Congrats!
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 10:06 AM Divye wrote:
>
> Congratulations Jan!
>
> Regards,
> Divye
>
> On Fri, 19 Feb, 2021, 00:26 Anshum Gupta, wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I’d like to inform everyone that the newly formed Apache Solr PMC nominated
> > and elected Jan Høydahl for the
and JVM GC settings to shorten the long individual GC pauses
you're reporting.
Good luck,
Jason
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 7:00 AM Paweł Róg wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
> I have a nasty problem with the scheduled Solr collections backup. From
> time to time when a scheduled backu
olrJ, open a JIRA
ticket with the details of what you're trying to do (or a PR directly)
and I'd be happy to take a look.
Best,
Jason
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 9:29 AM Timo Grün wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I’m currently trying to change the uniqueKey of my Solr Cloud schema using
> Solrj.
&g
though, it might be worth revisiting whether this is really
an issue? While this quirk of Solr's can bedevil automated tests or
other things that rely on repeatability, it's unusual in many
applications for end-users to submit identical queries multiple times.
Every case is different of course, but
differ across SolrCloud
replicas (due to non-deterministic conditions such as the segment
merging and deleted-doc removal that Lucene does under the hood), and
this can produce differently-ordered result sets for users that issue
the same query repeatedly.
Good luck narrowing things down!
Jason
On Mon
quest = new
GenericSolrRequest(SolrRequest.METHOD.GET, "/admin/metrics/history",
params);
final SimpleSolrResponse response = request.process(solrClient);
Hope that helps,
Jason
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:21 AM Gael Jourdan-Weil
wrote:
>
> Hello Steven,
>
> I believe what y
mple handy
- it uses the "type": "query" syntax that MIchael mentioned. [1]
[1] https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_5/json-facet-api.html#query-facet
Best,
Jason
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:49 PM Arturas Mazeika wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> I wish I were able to do a
your "custom-example" permission. When I do that (on Solr
8.6.2), I get the following behavior in the following pastebin link,
which looks close to what you're after: https://paste.apache.org/ygndt
Hope that helps!
Jason
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 3:49 PM Mark Dadisman
wrote:
>
> Hey, I'm
s everything but "id"
from your documents. In many/most usecases that'd be equally
concerning. Just wondering what your usecase is - if it's generally
applicable this is probably worth a JIRA ticket.
Best,
Jason
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:34 AM Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]
wrote
et showing the actual and expected values),
I may be able to provide more help.
Best,
Jason
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 1:54 AM Shivam Jha wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Does anyone have any advice on this issue?
>
> Thanks,
> Shivam
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 1:20 PM Shivam Jha
//lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_6/other-parsers.html#cross-collection-join
Best,
Jason
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 12:45 PM Irina Kamalova wrote:
>
> I suppose my question is very simple.
> Am I right that if I want to use joins in the single collection in
> SolrCloud across several shard
bout potential limitations.
Anyway, still hoping someone else might chime in with a slick
workaround or something. But it does look at this point like I'll
have to go another route or put in some effort myself.
Jason
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 3:41 PM David Smiley wrote:
>
> This is confus
eting (yet:
SOLR-14921).
If no one has other ideas here, maybe my best bet is to switch to
using JSON Faceting and adding an explicit "{!terms}" query as a
filter. I see you suggested that as a workaround here [1].
Jason
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/202010.mbox
early inconsistent between single and multi-shard, so it
deserves a JIRA either way. Just trying to figure out what the
expected behavior is.
Best,
Jason
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 8.6.3.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search, dynamic
clustering, database
something wrong with that
example, maybe we can fix the docs.
Jason
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 3:28 PM Vanalli, Ali A - DOT
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Solr is running on windows machine and wondering if it possible to setup
> BasicAuth with the LDAP?
>
> Also, tried the example of
Hey Mark,
I've fixed it for 8.7 as a part of this ticket here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14748. Thanks for reporting
this.
Jason
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 3:19 PM Jason Gerlowski wrote:
>
> Yikes, yeah it's hard to argue with that.
>
> I'm a little confused becaus
Yikes, yeah it's hard to argue with that.
I'm a little confused because I remember testing this, but maybe it
snuck in at the last minute? In any case, I'll reopen that jira to
fix the check there.
Sorry guys.
Jason
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 9:22 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> This seems t
ing
_some_ of these things or other related details might help you get the
answer you're looking for.
Alternately, if you've figured out the issue already post the answer
on this thread - help anyone with a similar issue in the future.
Jason
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:11 PM Abhijit Pawar wrote:
>
>
about some other security aspect here?
Jason
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:55 AM Noble Paul wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> The end-point for Managed resources is not secured. So it needs to be
> fixed/eliminated.
>
> I would like to know what is the level of adoption for that feature
> an
> Erick
>
> > On Jul 20, 2020, at 10:04 AM, Jason J Baik
> wrote:
> >
> > Our use case here is that we want to highlight a single document (against
> > user-provided keywords), and we know the document's unique key already.
> > So this is really no
Hi David,
I tried this out locally but couldn't reproduce. The command you
provided above works just fine for me.
Can you tell us a bit about your environment? Do you have the full
stack trace of the NPE handy?
Best,
Jason
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 8:01 PM David Glick wrote:
>
> When I
issues
doing so. A few of the exceptions are tracked in our JIRA portal and
you can get more info by searching there.
Best,
Jason
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 5:24 AM Mithun Seal wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> Could you please help me with below compatibility question.
>
> 1. We are trying to
a specific replica _only_ (I’ve often done this
> for
> troubleshooting), address the full replica and add “distrib=false”, i.e.
> http://…../solr/collection1_shard1_replica1?q=*:*=false
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> > On Jul 20, 2020, at 9:02 AM, Jason J Baik
> wrote:
&
Hi,
After upgrading from Solr 6.6.2 to 7.6.0, we're seeing an issue with
request routing in CloudSolrClient. It seems that we've lost the ability to
route a request to a specific core of a node.
For example, if a host is serving shard 1 core 1, and shard 2 core
1, @6.6.2, adding a "_route_="
Hi Aliaksandr
This sounds like a bug to me - I can't think of any reason why this
would be intentional behavior. Maybe I'm missing something and this
is "expected", but if so someone will come along and correct me.
Can you file a JIRA ticket with this information in it?
Jason
On W
might
be better off writing a small crawler in Java and using SolrJ to do
the indexing.
Good luck!
Jason
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 9:34 AM Fiz N wrote:
>
> Hello Solr experts,
>
> I am using standalone version of SOLR 8.5 on Windows machine.
>
> 1) I want to index all ty
thing else instead, but having a
non-standard git setup would be one more "papercut" in understanding
how to contribute to a project that already makes that harder than it
should.
Jason
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:33 AM Demian Katz wrote:
>
> Regarding people having a problem w
ou already did that for the root logger and it didn't give you
anything that helped solve the issue. So I'm stumped.
Good luck,
Jason
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 6:05 AM Ирина Камалова wrote:
>
> Could you please tell me if I can expand log trace here?
> (if I'm trying to do it through solr
Just wanted to close the loop here: Isabelle filed SOLR-14569 for this
and eventually reported there that the problem seems specific to her
custom configuration which specifies a seemingly innocuous
in solrconfig.xml.
See that jira for more detailed explanation (and hopefully a
resolution coming
Hi Daniel,
Just a heads up that attachments and images are stripped pretty
aggressively by the mailing list - none of your images made it through.
You might more success linking to the images in Dropbox or some other
online storage medium.
Best,
Jason
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 10:55 AM Gell
ons. But since you're already using it with some
success, it might be an orthogonal concern to your potential migration
to SolrCloud.
Best of luck deciding!
Jason
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 7:06 PM gnandre wrote:
>
> Thanks for this reply, Jason.
>
> I am mostly worried about CDCR featur
what's going on here of course.
Are all other queries running comparably?
Jason
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:25 AM jay harkhani wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Please refer below details.
>
> >Did you create Solrconfig.xml for the collection from scratch after
> >upgrading and rei
.
We should really change this resolution order to be something more commonsense.
Jason
On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 2:52 PM Jason Gerlowski wrote:
>
> Hi Isabelle,
>
> Two things to keep in mind with Solr's Rule-Based Authorization.
>
> 1. Each request is controlled by th
can't actually index.
Generally speaking, it's best to put the most specific rules first,
with the broader ones coming later.
For more information, see the "Permission Ordering and Resolution"
section in the page you linked to in your request.
Good luck, hope that helps.
Jason
On Tue, May
Hi Samuel,
Thanks for the very detailed description of the problem here. Very
thorough! I don't think you're missing anything obvious, please file the
jira tickets if you haven't already.
Best,
Jason
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 6:12 PM Samuel Garcia Martinez <
samuel...@inditex.com>
Hi Prakhar,
Newer versions of Solr offer an "Audit Logging" plugin for use cases
similar to yours.
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/audit-logging.html
If don't think that's available as far back as 5.2.1 though. Just
thought I'd mention it in case upgrading is an option.
Be
Very low-tech and manual, but worth mentioning...
If there's a particularly large core that's doing a full recovery, and
you have access to the disk itself you can navigate to the relevant
directory for that core and run something like "watch -n 10 ls -lah"
or "watch -n 10 du -sh ." to see how
ule-conditions
Good luck,
Jason
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 1:00 PM Karl Stoney
wrote:
>
> Hey,
> Thanks for the reply but I'm trying to have something fully automated and
> dynamic. For context I run solr on kubernetes, and at the moment it works
> beautifully with autosca
Thanks Adi,
There's no SolrJ code in your stacktrace, so this was something other
than SOLR-13780 apparently. Best of luck!
Jason
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 1:28 PM Kaminski, Adi wrote:
>
> Sure, thanks for the guidance and the assistance anyway.
>
> Here is the stack trace:
> He
.
That won't help you in the short term though. For that, yes, you'll
have to use ((Number)count).longValue() in the interim.
Best,
Jason
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 AM Kaminski, Adi wrote:
>
> Thanks Mikhail !
>
> In issue comments that you have shared it seems that Yonik S d
=timing and see how what that tells
you about the QTime's.
Tuning Solr performance is a tough, time consuming process. I wish
there was an easier answer for you, but there's not.
Best,
Jason
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 12:06 PM Rajdeep Sahoo
wrote:
>
> Please suggest anyone
>
> On Sun,
in terms of success.
Good luck making your decision!
Best,
Jason
t
commit N is happening before commit N-1 has even finished.
The fix usually is to commit less frequently. Are you triggering
explicit commits via the API (or through SolrJ)? How frequently do
the settings in your solrconfig.xml have you committing?
Hope that helps,
Jason
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020
milliseconds).
Hope that helps,
Jason
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 9:13 AM akhil dutt wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm trying to understand solr metrics and was looking at request/response
> dispatch rate. I want to understand what meanRate signify. As per below
> values, am I to suppose that
initial JWT config, with some default Rule-based config.
>
> Jan
>
> > 17. des. 2019 kl. 16:42 skrev Jason Gerlowski :
> >
> > Hey Jan,
> >
> > Is this a case of something that'd be fixed by
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13071 ?
> >
ocker
than 4.10.3. Additionally, 4.10.3 no longer receives any security
backports from the community, and hasn't for some time. It's worth
considering whether that offers enough benefits to be worth the pain
of reindexing.
Best,
Jason
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:26 AM Wael Kader wrote:
>
&
Hey Jan,
Is this a case of something that'd be fixed by
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13071 ?
Just wondering
Best,
Jason
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 5:43 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> Try something like this
> https://gist.github.com/b330e1bea7842bcdc1e5fa3940b4a4f7
Very curious what the config change that's related to reproducing this
looks like. Maybe it's something that is worth adding
test-randomization around? Just thinking aloud.
Freeman"
query matches one of those terms. Text fields are what you use when
you want matches to have some wiggle room based on your analyzers.
String fields are much more geared towards exact matches. No analysis
is done, so a query for "Freeman" would only match docs who have
It seems like an issue to me. Can you open a JIRA with these details?
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 10:51 AM Jacek Kikiewicz wrote:
>
> I found interesting situation, I've created a collection with only one
> replica.
> Then I scaled solr-cloud cluster, and run 'addreplica' call to add 2 more.
> So
that might help you. If those aren't
sufficient, you can fix the issue by upgrading to 8.2 - both of those
bugs are fixed in that version.
Hope that helps,
Jason
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 8:26 AM Nicolas Paris wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am having trouble with basic auth on a solrcloud in
data
files directly. Or edit them. etc. There may be edge cases around
using network drives or HDFS where encrypting this file is useful, I
haven't thought that side of things through entirely. But for most
use-cases I'm not sure encrypting basicAuth.conf provides anything
beyond security theater.
Be
If you can be more specific about the exposure you're concerned about,
we can discuss whether there's an actual security concern there and
how to work around it.
Best,
Jason
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:22 AM Kommu, Vinodh K. wrote:
>
> Does anyone have an any idea on this? If so, please
-guessing mode for
anything other than experimentation.
Best of luck,
Jason
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 7:42 AM Shubham Goswami
wrote:
>
> Hi Emir
>
> As you have mentioned above we cannot change field type after indexing once
> and we have to do dull re-indexing again, I tried to ch
I _think_ this is the fourth time you've submitted this exact question
as a different email thread. Most of your other threads have
responses on them, but maybe you're not seeing that for some reason.
Maybe you won't be able to see this response either, but in case you
can: I think you'll have
I _think_ this is the third time you've submitted this exact question
as a different email thread. Both of your other threads have
responses on them, but maybe you're not seeing that for some reason.
Maybe you won't be able to see this response either, but in case you
can: I think you'll have
ssage occur when making requests through curl or other
clients?
You might want to read this page for other ideas of what information
would help us help you:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best,
Jason
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 9:23 PM Lvyankui wrote:
>
&
of risk in
diverging from the commonly used/tested environments and usage
patterns. So, YMMV.
Best,
Jason
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:34 PM Andrew Corbett wrote:
>
> I have been trying to research the possibility of adding Solr to servers
> running the Solaris 10 and 11 operating systems
of looking at each is. But that
won't help you on 7.6 unfortunately.
Good luck, and let us know if you are able to fix things, or
eventually find out what the difference in behavior is between our two
setups.
Jason
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:01 AM Salmaan Rashid Syed
wrote:
>
> Hi
eturned status [200]
Request [/collection3/select?q=*:*] returned status [200]
Testing permissions for user [solr-user]
Request [/admin/collections?action=LIST] returned status [403]
Request [/collection1/select?q=*:*] returned status [200]
Request [/collection2/select?q=*:*] return
t;, "role": "admin"},
{"name": "config-read", "role": "admin"},
{"name": "core-admin-edit", "role": "admin"},
{"name": "core-admin-read", "role": "admin&q
rowse/SOLR-13355) What version of Solr
are you using?
Jason
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 5:21 AM Salmaan Rashid Syed
wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> Thanks for your prompt reply.
>
> Your code does address few of my concerns like restricting *solr-user* from
> accessing the dashboard a
"name":"security-edit",
"role":"admin"
},
{
"collection": ["Collection1", "Collection2"],
"name": ["update", "read"],
"role": "dev"
I was under the impression that non-committers could also edit the
wiki pages if the requested the appropriate karma on the mailing list.
Though maybe that changed with the move to cwiki, or maybe that's
never been the case
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 4:10 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> All
regardless. The url you posted works for me now. You can also use
the new url:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/lucene/HowtoConfigureIntelliJ
Best,
Jason
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 12:12 PM Richard Goodman
wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I went to set up the repo with intellij, but i
-Generatingapatch.
If you prefer, you can also create a PR on github with your changes, and
put a link to the PR on the JIRA ticket. (There are many guides out there
on creating Github PRs, so I won't get into that.)
Thanks for putting in the effort to share your work. Good luck!
Best,
Jason
On Tue
The Solr ref-guide has examples which show how to do this too. Take a
look at some of the faceting examples here:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/json-facet-api.html#bucketing-facet-example
Best,
Jason
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:50 AM David Hastings
wrote:
>
> i found this:
>
, but not necessarily.
Best,
Jason
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 2:34 AM Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I understand that currently there is plan for a Solr 8.1.2 bug fix release
> to resolve some of the bugs, like the SOLR-13510 basic authentication issue.
>
> Woul
/jira/browse/SOLR-13539 . (SOLR-13538 also
has some information)
Best,
Jason
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 4:00 PM David Winter wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like let you know about server side exceptions for specific field
> types after upgrading to 7.7.2, like Cla
>
8.0. You're using an 8.x version, right?
Jason
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 2:45 AM Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I have tried to add the "forwardCredentials": true in the security.json,
> but I still get the same error.
>
sure the "method"
and "params" properties match the request. Since the properties
aren't present, they're treated as wildcards and implicitly match.
4. So we've found a matching permission, now Solr checks whether
"user" has the correct role. The permission s
Hi Sotiris,
What version of Solr are you running? The behavior has changed some
over time, both intentionally and due to bugs that have come and gone
over time. I (or someone else) can explain things and offer you
better help once we know your Solr version.
Jason
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 12:13
"authentication": {
"blockUnknown": true,
"class": "solr.BasicAuthPlugin",
"credentials": {
"solradmin": ""
},
"forwardCredentials": true
},
...
}
Jason
On
One last note: as far as I can tell, nothing about this issue is
specific to JSON Faceting or the JSON request API. It can be
triggered just as easily with "/select?q=*:*".
The bug created for this is: SOLR-13510
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 9:17 AM Jason Gerlowski wrote:
>
&g
I'm also able to reproduce this bug on master. A few more notes about
the bad behavior:
- the behavior occurs regardless of the specific permissions
configured in security.json. (i.e. whether the top permission is
"all", or "security-edit", or there are no permissions at all.)
- I tried looking
Hi John,
I believe the documentation there is correct. That is: those are two
different "update" APIs. /update takes a JSON array of potentially
multiple docs, /update/json/docs takes either a JSON array of multiple
docs, or a single document not wrapped in the JSON array syntax.
Be
Hi Sotiris,
Is this your second time asking this question here, or is there a
subtle difference I'm missing? You asked a very similar question a
week or so ago, and I replied with a few suggestions for changing your
security.json and with a few questions. In case you missed it for
whatever
This might be of interest to you:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8776
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 10:32 PM Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> How are you indexing the message, or what is the command that you used to
> index the message?
>
> Also, the attachment might not make it to the
for those using it for
the first time, so any improvement to the docs will go a long way.
Jason
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 3:12 AM Aroop Ganguly wrote:
>
> hi jason
>
> which version of solr has the definitive fix for the rbap again ?
> also is there a jira to fix or create a documentati
ing user has the "admin" role. So "user" being unable to
query an alias makes sense. Usually "all" and other catchall
permissions are best used at the very bottom of your permissions list.
That way the catchall is the last rule to be checked, giving other
rules a chance
quot;: "read",
"role": "readonly"
},
{
"path": "*",
"role": "admin"
},
{
"name": "*",
"role": "admin"
}
Good luck,
Jas
quot;role": "readonly"
},
{
"name": "security-edit",
"role": "admin"
},
{
"path": "*",
"role": "admin"
}
Hope that helps.
Jason
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 5:23 PM Jérémy
e behavior persist after restarting your Solr nodes?
Good luck,
Jason
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 4:05 AM Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> For your info, I have enabled basic authentication and SSL in all the 3
> versions, and I'm not sure if the issue is more on the authentication s
security.json.
Best,
Jason
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 10:40 PM Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using the below JSON Facet to retrieve the count of all the different
> collections in one query.
>
> https://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=testing=https:
Hi Carsten,
I think this is probably worth a jira. I'm not familiar enough with
bin/post to say definitively whether the behavior you mention is a
bug, or whether it's "expected" in some odd sense. But there's enough
uncertainty that I think it's worth recording there.
Best,
Jas
://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/branch_8_0/solr/solr-ref-guide/src/index.adoc
Hope that helps,
Jason
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 7:34 AM Yoann Moulin wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I’m looking for the documentation for the latest release of SolR (8.0) but it
> looks like it’s not online yet.
above).
We should definitely be checking for all when there is a
PermissionNameProvider, so I'll create a JIRA for this.
Best,
Jason
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 6:11 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> There was some other issues with the "all" permission as well lately, see
> https://i
" user can even update security permissions
with the curl command below!
curl -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -u
"readonly:readonlyPassword"
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/authorization --d
@some_auth_json.json
My expectation was that the predefined "all" permission would act as a
catch all, and restrict all requests to "admin_role" that require
permissions I didn't explicitly give to my "readonly" user. But it
doesn't seem to work that way. Am I misunderstanding what the "all"
permission does, or is this a bug?
Thanks for any help or clarification.
Jason
This seems related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11503?
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:14 AM vishal patel
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am upgrading the solr 8.0.0 from 6.1.0. Before I can not add the
> coreNodeName in core.properties and its working fine for me. But when i
> start the solr
" and "httpBasicAuthPassword"
properties.
Currently (2) is not documented in our Solr Ref Guide, though it
really should be since it's the most practical way to setup auth.
Hope that helps,
Jason
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 1:25 PM Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> One tangent just so you’
be a way to set the credentials on the client itself, but
I can't think of it at the moment.
Hope that helps,
Jason
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 2:34 AM Lahiru Jayasekera
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I need help implementing the following code in solarj 8.0.0.
>
> private SolrClient serv
sed" error (typically
seen when a Java object gets closed too early and may indicate a bug).
I'm not used to seeing either of these associated with the "standard"
write.lock issues. What version of Solr are you seeing this on?
Best regards,
Jason
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 5:28 AM VAIBH
Hi Gerald,
That looks like it might be a bug in SolrJ's JSON faceting support.
Do you have a small code snippet that reproduces the problem? That'll
help us confirm it's a bug, and get us started on fixing it.
Best,
Jason
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:29 AM Gerald Bonfiglio wrote:
>
&g
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce that the Solr Reference Guide
for 7.7 is now available.
This 1,431-page PDF is the definitive guide to using Apache Solr, the
search server built on Lucene.
The PDF Guide can be downloaded from:
, unfortunately your only option is to use the NamedList
structures directly to retrieve the stat value.
Thanks for bringing it to our attention.
Best,
Jason
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 4:42 AM Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
>
> Good morning guys, I have a questions about Solrj and JSON facets.
>
> I'
-sensitive-properties.html
Hope that helps,
Jason
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 9:27 PM Aroop Ganguly wrote:
>
> try changing the passwords using the auth api
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/basic-authentication-plugin.html#BasicAuthenticationPlugin-AddaUserorEditaPassword
>
quot; from the solr/solr-ref-guide
directory, see the README in that same directory for more help)
Best,
Jason
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 11:05 PM Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Understand that Solr 7.7.1 has just been released, but Solr 7.7.0 has been
> released almost a mon
/master/pysolr.py#L1268
. Happy to be corrected by someone with more context.)
Best,
Jason
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 1:50 PM Ganesh Sethuraman
wrote:
>
> We are using Solr Cloud 7.2.1. Is there a leader aware python client (like
> SolrJ for Java), which can send the updates to the leader a
ell as on your Solr/ZK servers? Or are you just setting it in the
config for your Solr/ZK servers? I expect those system properties
need to be set for the client process as well, though the ref-guide
page doesn't explicitly say so.
Best,
Jason
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:56 PM Snead, Ryan [USA] w
1 - 100 of 706 matches
Mail list logo
