--
> > Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
> > Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 14 Jul 2020, at 14:00, Chris Dempsey wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm trying to understand
I'm trying to understand the difference between something like
fq={!cache=false}(tag:* -tag:email) which is very slow compared to
fq={!cache=false}(*:* -tag:email) on Solr 7.7.1.
I believe in the case of `tag:*` Solr spends some effort to gather all of
the documents that have a value for `tag`
ameter
>
> Hope it helps,
> Alex.
>
> On Thu., Jul. 9, 2020, 2:05 p.m. Chris Dempsey, wrote:
>
> > Hi all! In a collection where we have ~54 million documents we've noticed
> > running a query with the following:
> >
> > "fq":["{!cache=false}
Hi all! In a collection where we have ~54 million documents we've noticed
running a query with the following:
"fq":["{!cache=false}_class:taggedTickets",
"{!cache=false}taggedTickets_ticketId:100241",
"{!cache=false}companyId:22476"]
when I debugQuery I see:
@Mikhail
Thanks for the link! I'll read through that.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 6:28 AM Chris Dempsey wrote:
> @Erick,
>
> You've got the idea. Basically the users can attach zero or more tags (*that
> they create*) to a document. So as an example say they've created the
> tag
ies. Here's why it's worth to avoid them
> https://www.slideshare.net/lucidworks/search-like-sql-mikhail-khludnev-epam
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 6:17 PM Chris Dempsey wrote:
>
> > Hello, all! I'm relatively new to Solr and Lucene (*using Solr 7.7.1*)
> but
> > I'm lo
he data such that you won’t need wildcards.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> > On Jun 29, 2020, at 11:16 AM, Chris Dempsey wrote:
> >
> > Hello, all! I'm relatively new to Solr and Lucene (*using Solr 7.7.1*)
> but
> > I'm looking into options for optimizing som
Hello, all! I'm relatively new to Solr and Lucene (*using Solr 7.7.1*) but
I'm looking into options for optimizing something like this:
> fq=(tag:* -tag:*paid*) OR (tag:* -tag:*ms-reply-unpaid*) OR
tag:*ms-reply-paid*
It's probably not a surprise that we're seeing performance issues with
gt;
> And yes, your understanding of adding a new field is correct
>
> Best,
> Erick
> On Mon, May 25, 2020, 11:39 Chris Dempsey wrote:
>
> > I'm new to Solr and made an honest stab to finding this in info the docs.
> >
> > I'm working on an update to an e
I'm new to Solr and made an honest stab to finding this in info the docs.
I'm working on an update to an existing large collection in Solr 7.7 to add
a BoolField to mark it as "soft deleted" or not. My understanding is that
updating the schema will mean the new field will only exist and have a
10 matches
Mail list logo
