?????? query action with wrong result size zero

thank you ,Jay Potharaju I got a discover, in the same one solr core , i put two kinds of docs, which means that they does not have the same fields, does this means that different kinds of docs can not be put into the same solr core? thanks! max mi --

Re: fq behavior...

Please take a look at this blog, specifically "Leapfrog Anyone?" section- http://yonik.com/advanced-filter-caching-in-solr/ Thanks, Susmit On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Bastien Latard - MDPI AG < lat...@mdpi.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi guys, > > Just a quick question, that I did not find an

fq behavior...

Hi guys, Just a quick question, that I did not find an easy answer. 1. Is the fq "executed" before or after the usual query (q) e.g.: select?q=title:"something really specific"=bPublic:true=10 Would it first: * get all the "specific" results, and then apply the filter *

RE: Facet ignoring repeated word

Hi, Can you please help? If there is a solution then It will be easy, else I have to create a script in python that can process the results from TermVectorComponent and group the result by words in different documents to find the word count. The Python script will accept the exported Solr

Re: OOM script executed

Thank you Shawn! So if I run the two following requests, it will only store once 7.5Mo, right? - select?q=*:*=bPublic:true=10 - select?q=field:my_search=bPublic:true=10 kr, Bast On 04/05/2016 16:22, Shawn Heisey wrote: On 5/3/2016 11:58 PM, Bastien Latard - MDPI AG wrote: Thank you for

How to get all the docs whose field contain a specialized string?

Hi, all I do a query by solr admin UI ,but the response is not what i desired! My operations follows! first step: get all data. http://127.0.0.1:8080/solr/example/select?q=*%3A*=json=true response follows: "response": { "numFound": 5, "start": 0, "docs": [ {

BigDecimal Solr Field in schema

Hello All, I am using Solr 6.0.0 in cloud mode and have requirement to support all number in BigDecimal Does anyone know which solr field type should be used for BigDecimal? I tried using DoubleTrieField but it does not meet the requirement and round up very big number approx. after 16 digit.

Re: id field always stored?

Solr 6 or Solr 5.5, right? docValues now return the values, even if stored=false. That's probably what you are hitting. Check release notes (under 5.5 I believe) for more details. Regards, Alex. Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates: http://www.solr-start.com/

Re: collection alias and solr streaming expression

Thanks Joel , I have created JIRA issue. please let me know if any feedback. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9077 On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote: > Yes, this needs to be supported. If you open up a ticket, I'll be happy to > review. > >

Re: query action with wrong result size zero

Please show us: 1> a sample doc that you expect to be returned 2> the results of adding '=query' to the URL 3> the schema definition for the field you're querying against. It is likely that your query isn't quite what you think it is, is going against a different field than you think or your

Re: Query String Limit

Or perhaps the TermsQueryParser? See: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers#OtherParsers-TermsQueryParser Best, Erick On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote: > Hi, > > Wow thats a lot of IDs. Where are they coming from? > May be

Re: Filter queries & caching

Well, first of all I would use separate fq clauses. IOW: fq=filter(fromfield:[* TO NOW/DAY+1DAY]&& tofield:[NOW/DAY-7DAY TO *] && type:"abc") would probably be better written as: fq=fromfield:[* TO NOW/DAY+1DAY]=tofield:[NOW/DAY-7DAY TO *]=type:"abc" You can always spoof the * at the _end_ of

Re: Results of facet differs with change in facet.limit.

OK, this is strange on the face of it. Is there any chance you could create a test case that fails? Even if it only fails a small percentage of the time... Best, Erick On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Modassar Ather wrote: > The "val1" is same for both the test with limit

Re: Implementing partial search and exact matching

Hi Nick, Thanks for the reply. Actually q="software engineering" - > doc1 q="software engineer" - > no results q="Software engineer" - > doc2 I hope above test cases will explain my requirements further. So far I'm thinking of changing the qf according to query has enclosing double quotations

Re: I need Consultation/Suggestion and I am even willing to pay fee for that

My reading is that this whole thing is a content farm, automatically generating website based on the user queries against some sort of internal database of documents (PDFs, ebooks, etc perhaps). The goal seems to be SEO rather than user experience. Regards, Alex. Newsletter and

Re: Implementing partial search and exact matching

Lasitha, I think I understand what you are asking and if you have something like Doc1 = software engineering Doc2 = Software engineer And if you query q=software+engineer -> Doc1 & Doc2 but q="software+engineer" -> Doc1 Correct? If this is correct then to my knowledge no, Solr out of the box

Re: Solr 6 / Solrj RuntimeException: First tuple is not a metadata tuple

Joel Bernstein wrote >> Can you post your classpath? classpath as follows: solr-solrj-6.0.0 commons-io-2.4 httpclient-4.4.1 httpcore-4.4.1 httpmime-4.4.1 zookeeper-3.4.6 stax2-api-3.1.4 woodstox-core-asl-4.4.1 noggit-0.6 jcl-over-slf4j-1.7.7 slf4j-api-1.7.7 - Zeki ama calismiyor...

Re: Implementing partial search and exact matching

Hi nd, Here's the issue.. Let's say I search.. Software Engineer. For am example lets say this query will return 10 results when search against ngram field . Now I search "Software Engineer" with double quotations. This should not return same result set as the previous query. I thought the

Filtering on nGroups

I am grouping documents on a field and would like to retrieve documents where the number of items in a group matches a specific value or a range. I haven't been able to experiment with all new functionality, but I wanted to see if this is possible without having to calculate the count and add it

Re: Implementing partial search and exact matching

We implemented something similar it sounds to what you are asking but I dont see why you would need to match the original field. Since technically a field that has *software engineer* indexed is matched by a query like "software eng" to "software engineer" with the ngrams; which makes the

Re: Filter queries & caching

Hi, It depends on your re-use patterns. Query supplied to the filter query (fq) will be the key of the cache map. Subsequent filter query with an existing key will be served from cache. For example lets say that you always use these two clauses together. Then it makes sense to use

Re: collection alias and solr streaming expression

Yes, this needs to be supported. If you open up a ticket, I'll be happy to review. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 2:24 PM, sudsport s wrote: > I tried to run solr streaming expression using collection alias , I get > null pointer

Re: Filter queries & caching

I have almost 50 million docs and growing ...that being said in a high query volume case does it make sense to use fq=filter(fromfield:[* TO NOW/DAY+1DAY]&& tofield:[NOW/DAY-7DAY TO *] && type:"abc") OR fq=filter(fromfield:[* TO NOW/DAY+1DAY]&& tofield:[NOW/DAY-7DAY TO *] ) fq=filter(type:abc)

Re: Filter queries & caching

Are you suggesting rewriting it like this ? fq=filter(fromfield:[* TO NOW/DAY+1DAY]&& tofield:[NOW/DAY-7DAY TO *] ) fq=filter(type:abc) Is this a better use of the cache as supposed to fq=fromfield:[* TO NOW/DAY+1DAY]&& tofield:[NOW/DAY-7DAY TO *] && type:"abc" Thanks On Thu, May 5, 2016 at

id field always stored?

Hi, 1. I was doing some exploration and wanted to know if the id field is always stored even when I set stored = false. ** 2. Also, even though I removed dynamic fields, anything tagged *_id is getting stored despite marking that field stored = false. ** Where string is defined as:

Re: Upper and lower fence in stats component

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Duane Rackley wrote: > My team is switching from a custom statistics patch to using Stats Component > in Solr 5.4.1. One of the features that we haven't been able to replicate in > Stats Component is an upper and lower fence.

Re: Solr cloud 6.0.0 with ZooKeeper 3.4.8 Errors

Yes, Nick, I am using the chroot to share the ZK for different instances. On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Nick Vasilyev wrote: > Just out of curiosity, are you using sharing the zookeepers between the > different versions of Solr? If So, are you specifying a zookeeper

Re: Filter queries & caching

Hi, Cache enemy is not * but NOW. Since you round it to DAY, cache will work within-day. I would use separate filer queries, especially fq=type:abc for the structured query so it will be cached independently. Also consider disabling caching (using cost) in expensive queries:

Re: JSON-Facet ignoring excludeTags when numFound is 0

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Siddharth Modala wrote: > Thanks Yonik, > > That fixed the issue. Will this experimental flag be removed from future > versions? I don't think so... it's needed functionality, I just don't particularly like where I had to put it (in the

Re: JSON-Facet ignoring excludeTags when numFound is 0

Thanks Yonik, That fixed the issue. Will this experimental flag be removed from future versions? Is there any other webpage apart from your blog(which is btw really awesome) where I can find more info on the new facet module(like info reg the processEmpty flag e.t.c)? On May 5, 2016 2:37 PM,

Upper and lower fence in stats component

Hello, My team is switching from a custom statistics patch to using Stats Component in Solr 5.4.1. One of the features that we haven't been able to replicate in Stats Component is an upper and lower fence. The fences limit the data that is sent to the Stats Component but not the data that is

Re: Solr cloud 6.0.0 with ZooKeeper 3.4.8 Errors

Just out of curiosity, are you using sharing the zookeepers between the different versions of Solr? If So, are you specifying a zookeeper chroot? On May 5, 2016 2:05 PM, "Susheel Kumar" wrote: > Nick, Hoss - Things are back to normal with ZK 3.4.8 and ZK-6.0.0. I >

Re: JSON-Facet ignoring excludeTags when numFound is 0

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Siddharth Modala wrote: > Hi All, > > We are facing the following issue where Json Facet with excludeTag doesn't > return any results when numFound=0, even though excluding the filter will > result in matching few docs. (Note:

JSON-Facet ignoring excludeTags when numFound is 0

Hi All, We are facing the following issue where Json Facet with excludeTag doesn't return any results when numFound=0, even though excluding the filter will result in matching few docs. (Note: excludeTag works when numFound is > 0) We are using Solr 5.4.1 For eg. If we have the following data

collection alias and solr streaming expression

I tried to run solr streaming expression using collection alias , I get null pointer expression. after looking at log I see that getSlices returns null. can someone suggest if it is good idea to add support for collection alias in solr streaming expression? If yes I would like to submit fix and

Re: Query String Limit

Hi, Wow thats a lot of IDs. Where are they coming from? May be you can consider using join options of lucene/solr if these IDs are result of another query. Also terms query parser would be better choice in case of lots of IDs.

Re: Solr cloud 6.0.0 with ZooKeeper 3.4.8 Errors

Nick, Hoss - Things are back to normal with ZK 3.4.8 and ZK-6.0.0. I switched to Solr 5.5.0 with ZK 3.4.8 which worked fine and then installed 6.0.0. I suspect (not 100% sure) i left ZK dataDir / Solr collection directory data from previous ZK/solr version which probably was making Solr 6 in

Filter queries & caching

Hi, I have a filter query that gets documents based on date ranges from last n days to anytime in future. The objective is to get documents between a date range, but the start date and end date values are stored in different fields and that is why I wrote the filter query as below

Re: query action with wrong result size zero

Can you check if the field you are searching on is case sensitive? You can quickly test it by copying the exact contents of the brand field into your query and comparing it against the query you have posted above. On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 8:57 AM, mixiangliu <852262...@qq.com> wrote: > > i found a

Re: 11:12:25 ERROR SolrCore org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: undefined field 1948

Thanks Shawn! On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 5/5/2016 9:52 AM, Garfinkel, David wrote: > > I'm new to administering Solr, but it is part of my DAM and I'd like to > > have a better understanding. If I understand correctly I have a field in > my >

Re: 11:12:25 ERROR SolrCore org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: undefined field 1948

On 5/5/2016 9:52 AM, Garfinkel, David wrote: > I'm new to administering Solr, but it is part of my DAM and I'd like to > have a better understanding. If I understand correctly I have a field in my > schema with uuid 1948 that is causing an issue right? The data being indexed contains a field

query action with wrong result size zero

i found a strange thing  with solr query，when i set the value of query field like "brand:amd"，the  size of query result is zero,but the real data is not zero，can  some body tell me why，thank you very much！！ my english is not very good，wish some body understand my words!

11:12:25 ERROR SolrCore org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: undefined field 1948

I'm new to administering Solr, but it is part of my DAM and I'd like to have a better understanding. If I understand correctly I have a field in my schema with uuid 1948 that is causing an issue right? -- David Garfinkel Digital Asset Management/Helpdesk/Systems Support The Museum of Modern Art

Re: JDK requirements for Solr 5.5

On 5/5/2016 1:48 AM, t...@sina.com wrote: > Can Solr run on JDK 7 32 bit? Or must be 64 bit? You can use a 32-bit JVM ... but it will be limited to 2GB of heap. This is a Java limitation, not a Solr limitation. Depending on how large your index is, 2GB may not be enough. Thanks, Shawn

Re: Passing Ids in query takes more time

An ID lookup is a very simple and fast query, for one ID. Or’ing a lookup for 80k ids though is basically 80k searches as far as Solr is concerned, so it’s not altogether surprising that it takes a while. Your complaint seems to be that the query planner doesn’t know in advance that should be

Re: Query String Limit

On 5/4/2016 10:45 PM, Prasanna S. Dhakephalkar wrote: > We had increased the maxBooleanClauses to a large number, but it did not > work It looks like you have 1161 values here, so maxBooleanClauses does need to be increased beyond the default, but the error message would be different if that

Re: I need Consultation/Suggestion and I am even willing to pay fee for that

This statement has two possible meanings in my mind... "I want everything as automated manner with minimal manual work." Do you mean minimal work for your users? Or do you mean minimal work to get your idea up and running and generating income for you or your company? The first meaning is

Re: I need Consultation/Suggestion and I am even willing to pay fee for that

I'll just briefly add some thoughts... #1 This can be done several ways - including keeping a totally separate document that contains ONLY the data you're willing to expose for free -- but what you want to accomplish is not clear enough to me for me to start making recommendations. I'll just say

Re: Solr 6 / Solrj RuntimeException: First tuple is not a metadata tuple

Also since the same query is working from curl, it's a pretty strong indication that the error is occurring on the client. The logs show that the includeMetadata parameter is being sent properly. This is done automatically by the JDBC driver. So the /sql handler should be sending the metadata

Re: Solr 6 / Solrj RuntimeException: First tuple is not a metadata tuple

In looking at the logs things look good on the server side. The sql query is sent to the /sql handler. It's translated to a solr query and sent to the select handler. Results are returned and no errors. So, I'm going to venture a guess that problem is on the client side. I'm wondering if you're

RE: Facet ignoring repeated word

Hi, TermVectorComponent works. I am able to find the repeating words within the same document...that facet was not able to. The problem I see is TermVectorComponent produces result by a document e.g. and I have to combine the counts i.e count of word my is=6 in the list of documents. Can you

Re: Nodes appear twice in state.json

Hmm not good. Definitely a new bug. Please open an issue. Please look up the core node name in core.properties for that particular core and remove the other one from state.json manually. Probably best to do a cluster restart to avoid surprises. This is certainly uncharted territory. On Wed, May

I need Consultation/Suggestion and I am even willing to pay fee for that

What is in my mind!! I have data in TB mainly educational assignments and projects which will contain text, image and may be codes also if this is from computer Science. I will index all the documents into solr and I will also have original copy of those documents. Now, I want to create a

Passing Ids in query takes more time

Hi, I am retrieving ids from collection1 based on some query and passing those ids as a query to collection2 so the query to collection2 which contains ids in it takes much more time compare to normal query. Que. 1 - While passing ids to query why it takes more time compare to normal query

Passing IDs in query takes more time

Hi, I am retrieving ids from collection1 based on some query and passing those ids as a query to collection2 so the query to collection2 which contains ids in it takes much more time compare to normal query. Que. 1 - While passing ids to query why it takes more time compare to normal query

RE: Facet ignoring repeated word

Hi, Please ignore my previous email. CEB India Private Limited. Registration No: U741040HR2004PTC035324. Registered office: 6th Floor, Tower B, DLF Building No.10 DLF Cyber City, Gurgaon, Haryana-122002, India. This e-mail and/or its attachments are intended only for the use of the

RE: Facet ignoring repeated word

Hi, TearmVector component is also not considering query parameter. The below query shows result for all question id instead of question id 3426 http://localhost:8182/solr/dev/terms?terms.fl=comments=true=1000=questionid=3426 Thanks Rajesh CEB India Private Limited. Registration No:

Re: Solr 6 / Solrj RuntimeException: First tuple is not a metadata tuple

Also found // JDBC requires metadata like field names from the SQLHandler. Force this property to be true. props.setProperty("includeMetadata", "true"); in org.apache.solr.client.solrj.io.sql.DriverImpl are there any other ways to get response on solrj without metaData to avoid the

Re: Solr 6 / Solrj RuntimeException: First tuple is not a metadata tuple

could it be something with includeMetaData=true param? I have tried to set it to false but then the logs look like: webapp=/solr path=/sql params={includeMetadata=true=false=1=json=2.2=select+id,+text+from+test+where+tits%3D1+limit+5=map_reduce} status=0 QTime=3 - Zeki ama calismiyor...

Solr Suggester no results

Hi there, I want to use the Solr suggester component for city names. I have the following settings: schema.xml Field definition The field i want to apply the suggester on The copy field The field solr-config.xml true 10 mySuggester

Re: getZkStateReader() returning NULL

You'll need to call this.server.connect() - the state reader is instantiated lazily. Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 5 May 2016, at 01:10, Boman wrote: > I am attempting to check for existence of a collection prior to creating a > new one with that name, using Solrj: > >

JDK requirements for Solr 5.5

Hi, Can Solr run on JDK 7 32 bit? Or must be 64 bit? Thanks

Implementing partial search and exact search

Hi All, I'm trying to implement a search functionality using solr. Currently I'm suing edismax parser with ngram fields to do the search against. So far it works well. The question I have is when the user input double quotations to the search, As the requirement this should match against the

Implementing partial search and exact matching

Hi All, I'm trying to implement a search functionality using solr. Currently I'm suing edismax parser with ngram fields to do the search against. So far it works well. The question I have is when the user input double quotations to the search, As the requirement this should match against the

Re: Solr 6 / Solrj RuntimeException: First tuple is not a metadata tuple

> The logs you shared don't seem to be the full logs. There will be a > related > exception on the Solr server side. The exception on the Solr server side > will explain the cause of the problem. The logs are the full logs which I got on the console when I run the code, and there is no exception

Re: how to range search on the field which contains multiple decimal point (eg: 2.5.0.4)

Santhosh Sheshasayanan wrote: > When I do range search on the "version" field with criteria > [* TO 2.5.0.5], it gave me all the value like (2.5.0.1, 2.5.0.10, > 2.5.0.4). But this is wrong result. Since I was expecting only > 2.5.0.1 and 2.5.0.4. > But it include

Can Highlighting and MoreLikeThis works together in same requestHandler?

Hi, I'm finding out if we could possibly implement highlighting and MoreLikeThis (MLT) function in the same requestHandler. I understand that highlighting uses the normal SearchHandler, while MLT uses MoreLikeThisHandler, and reach requestHandler can only have one handler. For this case, we have

Duplicate docs in pagination with same score in Solr Cloud

We are running a match all query in solr cloud(for example, one shard with 3 replicas) - all data have same score. In solr, if docs have same score, they will be sorted by internal docid. In solr clound, CloudSolrClient will send request to different shards. - round robin Same document may have

Re: Query String Limit

Hi Prasanna, What is the exact number you set it to? What error did you get on solr console and in the solr logs? Did you reload the core/restarted solr after bumping up the solrconfig? Thanks, Susmit On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Prasanna S. Dhakephalkar < prasann...@merajob.in> wrote: > Hi