As you suggestedI have indexed 12million sample records in solr on hardware
of 8gb ram. Size of index is 3gb.
can i extrapolate this to predict actual size of index.?
--
View this message in context:
On 2/21/2014 1:39 AM, search engn dev wrote:
As you suggestedI have indexed 12million sample records in solr on hardware
of 8gb ram. Size of index is 3gb.
can i extrapolate this to predict actual size of index.?
If the sizes of those records are about the same size as the records in
the system
Thanks Alexey for giving some really good points.
Just to make sure I get it right
Are you suggesting
1. do facets on category first lets say I get 10 distinct category
2. do another query where q=search query and fq= facet category values
May be im missing something, however Im not sure how
Hi, I am getting Error if any of the field in the xml file has as value.
How can I fix this issue
FYI I changed to amp; in the field but still has issues
e.g filed name=NameATT/field or field name=NameATamp;T/field
Above both gives error, DO I need to change something in the configuration.
I’ve been experimenting with SolrCloud configurations in AWS. One issue I’ve
been plagued with is that during indexing, occasionally a node decides it can’t
talk to ZK, and this disables updates in the pool. The node usually recovers
within a second or two. It’s possible this happens when I’m
Ravi,
What's the error you're getting?
Thanks,
Greg
On Feb 21, 2014, at 11:08 AM, EXTERNAL Taminidi Ravi (ETI,
Automotive-Service-Solutions) external.ravi.tamin...@us.bosch.com wrote:
Hi, I am getting Error if any of the field in the xml file has as value.
How can I fix this issue
FYI
I am getting something like
ERROR org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore [com.ctc.wstx.excwstxLazyEception]
com.ctc.wstx.exc.WstxParsingException: Undeclared general entity nbsp
The filed content is nbsp; or amp;
-Original Message-
From: Greg Walters [mailto:greg.walt...@answers.com]
Sent:
: ERROR org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore [com.ctc.wstx.excwstxLazyEception]
: com.ctc.wstx.exc.WstxParsingException: Undeclared general entity nbsp
nbsp is not a legal XML entity unless you have an enty declaration that
defines it.
it sounds like you don't have valid xml -- it sounds like you
On 2/21/2014 10:31 AM, EXTERNAL Taminidi Ravi (ETI,
Automotive-Service-Solutions) wrote:
I am getting something like
ERROR org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore [com.ctc.wstx.excwstxLazyEception]
com.ctc.wstx.exc.WstxParsingException: Undeclared general entity nbsp
The filed content is nbsp; or amp;
Hi all,
we are using SolR 4.4.0 and planning to migrate to 4.6.1 very soon.
We are looking for a way to get results ordered in a certain way.
For example, we are doing query by ids this way : q=id=A OR id =C OR id=B and
we want the results to be sorted as A,C,B.
Is there a good way to do this
Hi Metin,
How many IDs are you supplying in a single query? You could probably
accomplish this easily with boosts if it were few.
Michael Della Bitta
Applications Developer
o: +1 646 532 3062
appinions inc.
The Science of Influence Marketing
18 East 41st Street
New York, NY 10017
t:
Thank you Michael,
this applies from 5 to about 60 contents.
We have already tried with boosts, but the results were not sorted well every
time.
Maybe our boost coefficients were not set properly, but I thought that there
will be a correct way to do this.
Metin OSMAN
Canal+ || DTD - VOD
01 71
If I want to search across cores, can I use (abuse?) the distributed
search?
My simple experiment seems to confirm this but I'd like to know if there is
any drawbacks other than those of distributed search listed here?
Hello,
We have following hard commit setting in solrconfig.xml.
updateHandler class=solr.DirectUpdateHandler2
updateLog
str name=dir${solr.ulog.dir:}/str
/updateLog
autoCommit
maxTime${solr.autoCommit.maxTime:60}/maxTime
maxDocs10/maxDocs
: Shouldn't we see DirectUpdateHandler2; start commit and
: DirectUpdateHandler2; end_commit_flush message in our log at least every
: ten minutes? I understand that if we have more than 100K documents to
: commit, hard commit could happen earlier than 10 minutes. But we see
: hard commit
On 2/21/2014 2:15 PM, T. Kuro Kurosaka wrote:
If I want to search across cores, can I use (abuse?) the distributed
search?
My simple experiment seems to confirm this but I'd like to know if
there is
any drawbacks other than those of distributed search listed here?
On 2/21/2014 2:34 PM, Joshi, Shital wrote:
updateHandler class=solr.DirectUpdateHandler2
updateLog
str name=dir${solr.ulog.dir:}/str
/updateLog
autoCommit
maxTime${solr.autoCommit.maxTime:60}/maxTime
maxDocs10/maxDocs
In solr 3.6, strictly using log files (catalina.out), how can I determine how
long a commit operation takes? I don’t see a QTime to help me out as in
optimize… No doubt, it’s staring me in the face but I can’t figure it out.
Thanks in advance,
Bill
On 2/21/2014 4:26 PM, William Tantzen wrote:
In solr 3.6, strictly using log files (catalina.out), how can I determine how
long a commit operation takes? I don’t see a QTime to help me out as in
optimize… No doubt, it’s staring me in the face but I can’t figure it out.
Here's a log entry
On 2/21/2014 5:15 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
Here's a log entry from Solr 4.6.1:
INFO - 2014-02-21 17:09:04.837;
org.apache.solr.update.processor.LogUpdateProcessor; [s1live]
webapp=/solr path=/update
params={waitSearcher=truecommit=truewt=javabinversion=2softCommit=true}
{commit=} 0 4698
Hello,
I am using edismax parser in my project.
I just wanted to confirm whether we can use dynamic fields with edismax or
not.
When I am using specific dynamic field in qf or pf parameter , it is
working.
But when iam using dynamic fields with *, like this:
requestHandler name=/select
21 matches
Mail list logo
