; its been used in many business scenarios. Looking out for what's going
> wrong.
>
> Thanks,
> Sripradeep P
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 1:00 PM Jörn Franke wrote:
>
>> And have you tried how fast it is if you don’t do anything in this
>> method?
>>
&
gt;> And have you tried how fast it is if you don’t do anything in this method?
>>
>> > Am 27.11.2019 um 07:52 schrieb Sripra deep :
>> >
>> > Hi Team,
>> > I wrote a custom sort function that will read the field value and parse
>> > and retu
ast it is if you don’t do anything in this method?
>
> > Am 27.11.2019 um 07:52 schrieb Sripra deep >:
> >
> > Hi Team,
> > I wrote a custom sort function that will read the field value and parse
> > and returns a float value that will be used for sor
And have you tried how fast it is if you don’t do anything in this method?
> Am 27.11.2019 um 07:52 schrieb Sripra deep :
>
> Hi Team,
> I wrote a custom sort function that will read the field value and parse
> and returns a float value that will be used for sorting. this fie
eep :
>
> Hi Team,
> I wrote a custom sort function that will read the field value and parse
> and returns a float value that will be used for sorting. this field is
> indexed, stored and docvalues enabled. my latency increases drastically
> from 10ms when the filter loads 50 doc
Hi Team,
I wrote a custom sort function that will read the field value and parse
and returns a float value that will be used for sorting. this field is
indexed, stored and docvalues enabled. my latency increases drastically
from 10ms when the filter loads 50 documents and 200ms when it loads 250
Thank you Erick, it worked.
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
CD1234
> ABCD5678
>
> *Expected Descending order*
>
> ABCD5678
> ABCD1234
> 5678ABCD
> 1234ABCD
> 1234#ABCD
> #2345DBCA
> #2345ACBD
> #2345ABCD
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Paddy
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Custom-Sort-option-to-apply-at-SOLR-index-tp4348787.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
egards,
Paddy
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Custom-Sort-option-to-apply-at-SOLR-index-tp4348787.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I'll take a look at that. Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Apoorva Gaurav [mailto:apoorva.gau...@myntra.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 11:32 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Help on custom sort
Try using a custom value source parser and pass the formula of computing the
price
Subject: Re: Help on custom sort
How many different groups are there? And can user A ever be part of more
than one group?
If
1 there are a reasonably small number of groups ( 100 or so as a
place to start)
and
2 a user is always part of a single group
then you could store separate prices
I need to provide a custom sort option for sorting by price and I would like
some suggestions. It's not the straightforward just sort by a price field in
the document scenario or I wouldn't be asking for help. Here's the scenario
I'm dealing with.
I have 100 million+ documents (so multi
is in. I admit I
haven't really thought that through well though...
Best,
Erick
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Scott Smith ssm...@mainstreamdata.com wrote:
I need to provide a custom sort option for sorting by price and I would like
some suggestions. It's not the straightforward just sort
Hello:
I want to get final search result sorted by (0.2*relervance score + 0.8*
specified_numberic_field) .
I have known that if I use “bf”in edismax (e.g. bf=field(value)), I can get a
result sorted by(relervance sore + field(value)) ,but I don`t know how to
Implement the result sorted
* specified_numeric_field)
Unless the actual numeric range of the scores matters, just use:
relevance score + 4.0* specified_numeric_field
or
bf=mul(4.0, specified_numeric_field)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: 刘健
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 9:50 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: Custom Sort(0.2
10:47 AM
To: solr-usersolr-user@lucene.apache.org;
Subject: Re: Custom Sort(0.2*relervanceScore + 0.8*numberic_field_value)
Edismax applies the multiplicative boost (boost) after applying the
additive boost functions (bf).
I think (0.2*relervance score + 0.8* specified_numberic_field
in the thread. So can we restrict it to send
single values based on certain category ID or something like this.
Thanks in advance,
Uma Shankar
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-regarding-solr-custom-sort-order-tp3631854p3665545.html
Sent from the Solr - User
-custom-sort-order-tp3631854p3637181.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.nabble.com/Query-regarding-solr-custom-sort-order-tp3631854p3637181.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.
Thanks in advance
Uma Shankar
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-regarding-solr-custom-sort-order-tp3631854p3631854.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-regarding-solr-custom-sort-order-tp3631854p3631854.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-regarding-solr-custom-sort-order-
tp3631854p3631854.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I suggest using the following fieldType for your field:
fieldType name=sint class=solr.SortableIntField sortMissingLast=true
omitNorms=true/
Regards
Bernd
Am 04.01.2012 14:40, schrieb umaswayam:
Hi,
We want to sort our records based on some sequence which is like
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Hi,
I use Solr 1.4 version and I have a question about SOLR sort order.
Requirement : Sort names(e.g. : location names like Dallas(City), las
vegas(City), Texas(State), India(Country), Canada(Country), etc..) based on
category(e.g. : CITY, STATE, COUNTRY, etc..)
How to sort the SOLR results
There's no good way of enforcing this as far as I know
as you've outlined the problem. You can easily specify
multiple sort criteria, where ties in the first criteria
are broken by the second criteria and so on.
So, if your records have *no* city value you can do what
you want by specifying the
We fullfilled a similar requirement by creating a new field that is
populated at client-level (a standalone app that converts binary data
in solr input documents)
Andrea
On 1/1/12, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no good way of enforcing this as far as I know
as you've
Marc Sturlese wrote:
I have been able to create my custom field. The problem is that I have
laoded in the solr core a couple of HashMapsid_doc,value_influence_sort
from a DB with values that will influence in the sort. My problem is that
I don't know how to let my custom sort have access
. The problem is that I have
laoded in the solr core a couple of HashMapsid_doc,value_influence_sort
from a DB with values that will influence in the sort. My problem is that
I don't know how to let my custom sort have access to this HashMaps.
I am a bit confused now. I think that would be easy to reach
, and
ValueSource. The ValueSource stuff is actually what's confusing me right
now. I wish I had an example other than RandomSortField. Any advice?
Alex
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Custom-sort-tp23722921p24434489.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I have been able to create my custom field. The problem is that I have laoded
in the solr core a couple of HashMapsid_doc,value_influence_sort from a DB
with values that will influence in the sort. My problem is that I don't know
how to let my custom sort have access to this HashMaps.
I am a bit
Hey there,
I want to implement a custom sort coding my own SortComparatorSource. The
sorter would sort the results doing some calculations of some document
attributes witch I have loaded previously from a DB at the solr core init. I
mean, I have a preloaded hash with some attributes per doc id
: custom order that is fairly simple: there is a list of venues and some of
: them are more relevant than others (there is no logic, it's arbitrary, it's
: not an alphabetic order), it'd be something like this:
:
: Orange venue = 1
: Red venu = 2
: Blue venue = 3
:
: So results where venue is
on the easiest way to have this example working?
Thanks a lot,
Paula
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Custom-sort-based-on-arbitrary-order-tp22908037p22908037.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:09 AM, George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to implement a custom sort in Solr based on a combination of
relevance (Solr gives me it yet = score) and a custom value I've
calculated
previously for each document. I see two options:
1. Use a function
:38 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Custom sort (score + custom value)
Ok Yonik, thank you.
I've tried to execute the following query: {!boost b=log(myrank)
defType=dismax}q and it works great.
Do you know if I can do the same (combine a DisjunctionMaxQuery with a
BoostedQuery
Hi,
I want to implement a custom sort in Solr based on a combination of
relevance (Solr gives me it yet = score) and a custom value I've calculated
previously for each document. I see two options:
1. Use a function query (I'm using a DisMaxRequestHandler).
2. Create a component that set SortSpec
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:09 AM, George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to implement a custom sort in Solr based on a combination of
relevance (Solr gives me it yet = score) and a custom value I've calculated
previously for each document. I see two options:
1. Use a function query (I'm using
Changing thread name;
Are you using local lucene or local solr, and which version?
P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have been testing locallucene with our data for the last couple of days.
one issue i faced with it is during when using geo sorting is that it seems
to eat up all the
: locallucene former custom-sort thread
Changing thread name;
Are you using local lucene or local solr, and which version?
P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have been testing locallucene with our data for the last couple of days.
one issue i faced with it is during when using geo sorting is that it
seems
-example_s1.3_ls0.2.tgz
is there a newer version available?
Thanks!
Sandeep
-Original Message-
From: patrick o'leary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 September 2007 16:08
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: locallucene former custom-sort thread
Changing thread name;
Are you using
also probably a point to consider, the index has about 2.9 million records
in total
-Original Message-
From: Sandeep Shetty
Sent: 28 September 2007 17:15
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: RE: locallucene former custom-sort thread
yes i was thinking abt the same.
i
Message-
From: patrick o'leary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 September 2007 17:02
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: locallucene former custom-sort thread
That's the latest. I was experimenting with caching, which might be the
problem.
I'll have a look, could you give me
42 matches
Mail list logo
