:38 AM Subject: Fw: confirm subscribe to solr-user@lucene.apache.org hi,  i am giving confirmation for subscribtion to 

Solr advanced boosting

Hello everyone! I am new to Solr and I have been doing a bit of reading about boosting search results. My search index consists of products with different attributes like a title, a description, a brand, a price, a discount percent and so on. I would like to do a fairly complex boosting, so that

Empty facet counts

Hi, I'm currently learning how to use solr and everything seems pretty straight forward. For some reason when I use faceted queries it returns only empty sets in the facet_count section. The get params I'm using are: ?q=*:*rows=0facet=truefacet.field=urn The result: facet_counts: {

RE: Build solr with Maven

Tried that, but I guess I am doing it wrong somehow with the paths. The home folder should be WEB-INF/solr inside the tomcat. But how would I set that path correctly? Do I need to use absolute paths? -Original Message- From: Ingar Hov [mailto:ingar@gmail.com] Sent: 29. mars 2012

Re: query help

Hmmm, I don't quite get this. Are you saying that you want to sort the documents or sort the content within the document? Sorting documents (i.e the results list) requires a single-valued field. So you'd have to, at index time, sort the entries. Sorting the content within the document is

Re: Localize the largest fields (content) in index

The admin UI (schema browser) will give you the counts of unique terms in your fields, which is where I'd start. I suspect you've already seen this page, but if not: http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_5_0/fileformats.html#file-names the .fdt and .fdx file extensions are where data goes when you set

Re: Luke using shards

I very much doubt that you can persuade Luke to reach across shards. Shards are really a higher-level notion, the automatic distribution of requests across shards is really a Solr-level construct (making use of the lower- level Lucene capabilities, to be sure). With Luke, you point it at index

Re: Slow first searcher with facet on bibliographic data in Master - Slave

If you add your query to the firstSearcher and/or newSearcher event listeners in the slave 'solrconfig.xml' ( http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching#newSearcher_and_firstSearcher_Event_Listeners ), each new search instance will wait before accepting queries. Example to load the FieldCache for

Re: Why this document does not match?

Alexander: Your images were stripped by one of our mail servers, so there's not much we can see G... But guessing, you aren't searching the fields you think you are: itemNameSearch:fifa12 becomes itemNameSearch:fifa defaultSearchField:12 where defaultSearchField is defined in your schema.xml

Re: Luke using shards

One option to try here (not verified) is to set up a Solr front that will point to these two shards. Then try accessing its luke interface via admin as you did on one of the shards. But as Erick already pointed out, Luke operates on a lower level than Solr, so this does not necessarily work.

Re: Build solr with Maven

I think you need absolute path. But perhaps if $CATALINA_HOME or $TOMCAT_HOME is set, you can use it with your path.Haven't tried it though.. In any case, you should quite easily be able to verify if relative paths can be used. All you need to do is to get the work directory for the webapp and

Re: disadvantage one field in a catchall field

I guess my question is why are you using a catchall field at all? This is the kind of thing edismax was designed for, so your qf could just contain all the fields with appropriate boosts, there aren't that many... But what you're actually doing will probably work. I think if you're not seeing

Re: SolrCloud

This is the way SolrCloud works at present. There must be at least one instance of each shard up in order to get results. I believe there are plans to return partial results in future, but that's not been implemented yet. Best Erick On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:37 AM, asia asia.k...@lntinfotech.com

Re: query help

a) No. i do not want to sort the content within document . I want to sort the documents . b) As i have explained i have result set( documents ) and each document contains a fields *ad_text* (with other fields also) which is multivalued..storing some tags say B1, B2, B3 in each. bt order of tags

Re: SOLR hangs - update timeout - please help

Could be garbage collection. Could be larger and larger merges. At some point your commit will cause all segments to be merged. It's likely that what's happening is you need to hit the magic combination of events, particularly the problem of too many warming searchers. So, look at your log files

Solr index files - GZIP compression

Hi, I am trying to do the gzip compression in solr server. I had refered to the below link to add the same in the web.xml http://blog.max.berger.name/2010/01/jetty-7-gzip-filter.html I am using jetty server version 6. When I restart the server after adding the above changes, I got the

Re: Slow first searcher with facet on bibliographic data in Master - Slave

I do have a firstSearcher, but currently coldSearcher is set to true. But doesn't this just mean that that any searches will block while the first searcher is running? This is how the comment describes first searcher. It would almost give the same effect; that some searches take a long time.

RE: Build solr with Maven

Yes I figured my problem would be something like that. I'll try with the catalina/tomcat home variables I think. Thank you. -Original Message- From: Ingar Hov [mailto:ingar@gmail.com] Sent: 29. mars 2012 14:13 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Build solr with Maven I

Re: Slow first searcher with facet on bibliographic data in Master - Slave

Arf, I didn't see your attached tgz. In your slave solrconfig.xml, only the 'firstSearcher' contains the query. Add it also in the 'newSearcher', so that the new search instances will wait also after a new index is replicated. The first request is long because the default faceting method uses

Re: Solr advanced boosting

We're doing something similar: We want to combine search relevancy with a fitness value computed from several other data sources. For this, we pre-compute the fitness value for each document and store it a flat file (lines of the format document_id=fitness_score) that we use an

Re: SOLR hangs - update timeout - please help

On 3/29/2012 2:49 AM, Rafal Gwizdala wrote: That's bad news. If 5-7 seconds is not safe then what is the safe interval for updates? Near real-time is not for me as it works only when querying by document Id - this doesn't solve anything in my case. I just want the index to be updated in

Re: Localize the largest fields (content) in index

Hi Erick, thanks:) The admin UI give me the counts, so i can identify fields with big bulks of unique terms. I known this wiki-page, but i read it one more time. List of my file extensions with size in GB(Index size ~150GB): tvf 90GB fdt 30GB tim 18GB prx 15GB frq 12GB tip 200MB tvx 150MB tvf is

Re: Slow first searcher with facet on bibliographic data in Master - Slave

On Mar 29, 2012, at 14:49 , fbrisbart wrote: Arf, I didn't see your attached tgz. In your slave solrconfig.xml, only the 'firstSearcher' contains the query. Add it also in the 'newSearcher', so that the new search instances will wait also after a new index is replicated. Did that now, but

[Announce] Solr 4.0 with RankingAlgorithm 1.4.1, NRT now supports both RankingAlgorithm and Lucene

I am very excited to announce the availability of Solr 4.0 with RankingAlgorithm 1.4.1 (NRT support) (build 2012-03-19). The NRT implementation now supports both RankingAlgorithm and Lucene. RankingAlgorithm 1.4.1 has improved performance over the earlier release (1.4) and supports the entire

Re: Slow first searcher with facet on bibliographic data in Master - Slave

I had the same issue months ago. 'newSearcher' fixed the problem for me. I also remember that I had to upgrade solr (3.1) because it didn't work with release 1.4 But, I suppose you already have a solr 3.x or more. So I'm afraid I can't help you more :o( Franck Le jeudi 29 mars 2012 à 15:41

Re: SOLR hangs - update timeout - please help

Have you tried using Solr 3.5 with RankingAlgorithm 1.4.1 ? Has NRT support and is very fast, updates about 5000 documents in about 490 ms (while updating 1m docs in batches of 5k). You can get more info from here: http://solr-ra.tgels.com/wiki/en/Near_Real_Time_Search_ver_3.x Regards,

Custom scoring question

Hi, I have a situation I want to re-score document relevance. Let's say I have two fields: text: The quick brown fox jumped over the white fence. terms: fox fence Now my queries come in as: terms:[* TO *] and Solr scores them on that field. What I want is to rank them according to the

Re: Empty facet counts

Send schema.xml and did you apply any patches? What version of Solr? Bill Bell Sent from mobile On Mar 29, 2012, at 5:26 AM, Youri Westerman yo...@pluxcustoms.nl wrote: Hi, I'm currently learning how to use solr and everything seems pretty straight forward. For some reason when I use

Re: SOLR hangs - update timeout - please help

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote: 5-7 seconds- there's the problem. If you want to have documents visible for search within that time, you want to use the trunk and near-real-time search. A hard commit does several hard writes to the disk (with the fsync()

Re: [Announce] Solr 4.0 with RankingAlgorithm 1.4.1, NRT now supports both RankingAlgorithm and Lucene

Nothing against RankingAlgorithm and your work, which sounds great, but I think that YOUR Solr 4.0 might confuse some Solr users and/or newbees. As far as I know the next official release will be 3.6. So your Solr 4.0 is a trunk snapshot or what? If so, which revision number? Or have you done

RE: dataImportHandler: delta query fetching data, not just ids?

You can also use $deleteDocById . If you also use $skipDoc, you can sometimes get the deletes on the same entity with a command=full-importclean=false delta. This may or may not be more convienent that what you're doing already. See

Re: [Announce] Solr 4.0 with RankingAlgorithm 1.4.1, NRT now supports both RankingAlgorithm and Lucene

It is from build 2012-03-19 from the trunk (part of the email). No fork. Regards, Nagendra Nagarajayya http://solr-ra.tgels.org http://rankingalgorithm.tgels.org On 3/29/2012 7:20 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote: Nothing against RankingAlgorithm and your work, which sounds great, but I think that

Re: SOLR hangs - update timeout - please help

If you must have real-time search, you might look at systems that are designed to do that. MarkLogic isn't free, but it is fast and real-time. You can use their no-charge Express license for development and prototyping: http://developer.marklogic.com/express OK, back to Solr. wunder Search

UTF-8 encoding

I cant get utf-8 encoding to work!! I havestr name=v.contentTypetext/html;charset=UTF-8/str in my request handler, and input.encoding=UTF-8 output.encoding=UTF-8 in velocity.properties, in various locations (I may have the wrong ones! at least in the folder where the .vm files reside)

Re: Slow first searcher with facet on bibliographic data in Master - Slave

I was wrong! It does seem to work! Thanks a bunch! cheers, :-Dennis On Mar 29, 2012, at 15:52 , fbrisbart wrote: I had the same issue months ago. 'newSearcher' fixed the problem for me. I also remember that I had to upgrade solr (3.1) because it didn't work with release 1.4 But, I

RE: UTF-8 encoding

Hi, Henri. Make sure that the container in which you are running Solr is also set for UTF-8. For example, in Tomcat, in the server.xml file, your Connector definitions should include: URIEncoding=UTF-8 Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | 

Re: UTF-8 encoding

Also, in case you use Apache's mod_proxy, be sure to use the nocanon attribute. (I don't know of an equivalent for mod_rewrite). In general, I tend also to advise also to change the default encoding of the java running the servlets... but I am sure you've done this. Tell us your success or lack

bbox query and range queries

Hello, I'm trying to perform some queries on a location field on the index. The requirement is to search listings inside a pair of coordinates, like a bounding box. Taking a look on the wiki, I noticed that there is the option to use the bbox query but in does not create a retangular shaped box

Re: Custom scoring question

I'm going to try index time per-field boosting and do the boost computation at index time and see if that helps. On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 10:08 -0400, Darren Govoni wrote: Hi, I have a situation I want to re-score document relevance. Let's say I have two fields: text: The quick brown fox

Re: Empty facet counts

The version is 3.5.0.2011.11.22.14.54.38. I did not apply any patches, but then again it is not my server. Do you have a clue on what is going wrong here? Regards, Youri 2012/3/29 Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com Send schema.xml and did you apply any patches? What version of Solr? Bill Bell

pattern error in PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory

Hello I am trying to filter out characters per unicode block or before tokenization, so I use PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory. In the end, I want to filter out all non-CJK characters, basically latin, greek, arabic and hebrew scripts. The problem is, PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory does not

Re: UTF-8 encoding

Thanks for the tips, but unfortunately, no progress so far. Reading through the Web, I guess that jetty has utf-8 problems! I guess that I will have to switch from the embedded (and pre installed - easy) jetty server present in Solr in favor of Tomcat (for which I have to rediscover the

why does building war from source produce a different size file?

hello all, i have been pulling down the 3.5 solr war file from the mirror site. the size of this file is: 6403279 Nov 22 14:54 apache-solr-3.5.0.war when i build the war file from source - i get a different sized file: ./dist/apache-solr-3.5-SNAPSHOT.war 6404098 Mar 29 11:41

Re: query help

Solr doesn't support sorting on multValued fields so I don't think this is possible OOB. I can't come up with a clever indexing solution that does this either, sorry. Best Erick On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Abhishek tiwari abhishek.tiwari@gmail.com wrote: a) No. i do not want to sort

Re: Localize the largest fields (content) in index

Yeah, it's worth a try. The term vectors aren't entirely necessary for highlighting, although they do make things more efficient. As far as MLT, does MLT really need such a big field? But you may be on your way to sharding your index if you remove this info and testing shows problems Best

Re: why does building war from source produce a different size file?

: 6403279 Nov 22 14:54 apache-solr-3.5.0.war : : when i build the war file from source - i get a different sized file: : : ./dist/apache-solr-3.5-SNAPSHOT.war : : 6404098 Mar 29 11:41 ./dist/apache-solr-3.5-SNAPSHOT.war : : am i building from the wrong source? I haven't tested this to

Re: UTF-8 encoding

I doubt that the pre-installed Jetty server has problems with UTF-8, although you haven't told us what version of Solr you're running on so it could be really old. And you also haven't told us why you think UTF-8 is a problem. How is this manifesting itself? Failed searches? Failed indexing? ???

Re: Empty facet counts

Hmmm, looking at your schema, faceting on a uniqueKey really doesn't make all that much sense, there will always be exactly one of them. At least it's highly questionable. But that's not your problem and what's wrong isn't at all obvious. Can you try pasting the results of adding debugQuery=on?

Re: SOLR hangs - update timeout - please help

Guys, thanks for all the suggestions I will be trying them, one at a time. Imho it's too early to give up and look for another tool, I'll try to work on configuration and see what happens. The NRT looks quite promising, there are also tons of config options to change. As for now, I have made the

Re: bbox query and range queries

What are your results? Can you show us the field definition for local and the results of adding debugQuery=on? Because this should work as far as I can tell. Best Erick On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Alexandre Rocco alel...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm trying to perform some queries on a

Re: SOLR hangs - update timeout - please help

More memory is not necessarily better, it can lead to longer, more intense garbage collections that cause things to stop. You might also consider lowering your memory allocation, but 2G is really not all that much so I somewhat doubt it's a problem but thought I'd mention it. Best Erick On Thu,

Re: query help

can i achieve this with help of boosting technique ? On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote: Solr doesn't support sorting on multValued fields so I don't think this is possible OOB. I can't come up with a clever indexing solution that does this either,

Re: SOLR hangs - update timeout - please help

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Rafal Gwizdala rafal.gwizd...@gmail.com wrote: Below i'm pasting the thread dump taken when the update was hung (it's also attached to the first message of this topic) Interesting... It looks like there's only one thread in solr code (the one generating the

Re: SOLR hangs - update timeout - please help

Yonik, I didn't say there was an update request active at the moment the thread dump was made, only that previous update requests failed with a timeout. So maybe this is the missing piece. I didn't enable nio with Jetty, probably it's there by default. Disabling it is the next thing to check. If

Re: bbox query and range queries

Erick, My location field is defined like in the example project: field name=local type=location indexed=true stored=true/ Also, there is the dynamic that stores the splitted coordinates: dynamicField name=*_coordinate type=double indexed=true stored=false multiValued=false/ The response XML

Re: query help

Boosting won't help either I don't think. Boosts apply to the document, and pretty much ignore position information. Best Erick On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Abhishek tiwari abhishek.tiwari@gmail.com wrote: can i achieve this with help of  boosting technique ? On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at

Re: bbox query and range queries

This all looks fine, so the next question is whether or not your documents have the value you think. +local_0_coordinate:[-23.6674 TO -23.6705] +local_1_coordinate:[-46.7314 TO -46.7274] is the actual translated filter. So I'd check the actual documents in the index to see if you have a single

Post Sorting hook before the doc slicing.

I'm currently looking to see what would be a decent way to implement a scrolling window in the result set when looking for an item. Basically, I need to find item X in the result set and return say N items before and N items after. - N items -- Item X --- N items So I was thinking a

Re: Custom scoring question

Can't you simply calculate that at index time and assign the result to a field, then sort by that field. On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Darren Govoni dar...@ontrenet.com wrote: I'm going to try index time per-field boosting and do the boost computation at index time and see if that helps.

Re: Localize the largest fields (content) in index

Yes, i think so, too :) MLT doesn´t need termVectors really, but it´s faster with them. I found out, what MLT works better on the title field in my case, instead of big text fields. Sharding is in planning, but my setup with SolrCloud, ZK and Tomcat doesn´t work, see here:

Re: SOLR hangs - update timeout - please help

Oops... my previous replies accidentally went off-list. I'll cut-n-paste below. OK, so it looks like there is probably no bug here - it's simply that commits can sometimes take a long time and updates were blocked during that time (and would have succeeded eventually except the jetty timeout was

Re: Localize the largest fields (content) in index

I don't think there's really any reason SolrCloud won't work with Tomcat, the setup is probably just tricky. See: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-new-td1528872.html It's about a year old, but might prove helpful. Best Erick On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Vadim Kisselmann

Re: Custom scoring question

Yeah, I guess that would work. I wasn't sure if it would change relative to other documents. But if it were to be combined with other fields, that approach may not work because the calculation wouldn't include the scoring for other parts of the query. So then you have the dynamic score and what to

Re: bbox query and range queries

Erick, Just checked on the separate fields and everything looks fine. One thing that I'm not completely sure is if this query I tried to perform is correct. One sample document looks like this: doc str name=id200/str str name=local-23.6696784,-46.7290193/str double

Re: bbox query and range queries

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Alexandre Rocco alel...@gmail.com wrote: http://localhost:8984/solr/select?q=*:*fq=local:[-23.6677,-46.7315 TO -23.6709,-46.7261] Range queries always need to be [lower_bound TO upper_bound] Try http://localhost:8984/solr/select?q=*:*fq=local:[-23.6709,-46.7315

Re: bbox query and range queries

Yonik, Thanks for the heads-up. That one worked. Just trying to wrap around how it would work on a real case. To test this one I just got the coordinates from Google Maps and searched within the pair of coordinates as I got them. Should I always check which is the lower and upper to assemble the

Re: bbox query and range queries

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Alexandre Rocco alel...@gmail.com wrote: Yonik, Thanks for the heads-up. That one worked. Just trying to wrap around how it would work on a real case. To test this one I just got the coordinates from Google Maps and searched within the pair of coordinates as

Re: Optimizing in SolrCloud

Don't. Optimize is a poorly-chosen name for a full merge. It doesn't make that much difference and there is almost never a need to do it on a periodic basis. The full merge will mean a longer time between the commit and the time that the data is first searchable. Do the commit, then search.

Re: Optimizing in SolrCloud

Thanks, does it matter that we are also updates to documents at various times? Do the deleted documents get removed when doing a merge or does that only get done on an optimize? On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org wrote: Don't. Optimize is a poorly-chosen

Re: Optimizing in SolrCloud

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, does it matter that we are also updates to documents at various times?  Do the deleted documents get removed when doing a merge or does that only get done on an optimize? Yes, any merge removes documents that have

Re: Optimizing in SolrCloud

The documents are removed from the search when the delete is committed. The space for those documents is reclaimed at the next merge for the segment where they were. wunder On Mar 29, 2012, at 4:15 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote: Thanks, does it matter that we are also updates to documents at

Re: NullPointException when Faceting

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote: I recently got this stack trace when trying to execute a facet based query on my index.  The error went away when I did an optimize but I was surprised to see it at all.  Can anyone shed some light on why this may have

Constant Score queries in functions

I am using the function query as part of an frange. So, something like this: q=productId:[* TO *] fq={!frange l=1}ceil(query(!v='documentType:(blah1 blah2 blah3)')) This is actually quite slow. I suspect that the problem is the query function is calculating a score for every document in the

Re: NullPointException when Faceting

I don't believe this is related to that bug as I don't set the facet prefix. I have honestly never seen the issue before either and an optimize fixed it. I can try to see if I can duplicate the issue tomorrow, but since I've done the optimize I haven't seen it again. On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at

Re: SolrCloud

Ok.Then what does exactly zookeeper do in Solrcloud?Why we use?I am geetting query response from both shards even without using zookeeper. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-tp3867086p3869896.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at

Re: Empty facet counts

Can you also include a /select?q=*:*wt=xml ? On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote: Hmmm, looking at your schema, faceting on a uniqueKey really doesn't make all that much sense, there will always be exactly one of them. At least it's highly

Re: [Announce] Solr 4.0 with RankingAlgorithm 1.4.1, NRT now supports both RankingAlgorithm and Lucene

Why don't yu contribute RA to the source so that it is a feature/module inside SOLR? On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Nagendra Nagarajayya nnagaraja...@transaxtions.com wrote: It is from build 2012-03-19 from the trunk (part of the email). No fork. Regards, Nagendra Nagarajayya