Hello everybody,
Hoping to get advice on a specific issue - We have a collection of 50M
documents. We recently added a featuredAt field defined as such -
This field is sparely populated such that only a small subset (3-5 thousand
currently) have been tagged with that field.
We have a business
only difference. I am testing the raw URL call timing
difference with and without the extra sort.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Ash
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 11:17 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/20/2019 6:25 AM, Ashwin Ramesh wrote:
> > Hoping to get advice on a specific issue - We have a coll
Hi everybody,
I can't find concrete evidence whether docValues are indeed useful for
filter queries. One example of a field:
This field will have a value between 0-1 The only usecase for this
field is to filter on a range / subset of values. There will be no scoring
/ querying on this
o these are just assumptions.
>
> Emir
> --
> Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
> Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
>
>
>
> > On 12 Sep 2019, at 01:27, Ashwin Ramesh wrote:
> >
> > Hi everybody,
>
Hi everybody,
I was wondering if there is a way we can tell solr (7.3+) to run none of
it's scoring logic. We would like to simply add a set of filter queries and
order on a specific docValue field.
e.g. "Give me all fq=color:red documents ORDER on popularityScore DESC"
Thanks in advance,
Ash
Ah! Thanks so much!
On Thu., 12 Sep. 2019, 11:56 pm Shawn Heisey, wrote:
> On 9/12/2019 12:43 AM, Ashwin Ramesh wrote:
> > I just tried a * query with filters with fl=id,score. I noticed that all
> > scores were 1.0. Which I assume means no scoring was done. When I added a
Hi everybody,
We have a usecase where we want to push a popularity boost for each
document in our collection. When a user searches for any term, we would
like to arbitrarily add an additional boost by this value (which is
different for each document).
E.g. q=foo=def(popularityBoostField,1)
am and adding
> it explicitly? As keyword:”ice cream”
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> > On Sep 30, 2019, at 5:27 AM, Ashwin Ramesh wrote:
> >
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I am using the edismax parser and have noticed a very specific behaviour
> > with how sow=tr
Hi everybody,
I am using the edismax parser and have noticed a very specific behaviour
with how sow=true (default) handles multiword keywords.
We have a field called 'keywords', which uses the general
KeywordTokenizerFactory. There are also other text fields like title and
description. etc.
uld describe the business
> case in more detail without including the solution itself more people could
> help.
>
> Eg it ie not clear why you have a scoring model and why this can address
> business needs.
>
> > Am 18.02.2020 um 01:50 schrieb Ashwin Ramesh :
> >
>
Hi,
We are in the process of applying a scoring model to our search results. In
particular, we would like to add scores for documents per query and user
context.
For example, we want to have a score from 500 to 1 for the top 500
documents for the query “dog” for users who speak US English.
We
ping on this :)
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 11:50 AM Ashwin Ramesh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are in the process of applying a scoring model to our search results.
> In particular, we would like to add scores for documents per query and user
> context.
>
> For example, we want to
Hi everybody,
Quick Specs:
- Solr 7.4 Solr Cloud
- 30gb index on 8 shards Tlog/Pull
We run daily backups on our 30gb index and noticed that the overseer does
not process other jobs on it's task list while the backup is being taken.
They remain on the pending list (in ZK). Is this expected?
Also
Hi everybody,
Do we need to have 'indexed=true' to be able to retrieve the value of a
field via FieldValueFeature or is having docValue=true enough?
Currently, we have some dynamic fields as [dynamicField=true, stored=false,
indexed=false, docValue=true]. However when we noticing that the value
Hi everybody,
We are running a query with both elevateIds=1,2,3 & a reranker phase using
LTR plugin.
We noticed that the results do not return in the expected order - per the
elevateIds param.
Example LTR rq param {!ltr.model=foo reRankDocs=250 efi.query=$q}
When I used the standard reranker
being flushed to segments though.
Regards,
Ash
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 3:18 AM Aroop Ganguly
wrote:
> May we know how you are invoking backups ?
>
> > On Mar 9, 2020, at 11:53 PM, Ashwin Ramesh
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > Quick Specs:
> >
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 9:21 AM Aroop Ganguly
wrote:
> Backups on hdfs ?
> These should not be blocking if invoked asynchronously, are u doing them
> async by passing the async flag?
>
> > On Mar 10, 2020, at 3:19 PM, Ashwin Ramesh
> wrote:
> >
> > We use the
tch to an ebs
> disk for backups on a different project because efs couldn't keep up.
>
> > On Aug 10, 2020, at 9:43 PM, Ashwin Ramesh
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Aroop, the general process for our backup is:
> > - Connect all machines to an EFS drive (AWS's NFS ser
I would love an answer to this too!
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 12:18 AM Bram Van Dam wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Been reading up about the various ways of creating backups. The whole
> "shared filesystem for Solrcloud backups"-thing is kind of a no-go in
> our environment, so I've been looking for ways
the
> queue.
>
> It would also help to ensure your overseer is on a node with a role that
> exempts it from any Solr index responsibilities.
>
>
> > On Aug 10, 2020, at 6:43 PM, Ashwin Ramesh
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Aroop, the general process for our backup is
t place and have
> autoAddReplicas=true for indemnity?
>
> > On Aug 10, 2020, at 6:32 PM, Ashwin Ramesh
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > We are using solr 7.6 (SolrCloud). We notices that when the backup is
> > running, we cannot add any rep
Hi everybody,
We are using solr 7.6 (SolrCloud). We notices that when the backup is
running, we cannot add any replicas to the collection. By the looks of it,
the job to add the replica is put into the Overseer queue, but it is not
being processed. Is this expected? And are there any workarounds?
Hi everyone,
We had an OOM event earlier this morning. This has caused one of our shards
to lose all it's replicas and it's leader is still in a down state. We have
restarted the Java process (solr) and it's still in a down state. Logs
below:
```
Feb 25, 2021 @ 11:46:43.000 2021-02-25
23 matches
Mail list logo
