I thought new versions of solr didn't split on whitespace at the query
parser anymore, so this should work?
That being said, I think I remember it having a problem coming after a
synonym filter. IIRC, if your input is "Foo Bar" and you have a synonym
"foo <=> baz" you would get foobaz bazbar
Hi guys, I'd like to get your tips on how to run a Solr fork at my
company. I know Yonik has a "heliosearch" fork, and I'm sure many others
have a fork. There have been times where I want to add features to an
existing core plugin, and subclassing isn't possible so I end up copying
the source
; I suspect these questions should go the Lucene Dev list instead. This
> > one is more for those who build on top of standard Solr.
> >
> > Regards,
> >Alex.
> >
> >
> > Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
> > http://
I developed a join transformer plugin that did that (although it didn't
flatten the results like that). The one thing that was painful about it is
that the TextResponseWriter has references to both the IndexSchema and
SolrReturnFields objects for the primary core. So when you add a
SolrDocument
Hey guys, I just logged this bug and I wanted to raise awareness. If you
use the QueryElevationComponent, and ask for fl=[elevated], you'll get only
false if solr is using LazyDocuments. This looks even stranger when you
request exclusive=true and you only get back elevated documents, and they
, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Ryan Josal rjo...@gmail.com wrote:
Using edismax, supplying a rq= param, like {!rerank ...} is causing an
UnsupportedOperationException because the Query doesn't implement
createWeight. This is for WildcardQuery in particular. From some
preliminary debugging it looks like
Using edismax, supplying a rq= param, like {!rerank ...} is causing an
UnsupportedOperationException because the Query doesn't implement
createWeight. This is for WildcardQuery in particular. From some
preliminary debugging it looks like without rq, somehow the qf Queries
might turn into
You can use Result Grouping by a function using query(), but you'll need a
version of Lucene with this bug fixed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7046
Ryan
On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Jens Mayer mjen...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote:
Hey everybody,
I have the following situation in my
:50 PM, Ryan Josal rjo...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your thought Shawn, I don't think fq will be helpful here.
The
field for which I want to turn TF off is title, which is actually one
of
the primary components of score, so I really need it in qf. I just don't
want the TF portion
Hey guys, it seems that omitTermFreqAndPositions is not very usable with
edismax, and I'm wondering if this is intended behavior, and how I can get
around the problem.
The setup:
define field foo with omitTermFreqAndPositions=true
The query:
q=ground coffeeqf=foo bar baz
The error:
try to build a phrase query against a no TF no pos field.
Ryan
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 4/8/2015 5:06 PM, Ryan Josal wrote:
The error:
IllegalStateException: field foo indexed without position data; cannot
run PhraseQuery.
It would actually
Sorting the result set or the facets? For the facets there is
facet.sort=index (lexicographically) and facet.sort=count. So maybe you
are asking if you can sort by index, but reversed? I don't think this is
possible, and it's a good question. I wanted to chime in on this one
because I wanted
Awesome, I didn't know this feature was going to add so much power!
Looking forward to using it.
On Thursday, April 2, 2015, Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Ryan Josal rjo...@gmail.com
javascript:; wrote:
Sorting the result set or the facets
Hey guys, I wanted to ask if I'm using the DocTransformer API as intended.
There is a setContext( TransformerContext c ) method which is called by the
TextResponseWriter before it calls transform on any docs. That context
object contains a DocIterator reference. I want to use a DocTransformer to
Ticket filed, thanks!
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7152
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Joel Bernstein joels...@gmail.com wrote:
Ryan,
This looks like a good jira ticket to me.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Ryan Josal rjo
What you are describing is hyponymy. Pastry is the hypernym. You can
accomplish this by not using expansion, for example:
cannelloni = cannelloni, pastry
This has the result of adding pastry to the index.
Ryan
On Saturday, February 21, 2015, Mikhail Khludnev mkhlud...@griddynamics.com
wrote:
Hey guys, I put a rq in defaults but I can't figure out how to override it
with no rankquery. Looks like one option might be checking for empty
string before trying to use it in QueryComponent? I can work around it in
the prep method of an earlier searchcomponent for now.
Ryan
Hey guys, I have a desire to order (field) facets by their order of
appearance in the search results.
When I first thought about it, I figured there would be some way to plug a
custom Comparator into FacetComponent and link it to facet.sort=rank or
something like that, but not only is there no
field grouping command is used as the
main result list in the response, using group.format=simple”
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing
Jim
On 1/27/15, 9:22 AM, Ryan Josal rjo...@gmail.com javascript:;
wrote:
Thanks a lot! I'll try this out later this morning. If group.func
can¹t find one.
Jim Musil
On 1/26/15, 6:34 PM, Ryan Josal r...@josal.com javascript:; wrote:
I have an index of products, and these products have a category which we
can say for now is a good approximation of its location in the store. I'm
investigating altering the ordering
I have an index of products, and these products have a category which we
can say for now is a good approximation of its location in the store. I'm
investigating altering the ordering of the results so that the categories
aren't interlaced as much... so that the results are a little bit more
whatever
you need to define to make the prod/dev distinction you need.
WARNING: I'm not entirely sure that relative pathing works here, which
just means I haven't tried it.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Ryan Josal ry...@pointinside.com wrote:
Thanks Erick, that mirrors my thoughts
Hi all, I have a question about dynamically loading a core properties
file with the new core discovery method of defining cores. The concept
is that I can have a dev.properties file and a prod.properties file, and
specify which one to load with -Dsolr.env=dev. This way I can have one
file
after evaluating variables.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Ryan Josal ry...@pointinside.com wrote:
Hi all, I have a question about dynamically loading a core properties file
with the new core discovery method of defining cores. The concept is that I
can have a dev.properties file
?
- Mark
On Feb 5, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Ryan Josal rjo...@rim.com wrote:
By way of the deprecated SolrCore.getSolrCore method,
SolrCore.getSolrCore().getCoreDescriptor().getCoreContainer().getCores()
Solr starts up in an infinite recursive loop of loading cores. I understand
now
Hey guys,
I am writing an UpdateRequestProcessorFactory plugin which needs to have some
initialization code in the init method. I need to build some information about
each SolrCore in memory so that when an update comes in for a particular
SolrCore, I can use the data for the appropriate
to the core container, which knows about all the
cores.
- Mark
On Feb 5, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Ryan Josal rjo...@rim.com wrote:
Hey guys,
I am writing an UpdateRequestProcessorFactory plugin which needs to have
some initialization code in the init method. I need to build some
information about each
SolrCore.getSearcher().get().getIndexReader() to get the IndexReader,
but if that happens after a good point of plugging in this initialization, then
I guess SolrCore.getIndexReaderFactory() is the way to go.
Thanks,
Ryan
From: Ryan Josal [rjo...@rim.com
Thanks Hoss,
The issue mentioned describes a similar behavior to what I observed, but not
quite. Commons-fileupload creates java.io.File objects for the temp files, and
when those Files are garbage collected, the temp file is deleted. I've
verified this by letting the temp files build up
: SolrJ DirectXmlRequest
Hi Ryan,
I'm not sure what is creating those upload files something in Solr? Or
Tomcat?
Why not specify a different temp dir via system property command line
parameter?
Otis
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Jan 8, 2013 12:17 PM, Ryan Josal rjo
/
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Ryan Josal rjo...@rim.com wrote:
I also don't know what's creating them. Maybe Solr, but also maybe
Tomcat, maybe apache commons. I could change java.io.tmpdir to one with
more space, but the problem is that many of the temp files end up
permanent, so
I have encountered an issue where using DirectXmlRequest to index data on a
remote host results in eventually running out have temp disk space in the
java.io.tmpdir directory. This occurs when I process a sufficiently large
batch of files. About 30% of the temporary files end up permanent.
32 matches
Mail list logo
