i'm having no luck deleting by a negative query
indexing the example docs from 1.2, these steps work:
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/update --data-binary
'deletequerysolr/query/delete' -H 'Content-type:text/xml;
charset=utf-8'
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/update --data-binary 'optimize
piete,
thanks for the quick reply.
You need to explicitly define the field you are referring to in order to
achieve this, otherwise the query parser will assume that the minus
character is part of the query and interpret it as field:-solr (where
field is the name of the default field set in
the work arround is to include *:* in yoru query ...
deletequery*:* -solr/query/delete
... if/when this is fixed
in Solr that's esentally what solr will do under the covers.
(would you mind opening a bug to track this and mention the work arround
for other people who encounter it)
will
name=existtrue/str
arr name=suggestions/
/response
any pointers as to what i'm doing wrong, misinterpreting? i suspect
i'm just doing something bone-headed in the analyzer sections...
thanks as always,
rob casson
miami university libraries
:11 PM, Norskog, Lance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are a few parameters for limiting what words are added to the
dictionary. You might be trimming out 'thorne'. See this page:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckerRequestHandler
-Original Message-
From: Rob Casson [mailto:[EMAIL
bram,
you'll want to look at the KeywordTokenizerFactory (which doesn't
actually tokenize), and then use the LowerCaseFilterFactory. the
schema in the example has a fieldType called 'alphaOnlySort' that
should get you started.
cheers,
rob
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 6:21 AM, Bram de Jong [EMAIL
you're likely not copyField-ing *_facet to text, and we'd need to see
what type of field it is to see how it will be analyzed at both
search/index time.
the default schema.xml file is pretty well documented, so you might
want to spend some time looking thru it, and reading the
commentslots of
you might find these helpful...similar question came up last week:
http://ln-s.net/7WpX
http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/solr-forcing-items-with-all-query-terms-to-the-top-of-a-solr-search/
not exactly the same, as this case wanted to boost if *every* term
matched, but a similar
i don't think that's currently supported, but sure others will correct
me if i'm wrong:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/ac8cf41bdb761069/solr_replication_and_spellcheck_data
cheers,
rob
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:08 AM, michael8 mich...@saracatech.com wrote:
I'm currently
sounds like a job for copyField:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FAQ#How_do_I_use_copyField_with_wildcards.3F
add sku_defaultPriceAll to your fields and then:
copyField source=sku_defaultPrice_* dest=sku_defaultPriceAll /
...query on sku_defaultPriceAll.
hth,
rob
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009
from http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
On wildcard and fuzzy searches, no text analysis is performed on
the search word.
i'd just lowercase the wildcard-ed search term in your client code,
before you send it to solr.
hth,
rob
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:18 PM,
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?indent=onversion=2.2q=climatefq=awardinstrument_s:Continuing+grant
str name=awardinstrument_sContinuing grant /str
everything that erik already mentioned, but looks like you also have a
trailing space in the document, so even quoting it would require that
last
poking around at the spellcheck component, and have a couple questions:
1) is there a way to return the distance measure with
spellcheck.extendedResults? haven't poked too closely at the source,
but it might be useful.
2) i'm not entirely clear on the order in which suggestions are
returned.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394282/solr2_maho_impression.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394266/apache_solr_b_red.jpg
thanks to everyone who contributed,
rob
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please submit your
i've experimented with the KStem stuff in the past, and just pulled a
fresh copy of solr from trunk
it looks like Hoss' suggestion #1 does the trick, by simply commenting
out the super.init call...loaded the example data, tested some
analysis, and it seems to work as before.
just a confirmation,
very similar situation to those already reported. 2.9M bilbiographic
records, with authors being the (previous) bottleneck, and the one
we're starting to test with the new algorithm.
so far, no load tests, but just in single requests i'm seeing the same
improvements...phenomenal improvements,
exact can mean a lot of things (do diacritics count?, etc), but in
this case, it sounds like you just need to turn off the stemmer you
have on this fieldtype (or create a new one that doesn't include the
stemmer).
hth,
rob
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Olson, Ron rol...@lbpc.com wrote:
Hi
it's always been my understanding that the caches are discarded, then
rebuilt/warmed:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching#Caching_and_Distribution.2BAC8-Replication
hth,
rob
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Mike Austin mike.aus...@juggle.com wrote:
How does warming work when a
you should probably post your schema.xml and some parts of your
synonyms.txt. it could be differences between your index and query
analysis chains, synonym expansion errors, etc, but folks will likely
need more details to help you out.
cheers,
rob
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:46 PM, deniz
for #1, i don't use DIH, but is there any possibility of that column
having duplicate keys, with subsequent docs replacing existing ones?
and for #2, for some cases you could use a negative filterquery:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Retrieve_docs_with_facets_missing
so
you could look at the ping stuff:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml#The_Admin.2BAC8-GUI_Section
cheers,
rob
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Xin Li x...@book.com wrote:
As we know we can use browser to check if Solr is running by going to
just making sure that you're aware of the built-in replication:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
can pull the indexes, along with config files.
cheers,
rob
2010/12/15 Robert Gründler rob...@dubture.com:
Hi again,
let's say you have 2 solr Instances, which have both exactly
if i'm understanding your question, it sounds like
localparams/tagging/exclusion might be what you want:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Multi-Select_Faceting_and_LocalParams
hth,
rob
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Tim Christensen
tim.christen...@vanns.net wrote:
Hi,
you could just explicitly send multiple sorts...from the tutorial:
sort=inStock asc, price desc
cheers.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:59 PM, kenf_nc ken.fos...@realestate.com wrote:
Is sort order when 'score' is the same a Lucene thing? Should I ask on the
Lucene forum?
--
View this
copyField should do the trick:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Copy_Fields
A common requirement is to copy or merge all input fields into a
single solr field. This can be done as follows:-
copyField source=* dest=text/
hth,
rob
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Saler, Jeff
it does seem a little weird, but q.alt will get what you want:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin#q.alt
hth,
rc
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Jason Chaffee jchaf...@ebates.com wrote:
Can you shed some light on what you did to configure it to handle *:*?
I have the same
a lot of this stuff is covered in the tutorial, and expanded in the
wiki. still the best places to start in figuring out the fundamentals:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.SynonymFilterFactory
hth,
rc
On Mon,
the default schema.xml provided in the Solr distribution is
well-documented, and a good place to get started (including numeric
fieldTypes):
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml
Lucid Imagination also provides a nice reference guide:
i also thought of the lengthFilter stuff, provided it's a
text/KeywordTokenizer field:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.LengthFilterFactory
cheers,
rob
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Erick Erickson
erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you tried setting
sounds like the Luke request handler will get what you're after:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LukeRequestHandler
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LukeRequestHandler#id
cheers,
rob
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Gabriele Kahlout
gabri...@mysimpatico.com wrote:
Hello,
With an inverted
chip,
gonna need more information about your particular analysis chain,
content, and example searches to give a better answer, but phrase
queries (using quotes) are supported in both the standard and dismax
query parsers
that being said, lots of things may not match a person's idea of an
exact
looks like it might actually be a zip file. try renaming/unzipping it.
cheers,
rob
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
I am uable to use the rar file from the site
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1872.
When I try to open it,I get the message
it sounds to me like the field you're using (artistText) is tokenized
and lowercased. it might be good to go over the wiki pages again:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrFacetingOverview
if you keep having problems, post your schema...cheers,
rob
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Andrew
this isn't advice on how to upgrade, but if you/your-project have a
bit of time to wait, 1.4 sounds like it's getting close to an official
releasefyi.
cheers,
rob
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Francis Yakin fya...@liquid.com wrote:
What's the best way to upgrade solr from 1.2.0 to 1.3.0
34 matches
Mail list logo
