Hi,
I've got an app here that posts data to Solr using Solrj...
I'm trying to update all our apps dependencies, and now I've reached Solrj
Last kown working version is 5.5.0, anything after that dies at compile
time with:
cannot find symbol
[javac] import
Thnx, but that doesn't compile either... lemme read up this...
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> On 5/23/2018 7:25 AM, BlackIce wrote:
>
>> I've got an app here that posts data to Solr using Solrj...
>> I'm trying to update a
Hi again,
Is there a list of things that have been deprecated in solr since 5.0.0? Or
do I have to read EVERY release readme till I get to 7.3.1?
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 4:31 PM, BlackIce <blackice...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thnx, but that doesn't compile either... lemme read up this...
&
I'm not a Solr guru
I take i that you installed Solr with the install script
then it installs into a dir where normal users have no right to access the
necessary files...
One way to circumvent this is to un-install Solr and then re-install
without using the default and have it install
gt; find the data dir for the core (parent of the index dir)
> > > find the config dir for the core
> > > shut down Solr
> > > "rm -rf data"
> > > make any changes to the configs you want
> > > start Solr
> >
> > As BlackIce said, r
ed!
RRK
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Shawn Heisey <elyog...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> On 2/23/2018 6:23 AM, BlackIce wrote:
>
>> I'm reworking some documentation for the Nutch project, and for the sake
>> of
>> correctness and completness could someone tell me at whi
hi,
I'm reworking some documentation for the Nutch project, and for the sake of
correctness and completness could someone tell me at which version did Solr
switch over to the "managed-Schema" by default?
Thank you very much!
RRK
r do well with Scale-up or Scale-out?"
>
> Are there any Performance Benchmarks for the same out there supporting the
> claim?
>
> On 11 Mar 2018 23:05, "BlackIce" <blackice...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have some questions regar
Second to this wouldn't 4 Solr instances each with its own HD be fault
tolerant? vs. one solr instance with 4 HD's in RAID 0? Plus to his comes
the storage capacity, I need the capacity of those 4 drives... the more I
read.. the more questions
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 9:43 PM, BlackIce
Hi,
I have some questions regarding performance.
Lets says I have a dual CPU with a total of 8 cores and 24 GB RAM for my
Solr and some other stuff.
Would it be more beneficial to only run 1 instance of Solr with the
collection stored on 4 HD's in RAID 0?? Or Have several Virtual
Machines
m/deicool
> LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool
>
> "Plant a Tree, Go Green"
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:57 PM, BlackIce <blackice...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > So Im thinking following scenarios :
> > Single instance with drives in
So Im thinking following scenarios :
Single instance with drives in raid 0, raid 10 and raid 5.
And then having 3 Vms and 4 Solr instances each with its own HD.
How do I test this?
Greetz
On Mar 12, 2018 1:16 PM, "BlackIce" <blackice...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, so we're g
r original question about performance with
> reliability
>
> On 12 Mar 2018 02:29, "BlackIce" <blackice...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Second to this wouldn't 4 Solr instances each with its own HD be fault
> > tolerant? vs. one solr instance with 4 HD's in
but it should be possible, without the overhead of VM's
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Deepak Goel <deic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The OS resources would be shared in that case
>
> On 14 Mar 2018 17:19, "BlackIce" <blackice...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
I was just thinking Do I really need separate VM's in order to run
multiple Solr instances? Doesn't it suffice to have each instance in its
own user account?
Greetz
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 7:41 PM, BlackIce <blackice...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't have any production logs and
.. the rest collide with the CPU
heatsinks (Don't ask)
so my entire initial set-up has changed and with it my initial "growth
strategy"
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> On 3/14/2018 5:49 AM, BlackIce wrote:
>
>> I was just t
Looks like I've opened up a very interesting can of worms
Thank you to all that are posting to this thread, I'm learning a lot...
The way I see it now... a Single Solr instance on this machine, seems like
the most intelligent choice.
And then as upgrade path, adding in-expensive machines.
Do you load the index onto a RAM disk? I was under the impression that the
JVM had everything contained that had to do with SOLR (I might be wrong),
if thats the case and you are not loading the Index onto a ram disk then
you won't see any difference.
in either scenario, I don't think you would
I'm not that proficient with Solr.. I used it, but I'd yet have to fully
dive into it, but this topic really interests me.
In those 8 hour tests, does ALL information get accessed, or just partial?
That could be a reason as to why you don't see any difference, that the
test in that time period
Hi,
I'm a comitter at another project.
I just came back from Fosdem and did see some very interesting things some
of which I think the Solr-Lucene project could benefit from... How do I go
about opening a "Ticket"?
Thnx
Have a Great day!
20 matches
Mail list logo
