solrcloud -How to delete a doc at a specific shard

my solrcloud,3 shards,and 2replica, and one shard docs is duplicate,the document router is compositeId who can help me? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solrcloud-How-to-delete-a-doc-at-a-specific-shard-tp4249354.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list

Re: SOLR 5.4.0?

Sorry for taking so long. I can confirm that SOLR-8418 is fixed for me in a self-built 5.5.0 snapshot. Now the next obvious question is, any ETA for a release? Regards, Ere 31.12.2015, 19.15, Erick Erickson kirjoitti: Ere: Can you help with testing the patch if it's important to you?

Re: date difference faceting

For anyone wanting to know an answer, I used facet.query={!frange l=0 u=3110400}ms(d_b,d_a) facet.query={!frange l=3110401 u=6220800}ms(d_b,d_a) facet.query={!frange l=6220801 u=15552000}ms(d_b,d_a) etc ... Not the prettiest nor most efficient but accomplishes what I need

Re: SOLR replicas performance

Hi Luca, It looks like your queries are complex wildcard queries. My theory is that you are CPU-bounded, for a single query one CPU core for each shard will be at 100% for the duration of the sub-query. Smaller shards make these sub-queries faster which is why 16 shards is better than 8 in your

SolrCloud: Setting/finding node names for deleting replicas

Hi, I'm having trouble identifying a replica to delete... I've created a 3-shard cluster, all 3 created on a single host, then added a replica for shard2 onto another host, no problem so far. Now I want to delete the original shard, but got this error when trying a *replica* param value I

Re: SOLR replicas performance

Hi Shawn, I expect that indexing is a little bit slower with replication but in my case is 3 times worst. I don't explain this. The monitored consumption of resources is: All the test have point out an I/O utilization of 100MB/s during loading data on disk cache, disk cache

Re: enable disable filter query caching based on statistics

I read the client was happy, so I am only curious to know more :) Apart the readibility, shouldn't be more efficient to put the filters directly in the main query if you don't cache ? ( checking into the code when not caching is adding a lucene boolean query, with specifically 0 score, maybe this

Re: SOLR replicas performance

Hi Tomas, I give you other details. - The fragment field contains 3KB xml messages. - The queries that I used for the test are (I only change the word to search inside the fragment field between requests): curl "

Re: SolrCloud: Setting/finding node names for deleting replicas

Honestly, I have no idea which is "old". The solr source itself uses slice pretty consistently, so I stuck with that when I started the project last year. And logically, a shard being an instance of a slice makes sense to me. But one significant place where they word shard is exposed is the

Re: Performance of stats=true={!cardinality=1.0}fl

On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 12:39 +0530, Modassar Ather wrote: > *q=fl1:net*=fl=50=true={!cardinality=1.0}fl* > is returning cardinality around 15 million. It is taking around 4 minutes. Is this a single shard or multiple? Anyway, you might have better luck trying the 'unique' request in JSON

Re: SolrCloud: Setting/finding node names for deleting replicas

I’m pretty sure you could change the name when you ADDREPLICA using a core.name property. I don’t know if you can when you initially create the collection though. The CLUSTERSTATUS command will tell you the core names:

Re: SolrCloud: Setting/finding node names for deleting replicas

Thanks for the pointer Jeff, For SolrCloud it turned out to be... =xxx btw, for your app, isn't "slice" old notation? On 08/01/16 22:05, Jeff Wartes wrote: I’m pretty sure you could change the name when you ADDREPLICA using a core.name property. I don’t know if you can when you

Re: solrcloud -How to delete a doc at a specific shard

solr version is 5.2.0, this problem is different shards with the same ID, the document router is compositeId , and if i do this ../collection/update?commit=true=idhere, then this id is missing in whole solrcloud. -- View this message in context:

Specifying a different txn log directory

Hi, How do I specify a different directory for transaction logs? I tried using the updatelog entry in solrconfig.xml and reloaded the collection but that does not seem to work. Is there another setting I need to change? Thanks Nitin

Re: Performance of stats=true={!cardinality=1.0}fl

Hi, An input will be helpful. Thanks, Modassar On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Modassar Ather wrote: > Hi, > > > *q=fl1:net*=fl=50=true={!cardinality=1.0}fl* > is returning cardinality around 15 million. It is taking around 4 minutes. > Similar response time is seen

date difference faceting

Hi, I have two date fields, d_a and d_b, both of type solr.TrieDateField, that represent different events associated with a particular document. The interval between these dates is relevant for corner-case statistics. The interval is calculated as the difference: sub(d_b,d_a) and I've been

Re: Solr search and index rate optimization

On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 10:55 +0500, Zap Org wrote: > i wanted to ask that i need to index after evey 15 min with hard commit > (real time records) and currently have 5 zookeeper instances and 2 solr > instances in one machine serving 200 users with 32GB RAM. whereas i wanted > to serve more than

Re: Manage schema.xml via Solrj?

On 1/8/2016 6:30 AM, Bob Lawson wrote: > Thanks for the replies. The problem I'm trying to solve is to automate > whatever steps I can in configuring Solr for our customer. Rather than an > admin have to edit schema.xml, I thought it would be easier and less > error-prone to do it

Re: Performance of stats=true={!cardinality=1.0}fl

Hi Toke, Is this a single shard or multiple? It is 12 shard cluster without replicas and has around 90+ GB on each shard. Thanks for sharing the link. I will look into that. Regards, Modassar On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Toke Eskildsen wrote: > On Wed, 2016-01-06

Re: Solr UIMA Custom Annotator PEAR file installation on Linux

Hi, do you mean you want to use a PEAR to provide the Annotator for the Solr UIMA UpdateProcessor ? Can you please detail a bit more your needs? Regards, Tommaso 2016-01-08 1:57 GMT+01:00 techqnq : > implemented custom annotator and generated the PEAR file. > Windos has the

Re: Manage schema.xml via Solrj?

Thanks for the replies. The problem I'm trying to solve is to automate whatever steps I can in configuring Solr for our customer. Rather than an admin have to edit schema.xml, I thought it would be easier and less error-prone to do it programmatically. But I'm a novice, so if there is a better,

Re: SOLR replicas performance

Hi Erick, I used solr5.3.1 and I sincerely expected response times with replica configuration near to response times without replica configuration. Do you agree with me? I read here http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Cloud-Query-Scaling-td4110516.html that "Queries do not need to be routed

Re: SOLR replicas performance

Hi Erick, I used solr5.3.1 and I sincerely expected response times with replica configuration near to response times without replica configuration. Do you agree with me? I read here http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Cloud-Query-Scaling-td4110516.html that "Queries do not need to be routed

RE: Manage schema.xml via Solrj?

Bob, XY problem means that you are presenting the imagined solution without presenting the problem to solve. In other words, you are presenting X (solve for X), without a full statement of the equation to be solved for X. My guess at your problem is the same as my problem - editing Solr

Re: SOLR replicas performance

Hi Matteo, the questions are two: - "Why are response times on a solr cloud collecton with 1 replica higher than on solr cloud without replica" Configuration1: solrCloud with two 8 cores VMs each with 8 shards of 17M docs Configuration2: solrClous with two 8 cores VMs

Re: Solr UIMA Custom Annotator PEAR file installation on Linux

Yes, I want to use PEAR file to provide my custom annotator for the solr UIMA UpdateProcessor. Basically I have written a custom annotator to capture the certain type of data from "content" and copies over to other solr field. Generated the PEAR file using eclipse UIMA plugins. All well till now.

Re: Manage schema.xml via Solrj?

Bob, Not sure why you would want to do this. You can set up Solr to guess the schema. It creates a file called manage_schema.xml for an override. This is the case with 5.3 I came across it by accident setting it up the first time and I was a little annoyed but it made for a quick setup. Your

Re: Manage schema.xml via Solrj?

First, Daniel nailed the XY problem, but this isn't that... You're correct that hand-editing the schema file is error-prone. The managed schema API is your friend here. There are several commercial front-ends that already do this. The managed schema API is all just HTTP, so there's nothing

Re: solrcloud -How to delete a doc at a specific shard

This simply shouldn't be the case if by "duplicate" you mean it has the same id (i.e. the field defined as the uniqueKey in schema.xml). If you do have docs in different shards with the same ID, then something is very strange about your setup. What version of Solr BTW? Assuming you mean "same

Kerberos ticket not renewing when storing index on Kerberized HDFS

Hello, I have Solr Cloud configured to stores its index files on a Kerberized HDFS (I followed documentation at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Running+Solr+on+HDFS), and have been able to index some documents with the files being written to the HDFS as expected. However, it

Re: date difference faceting

I'm going to side-step your primary question and say that it's nearly always best to do your calculations up-front during indexing to make queries more efficient and thus serve more requests on the same hardware. This assumes that the stat you're interested in is predictable of course... Best,

Re: SOLR replicas performance

On 1/8/2016 7:55 AM, Luca Quarello wrote: > I used solr5.3.1 and I sincerely expected response times with replica > configuration near to response times without replica configuration. > > Do you agree with me? > > I read here >

Re: Solr search and index rate optimization

Here's a longer form of Toke's answer: https://lucidworks.com/blog/2012/07/23/sizing-hardware-in-the-abstract-why-we-dont-have-a-definitive-answer/ BTW, on the surface, having 5 ZK nodes isn't doing you any real good. Zookeeper isn't really involved in serving queries or handling updates, it's