Hi, according to slides #3 it's 250,000+ monthly downloads.
http://www.slideshare.net/anshumg/ease-of-use-in-apache-solr
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis.gospodne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 01:25
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: # of
the changes to Solr afterwards.
Thank you,
Alexey Kozhemiakin
: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart
Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853
On 3 December 2014 at 06:35, Alexey Kozhemiakin
alexey_kozhemia...@epam.com wrote:
Dear All,
We have
Dear Community,
We've faced a strange data corruption issue with one of our clients old solr
setup (3.6).
When we do a query (id:X OR id:Y) we get 2 nodes, one contains normal doc data,
another is empty (doc /).
We've looked inside lucene index using Luke - same story, one of documents is
The system was up and running for long time(months) without any updates.
There was no crashes for sure, at least support team says so.
Logs indicate that at some point there was not enough disk space (caused by
weekend index optimization).
Were there any other similar cases or it's unique for
You can think of using facets by category field instead of grouping. It will be
faster and categorization can be done against multiple category fields. Try
different facet methods.
If you don't need number of documents in each category and number of unique
categories is relatively low, you
, including comments in the code like
//nocommit will cause it to fail the ant precommit step. This is
often useful to get other eyeballs on the code early.
But it's up to you.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Alexey Kozhemiakin
alexey_kozhemia...@epam.com wrote:
Dear All
Dear All,
Background:
We have a dataset containing hundreds of millions of records, we facet by
dozens of fields with many of facet-excludes and have relatively small number
of unique values in fields, around thousands.
Before executing search, our users work with advanced search and goal is to
Btw timing for distributed requests are broken at this moment, it doesn't
combine values from requests to shards. I'm working on a patch.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3644
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February
Hi Tim, Torsten,
Please review following threads which covers chatty shard-shard and
shard-replica conversations, and since you index large volumes of data it can
be a potential bottleneck in your case.
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Sharding-and-Replication-td4071614.html
+1 I'd like to vote for this issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4956
It would be useful to have this parameters configurable.
When we index hundreds of millions of documents to 4 shard SolrCloud in
batches of 20K - overhead of this chatty conversation with replicas and other
Dear All,
We are facing strange issue with SolrCloud (4.4 with Embedded Zookeeper).
Cluster consists of 2 shards and 4 nodes. 4th node cannot be added to cluster
and stays in recovering state with following error in logs. Picture from
admin cloud interface
Dear All,
Our SolrCloud cluster(4 nodes, 4 shards, Embedded Zookeeper) failed to start
after VMs we started after weekend.
We shut down 4VM in our private cloud for weekend and started SOLR in the same
order as they were initialized - first zookeeper-hosting node and then 3 other
nodes.
We considered MLT component to implemented a sort of near exact duplicate
detection - which is probably very similar to your task.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MoreLikeThis
You may think of MoreLikeThis as a two phase process (transform a document to
query and run it):
1a) it
One more thanks for posting this!
I struggled with the same issue yesterday and solved it with _version_ hint
from mailing list .
Alex.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Mandel [mailto:mark.man...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 1:53 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
15 matches
Mail list logo
