It's okay to not use the SynonymFilter for querying and for indexing. In
fact, you would really only want to use one or the other: either index all
synonyms, or query for them, but not both.
I have read that there are issues with multi-word synonyms and my guess is
that this is where your problem
Hi list,
I've been working the last couple days on some synonym functionality and
I've been reading about the limitations regarding query-time multi-word
synonyms. All recommended solutions that I've come across so far suggest
using the SynonymFilter at index time rather than at query time.
Hi,
I am wondering if there is a way to set a filter on the frequency of a
keyword match in a document. For example, if I search for the word cheerio
I would like that word to appear at least x times in a field in order for
the document to be returned. I know that Lucene internals already give
Hi,
I am trying to come up with a strategy for a solr setup in which a user's
indexed data can be nearly immediately available to them for search. My
current strategy (which is starting to cause problems) is as follows:
- each user has their own personal index (core), which gets committed
- Original Message
From: Mark Ferguson mark.a.fergu...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 1:14:15 AM
Subject: Near real-time search of user data
Hi,
I am trying to come up with a strategy for a solr setup in which a
user's
indexed data can
Hello,
I am wondering if the UpdateResponse status codes are documented somewhere?
I haven't been able to find them. I know 0 is success..
Thanks,
Mark
Hello,
My apologies if this topic has already been discussed but I haven't been
able to find a lot of information in the wiki or mailing lists.
I am looking for more information about how searchers work in different
environments. Correct me if I'm mistaken, but my understanding is that in a
What I'm also curious about is how searchers are handled in a multi-core
environment. Does the maxWarmSearchers argument apply to the entire set
of
cores, or to each individual core?
It applied to one core unless ofcourse, you are sharing the solrconfig.xml
with multiple cores. Also,
Hello,
I have a problem with setting the instanceDir property for the cores in
solr.xml. When I set the value to be relative, it sets it as relative to the
location from which I started the application, instead of relative to the
solr.home property.
I am using Tomcat and I am creating a context
this is probably just something I screwed up, so
feel free to ignore this email.
Mark
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Mark Ferguson mark.a.fergu...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with setting the instanceDir property for the cores in
solr.xml. When I set the value to be relative, it sets
Hi,
I am trying to set up a multi-core environment in which I share a single
conf folder. I am following the instructions described in this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user@lucene.apache.org/msg16954.html
In solrconfig.xml, I am setting dataDir to /srv/solr/cores/data/${
:
This is a known issue. I'll try to give a patch soon.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-883
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Mark Ferguson
mark.a.fergu...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I am trying to set up a multi-core environment in which I share a single
conf folder. I am
Hi,
In my solr.xml file, I am trying to set the dataDir property the way it is
described in the CoreAdmin page on the wiki:
core name='p11' instanceDir='./'
property name=dataDir value=./data/p11 /
/core
However, the property is being completed ignored. It is using whatever I
have set in the
Hi,
In my solrconfig.xml file there are two request handlers configured: one
uses defType=dismax, and the other doesn't. However, it seems that when the
dismax request handler is set as my default, I have no way of using the
standard request handler . Here is the relevant part of my
handler configuration.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Mark Ferguson mark.a.fergu...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
In my solrconfig.xml file there are two request handlers configured: one
uses defType=dismax, and the other doesn't. However, it seems that when the
dismax request handler is set as my default
no results when I
specify a field).
Can someone try reproducing this using the configuration I specified in my
first post? Sorry again for being confusing, I got sidetracked by the
caching issue.
Mark
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Mark Ferguson mark.a.fergu...@gmail.comwrote:
It seems
for
the fix.
Mark
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Mark Ferguson mark.a.fergu...@gmail.com
wrote:
It seems that the problem is related to the defType parameter. When I
specify defType=, it uses the correct request handler
Hello,
It looks like a boost query will accomplish what I am looking for quite
nicely.
Mark
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Mark Ferguson mark.a.fergu...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I have a set of documents in which I have different classes of fields that
I would like to search separately
, even if
there are no keyword matches. I also want all documents with keyword matches
to be returned, even when the user_id doesn't match, so I can't just switch
the query and the boost query.
Any ideas? Thanks for your time.
Mark
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Mark Ferguson mark.a.fergu
can specify
which fields correspond to which sets of keywords. Has anything like this
been tackled before? If not, can someone help point me in the right
direction for how I would build this myself? Thanks very much for your time.
Regards,
Mark Ferguson
/solr/client/solrj/response/QueryResponse.html#getResults%28%29
returns a SolrDocumentList
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/common/SolrDocumentList.html
which has that information
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Mark Ferguson mark.a.fergu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I
SolrHighlighter is the component that uses that parameter. So yes, it
must be specified at the request handler level, not the fragmenter
configuration.
Erik
On Dec 15, 2008, at 7:35 PM, Mark Ferguson wrote:
It seems like maybe the fragmenter parameters just don't get displayed
ignored as well.
Thanks,
Mark Ferguson
you escape the question mark at the end too?
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Mark Ferguson mark.a.fergu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Someone helped me with the regex and pointed out a couple mistakes, most
notably the extra quantifier in .*{400,600}. My new regex is this:
\w.{400,600
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com wrote:
Try adding echoParams=all to your query to verify the params that the
solr request handler is getting.
-Yonik
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Mark Ferguson
mark.a.fergu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
In my
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Mark Ferguson mark.a.fergu...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks for this tip, it's very helpful. Indeed, it looks like none of the
highlighting parameters are being included. It's using the correct request
handler and hl is set to true, but none of the highlighting parameters
the gap fragmenter. In the above result I don't see any reason why it
shouldn't have stripped out the preceding period and the last two words,
there is plenty of room in the slop and in the regex pattern. Please help me
figure out what I'm doing wrong...
Thanks a lot,
Mark Ferguson
with punctuation. Any ideas
would else could be wrong?
Mark
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Mark Ferguson mark.a.fergu...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I am trying to use the regex fragmenter and am having a hard time getting
the results I want. I am trying to get fragments that start on a word
character
=urlmd501598a6e06190bd8b05c8b03f51233a1/str
/doc
The reason I would prefer this second response format is because I don't
need the first field, and it greatly simplifies my call to
QueryResponse.getBeans() in SolrJ, as it will fill in everything I need in
one call.
Thanks very much,
Mark Ferguson
29 matches
Mail list logo
