On 8/8/2018 7:26 AM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> We also took a good look at our monitoring, JVM heap was normal, IO was
> normal, CPU was normal until the first restart. CPU usage is since the first
> restart erratic but not worryingly off the charts, just not 'normal' as usual.
I've seen systems
I am not using edismax (eventually I would like to get there) but I'm just
testing with standard query right now. Original posting:
I'm trying to figure out why the multi-word synonym expansion is not
working correctly (or, at least what I'm misunderstanding). Specifically,
when I test a
Also share your fieldType settings for myfield as well from your schema
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 8:00 PM Doug Turnbull <
dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> Aside from the screenshot issue, one thing to check: are you searching
> with defType=edismax ?
>
> As in
>
Aside from the screenshot issue, one thing to check: are you searching
with defType=edismax ?
As in
q=lcd=myfield=false=edismax
?
Also sow=false should the the default on Solr 7 and above
Doug
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 6:27 PM Roy Lim wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out why the multi-word
Yes please. That way we’ll see the whole thing.
--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com
> On Aug 15, 2018, at 7:20 PM, Roy Lim wrote:
>
> I've subscribed, shall I re-post it then via email?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
I've subscribed, shall I re-post it then via email?
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Keeping the field as string so that no analysis is done on it has yielded
promising results.
I will test more tomorrow and report back.
-Original Message-
From: Hanjan, Harinder [mailto:harinder.han...@calgary.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 5:01 PM
To:
Roy,
Not sure of the point of Nabble when it strips content before passing messages
on to the mailing list. I’ve emailed them about this problem in the past but
they have done nothing about it.
Updating a post on Nabble will never make it to the mailing list. If you want
us to be able to
Hello!
I can't get Solr to give the results I would expect, would appreciate if
someone could point me in the right direction here.
/select?q={!complexphrase}"gar*"
shows me the following terms
-garages
-garburator
-gardening
-gardens
-garage
-
Thanks, updated original post. It just removed what I surrounded with the
raw text markup, I've added it back without markup. Not sure of the point
of raw text if it's always removed
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
The mail server strips pretty much all screenshots and attachments, so
I think some of the data you're trying to provide is missing from the
e-mail.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:27 PM, Roy Lim wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out why the multi-word synonym expansion is not working
>
I'm trying to figure out why the multi-word synonym expansion is not working
correctly. Specifically, when I test a standard query with Solr Admin it is
still splitting on whitespace.
Here is my setup:
- Solr 7.2.1
- synonym LCD => liquid crystal display
- q=myfield:LCD
- added: sow=false
-
Hi Sushant,
I had the same issue and unfortunately the exporter does not appear to support
a secure cluster. I raised a JIRA feature request so please upvote it as this
will increase the chances of it being included in a future release.
Christopher
The Lucene devs in particular already are, thanks.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Erick,
>
> On 8/15/18 12:56 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
>> Also note that the OpenJDK devs regularly get to test very
Thomas:
If you go to the admin UI, pick a collection (or core) and go to the
"analysis" page. Put different values in the "index" and "query" entry
boxes. Sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words ;).
And, indeed, synonyms are one of the prime filters that are often
different between the
You're welcome, great to hear you have less doubts.
I see you're using the SynonymGraphFilter followed by a StopFilter at
query time: have a look at this post [1], you might find some useful info.
Best,
Andrea
[1] https://sease.io/2018/07/combining-synonyms-and-stopwords.html
On 15/08/18
Hi Andrea,
Thanks so much. I wasn¹t thinking in the correct perspective on the query
portion of the analyzer, but your explanation makes perfect sense. In my
head I imagine the result set of the query being transformed by the
filters, but in actuality the filter is being applied to the query
Hi Thomas,
as you know, the two analyzers play in a different moment, with a
different input and a different goal for the corresponding output:
* index analyzer: input is a field value, output is used for building
the index
* query analyzer: input is a (user) query string, output is used
Hi,
We have the text field below configured on fields that are both stored and
indexed. It seems to me that applying the same filters on both index and query
would be redundant, and perhaps a waste of processing on the retrieval side if
the filter work was already done on the index side. Is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Erick,
On 8/15/18 12:56 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Also note that the OpenJDK devs regularly get to test very early
> (unreleased) Java versions, which flushes out a lot of issues long
> before a general release of Java
We (dev@tomcat) get
Also note that the OpenJDK devs regularly get to test very early
(unreleased) Java versions, which flushes out a lot of issues long
before a general release of Java
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 5:25 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 8/14/2018 8:07 PM, Yasufumi Mizoguchi wrote:
>>
>> I am looking for
I found a tipping point where the search being built changes with the
number of qf fields being passed in.
Example search: "foo bar"
solr 7.2.1
select?q.op=AND=edismax=foo bar
Debugging the query you can see it results in:
"parsedquery_toString":"+(+(text:foo) +(text:bar))"
Adding more qf
I have followed this guide for monitoring the solrcloud
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_3/monitoring-solr-with-prometheus-and-grafana.html
I have basic authentication enabled for the solrcloud. How do I configure
the solr-exporter to authenticate with the set username and password.
Thank
On 8/15/2018 1:26 AM, Derek Poh wrote:
We have a setup of 2 servers, running Solr 6.6.2, on production.
There are 5 collections.
All collection are created as 1 shard x 2 replicas.
4 of the collections have this issue.
A replica of each of this 4 collections is in Recovery Mode. The
affected
On 8/14/2018 8:07 PM, Yasufumi Mizoguchi wrote:
I am looking for Lucene/Solr's bug list caused by JVM's implementations.
And I found the following, but it seems not to be updated.
https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/JavaBugs
Where can I check the latest one?
That is the only such list that
Hi
We have a setup of 2 servers, running Solr 6.6.2, on production.
There are 5 collections.
All collection are created as 1 shard x 2 replicas.
4 of the collections have this issue.
A replica of each of this 4 collections is in Recovery Mode. The
affected replicas are on the same server or
26 matches
Mail list logo
