scaling.
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
twitter.com/DmitryKan
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
On 02.08.2011 21:00, Shawn Heisey wrote:
...
I did try some early tests with a single large index. Performance was
pretty decent once it got warmed up
PathHierarchyTokenizerFactory is quite the answer either.
What kind of Solr magic, if any, am I looking for here?
Thanks in advance for any help or advice.
Michael
---
Michael B. Klein
Digitization Workflow Engineer
Stanford University Libraries
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
the merging SOLR combine the results
from shard, when they exceed the facet.limit?
Please ask questions, if something isn't clear or you need more details.
Thanks,
Dmitry Kan
(semisubmersibles and
drillships) are 21 deepwater lt;emdrillinglt;/em
/str
/arr
/lst
Why did solr highlight drilling even though there is no ships in the
text?
*
*--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
), the results you are getting, and the results
you are expecting? actually providing the response xml is very helpful.
(change the fl to hide any fields you consider sensitive)
-Hoss
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
Hi Rohit,
Do you use caching?
How big is your index in size on the disk?
What is the stack trace contents?
The OOM problems that we have seen so far were related to the
index physical size and usage of caching. I don't think we have ever found
the exact cause of these problems, but sharding has
: Dmitry Kan [mailto:dmitry@gmail.com]
Sent: 14 September 2011 08:15
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Out of memory
Hi Rohit,
Do you use caching?
How big is your index in size on the disk?
What is the stack trace contents?
The OOM problems that we have seen so far were related
, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote:
(11/09/14 15:54), Dmitry Kan wrote:
Hello list,
Not sure how many of you are still using solr 1.4 in production, but here
is
an issue with highlighting, that we've noticed:
The query is:
(drill AND ships) OR rigs
Excerpt from
document should satisfy the query (ie it probably
has ships/s somewhere else in it), but each snippet won't generally have all
the terms.
-Mike
On 9/14/2011 2:54 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
Hello list,
Not sure how many of you are still using solr 1.4 in production, but here
is
an issue
again
Rohit
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Kan [mailto:dmitry@gmail.com]
Sent: 14 September 2011 10:23
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Out of memory
Hi,
OK 64GB fits into one shard quite nicely in our setup. But I have never
used
multicore setup. In total you
...@in-rev.com wrote:
It's happening more in search and search has become very slow particularly
on the core with 69GB index data.
Regards,
Rohit
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Kan [mailto:dmitry@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 September 2011 07:51
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject
about the X so that we can understand the
: full issue. Perhaps the best solution doesn't involve Y at all?
: See Also: http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=542341
-Hoss
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
,
Dmitry Kan
://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ#Are_Wildcard.2C_Prefix.2C_and_Fuzzy_queries_case_sensitive.3F
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
. For
clarification see source code of SolrQueryParser.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
Thanks Erick.
Do you think the patch you are working on will be applicable as well to 3.4?
Best,
Dmitry
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
As it happens I'm working on SOLR-2438 which should address this. This
patch
will provide two things:
The
. You'll have to change it after
applying
the patch for this to work for you. Should be trivial, I'll leave a note
in the
code about this, look for SOLR-2438 in the 3x code line for the place
to change.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Erick.
Do
if that worked for you.
But you can't do any of this until the JIRA (SOLR-2438) is
marked Resolution: Fixed.
Don't be fooled by Fix Version. Fix Version simply says
that those are the earliest versions it *could* go in.
Best
Erick
Best
Erick
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Dmitry Kan dmitry
am doing wrong?
Regards,
Siva
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Search-on-multiple-fields-is-not-working-tp3530145p3530145.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
Erick
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Erick. I was in fact reading the patch (the one attached as a
file to the aforementioned jira) you updated sometime yesterday. I'll
watch the issue, but as said the change of a hard-coded boolean to its
Hello,
Is this log from the frontend SOLR (aggregator) or from a shard?
Can you merge, e.g. 3 shards together or is it much effort for your team?
In our setup we currently have 16 shards with ~30GB each, but we rarely
search in all of them at once.
Best,
Dmitry
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:12 PM,
aggregator
Can you merge, e.g. 3 shards together or is it much effort for your team?
Yes, we can merge. We'll try to do this and review how it will works
Thanks, Dmitry
Any another ideas?
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is this log from
this and review how it will works
Thanks, Dmitry
Any another ideas?
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
Is this log from the frontend SOLR (aggregator) or from a shard?
Can you merge, e.g. 3 shards together or is it much effort for your
team
/
/analyzer
/fieldType
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
out
with this.
Thank u in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-request-handler-queries-in-fiddler-tp3564260p3564260.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
, increase the maxsize
value to your acceptable limit.
Regards
Pravesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/cache-monitoring-tools-tp3566645p3566811.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Dmitry Kan [via Lucene]
ml-node+s472066n351...@n3.nabble.com wrote:
If you mean debugging the queries, you can use eclipse+jetty plugin setup
(
http://code.google.com/p/run-jetty-run/) with solr web app (
http://hokiesuns.blogspot.com/2010/01/setting-up
tool. See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrJmx
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, we do require that much.
Ok, thanks, I will try increasing the maxsize.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 10:56 AM, pravesh suyalprav...@yahoo.com wrote:
facet.limit
The culprit seems to be the merger (frontend) SOLR. Talking to one shard
directly takes substantially less time (1-2 sec).
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
Tomás: thanks. The page you gave didn't mention cache specifically, is
there more documentation
-and-lucidworks-with-zabbix/
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
The culprit seems to be the merger (frontend) SOLR. Talking to one shard
directly takes substantially less time (1-2 sec).
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote
, multipled by some
constant (i think it's 2 but it might be higher) in order to over
request facet constriant counts from each shard to aggregate them.
the dominant factor in the slow speed you are seeing is most likeley
Network IO between the shards.
-Hoss
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
to show graphs of loads, e.g. cache counts or CPU load, in
parallel to a console log or to an http request log??
I am working on such a tool currently but I have a bad feeling of
reinventing the wheel.
thanks in advance
Paul
Le 8 déc. 2011 à 08:53, Dmitry Kan a écrit :
Otis, Tomás: thanks
to a console log or to an http request log??
I am working on such a tool currently but I have a bad feeling of
reinventing the wheel.
thanks in advance
Paul
Le 8 déc. 2011 à 08:53, Dmitry Kan a écrit :
Otis, Tomás: thanks for the great links!
2011/12/7 Tomás Fernández Löbbe
If you allow me to chime in, is there a way to check for which
DirectoryFactory is in use, if
${solr.directoryFactory:solr.StandardDirectoryFactory} has been configured?
Dmitry
2011/12/12 Yury Kats yuryk...@yahoo.com
On 12/11/2011 4:57 AM, Rohit wrote:
What are the difference in the
Maybe you should index your values differently? Here is what Lucene's 2.9
javadoc says:
To use this, you must first index the numeric values using
NumericFieldhttp://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_0/api/all/org/apache/lucene/document/NumericField.html(expert:
indexes that handle the queries, while our master handles
updates/commits.
Justin
Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com writes:
Justin, in terms of the overhead, have you noticed if Munin puts much of
it
when used in production? In terms of the solr farm: how big is a shard's
index (given
You can disable stemming in a copy field. So you need to define one field
with your input data on which stemming will be done and the other field
(copy field), on which stemming will not be done. Then on the client you
can decide which field to search against.
Dmitry
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:00
the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
-monitoring.org/plugins/search?keyword=solr
Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com writes:
Thanks, Justin. With zabbix I can gather jmx exposed stats from SOLR, how
about munin, what protocol / way it uses to accumulate stats? It wasn't
obvious from their online documentation...
On Mon, Dec 12
going
to see under solr/ ?
From the numbers (e.g. numDocs of searcher), jconsole see the stats of A.
Where do stats of B go? Or is firstly activated core will capture the jmx
pipe and won't let B's stats to go through?
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
Solved by exposing jmx only on one of the cores, as it is of a more
interest than the other one.
Dmitry
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list,
This might be not the right place to ask the jmx specific questions, but I
decided to try, as we
on a
cloud with Hadoop make it faster (to seconds) as faceting seems to be a
natural map-reduce task?
Are there any other options to look into before stepping into the cloud?
Please let me know, if you need specific details on the schema / solrconfig
setup or the like.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
.
Jonathan
On 3/16/2011 11:51 AM, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 13:05 +0100, Dmitry Kan wrote:
Hello guys. We are using shard'ed solr 1.4 for heavy faceted search over
the
trigrams field with about 1 million of entries in the result set and more
than 100 million of entries
much
worry for you?
I'll check out the direct query and let you know.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Toke Eskildsen t...@statsbiblioteket.dkwrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 13:05 +0100, Dmitry Kan wrote:
Hello guys. We are using shard'ed solr 1.4 for heavy faceted search over
the
trigrams
AM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
Hello guys. We are using shard'ed solr 1.4 for heavy faceted search over
the
trigrams field with about 1 million of entries in the result set and more
than 100 million of entries to facet on in the index. Currently the
faceted
search is very slow
/solr/SolrCloud ?
Basically, of high interest is checking out the Map-Reduce for distributed
faceting, is it even possible with the trunk?
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
with the trunk?
Hm, MR for distributed faceting? Maybe I missed this... can you point to a
place that mentions this?
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
...@lucidimagination.comwrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
Basically, of high interest is checking out the Map-Reduce for
distributed
faceting, is it even possible with the trunk?
Solr already has distributed faceting, and it's much more performant
than a map
you mean when you
refer to distribution of facet requests across hosts?)
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:44 +0200, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Yonik,
Oh, this is great. Is distributed faceting available in the trunk
and generate 2 index.
So I don't know how I could generate 2 different index?
Thank you for your help.
Amel.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
- Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk
Sent: Fri, March 25, 2011 8:26:33 AM
Subject: Re: solr on the cloud
Hi, Upayavira
Probably
for reading the index [randomly] out of
HDFS. Benchmarking'll be implemented next. It's not production
ready, suggestions are welcome.
Jason
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Otis,
Thanks for elaborating on this and the link (funny!).
I have
-tp2752676p2752676.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
such situations, is going all the way
to modifying the Porter stemming source code the best choice?
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
to use stemming on both side (index and query) if you
really want to use stemming.
Ludovic
2011/5/3 Dmitry Kan [via Lucene]
ml-node+2893599-894006307-383...@n3.nabble.com
Dear list,
In SOLR schema on the index side we use no stemming to support favor
wildcard search. On the query
and consistent wildcard support
in the same field.
To me, you have to create 2 different fields.
Ludovic.
2011/5/3 Dmitry Kan [via Lucene]
ml-node+2893628-993677979-383...@n3.nabble.com
Hi Ludovic,
That's an option we had before we decided to go for a full-blown support
of
wildcards
as the
first does *not* double your index size at all.
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Kan [mailto:dmitry@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 4:06 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: stemming for English
Yes, Ludovic. Thus effectively we get index doubled. Given
Hi Pawan,
Which SOLR version do you have installed?
It should be absolutely normal for the data/ sub directory to create when
starting up SOLR.
So just go ahead and post your data into SOLR, if you have changed the
schema already.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 4:01 PM
as the original query and same debug output.
Why is that?
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
to the one you specifically did add the AND in. I guess that it
basically groups left-to-right. So:
term1 AND term2 OR X OR Y
is the same as:
term1 AND (term2 OR (X OR Y))
But I guess you already figured this all out, yeah?
On 5/16/2011 9:24 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
Dear list,
Might have
Hello list,
Is it possible to sort on date field in a facet query in SOLR 3.1?
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
Can you provide an example of what you are trying to do? Are you
referring to ordering the result set or the facet information?
Best
Erick
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list,
Is it possible
, that would/could
not really work.
Perhaps we have to ask another Question .. what are you trying to
achieve? Boost by Date?
Regards
Stefan
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Erick,
It is about ordering the facet information. The result set is empty via
the top of my head here
Erick
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the questions, guys, and sorry for the confusion. I should
start
with a broader picture of what we are trying to achieve. The only problem
is
that I cannot speak
in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/sorting-on-date-field-in-facet-query-tp2956540p2961612.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
way to tell
SOLR to execute query parser the last after all other filters have processes
the query?
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
-sort-question-tp2980683p2980683.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
archive at Nabble.com.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
PM, antonio antonio...@email.it wrote:
Hi Dmitry Kan, thanks for your anwser.
This is an idea, but i think that will be not so performing. Because if the
terms are 1000, i must reorder 1000 terms by own length, and i think the
time will be high for make autocomplete.
Don't you think
routing of
queries to the shards they map to. Can you please give some pointers as to
what would be an optimal way to achieve such a routing inside the front end
solr? Is there a way to configure mapping inside the solrconfig?
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
- Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; yo...@lucidimagination.com
Sent: Thu, June 2, 2011 7:00:53 AM
Subject: query routing with shards
Hello all,
We
the request, it has the correct shard in
there
already.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Fri, June 3
-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Fri, June 3, 2011 12:56:15 PM
Subject: Re: query routing with shards
Hi Otis,
Thanks! This sounds promising. This custom implementation, will it hurt
in
any
.
--
Ken Krugler
+1 530-210-6378
http://bixolabs.com
custom data mining solutions
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
experience / pointers to load balancer software that
was tried with SOLR?
Dmitry
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:42 +0300, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello list,
Thanks for attending to my previous questions so far
authentication. Nginx and others can also do load balancing.
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:32 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:42 +0300, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello list,
Thanks for attending to my previous questions so far
indexing so instead
changed the index time parameter termIndexInterval from 128 to 1024.
(More details here: http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large-scale-search)
Tom Burton-West
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
is only sending in
the
+text:(wasp) on parsing, and doesn't use the was value. Why is it
removing one of the terms?
Thanks!
Andrea
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
param.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Fri, June 3, 2011 12:56:15 PM
Subject: Re: query
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
Hi Otis,
I have fixed it by assigning the value to rb same as assigned to sreq:
rb.shards = shards.toString().split(,);
not tested that fully yet, but distributed faceting works at least on my pc
_3 shards 1 router_ setup.
Dmitry
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Dmitry Kan dmitry
sequence (ngram)
length.
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone have details of how to generate a tag cloud of popular terms
across an entire data set and then also across a query?
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
a 'give me only facets related to the most
relevant docs in the results' functionality.
Any idea on how to do that?
Tommaso
2011/6/16 Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters
facet.offset
This param indicates an offset into the list of constraints
will
make it easier for others to find the right solution for themselves.
Thanks,
Shawn
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
passed
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Esteban Donato
esteban.don...@gmail.comwrote:
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
to it on the Solr end. Our previous implementation used a
QueryWrapperFilter along with some custom code to build a new Filter from
the query provided. How can we plug this filter into Solr?
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
this message and its attachments, along with
any copies thereof. This message does not create any contractual obligation
on behalf of the sender or Law Bulletin Publishing Company.
Thank you.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
=English
protected=protwords.txt /
/analyzer
/fieldType
Thanks in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-improve-query-result-time-tp3136554p3136554.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
Hi all!
solr.StandardTokenizerFactory -- is it possible to see the full description
of its behaviour for solr.1.4 somewhere? Wiki
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.StandardTokenizerFactory
is
very short..
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
,
The underlying Lucene implementation is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_2_9_1/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/standard/
StandardTokenizerImpl.jflex is probably where you should start.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Kan [mailto:dmitry
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Kan [mailto:dmitry@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 9:21 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: solr.StandardTokenizerFactory: more info needed
Hi Steven,
This looks very good. Thanks. Do I understand correctly, that I were
ones of your own to exercise your changes to insure
that they do what you want
Best
Erick
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
OK, thanks. Do you know if there are tokenizer specific tests to run
after
compilation?
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:25 PM
.n3.nabble.com/sorting-on-date-field-in-facet-query-tp2956540p2961612.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
a
completely blank slate so any guidance would be appreciated.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
was typying this on-the-go from my phone, I meant LuceneQParserPlugin of
course.
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
you can try extending LuceneQParser. In its createParser method
(lucene 2.9.3 and solr 1.4) you can analyze the input query in the
param q
...
-
Zeki ama calismiyor... Calissa yapar...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/any-detailed-tutorials-on-plugin-development-tp3177821p3177821.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
.n3.nabble.com/any-detailed-tutorials-on-plugin-development-tp3177821p3184160.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultitermQueryAnalysis
Well, it works in 3.6. With one exception: If I use german umlauts it does
not work anymore.
Text: Bär
Bä* - no hits
Bär - hits
What can I do in this case?
Thank you
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
101 - 200 of 538 matches
Mail list logo
