Using SOLR Autocomplete for addresses (i.e. multiple terms)

Hi, I'm new to SOLR, but I've got it up and running, indexing data via the DIH, and properly returning results for queries. I'm trying to setup another core to run suggester, in order to autocomplete geographical locations. We have a web application that needs to take a city, state / region,

Using SOLR Autocomplete for addresses (i.e. multiple terms)

Hi, I'm reposting my StackOverflow question to this thread as I'm not getting much of a response there. Thank you for any assistance you can provide! http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8705600/using-solr-autocomplete-for-addresses I'm new to SOLR, but I've got it up and running, indexing data

Re: Using SOLR Autocomplete for addresses (i.e. multiple terms)

setup, but I'm not quite comfortable enough with SOLR and the SOLR architecture yet (honestly I've only been using it for about 2 weeks now). Thanks for the help! Dave On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com wrote: Hi, As you see, you've got an answer at StackOverflow

Re: Using SOLR Autocomplete for addresses (i.e. multiple terms)

to the suggester? Thanks! Dave On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Dave dla...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jan, Yes, I just saw the answer. I've implemented that, and it's working as expected. I do have Suggest running on its own core, separate from my standard search handler. I think, however

Re: SOLR results case

Hi Juan, When I'm storing the content, the field has a LowerCaseFilterFactory filter, so that when I'm searching it's not case sensitive. Is there a way to re-filter the data when it's presented as a result to restore the case or convert to Title Case? Thanks, Dave On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:41

Re: SOLR results case

lower-case. Thanks! Dave On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Juan Grande juan.gra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Dave, Have you tried running a query and taking a look at the results? The filters that you define in the fieldType don't affect the way the data is *stored*, it affects the way the data

Trying to understand SOLR memory requirements

if necessary. However, I can't understand why it would need so much memory. Could I have something configured incorrectly? I've been over the configs several times, trying to get them down to the bare minimum. Thanks for any assistance! Dave

Re: Trying to understand SOLR memory requirements

I've tried up to -Xmx5g On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:15 PM, qiu chi chiqiu@gmail.com wrote: What is the largest -Xmx value you have tried? Your index size seems not very big Try -Xmx2048m , it should work On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Dave dla...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to figure

Re: Trying to understand SOLR memory requirements

: you may disable FST look up and use lucene index as the suggest method FST look up loads all documents into the memory, you can use the lucene spell checker instead On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Dave dla...@gmail.com wrote: I've tried up to -Xmx5g On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:15 PM

Re: Trying to understand SOLR memory requirements

Thank you Robert, I'd appreciate that. Any idea how long it will take to get a fix? Would I be better switching to trunk? Is trunk stable enough for someone who's very much a SOLR novice? Thanks, Dave On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: looks like https

Re: Trying to understand SOLR memory requirements

you can try out branch_3x if you want. you can either wait for a nightly build or compile from svn (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/). On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Dave dla...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Robert, I'd appreciate that. Any idea how long

Re: Trying to understand SOLR memory requirements

Robert, where can I pull down a nightly build from? Will it include the apache-solr-core-3.3.0.jar and lucene-core-3.3-SNAPSHOT.jar jars? I need to re-build with a custom SpellingQueryConverter.java. Thanks, Dave On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: I committed

Re: Trying to understand SOLR memory requirements

branch_3x if you want. you can either wait for a nightly build or compile from svn (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/). On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Dave dla...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Robert, I'd appreciate that. Any idea how long it will take to get

Re: Trying to understand SOLR memory requirements

, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Dave dla...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Robert, I'd appreciate that. Any idea how long it will take to get a fix? Would I be better switching to trunk? Is trunk stable enough for someone who's very much a SOLR novice? Thanks, Dave On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:08 PM

Re: Trying to understand SOLR memory requirements

$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Dave dla...@gmail.com wrote: Unfortunately, that doesn't look like it solved my problem. I built

Re: Trying to understand SOLR memory requirements

, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Dave dla...@gmail.com wrote: I'm also seeing the error when I try to start up the SOLR instance: SEVERE: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space at org.apache.lucene.util.ArrayUtil.grow(ArrayUtil.java:344) at org.apache.lucene.util.ArrayUtil.grow(ArrayUtil.java:352

Re: Trying to understand SOLR memory requirements

. Once they select a suggestion, that suggestion needs to have certain information associated with it. It seems that the Suggester component is not the right tool for this. Anyone have other ideas? Thanks, Dave On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Dave dla...@gmail.com wrote: That was how I originally

Re: Using SOLR Autocomplete for addresses (i.e. multiple terms)

Thanks Jan, this is perfect! I'm going to work on implementing it this week and let you know how it works for us. Thanks again! Dave On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com wrote: Hi, I don't think that the suggester can output multiple fields. You would have

Re: Question about best way to architect a Solr application with many data sources

B is a better option long term. Solr is meant for retrieving flat data, fast, not hierarchical. That's what a database is for and trust me you would rather have a real database on the end point. Each tool has a purpose, solr can never replace a relational database, and a relational database

Re: Question about best way to architect a Solr application with many data sources

; you could re-read and send to Solr. > > Best, > Erick > >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Dave <hastings.recurs...@gmail.com> wrote: >> B is a better option long term. Solr is meant for retrieving flat data, >> fast, not hierarchical. That's what a database

Re: Issues with Solr Morphline reading RFC822 files

Can't see what's color coded in the email. > On Feb 13, 2017, at 5:35 PM, Anatharaman, Srinatha (Contractor) > wrote: > > Hi, > > I am loading email files which are in RFC822 format into SolrCloud using Flume > But some meta data of the emails is not

Re: Solr Data Import Handler

That sounds pretty much like a hack. So if two imports happen at the same time they have to wait for each other? > On Feb 12, 2017, at 4:01 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > >> On 2/12/2017 10:30 AM, Minh wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> How can i run multithreads of DIH in a cluster for

Re: solr warning - filling logs

Can you please elaborate? > Sure, will try to move out to external zookeeper > >> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 7:07 PM Dave <hastings.recurs...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> You shouldn't use the embedded zookeeper with solr, it's just for >> development not anywher

Re: solr warning - filling logs

You shouldn't use the embedded zookeeper with solr, it's just for development not anywhere near worthy of being out in production. Otherwise it looks like you may have a port scanner running. In any case don't use the zk that comes with solr > On Feb 26, 2017, at 6:52 PM, Satya Marivada

Re: SOLR JOIN

That seems difficult if not impossible. The joins are just complex queries, with the same data set. > On Feb 28, 2017, at 11:37 PM, Nitin Kumar wrote: > > Hi, > > Can we use join query for more than 2 cores in solr. If yes, please provide > reference or example. >

Re: Phrase Fields performance

Maybe commongrams could help this but it boils down to speed/quality/cheap. Choose two. Thanks > On Apr 1, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > >> On 3/31/2017 1:55 PM, David Hastings wrote: >> So I un-commented out the line, to enable it to go against 6 important >>

Re: Facet? Search problem

https://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing > On Mar 13, 2017, at 9:59 PM, Dave <hastings.recurs...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Perhaps look into grouping on that field. > >> On Mar 13, 2017, at 9:08 PM, Scott Smith <ssm...@mainstreamdata.com> wrote: >> >

Re: Facet? Search problem

Perhaps look into grouping on that field. > On Mar 13, 2017, at 9:08 PM, Scott Smith wrote: > > I'm trying to solve a search problem and wondering if facets (or something > else) might solve the problem. > > Let's assume I have a bunch of documents (100 million+).

Re: Filter Facet Query

Min.count is what you're looking for to get non 0 facets > On Apr 17, 2017, at 6:51 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote: > > My query: > > /select?facet.field=research=on=content:test > > Q1) Facet returns research values with 0 counts which has a research value > that is not from

Re: solr cloud vs standalone solr

There is no solid rule. Honestly stand alone solr can handle quite a bit, I don't think there's a valid reason to go to cloud unless you are starting from scratch and want to use the newest buzz word, stand alone can handle well over half a terabyte index at sub second speeds all day long. >

Re: Move index directory to another partition

To add to this, not sure of solr cloud uses it, but you're going to want to destroy the wrote.lock file as well > On Aug 1, 2017, at 9:31 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > >> On 8/1/2017 7:09 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: >> WARNING: what I currently understand about the limitations

Re: Fetch a binary field

Why didn't you set it to be indexed? Sure it would be a small dent in an index > On Aug 11, 2017, at 5:20 PM, Barbet Alain wrote: > > Re, > I take a look on the source code where this msg happen >

Re: MongoDb vs Solr

Personally I say use a rdbms for data storage, it's what it's for. Solr is for search and retrieve and the expense of possible loss of all data, in which case you rebuild it. > On Aug 12, 2017, at 11:26 AM, Muwonge Ronald wrote: > > Hi Solr can use mongodb for storage and

Re: Different order of docs between SOLR-4.10.4 to SOLR-6.5.1

Rebuild your index. It's just the safest way. On Aug 13, 2017, at 2:02 PM, SOLR4189 wrote: >> If you are changing things like WordDelimiterFilterFactory to the graph >> version, you'll definitely want to reindex > > What does it mean "*want to reindex*"? If I change >

Re: Need help with query syntax

Eric you going to vegas next month? > On Aug 10, 2017, at 7:38 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > > Omer: > > Solr does not implement pure boolean logic, see: > https://lucidworks.com/2011/12/28/why-not-and-or-and-not/. > > With appropriate parentheses it can give the same

Re: Network segmentation of replica

Sorry that should have read have not tested in solr cloud. > On Jul 6, 2017, at 6:37 PM, Dave <hastings.recurs...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have tested that out in solr cloud, but for solr master slave replication > the config sets will not go without a reload,

Re: Network segmentation of replica

I have tested that out in solr cloud, but for solr master slave replication the config sets will not go without a reload, even if specified in the in the slave settings. > On Jul 6, 2017, at 5:56 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > > I'm not entirely sure what happens if the

Re: MongoDb vs Solr

Ones a search engine and the other is a nosql db. They're nothing alike and are completely different tools for completely different jobs. > On Aug 4, 2017, at 7:16 PM, Francesco Viscomi wrote: > > Hi all, > why i have to choose solr if mongoDb is easier to learn and to

Re: MongoDb vs Solr

Uhm. Dude are you drinking? 1. Lucidworks would never say that. 2. Maria is not a json +MySQL. Maria is a fork of the last open source version of MySQL before oracle bought them 3.walter is 100% correct. Solr is search. The only complex data structure it has is an array. Something like mongo

Re: MongoDb vs Solr

Also, id love to see an example of a many to many relationship in a nosql db >> as you described, since that's a rdbms concept. If it exists in a nosql >> environment I would like to learn how... >> >>> On Aug 4, 2017, at 10:56 PM, Dave <hastings.recurs...@gmail.com&

Re: MongoDb vs Solr

>> >>>> wunder >>>> Walter Underwood >>>> wun...@wunderwood.org >>>> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Aug 4, 2017, at 8:13 PM, David Hastings <dhasti...@wshein.com>

Re: MongoDb vs Solr

to the mailing list that's supposed to serve as a source of help, which, you asked for. > On Aug 5, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Dave <hastings.recurs...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Also I wouldn't really recommend mongodb at all, it should only to be used as > a fast front end to an acid compliant

Re: SOLR as nosql database store

You will want to have both solr and a sql/nosql data storage option. They serve different purposes > On May 8, 2017, at 10:43 PM, bharath.mvkumar > wrote: > > Hi All, > > We have a use case where we have mysql database which stores documents and > also some of

Re: Solr in NAS or Network Shared Drive

This could be useful in a space expensive situation, although the reason I wanted to try it is multiple solr instances in one server reading one index on the ssd. This use case where on the nfs still leads to a single point of failure situation on one of the most fragile parts of a server, the

Re: Best practices for backup & restore

I think it's depends what you are backing up and restoring from. Hardware failure? Accidental delete? For my use case my master indexer stores the index on a San with daily snap shots for reliability, then my live searching master is on a San as well, my live slave searchers are all on SSD

Re: Solr Web Crawler - Robots.txt

If you are not capable of even writing your own indexing code, let alone crawler, I would prefer that you just stop now. No one is going to help you with this request, at least I'd hope not. > On Jun 1, 2017, at 5:31 PM, David Choi wrote: > > Hello, > > I was

Re: Solr Web Crawler - Robots.txt

And I mean that in the context of stealing content from sites that explicitly declare they don't want to be crawled. Robots.txt is to be followed. > On Jun 1, 2017, at 5:31 PM, David Choi wrote: > > Hello, > > I was wondering if anyone could guide me on how to crawl

Re: length of indexed value

I’d personally use your second option. Simple and straightforward if you can afford the time for a reindex > On Oct 3, 2017, at 6:23 PM, John Blythe wrote: > > hey all. > > was hoping to find a query function that would allow me to filter based on > the length of an

Re: Semantic Knowledge Graph

ppose any one knows where i may be able to find them, or point me in >> a direction to get more information about this tool. >> >> Thanks - dave >>

Re: Performance Test

Get the raw logs from normal use, script out something to replicate the searches and have it fork to as many cores as the solr server has is what I'd do. > On Sep 4, 2017, at 5:26 AM, Daniel Ortega wrote: > > I would recommend you Solrmeter cloud > > This fork

Re: query with wild card with AND taking lot of time

My other concern would be your p's and q's. If you start mixing in Boolean logic and solrs weak respect for it, it could be unpredictable > On Sep 3, 2017, at 5:43 PM, Phil Scadden wrote: > > 5 seems a reasonable limit to me. After that revert to slow. > > -Original

Re: Sorting on ip address

Store it as an atom rather than an up address. > On Jun 18, 2018, at 12:14 PM, root23 wrote: > > Hi all, > is there a built in data type which i can use for ip address which can > provide me sorting ip address based on the class? if not then what is the > best way to sort based on ip address

Re: Scaling issue with Solr

You may find that buying some more memory will be your best bang for the buck in your set up. 32-64 gb isn’t expensive, > On Dec 27, 2017, at 6:57 PM, Suresh Pendap wrote: > > What is the downside of configuring ramBufferSizeMB to be equal to 5GB ? > Is it only that

7.3 to 7.5

Would a minor solr upgrade such as this require a reindexing in order to take advantage of the skg functionality, or would it work regardless? A full reindex is quite a large operation in my use case

Re: Index optimization takes too long

On a side note, does adding docvalues to an already indexed field, and then optimizing, prevent the need to reindex to take advantage of docvalues? I was under the impression you had to reindex the content. > On Nov 3, 2018, at 4:41 AM, Deepak Goel wrote: > > I would start by monitoring the

Re: Large Number of Collections takes down Solr 7.3

Do you mind if I ask why so many collections rather than a field in one collection that you can apply a filter query to each customer to restrict the result set, assuming you’re the one controlling the middle ware? > On Jan 22, 2019, at 4:43 PM, Monica Skidmore > wrote: > > We have been

Re: Solr Cloud configuration

But then I would lose the steaming expressions right? > On Nov 20, 2018, at 6:00 PM, Edward Ribeiro wrote: > > Hi David, > > Well, as a last resort you can resort to classic schema.xml if you are > using standalone Solr and don't bother to give up schema API. Then you are > back to manually

Re: SOLR Text Field

Wow. Ok dude relax and take a nap. It sounds like you don’t even have a core defined. Maybe you’d do and I’m reaching a bit but start there solr is super simple and only gets complicated when you’re complicated. > On Apr 6, 2019, at 8:59 AM, Dave Beckstrom wrote: > > Hi Everyone,

Re: MLT and facetting

Use the mlt to get the queries to use for getting facets in a two search approach > On Feb 25, 2019, at 10:18 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo > wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > I think there are some pictures which are not being sent through in the > email. > > Do send your query that you are using, and

Re: MLT and facetting

I’m more curious what you’d expect to see, and what possible benefit you could get from it > On Feb 28, 2019, at 8:48 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > I have no idea on this, as the case has not been active for almost 2 years. > Maybe I can try to follow up. > > Faceting by

Re: edismax: sorting on numeric fields

Sounds like you need to use code and post process your results as it sounds too specific to your use case. Just my opinion, unless you want to get into spacial queries which is a whole different animal and something I don’t think many have experience with, including myself > On Feb 16, 2019,

Re: English Analyzer

This will tell you pretty everything you need to get started https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/language-analysis.html > On Feb 5, 2019, at 4:55 AM, akash jayaweera wrote: > > Hello All, > > Can i get details how to use English analyzer with stemming, > lemmatizatiion, stopword removal

Re: Using Solr as a Database?

You *can use solr as a database, in the same sense that you *can use a chainsaw to remodel your bathroom. Is it the right tool for the job? No. Can you make it work? Yes. As for HA and cluster rdbms gallera cluster works great for Maria db, and is acid compliant. I’m sure any other database

Re: Solr 7.7.2 Autoscaling policy - Poor performance

You’re going to want to start by having more than 3gb for memory in my opinion but the rest of your set up is more complex than I’ve dealt with. On Sep 3, 2019, at 1:10 PM, Andrew Kettmann wrote: >> How many zookeepers do you have? How many collections? What is there size? >> How much CPU /

Re: Need more info on MLT (More Like This) feature

As a side note, if you use shingles with the mlt handler I believe you will get better scores/relevant results. So “to be free” becomes indexes as “to_be” “to_be_free” and “be_free” but also as each word. It makes the index significantly larger but creates better “unique terms” in my opinion

Re: Sample JWT Solr configuration

I know this has nothing to do with the issue at hand but if you have a public facing solr instance you have much bigger issues. > On Sep 19, 2019, at 10:16 PM, Tyrone Tse wrote: > > I finally got JWT Authentication working on Solr 8.1.1. > This is my security.json file contents > { >

Re: Solr process takes several minutes before accepting commands after restart

https://doc.sitecore.com/developers/90/platform-administration-and-architecture/en/using-solr-auto-suggest.html If you need more references. Set all parameters yourself, don’t rely on defaults. > On Nov 21, 2019, at 3:41 PM, Dave wrote: > > https://lucidworks.com/post/solr-

Re: Solr process takes several minutes before accepting commands after restart

https://lucidworks.com/post/solr-suggester/ You must set buildonstartup to false, the default is true. Try it > On Nov 21, 2019, at 3:21 PM, Koen De Groote > wrote: > > Erick: > > No suggesters. There is 1 spellchecker for > > text_general > > But no buildOnCommit or buildOnStartup setting

Re: Is it possible to have different Stop words depending on the value of a field?

It clarifies yes. You need new fields. In this case something like Address_us Address_uk And index and search them accordingly with different stopword files used in different field types, hence the copy field from “address” into as many new fields as needed > On Dec 2, 2019, at 7:33 PM,

Re: Is it possible to have different Stop words depending on the value of a field?

.org If you can, please build on your explanation as It > sounds relevant. > -Original Message- > From: Dave > Sent: Monday, December 2, 2019 7:38 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Cc: jornfra...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: Is it possible to have different

Re: Indexing strategies for user profiles

I would index the products a user purchased as well as the number of times purchased, then I would take a user, search their bought products boosted by how many times purchased, against other users, have a facet for products and filter out the top bought products that are not on the users

Re: xms/xmx choices

Actually at about that time the replication finished and added about 20-30gb to the index from the master. My current set up goes Indexing master -> indexer slave/production master (only replicated on command)-> three search slaves (replicate each 15 minutes) We added about 2.3m docs, then I

Re: POS Tagger

teh query >> >> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:11 PM Audrey Lorberfeld - >> audrey.lorberf...@ibm.com wrote: >> >>> So then you do run your POS tagger at query-time, Dave? >>> >>> -- >>> Audrey Lorberfeld >>> Data Scientist, w3 Search >

Re: A Last Message to the Solr Users

I’m young here I think, not even 40 and only been using solr since like 2008 or so, so like 1.4 give or take. But I know a really good therapist if you want to talk about it. > On Nov 30, 2019, at 6:56 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > > Now I have sacrificed to give you a new chance. A little for my

Re: Active directory integration in Solr

I guess I don’t understand why one wouldn’t simply make a basic front end for solr, it’s literally the easiest thing to throw together and then you control all authentication and filters per user. Even a basic one would be some w3 school tutorials with php+json+whatever authentication Mech you

Re: does copyFields increase indexe size ?

#1 merry Xmas thing #2 you initially said you were talking about 1k documents. That will not be a large enough sample size to see the index size differences with this new field, in any case the index size should never really matter. But if you go to a few million you will notice the size has

Re: How to add a new field to already an existing index in Solr 6.6 ?

Or just do it the lazy way and use a dynamic field. I’ve found little to no drawbacks with them aside from a complete lack of documentation of the field in the schema itself > On Dec 8, 2019, at 8:07 AM, David Barnett wrote: > > Also - look at adding fields using Solr admin, this will these

Re: Clarity on Stable Release

But! If we don’t have people throwing a new release into production and finding real world problems we can’t trust that the current release problems will be exposed and then remedied, so it’s a double edged sword. I personally agree with staying a major version back, but that’s because it

Re: Solr cloud production set up

If you’re not getting values, don’t ask for the facet. Facets are expensive as hell, maybe you should think more about your query’s than your infrastructure, solr cloud won’t help you at all especially if your asking for things you don’t need > On Jan 18, 2020, at 1:25 PM, Rajdeep Sahoo

Re: Solr cloud production set up

Agreed with the above. what’s your idea of “huge”? I have 600 ish gb in one core plus another 250x2 in two more on the same standalone solr instance and it runs more than fine > On Jan 18, 2020, at 11:31 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > > On 1/18/2020 1:05 AM, Rajdeep Sahoo wrote: >> Our Index size

Re: Failed to connect to server

It doesn’t need to be identical, just anything with a buildon reload statement > On Jan 17, 2020, at 12:17 PM, rhys J wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:10 PM David Hastings < > hastings.recurs...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> something like this in your solr config: >> >> autosuggest >

Re: Solr 7.5 speed up, accuracy details

There is no increase in speed, but features. Doc values add some but it’s hard to quantify, and some people think solr cloud has speed increases but I don’t think they exist when hardware cost is nonexistent and it adds too much complexity to something that should be simple. > On Dec 28,

Re: Upgrading Solrcloud indexes from 7.2 to 8.4.1

You best off doing a full reindex to a single solr cloud 8.x node and then when done start taking down 7.x nodes, upgrade them to 8.x and add them to the new cluster. upgrading indexes has so many potential issues, > On Mar 6, 2020, at 9:21 PM, lstusr 5u93n4 wrote: > > Hi Webster, > > When

Re: Solr endpoint on the public internet

#1. This is a HORRIBLE IDEA #2 If I was going to do this I would destroy the update request handler as well as the entire admin ui from the solr instance, set up a replication from a secure solr instance on an interval. This way no one could send an update /delete command, you could still

Re: Avoiding single digit and single charcater ONLY query by putting them in stopwords list

Agreed. Just a JavaScript check on the input box would work fine for 99% of cases, unless something automatic is running them in which case just server side redirect back to the form. > On Oct 27, 2020, at 11:54 AM, Mark Robinson wrote: > > Hi Konstantinos , > > Thanks for the reply. > I

Re: sorting help

That’s a good place to start. The idea was to make sure titles that started with a date would not always be at the forefront and the actual title of the doc would be sorted. > On Jul 15, 2020, at 4:58 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > > Yeah, it’s always a question “how much is enough/too much”.

Re: solr startup

It sounds like you have suggester indexes being built on startup. Without them they just come up in a second or so > On Aug 7, 2020, at 6:03 PM, Schwartz, Tony wrote: > > I have many collections. When I start solr, it takes 30 - 45 minutes to > start up and load all the collections. My

Re: solr startup

e.org > Subject: RE: solr startup > > suggester? what do i need to look for in the configs? > > Tony > > > > Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone > > > > Original message > From: Dave mailto:hastings.recurs...@gmail

Re: ***URGENT***Re: Questions about Solr Search

Seriously. Doug answered all of your questions. > On Jul 3, 2020, at 6:12 AM, Atri Sharma wrote: > > Please do not cross post. I believe your questions were already answered? > >> On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 3:08 PM Gautam K wrote: >> >> Since it's a bit of an urgent request so if could please

Re: Getting rid of zookeeper

Is it horrible that I’m already burnt out from just reading that? I’m going to stick to the classic solr master slave set up for the foreseeable future, at least that let’s me focus more on the search theory rather than the back end system non stop. > On Jun 9, 2020, at 5:11 PM, Vincenzo

Re: Script to check if solr is running

A simple Perl script would be able to cover this, I have a cron job Perl script that does a search with an expected result, if the result isn’t there it fails over to a backup search server, sends me an email, and I fix what’s wrong. The backup search server is a direct clone of the live server

Re: How to determine why solr stops running?

I’ll add that whenever I’ve had a solr instance shut down, for me it’s been a hardware failure. Either the ram or the disk got a “glitch” and both of these are relatively fragile and wear and tear type parts of the machine, and should be expected to fail and be replaced from time to time. Solr

Re: Solr8.7 - How to optmize my index ?

I’m going to go against the advice SLIGHTLY, it really depends on how you have things set up as far as your solr server hosting is done. If you’re searching off the same solr server you’re indexing to, yeah don’t ever optimize it will take care of itself, people much smarter than us, like

Re: Recovering deleted files without backup

Just rebuild the index. Pretty sure they’re gone if they aren’t in your vm backup, and solr isn’t a document storage tool, it’s a place to index the data from your document store, so it’s understood more or less that it can always be rebuilt when needed > On Nov 13, 2020, at 9:52 PM, Alex

Re: Need help to resolve Apache Solr vulnerability

Solr isn’t meant to be public facing. Not sure how anyone would send these commands since it can’t be reached from the outside world > On Nov 12, 2020, at 7:12 AM, Sheikh, Wasim A. > wrote: > > Hi Team, > > Currently we are facing the below vulnerability for Apache Solr tool. So can > you

Re: SpellCheckerRequestHandler and onlyMorePopular

Are you running off of a release? onlyMorePopular was only implemented in the trunk a few days ago (in earlier versions, even if you specified onlyMorePopular, it was ignored). dave On Oct 24, 2007, at 5:58 PM, Justin Knoll wrote: I'm running the example Solr install with a custom

Re: how to use PHP AND PHPS?

of the request. $solrResults then has nice arrays for accessing the results, facets, etc. It is a string you're getting back -- but it's just the serialized representation. dave

Re: how to use PHP AND PHPS?

What are the results of the two var_dumps? dave On Nov 5, 2007, at 10:06 PM, James liu wrote: first: i m sure i enable php and phps in my solrconfig.xml two: i can't get answer. *phps: *?php $url = ' http://localhost:8080/solr1/select/? q=2version=2.2start=0rows=10indent=onwt=phps

Re: how to use PHP AND PHPS?

;}} This is exactly correct. two var_dump result: bool(false) So, unserializing is failing. Are you running from the trunk or from a nightly? There was a bug a couple of weeks ago that sent back faulty serialized data. It's fixed now. It's possible this is your issue. dave On Nov 6, 2007

Re: how to use PHP AND PHPS?

use phps, you must unserialize the results. If you use php, you must eval the results (including some sugar to get a variable set to that value). dave

  1   2   3   >